| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
841. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: Ok one more .... If you can show me where CCP has said that they will ban someone with NO EVIDENCE that they have done anything against the TOS because someone on an anonymous account claimed to be them I will spend all day ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 08:08:00
|
842. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: CCP has provided sufficient evidence to show me that such scams were not allowed prior to the TOS change. They were forbidden by language in the naming policy. I have no problem believing that the GMs have not changed anythin...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 08:06:00
|
843. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: I do not see any reason why you could not conduct non-scam business on your alts or conduct scams that don't involve impersonating any other character on whatever character you want. You skipped right over most of my post,...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 07:10:00
|
844. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: How in god's name did you get to that conclusion from what I wrote? Seriously? You're trolling me now right? Please say that you are... Then define a scam in EVE in a way that doesn't amount to "a business deal which one p...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 06:50:00
|
845. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: He is saying that if you choose to use an alt to IMPERSONATE yourself in a SCAM then he has to handle that the same way as he handles someone else IMPERSONATING you in a scam. So, any and all business conducted through alt...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 06:33:00
|
846. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GM Karidor wrote: Last reply from me, before I really go back to watching mode for the thread (well, some sleep as well). greiton starfire wrote: New hard question. is this rule to protect those who have been imposted or those who have been...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 05:49:00
|
847. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GM Karidor wrote: Let me wuote the relevant sentence, the EULA paragraph is not only about sharing, but also usage of names from other players in general: Quote: ... No player may use the character name of another player to impersonate or ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 00:56:00
|
848. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ssoraszh Tzarszh wrote: The issue is that these "infractions" will always be handled case by case, and as such by their very nature will be "arbitrary decisions" as you state. I do not believe any amount of precise wording in the TOS, EULA, nam...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.13 00:08:00
|
849. Writing Checks they cant cash..... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
virm pasuul wrote: Currently it's the less well informed who are likely to fall for the market trading scam. Yes, people who refuse to look at the readily available information on the investment they're considering often lose money on that i...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 23:49:00
|
850. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FightingMoose wrote: Has anybody started compiling a list of what is and isn't being allowed? Not the wording of the TOS, but whether or not impersonating your alt/pretending to be a recruitment officer/etc is leading to warnings or bans? Seems...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 22:36:00
|
851. Offline POs = no shield. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Souverainiste wrote: Because those are structures only present in null, which means you can bash it with dreads, it was not intended to be possibly bashed alone. In HS, you must declare war on a POS owners corp to bash it, meaning that your ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 07:02:00
|
852. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: I am certain that whatever legal beagles exist at CCP are advising them to keep this kind of language in the TOS as broad as possible in order to give CCP and their GMs the maximum amount of discretion. You have to remember t...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 03:02:00
|
853. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
John Ryuk wrote: It's against Federal Law to smoke Marijuan-a yet they do it in WA and CO, but the federal law is rarley enforced, but you push your luck then the local pd can charge you with a federal charge instead of a state charge to make i...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 01:19:00
|
854. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
John Ryuk wrote: Use some common sense. So, according to your "common sense" is it against the rules to say that your alt is you? Because GM Karidor has answered that question, and the answer may surprise you. There's a reason why laws d...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 00:37:00
|
855. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sid Hudgens wrote: It was recently pointed out to me that CCP doesn't have to go that deep into the TOS to ban most of you. Read the TOS ... no. 2 and 3 specifically. If all TOS violations resulted in ban-hammer ... how many of you would still ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.12 00:32:00
|
856. Margin Trading Scams and Proposed Fixes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lephia DeGrande wrote: RubyPorto wrote: The UI gives you the following information for every single item on the market: The highest and lowest transaction prices for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The median transaction...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.11 22:57:00
|
857. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Echo Echoplex wrote: Wait, I heard rioting never works. Color me confused! Rioting never works, so we should use civil discourse, but of course civil discourse on the official forums for EVE related discourse is considered rioting...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.11 22:36:00
|
858. Margin Trading Scams and Proposed Fixes - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lephia DeGrande wrote: brinelan wrote: Lephia DeGrande wrote: You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course). you mean like adding a tab that shows you the sales history of that item so...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.11 22:00:00
|
859. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Dextrust wrote: Anyone up for shooting some monuments? Sorry busy shooting stuff in Delve So... what exactly is the difference between a Sov Structure and a monument?
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.11 21:53:00
|
860. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ivan Krividus wrote: Don't worry, if the GMs lie to us its against TOS, Except that we'd have to share GM correspondence to determine whether they've lied to us, which is itself a TOS violation, so...
- by RubyPorto - at 2013.09.11 21:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |