Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CSM meets CCP Senior Producer Zulu about your concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As an aside to the current direction this thread has taken, despite my continued irritation with the CSM being hobbled by NDA nonsense I'd like to register my appreciation towards Meissa and Two Step in particular for actively fielding communicati...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.14 12:15:00
|
2. CSM meets CCP Senior Producer Zulu about your concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Aiel wrote: Video of the latest CSM meeting I fell for this. :(
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.12 05:04:00
|
3. CSM meets CCP Senior Producer Zulu about your concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Saerathus wrote: "Council Representatives will communicate with the voting community through the topic forums mentioned above, but also with individuals as necessary through any means they agree upon. Although private communications between ...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.12 04:58:00
|
4. CSM meets CCP Senior Producer Zulu about your concerns - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Meissa Anunthiel wrote: Hello Everyone, Amidst the recent forum activity about reports of decreased subscriber count, discontent about lack of resources allocated to "Flying In Space" (or, as we know it, Eve Online) and, despite Gridlock and T...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.12 01:57:00
|
5. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eladaris wrote: This CSM saw directly the after effects of the prior CSM's "Terrorist activities"... I personally believe they know from example how effective, or not effective, such tactics would be with CCP. Armchair quarterbacking without th...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 09:54:00
|
6. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mara Rinn wrote: Are you able to support that claim with evidence of some kind? CCP's financial statements were listed as are most Icelanding companies, if I recall correctly. You might find that the development of WoD and DUST has been bought...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 09:43:00
|
7. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hrald wrote: First using someone abiding by an NDA as criticism of the CSM. If you could clarify here: You defend the CSM using the NDA as something to hide behind when they don't want to talk about something? The CSM delegate was the one t...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 07:12:00
|
8. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Luckytania wrote: Saerathus wrote: ... ended up buying a character for a little while so I could actually experience the game because I found the skill system to be ridiculous ... I might go back and read the rest. But probably not. With...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 07:01:00
|
9. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Barricade Dark wrote: Long post, with a lot of interesting topics, far to broad to reply to all at once, but the one that caught my attention was. Quote: "CCP needs us to finance their other games/CCP is killing their golden goose" - No, th...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 06:41:00
|
10. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eladaris wrote: Meryl SinGarda wrote: Eladaris wrote: Jett0 wrote: Love the post. Got me to think about some things I've never considered. Here's to hoping the winter expansion clears up some of the drama, and that DUST is as good in r...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 06:32:00
|
11. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Puppet Mas'ter wrote: The Mittani wrote: There's always someone who will attempt to feign superior wisdom by prostrating themselves in front of authority, declaring the status quo unchangeable. These are the speedbumps in the way of progress...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 05:35:00
|
12. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Mittani wrote: There's always someone who will attempt to feign superior wisdom by prostrating themselves in front of authority, declaring the status quo unchangeable. These are the speedbumps in the way of progress; it is incredibly satisf...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 05:25:00
|
13. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Mittani wrote: I'll just come back to this thread when the drama ends, one way or another, to either smug at you or concede defeat. For the sake of the game, let's hope I get to mock you relentlessly for being both uninformed and wrong. S...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 05:21:00
|
14. MT Model Success (And other claims)-Burden of Proof - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dradius Calvantia wrote: Do you know of a game which incorporates MT as a main source of income that you feel meets a reasonable definition for long term success? This has been going on for decades, though. There are several MUDs that were...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:55:00
|
15. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Meryl SinGarda wrote: While I do believe that people should do whatever they please with their money, (and I can't help but feel this was just an over-convoluted "I quit" thread), I am on the side of the fence that doesn't really see a whole l...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:37:00
|
16. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
White Tree wrote: Ahh, I can vaguely point out your err but it does not mean that I am at liberty to correct it. An unfortunate consequence of being on the CSM. That sort of seems to validate some of my concerns about how the CSM is acti...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:28:00
|
17. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
White Tree wrote: An interesting post and while I find myself agreeing with some elements, others are, at their core: Flawed. Without knowing what is occurring in the background you've filled holes in the story then supplied them as inherent t...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:18:00
|
18. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Shamrock1 wrote: Saerathus wrote: Charis Loftus wrote: I read the post. Pretty well-presented, but requires prior background knowledge in order to be understood. However, as it seems your target audience is those who are already involved ...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:17:00
|
19. Why CCP isn't going to care about current CSM tactics - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dradius Calvantia wrote: The only thing that jumps out at me that I can disagree with is the idea that EVE could shut down tomorrow and CCP would be just fine. They do in fact need our money in order to stay in business. It may be possible for ...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:14:00
|
20. MT Model Success (And other claims)-Burden of Proof - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dradius, the sudden interest in the MT business model is easy to see if you're familiar with how studios do their work. You cite WoW's similar decline as a defense, I would point out that the particular model of subscription + MTs is very unpopula...
- by Saerathus - at 2011.09.09 04:00:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |