Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. [CSM] November 2010 Prioritization Crowdsourcing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Sunbound,16,18,31,40,67,96,197
- by Sunbound - at 2010.11.25 08:00:00
|
2. Test server: Requests for account reactivation and unbanning - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate this account.
- by Sunbound - at 2010.03.17 09:45:00
|
3. Wormhole locations on Singularity (not frequently updated) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Oneiromancer Please read the first post. I am currently in a wormhole system, and the only signature in it is a wormhole to k-space. There are no Gravimetric, Magnetometric, Radar or Ladar sites. Is this intended? I ...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.02.24 13:14:00
|
4. Interstellar Correspondents and the art of proofreading - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A while ago they have informed us that Infrastructure Hubs have "a mass of 750,000m3", now they're telling us that Mimir is a frigate... does anyone actually proofread those?
- by Sunbound - at 2010.02.13 09:19:00
|
5. TEST SERVER getting people on no hassles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
People who actually give a damn about fixing large fleet battles are concerned that getting the required numbers of people on Singularity would leave their Tranquility assets unprotected. You don't want to return from the mass testing and discover...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.02.13 09:04:00
|
6. Wormhole locations on Singularity (not frequently updated) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Are the wormhole sites supposed to not spawn on Singularity?
- by Sunbound - at 2010.02.08 11:35:00
|
7. EVE Voice, I sound HOT!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It didn't work for me the first time around, but the when I double-checked before bugreporting it - it did. I guess CCP is staying true to the "risk vs reward" paradigm in this I doubt it will stop this from becoming FOTM though
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.22 16:20:00
|
8. ccp and ganktards - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tippia So suddenly, mining isn't such a mindnumbing AFK activity all of a sudden û that sounds like a good thing. No, it just makes mining a tedious and repetitive mindnumbing manual activity for even less reward. Which ...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.18 14:19:00
|
9. Suicide ganking balancing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: GIGAR Originally by: Sunbound - For trial accounts, disable the ability to aggress players that aren't flagged towards them Trial pirates? Please, no. Just the opposite. Being a pirate should have its conseque...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.18 13:17:00
|
10. ccp and ganktards - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1252878
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.18 12:24:00
|
11. Suicide ganking balancing - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Suicide ganking can currently be done essentially for free, using disposable trial account alts and insurable ships. In fact it is arguably quite easy to negate the security status penalty with regular mission running (especially when you compare ...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.18 12:16:00
|
12. ccp and ganktards - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Sunbound on 17/01/2010 14:50:33 Originally by: Bibbleibble You can't come into EVE saying that it is unfair to get ganked, when you freely choose to play knowing the risks. I can read fine thank you. The unfair pa...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.17 14:46:00
|
13. ccp and ganktards - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kerfira MMO's where there are consequences for your actions: EVE Consequence of paying for subscription and putting timie and effort into game: being shot for lulz. Consequence of shooting people for lulz: having to th...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.17 14:05:00
|
14. Browsing toxic sites with In-game EVE browser - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Sunbound on 12/01/2010 14:44:14 Originally by: Mey Alman You guys all miss the point. The point is maleware is coded to infect the underlying system (in most cases Windows). But the IGB essentially (at least apparently) runs...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.12 14:42:00
|
15. Is this a bannable offense? Plex - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: AnonyTerrorNinja I don't have trouble separating fact from opinion - you have trouble accepting that people don't necessarily like the facts you cling to, and wish to have an opinion against them. Instead of giving a good, s...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.12 13:09:00
|
16. When is CCP nerfing NPC miners? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Mister Xerox Indeed, NPC corps need some hefty nerfs that strike at the core of what they're being abused for: Macro mining, un-declarable hauler alts, ect ect ect. Yes, there are mission runners also hiding there and that, ...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.12 12:52:00
|
17. Is this a bannable offense? Plex - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: AnonyTerrorNinja For the person that argued that all items are essentially acquired through real money; you're now arguing semantics, and my comparative scenarios were not a demonstration based on semantics, they were just t...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.12 12:27:00
|
18. Secure empire space is too big - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gontarski No I did not, like I said, there are enough tools available to avoid them, also scouts. When in groups we never jump through a gate all at the same time, but one goes in with a proper fitted ship and reports back. ...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.07 12:41:00
|
19. Help With WH Based Testing - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Make an alt character, train astrometrics, frigate 3 or 4, and maybe cloaking. Should take around a day if not less. Get that char into a probing frig with gravimetric capacitor rigs, put him into w-space, and leave him there. On the next mirror, ...
- by Sunbound - at 2010.01.07 09:17:00
|
20. Hypothetically... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ships only warp out if not scrambled at the moment you log off, and downtime disconnect works the same way. If you scramble each other, neither ship will be able to warp, and in that case ships will continue to run whatever modules were active whe...
- by Sunbound - at 2009.12.30 11:36:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |