| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
21. Thanks CCP for ruining yet another part of the player experience! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: So CCP, I'm really looking forward to reading your public announcement of this policy change and the explanation of the decision. This please CCP. If there a valid reason Im sure the players will understand, or at least suggest s...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.27 08:02:00
|
22. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The people who are asking for a change to the war dec system with regard to the militia are only asking for the same basic protection that alliance players already have. I see no problem with this. Just include the NPC militia corps in the war dec...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.22 08:05:00
|
23. Random. Oh, and moving sucks. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I always clean up and generally hate having anything anywhere than my main 2-3 hub/home systems. Though when I reactivated my account I had a load of crap in 0.0 I just public contracted for way less than its value because I couldn't be bothered g...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 18:06:00
|
24. What if Concord worked similar to FW navies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Forget 0.5 if CONCORD worked like the FW navies you could tank them forever in 1.0.
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 18:01:00
|
25. Please modify the variant hull meshes more. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Im not asking for new models (although this would be nice). As CCP appears to have 1 1/2 modelers in their (non ambulation) art department. Some additions to the existing ship meshes for some of the T2 ships that changes their sillhouette a little...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 07:29:00
|
26. Low sec 1v1 Arena's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I dont like this idea. Im afraid it has no place in EvE.
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 07:24:00
|
27. What if Concord worked similar to FW navies? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is a bad idea. If CONCORD was like the FW faction navies. A corp with a dozen or so month or two old characters could basically terrorise all of empire on their own. Forget about what a corp of experienced pvp, high sp/skill pirates could do.
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 05:14:00
|
28. So how is FW going - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Why does that income stream need to come from FW itself? What did you do for isk before FW came out? I still don't get why people think FW should award isk for participation. Yes, it is an isk sink but all other combat warfare in this...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 04:44:00
|
29. 5 billion isk what does it mean to you ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Veaon on 21/08/2008 04:25:43 Quote: If I was to train a alt on the second account just to fly mega/raven BS's with smartbombs how long you think it would last till I was not allowed in 0.5 =) Not long, I suppose you could ...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 04:24:00
|
30. 5 billion isk what does it mean to you ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd say **** it and fly round in 5mill total cost of ownership smartbombing megas popping every frig, shuttle and pod that moved, laughing crazily at my monitor all day. That or finance a FW corp.
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 04:19:00
|
31. [Issue] FW Player Corps unable to assist allied FW Player Corps at war - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Veaon on 21/08/2008 03:54:07 [edit:] Oh dear, I read the topic and posted my support instnantly. Thats bad news. ----------------------------------------- Sounds like a good solution to me
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.21 03:49:00
|
32. Thoughts on the future of EVE: My wishlist(no nano discussion in here) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Part of issue here is that "your" playstyle and "my" playstyle effect each other. Even if they are totally different, even if we never meet in game. Its kind of the point of a persistant world. You can't just buff the hell out of nullsec and low...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.16 11:13:00
|
33. Thoughts on the future of EVE: My wishlist(no nano discussion in here) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I apologise if I sounded too harsh. Though you should know I have spent most of my eve life in empire and low sec and only a small percentage of it in null sec, I have also never pirated. I suppose I do find it difficult to understand the type of ...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.15 22:39:00
|
34. Thoughts on the future of EVE: My wishlist(no nano discussion in here) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Veaon on 14/08/2008 05:13:54 Also do this please: Weapons graphics update New POS deisgns Missile training times Some elements of this exploration idea are very interesting, read the whole thread
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.14 05:13:00
|
35. Thoughts on the future of EVE: My wishlist(no nano discussion in here) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Here are my thoughts on this subject. Most of these issues are being discussed in other threads but I thought I would post a thread that consololidates what I feel are the best ideas into a cohesive whole. Though I can't cover everything here is m...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.14 05:10:00
|
36. Someone's thought's on speed that i think you should all see (devs): - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Haha we're back to the old days of EVE, where battleships were wtfsolopwnmobiles. Awesome! it will feel just like Exodus again.....wait.....oh :(
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.07 08:26:00
|
37. The Big Question: What's next after Ambulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mabye planetary/moon colonisation. Once ambulation is out it would be shit easy. Just recycle and modify the station interiors, add windows that look out into courtyards or onto other buildings (no sweeping vistas, or at least no real ones) and do...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.07 08:17:00
|
38. What's Next on CCP's Rebalancing Agenda? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Caracal nerf
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.07 08:08:00
|
39. What's Next on CCP's Rebalancing Agenda? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There is a problem that all MMO's eventually come accross that I believe CCP is attempting to deal with; scope creep (or the kamehameha fallacy) In order to keep long time players subscribing to their game, developers must continually move the e...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.06 20:30:00
|
40. Future of Factional Warfare? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lag is something of a seperate issue and has been discussed to death already. We all know that CCP is working on it, we all know what they are doing. Regardless, factional warfare needes some work. I think we can all agree that we dont want wow b...
- by Veaon - at 2008.08.06 20:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |