| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
41. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 21:38:42 According to the most recent Dev Blog there are more than ten thousand carriers in game. The Rokh I'm flying right now cost me over 450m to fit, and I think 1 billion for a capital is far too lenie...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 21:37:00
|
42. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If something isn't done about Carriers, with or without the developers being held hostage by the Carrier community, you will see Battleships (Black-Ops excluded) go the way of the Frigate. The only people flying them into combat are those who can'...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 19:02:00
|
43. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic Edited by: Tarminic on 30/11/2007 18:51:45 Originally by: Woolygimp Originally by: Haniblecter Teg I think the OP is trying to say that carriers, as they are now, are the step up in terms of powe...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:55:00
|
44. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Haniblecter Teg I think the OP is trying to say that carriers, as they are now, are the step up in terms of power from a BS. What he's saying, and what CCP has stated, is that they dont want the carrier to be that next step...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:48:00
|
45. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 18:40:28 Originally by: Kweel Nakashyn I personaly think (who cares) that a Tech 2 battleship will be at least 3 times to 10 the cost of a Carrier. So it'll be something like 300/1b. The problem is ...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:39:00
|
46. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 18:35:57 Originally by: Taedrin Carriers have several disadvantages, the most notable being that they are extremely vulnerable without support. As someone mentioned, carriers can not really do much ag...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:32:00
|
47. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 18:29:30 Originally by: Tashiell Gao Originally by: Woolygimp Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 17:39:29 You have all skills maxed to V in Eve . You have enough money to buy a ship (eith...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:28:00
|
48. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 18:25:26 Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Woolygimp Well I was originally planning to spec for a Blaster Rokh, which would take 68 days for Neutron Blaster II's. Or I could spend anothe...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:25:00
|
49. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Danae Melios Originally by: Woolygimp Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 18:08:23 Originally by: Jaketh Ivanes Originally by: Woolygimp If a Marauder ends up costing 800m, then it should be able...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:16:00
|
50. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 18:09:06 Originally by: Cookie Muncher Stop trying to compare the carrier to the marauder, they are completely different ships and comparing them is like me saying a frigate doesnt have enough damage ...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:08:00
|
51. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jaketh Ivanes Originally by: Woolygimp If a Marauder ends up costing 800m, then it should be able to effectively 1v1 a Carrier which by definition is a 'LOGISTICS SHIP'. Where is the flaw in this reasoning? G...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:06:00
|
52. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic I said this before, but I think you missed it so I'll re-state it in simpler terms: T2 SHIPS DO NOT HAVE TO BE BASED AROUND ADDITIONAL DAMAGE OR OVERALL COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS Basically, just because it's a T2 Ba...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 18:05:00
|
53. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 17:54:56 Originally by: insidion Personally, I do think that the black ops needs to have fairly high reqs and cost for obvious reasons. The marauder does make me wonder what they were thinking though....
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:54:00
|
54. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: An Anarchyyt Regardless of what you think a Tech 2 BS is, they are Tech 2 BSs. But this whole discussion is ridiculous, as it goes much more, Exeq -> Oneiros -> Thanatos rather than any other way. A much more logica...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:52:00
|
55. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kwint Sommer They aren't really comparable but just to shut you up: BS's can go in high sec BS's can use jump gates and thus can be moved without the help of someone else BS's don't run out of fuel and thus leave you stuck ...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:47:00
|
56. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Stop bringing up Black-Ops, please. We are arguing about the straightforward combat ability of Battleships, Marauders, and Carriers. Black-Ops aren't even really going to be considered Tech2 Battleships, but more of an entirely different class. ...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:46:00
|
57. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Originally by: Woolygimp You have all skills maxed to V in Eve. You have enough money to buy a ship (either Marauder/Carrier) and fully fit it. Who here would choose a Marauder, honestly? No. Honestly. ...and...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:43:00
|
58. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 17:41:32 Ah. So if you want to PvP then it's Battleships -> Carriers. Marauders will have no use? Good to know that Marauders will have the 'mission-running niche'. I just don't see Marauders being worth...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:41:00
|
59. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Woolygimp on 30/11/2007 17:39:29 You have all skills maxed to V in Eve. You have enough money to buy a ship (either Marauder/Carrier) and fully fit it. Who here would choose a Marauder, honestly? No. Honestly. ...and why? A fully...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:36:00
|
60. Carriers -- The real Tech 2 Battleships? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gabriel Karade Originally by: Woolygimp Originally by: Gabriel Karade Can you use a stargate in a carrier? no... That's it? Fine. 1. Can operate solo if need be - no cyno requirement 2. Turrets 3. MWD ...
- by Woolygimp - at 2007.11.30 17:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |