| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
21. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Papa Digger wrote: Arrendis wrote: Don't let us. Don't give us the tools to be worse than we already are. Because we will. And we'll enjoy it, for as long as CCP lets us ride that mechanic into the ground. And for every voice saying 'you'll ...
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.05 11:52:43
|
22. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: This is the kind of thing where actions always speak louder than words, so I'll just say that I hope that for many of you the actions you've seen from CCP recently have increased your trust that we will follow through. Not ...
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.05 10:32:36
|
23. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Primary This Rifter wrote: Alp Khan wrote: The sovereignty system Fozzie described in the dev blog he wrote is extremely poorly thought and half baked. CCP should just take it back to the drawing board and rethink. Meanwhile, perhaps they wo...
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.05 08:36:38
|
24. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ISD Ezwal wrote: I removed a reply to an edited out part of the quoted post. Good work, man
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.04 14:01:42
|
25. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Albert Madullier wrote: sov is only useful for alliance and corp leadership at the moment, ccp need to give us average joes a reason to care, Then you are in the wrong Alliance :)
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.04 13:56:00
|
26. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jessy Andersteen wrote: And people just want less large scales engagment. Wrong. A LOT of people love them.
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.04 12:41:31
|
27. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dominique Vasilkovsky wrote: Not even a hundred pages in 24h, people must be rather happy with this change then. No. They just realise that CCP will do what they want whatever is said. So all this is rather pointless.
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.04 12:40:24
|
28. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
epicurus ataraxia wrote: If they succeed, they will celebrate their plan and CCP will look stupid. I donGÇÖt think CCP need any help in that area
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.04 11:55:40
|
29. Sticky:Dev Blog: Download-on-Demand Is Coming To Singularity! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
A few queries that I hope someone who has carried this out can help with. The Devs stopped monitoring this thread some time ago, as they do. What is the size of the new cache ? Does priming the cache, move the current files (keep the overall s...
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.04 08:06:29
|
30. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
My God What a load of cr4p. What the hell is WRONG with you people ?
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.03 17:07:07
|
31. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nerd Slayer wrote: CCP Rise wrote: This thread is for discussing the proposed removal of fighter assist for carriers and super carriers . I think you mean fighter control delegation and not fighter assist. As one of the key person f...
- by Worrff - at 2015.03.01 11:16:43
|
32. Sticky:Dev Blog: Balance Changes Coming In Scylla - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP RISE......... It may be an idea for you to take a look at your Skynet thread in the Features and ideas section. You say that you want feedback, but make no comment after 31 pages of it.
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.28 21:26:27
|
33. Sticky:Dev Blog: Download-on-Demand Is Coming To Singularity! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Snorlax wrote: Makari Aeron wrote: So... "DoD Sappin' My Bandwidth!" *Waves engineer wrench wildly" You always have the option of downloading everything before you start your client. That's what it does today - it's called patching. We...
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.28 21:18:13
|
34. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serendipity Lost wrote: I feel like you are asking for some kind of special treatment. Being that this affects all of null, low and WH space (to an extent) how dare you demand a response on page 25. Your over developed sense of entitlement sic...
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.28 11:10:55
|
35. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The best bit is that you can tell that CCP Rise has never used fighters from a carrier himself, as he didn't know that there is an option to stop the fighters following a target. Awesome idea of Devs nerfing things they have no clue about, and no...
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.28 11:05:50
|
36. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Rise............ 25 pages of feedback. Do you think it's time for a comment from you yet ?
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.28 08:33:24
|
37. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Anon Nymous wrote: my take on it is to give them sellectable "pursue to warp" setting (where the focus fire checkbox is) That option is already there.
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.27 14:41:46
|
38. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This Proton Stars wrote: Has any thought gone into this at all? From an attackers point of view you want to either kill the fighters or the capitals, but people are not going to put these assets on gates so by removing remote assist you remo...
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.27 12:43:31
|
39. Sticky:Dev Blog: Download-on-Demand Is Coming To Singularity! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Worrff wrote: I currently have two separate installs of the EVE client on my PC, so that when a patch fails and corrupts the install so badly, repair won't work (happened more than once), I can just copy the entire EVE directory from the uncorr...
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.27 12:10:42
|
40. Sticky:Dev Blog: Download-on-Demand Is Coming To Singularity! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I currently have two separate installs of the EVE client on my PC, so that when a patch fails and corrupts the install so badly, repair won't work (happened more than once), I can just copy the entire EVE directory from the uncorrupted version. I ...
- by Worrff - at 2015.02.27 08:58:56
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |