| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
41. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Deep DonkeyPunch wrote: Having to play a game where every time you rename your ship/pos/station you have to send a petition in and wait a couple days to see if naming your machariel "machariel" is a bannable offense nothx Thats clearly fine ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.11 14:29:00
|
42. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So who decides whether I represent a player group or not? Say I go around offering to sell PL mercenary contracts even though I'm not an in game member of PL. If I get petitioned now a GM has to go find someone in PL and check whether I was act...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.11 14:19:00
|
43. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
GM Karidor wrote: What needs to be kept in mind regarding impersonations is that all characters involved are seen as their own, independent entity, which effectively means it's quite possible that a situation may appear where a player imperson...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.11 13:28:00
|
44. CFC disband - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Harry Forever wrote: the operation will be called: kiss of the sledgehammer Do they make sledgehammers for ants? How do you even hold one with no arms?
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.09 14:37:00
|
45. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Linistitul wrote: I don't think that missing a red tag will make people stop shooting each other. It's your choice if you want to be NRDS or NBSI. No its not. Under your proposed system your choices are Not Blue Shoot It or Not Conforming ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.04 18:21:00
|
46. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Linistitul wrote: Yeep wrote: Oh sorry, I didn't realise this was in addition to your other stupid idea rather than instead of it. Oh, I see, show me on the blue doughnut where the bad people touched you. Argument from consequences much? ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.04 16:58:00
|
47. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Linistitul wrote: Yeep wrote: So you want to remove all the politics and metagaming and replacing it with a neutered, hardcoded version of NRDS? You can shot whoever you want, this part is for addressing the concerns of the NRDS minority. ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.04 15:41:00
|
48. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Linistitul wrote: You can add the tag "Criminal for sov owner". Or if CCP doesn't want new tags, they could copy the Concord and make him flashy red. Was that hard? So you want to remove all the politics and metagaming and replacing it with...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.04 14:57:00
|
49. Sticky:The 'one-line bad idea' thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Damage deflection modules that allow you to absorb 50% of the damage done to a target directly on your structure.
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.04 12:44:00
|
50. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
JinSanJong wrote: Yeep wrote: JinSanJong wrote: oh and dont say new alliances take over all the time, they don't its just the same vet players, under a different name [Citation needed] You are not seriously disagreeing are you. Dam...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.03 09:39:00
|
51. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
JinSanJong wrote: oh and dont say new alliances take over all the time, they don't its just the same vet players, under a different name [Citation needed]
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.03 09:17:00
|
52. EVE - Without Large Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Skydell wrote: Minor point to be be made: What do all entities destroyed by CFC have in common? They were blue to CFC a year before they fell. [Citation needed]
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.02 13:12:00
|
53. EVE - Without Large Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dragon Outlaw wrote: Despite what some people are saying, I think OP has valid a point. When I looked at when I started 3-4 years ago, It did felt like they were more "independent" blocs in Null sec then it does today. Was it more fun? Yes, I t...
- by Yeep - at 2013.09.02 12:33:00
|
54. Why pay rent to live in Null Sec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Deka Ekato wrote: So, this game play mechanic, ( the "freedom" of living in Null Sec ), is now a, ( player ), marketable product.. The only thing paying your subscription entitles you to is access to the game client and servers. You have ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.31 07:57:00
|
55. DePithification, or 'Lets get rid of the latin names' - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why even bother with battleship thats pretty hard to remember too right? Rename the ship classes to small ship, medium ship, big ship and really big ship.
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.30 19:51:00
|
56. Why pay rent to live in Null Sec. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Deka Ekato wrote: I find the concept of paying other "players" for the right, (for what is), for more rewarding gaming, well, just silly. I guess you've never bought a ship off the market then? You make all your own ships and modules or just...
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.30 18:19:00
|
57. Marauders - now great for high sec, terrible for null. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: destiny2 wrote: what the heck is a bastion module. It's a module that provides a smooth yet gravelly voice-over that narrates your murder spree. It should also let you fly into a jump gate and explode destroying yourself ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.30 18:17:00
|
58. Sticky:The 'one-line bad idea' thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
NPC corporations to issue fines to any members engaging in activities that might tarnish their reputation such as aggressing other capsuleers, leaving the confines of high security space or shooting non-pirate NPCs.
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.30 17:21:00
|
59. So this is it for eve, is this the future, is it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Well we have to be reasonable. A 30,000 hp POCO would be stupid. A 10 million HP POCO is okay. However a 10 million HP POCO that becomes invulnerable and requires you to turn up to get ganked 24 hours later, not smart at ...
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.30 15:03:00
|
60. Sticky:The 'one-line bad idea' thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mashie Saldana wrote: One way wormholes. Make all smuggler gates one way
- by Yeep - at 2013.08.30 11:48:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |