| Pages: [1] |
1. [proposal] WH space shows no local is win, now lets bring it to 0.0! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
They get get rid of local as soon as poses in sov holding systems can track enemies. I.e. If you own the space you can actively see who is in your space(like current local), if not you have to probe or scout the old fashioned way.
- by Yonker - at 2009.04.08 13:46:00
|
2. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: corebloodbrothers Edited by: corebloodbrothers on 24/03/2009 14:55:12 ok, fine then i will disclose, its indeed all in the name, as alot refer too. kenzoku is a registred trade mark name and the name is licensed and pro...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 15:01:00
|
3. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Ivoryman I vote no! This gives Goons + the 70% of all space holding alliances NAP'ed with them something to poast about This whole debacle is made of WIN! imo. Maybe CCP has had enough of Goons + friends... it's CCP's gam...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 14:43:00
|
4. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Vincent Gaines Originally by: Yonker Quote: Chribba has a dread in Amarr, not a Titan. Whatever, capital/supercapital veldspar mining craft. did you forget the rest of what I said or just decide to ig...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 14:38:00
|
5. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Jmanis Catharg I present something else to the table. Originally by: GM Grimmi The leadership of KenZoku/Band of Brothers did petition us immediately after they were disbanded and their name was taken. While we work...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 14:27:00
|
6. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Yonker on 24/03/2009 14:20:12 Edited by: Yonker on 24/03/2009 14:19:43 Originally by: Karezan Which is probably the exact reason why the rename was allowed. They had to emergency reform in a (now proven to be pointless) ...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 14:19:00
|
7. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Vincent Gaines Edited by: Vincent Gaines on 24/03/2009 14:06:03 Originally by: Couldbe Acrackhead Originally by: Vincent Gaines allowing a Titan in Amarr. what? proof or stfu? Three threads down...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 14:11:00
|
8. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Karezan Well, this is a different situation in the sense that they did lose all sov, and they did pay 1b for a new alliance. It's just that they didn't do the disbanding, someone else did, and they didn't change to the allia...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 13:52:00
|
9. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: corebloodbrothers underlying message implies that the earlier goon action which lead to delve war II is started with eula breach itself, else there is no reason to adjust that mentioned "suffering" if any this answer implies...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 13:45:00
|
10. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Jmanis Catharg Edited by: Jmanis Catharg on 24/03/2009 13:23:54 I merely ask one question. What was stopping them from changing their alliance name just like any other alliance does? By disbanding their alliance and refo...
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 13:27:00
|
11. [Proposal] Disband BOBR - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
- by Yonker - at 2009.03.24 00:38:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |