| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:[Odyssey 1.1] Dominix bonus change - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
So CCP Rise... You are just going to make this change despite page after page of people saying this is not what we want. Page after page showing you why drone use is completely different from turrets. You are just making this change and ignoring ...
- by Zachstar - at 2013.08.28 08:24:00
|
2. CCP Goliath needs pilots for his Sisi fleet fight!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I will be there as logistics. Should I bring basi oni or guardian? Do you have a logistics channel for your fleets?
- by Zachstar - at 2012.03.26 10:53:00
|
3. PvEve.com: Information gathering! - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Endeavour Starfleet wrote: Th3 Ladyship wrote: Bump for more user submitted information. The beta version should be up come the weekend (at some point, dont sue me if its the following monday :3) I will be happy to see what I can do to su...
- by Zachstar - at 2012.01.14 04:34:00
|
4. China's first battlestar - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
I don't really understand why they would want to go on this crazy path. Anyone in the know ought to understand that drone warfare is the future. A mass of drones will overwhelm just about any countermeasure currently in existence. (Not an EVE ref...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.08.15 22:30:00
|
5. [Proposal] AFK Cloakers nerf solutions (no macro can avoid). - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Zachstar on 13/08/2011 05:53:35 Edited by: Zachstar on 13/08/2011 05:52:46 Originally by: Danika Princip Originally by: Vertisce Soritenshi That said I would say a better fix would to just add in a afk timeout ...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.08.13 05:52:00
|
6. [CSM] July 2011 Prioritization Crowdsourcing -- Vote Here! - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Zachstar,1,-12,13,14,27,28,31,49,59,-61,68,78,82,83,99,108,112
- by Zachstar - at 2011.08.01 01:35:00
|
7. New Dev Blog: The realities of EVE - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
As long as we can continue to take small steps here and there and not dig the hole any deeper we can eventually dig our way out of this crisis. I accept the blog and will wait for the results of the meeting with CSM.
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.27 03:25:00
|
8. Ships for $ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow In the hopes of clarifying matters, here is the timeline of what happened at the Summit. I drafted the minutes on the virtual goods session, and when this issue exploded I went back, reviewed the video record...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.25 17:36:00
|
9. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Azhpol Has it occurred to anyone else that buying faction standing for plex would mean that you could buy your way out of flashy red sec status, since sec status is actually your CONCORD faction standing? The large amount o...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 11:24:00
|
10. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Went out and tested it right before downtime and with the Alt-Drag system and a good intial placement it is working SO much better than the old 2D system. Because now I can bring them closer without worrying about losing the contact because of ver...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 11:04:00
|
11. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Actually I need to come out and fully apologize. The last few days have been a bit sore for the community with the leak and issues with Captains Quarters. I should have been more professional in my posts on this change. While my opinion is this in...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:53:00
|
12. An overdue apology and request for parley - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I do hope the blog will help end this crisis. 90 pages shows just how concerned the community is about this issue.
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:49:00
|
13. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Veritas Originally by: Zachstar Originally by: CCP Veritas Originally by: Zachstar Once you get that working may I request a feature then? Have you noticed Veritas that it is becoming even more of...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:47:00
|
14. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Veritas Originally by: Zachstar Once you get that working may I request a feature then? Have you noticed Veritas that it is becoming even more of a clickfest? Is there a way you can make it where all probes can c...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:42:00
|
15. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Frau Klaps Originally by: CCP Veritas Before the patch, scanning results were based on the best 4 hits for any given target. When tracking down something in particular, having 4 out in a good configuration was the be...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:34:00
|
16. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney Originally by: Rage Spear CCP have never explained the detailed numbers behind the game: missile damage, gun tracking, exploration etc. All those guides you use instead of thinking for yourselves were...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:30:00
|
17. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Veritas Originally by: MisterAl tt1 Seems like I have to appologise to Veritas for being very persistent. I'm sorry. Well, the idea that redundant probes does not contribute is clear. Then, may we assume that fo...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:26:00
|
18. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Veritas Originally by: Skippermonkey tbh, i dont even know why they changed scanning, it was runnign farily well as it was. I suppose I can let that reason be known. I'm a performance guy; I fix lag. My inter...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:23:00
|
19. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Skippermonkey tbh, i dont even know why they changed scanning, it was runnign farily well as it was. All they've done is nerf the scan res of each probe or something and turned it into an even more clickfest. GIVE US PROBE...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:14:00
|
20. Scanning change they "forgot" to mention? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Veritas Originally by: Rek Seven Edited by: Rek Seven on 24/06/2011 09:56:07 CCP Veritas, I'm just annoyed that my abilities have been lowered. I don't remember the exploration tutorial saying only 4 probe...
- by Zachstar - at 2011.06.24 10:09:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |