| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
381. Incursions : Revisiting Assaults . - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Estella Osoka wrote: Goldiiee wrote: Estella Osoka wrote: Garak n00biachi wrote: 99% of the PVE in this game needs attention but the EVE trillionairs club aka the caravan of isk want their **** fixed so they can get richer, fine....any...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.13 00:52:00
|
382. Why freighter bumping in High Sec is an exploit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Riot Girl wrote: Goldiiee wrote: 'External forces are preventing you from warping at this time.' Warp scram, bumping same thing, you just don't get the message when your getting bumped. That's because bumping isn't scramming. Nothing is pr...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.12 12:51:00
|
383. Why freighter bumping in High Sec is an exploit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Riot Girl wrote: Your Dad Naked wrote: It achieves the identical result of a warp scram No it doesn't, not in any way at all. 'External forces are preventing you from warping at this time.' Warp scram, bumping same thing, you just don't...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.12 12:10:00
|
384. Incursions : Revisiting Assaults . - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Haha; Had a random thought, set mass limits on the gate (Like Wormholes), so any combination of ships not to exceed xxx,xxx,xxx mass can enter, after that the gate self destructs. It would make it a requirement to go in light or bring a few cruise...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.12 11:58:00
|
385. Incursions : Revisiting Assaults . - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Estella Osoka wrote: Garak n00biachi wrote: 99% of the PVE in this game needs attention but the EVE trillionairs club aka the caravan of isk want their **** fixed so they can get richer, fine....any fix of incursions should also come with th...
- by goldiiee - at 2014.02.12 01:06:00
|
386. Incursions : Revisiting Assaults . - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Antillie Sa'Kan wrote: James Tzashi wrote: It's very clear that there is something wrong with assaults if there wasn't why do you see a system that has all NCNs and next to no one in the system. NCNs are the sole problem and they need to be ...
- by goldiiee - at 2014.02.12 01:06:00
|
387. Incursions : Revisiting Assaults . - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Garak n00biachi wrote: 99% of the PVE in this game needs attention but the EVE trillionairs club aka the caravan of isk want their **** fixed so they can get richer, fine....any fix of incursions should also come with the removal of it from hig...
- by goldiiee - at 2014.02.12 01:05:00
|
388. Why freighter bumping in High Sec is an exploit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rhamnousia Nosferatu wrote: Bumping is a mechanic used for various other purposes other than ganking freighters (killing/saving titans, killing stuff other stuff on gates in all sec levels etc.) yet you don't see ' Why bumping aggroed battleshi...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.11 14:14:00
|
389. Why freighter bumping in High Sec is an exploit - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cathy Mikakka; They argue points to avoid the original subject, Once bumped a freighter is no longer in the control of the pilot. Once the gank squad arrives they kill it and take the loot. Anyone that has had this happen to them knows it's hopele...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.11 12:17:00
|
390. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Tauranon wrote: Goldiiee wrote: You three are obviously Pro Gank and leaving high sec more vulnerable in some aspects than low sec , I am Pro Security making High sec a place that new recruits can make isk while they pad their accounts and g...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.10 03:40:00
|
391. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Evilishah wrote: Goldiiee wrote: You three are obviously Pro Gank and leaving high sec more vulnerable in some aspects than low sec , I am Pro Security making High sec a place that new recruits can make isk while they pad their accounts and ...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.10 02:56:00
|
392. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
You three are obviously Pro Gank and leaving high sec more vulnerable in some aspects than low sec , I am Pro Security making High sec a place that new recruits can make isk while they pad their accounts and get the courage to go risk it in Low/Nu...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.10 01:57:00
|
393. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
I think you misunderstood my post, let me clarify. There have been an addition of 4 new Destroyers, and 4 new Battle Cruisers, making it easier to put a flying turret with no tank on a gank fleet . There has been a nerf to projectile range a ner...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.10 01:26:00
|
394. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Evilishah wrote: Because you can't make every one happy? So making the few happy is a better solution? Evilishah wrote: Because people aren't leaving. EVE has been getting increasingly more popular. Sure, the ones that I see leave mus...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 23:47:00
|
395. Incursions : Revisiting Assaults . - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
+1
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 22:38:00
|
396. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Leave then, I can not begin to understand why it is ok to have people rage quit over a misleading representation of high sec, but it's not ok to have people leave over a change in profitability of a manipulation of the rules. Your obviously enrag...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 08:44:00
|
397. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Anize Oramara wrote: Actually both work in this case (yey auto correct!). Hearsay doesn't apply to CCP devblogs either, or does it? Also, how does it work where you can make conjecture (all the missionrunners are going to leave the game!) fro...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 07:20:00
|
398. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Anize Oramara wrote: Goldiiee wrote: Anize; You lobby for your group, I will lobby for mine. But don't kid yourself with 'Facts' you haven't produced any Evidence or Facts, you have presented conjecture and hearsay but nothing that even come...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 05:52:00
|
399. Very serious danger for all people who like to do missions in faction ships - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Anize; You lobby for your group, I will lobby for mine. But don't kid yourself with 'Facts' you haven't produced any Evidence or Facts, you have presented conjecture and hearsay but nothing that even comes close to a valid proof.
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 04:08:00
|
400. How to make 100mil per hour doing L4 missions - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
I tend to be a cautious yet relaxed mission runner, and yet I don't see numbers over 60mil an hour (ISK only). My LP pool is pretty big right now with over 25mil unspent LP for various factions, so adding those in would probably push me over the t...
- by Goldiiee - at 2014.02.09 03:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 40 50 60 70 80 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |