| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 |
61. A simple idea to give Assault Frigates a gang orientated role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
How about improved damage bonuses to all missile types (greater than what kinetic has at the moment)? Or improved bonuses to use of Ballistic Control units?
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.11 06:43:00
|
62. Missing Resolutions? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm not sure since when, but apparently I can't pick the 1600x900 resolution under the EVE test client. I still can with Tranquility, though...
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.11 00:45:00
|
63. Missing Resolutions? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm not sure since when, but apparently I can't pick the 1600x900 resolution under the EVE test client. I still can with Tranquility, though...
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.11 00:45:00
|
64. Starbase Defense Management - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Two questions: 1. What does the interface look like? 2. Assuming one has skills, is it possible for them to access another alliance POS' turrets without having to be in the same corporation?
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.10 01:20:00
|
65. EVE Voice free forever... right now? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If that's so, they should change the page in order to reduce confusion somehow... :S Or just enable it for everyone right now and get it over with. :)
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.05 05:13:00
|
66. EVE Voice free forever... right now? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I know it was announced at the Fanfest 2007 that EVE Voice was going free. However: http://myeve.eve-online.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1580&tid=1 This entry indicates that activating EVE Voice is free at this time... does this mean to say that ...
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.05 02:37:00
|
67. Stasis Webifiers: Problem and Solution - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Seems like a fine idea on paper, but will require testing and lots of working around to see how well it fares in actual use.
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.04 21:37:00
|
68. Idea: Interceptors that look like Fighters? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This a possible thing look into?
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.04 20:20:00
|
69. EVE Atmospheric Flight! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
http://youtube.com/watch?v=8Pg1dzAvL2M Please let this be, CCP! Bring this one as soon as you can! /signed
- by velocity7 - at 2007.11.01 03:57:00
|
70. FIX the t2 freighters - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I think the important part is to make jump freighters viable and much better than carriers in the first place, before a carrier nerf happens that no one will notice (in this case).
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.31 14:48:00
|
71. SiSi: No cargo allowed in ships inside a carrier ship maint. array - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You guys do realize that jump freighters are being introduced to replace this aspect of carriers?
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.28 05:06:00
|
72. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: velocity7 on 24/10/2007 03:43:11 Last I checked, carriers were not solopwnmobiles, but solo pwned mobiles. My vote in the petition still stands.
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.24 03:40:00
|
73. Petition for carriers and moms to stay the way they are. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.23 23:08:00
|
74. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Valea Originally by: velocity7 I think that instead of forcing carriers to delegate, there should be a bonus to delegating the fighters instead. That way, delegating is greatly encouraged rather than forced. ...
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.22 14:56:00
|
75. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I think that instead of forcing carriers to delegate, there should be a bonus to delegating the fighters instead. That way, delegating is greatly encouraged rather than forced.
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.22 14:43:00
|
76. Mackinaw and Ice Upgrade T2s - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Because it's a Mackinaw? :p
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.14 18:16:00
|
77. Mackinaw and Ice Upgrade T2s - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I end up with 236.14/235 CPU and 22/43.75 grid. Odd...
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.14 16:57:00
|
78. Mackinaw and Ice Upgrade T2s - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I was just checking the math in EFT with a character with Level V throughout... Try fitting two Ice Harvester IIs on a Mackinaw with two Ice Harvester Upgrade IIs. Does CPU/powergrid manage to fit?
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.14 16:44:00
|
79. Woot t Interceptor Bonuses Changed! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Here's the full list of changes at the moment.
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.13 15:01:00
|
80. Mining with bombs not zapping them -- relink - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: velocity7 on 11/10/2007 21:58:45 Well, in my idea anyway, the bombs wouldn't be allowed in 0.5+. So if someone comes to bomb the entire field, go kick their ass. And if they come to steal your debris, go kick their ass. :) I'm sure...
- by velocity7 - at 2007.10.11 21:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |