EVE Search - Battle in 49-U - a preliminary report

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Battle in 49-U - a preliminary report

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lina Jakiri Gallente GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.26 19:51:00 - [391] Originally by: Tranking Edited by: Tranking on 26/03/2009 09:45:28 Goons fail in 49-u yesterday night, 24 capitals down and over 60 bs... why only 60 bs of 1300 local? becouse they like use ceptor and cruiser siza ships, so they can run faster... btw nice fight... here one pic in the middle of the fight, you can see all the yellow wreak, are all goons and fried... http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/1747/20090325214145.jpg Man and I thought we were terrible at this game (We are)
Petar Quaresma Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.26 19:54:00 - [392] Originally by: O Thief Originally by: Petar Quaresma None of that is even true but that's cool, it's CAOD. its so cute how you believe your own propaganda No, I believe the map, the figures and the facts. As a roleplayer who owns no space, your opinion is roughly as valid as Jade Constantine. That is to say, you know nothing about Eve politics and you probably cyber men in virtual brothels. Looking at the map, constellation by constellation; factoring in sov 4 fuel mechanics; factoring in NPC space circumstances; factoring in proximity to empire; factoring in Stain eventually if we want to use it or Catch should we assault it; factoring in the growing pointlessness of the titan race and a lack of need for massive massive sums of moon revenue (although we have far more than before for reimbursements and new programs that we don't even need); factoring in the density of the space versus what we were forced to live under before, it becomes quite clear that you are just a pubbie who doesn't know what he's talking about. AAA got some moons. Ok, that's your major point? So what. We got the best space in the game for an alliance our size and all of the station constellations have been built up for us without even having to invest in them ourselves.
O Thief Amarr The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.26 19:55:00 - [393] Originally by: Petar Quaresma No, I believe the map, the figures and the facts. As a roleplayer who owns no space, your opinion is roughly as valid as Jade Constantine. That is to say, you know nothing about Eve politics and you probably cyber men in virtual brothels. Looking at the map, constellation by constellation; factoring in sov 4 fuel mechanics; factoring in NPC space circumstances; factoring in proximity to empire; factoring in Stain eventually if we want to use it or Catch should we assault it; factoring in the growing pointlessness of the titan race and a lack of need for massive massive sums of moon revenue (although we have far more than before for reimbursements and new programs that we don't even need); factoring in the density of the space versus what we were forced to live under before, it becomes quite clear that you are just a pubbie who doesn't know what he's talking about. AAA got some moons. Ok, that's your major point? So what. We got the best space in the game for an alliance our size and all of the station constellations have been built up for us without even having to invest in them ourselves. adorable! but... u mad?
Myz Toyou Minmatar Ministry of Destruction SCUM.	Posted - 2009.03.26 19:56:00 - [394] Originally by: O Thief Originally by: The Mittani iss and uk do know an awful lot about losing conquerable space, i suppose you would be an expert~ you remember this thread? Well, I completely forgot to mention that the NC got their share of moon income, 'payment' if you will for helping out their dear brosefs. So, er... you actually have less moon income now than before the invasion, along with higher fuel bills, and less overall space. Victory indeed. You forgot all these T2 BPOs that now will spawn in Goon hangars, so they won. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [gold]Your signature image exceeds the maximum allo
Petar Quaresma Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.26 19:57:00 - [395] Originally by: O Thief Originally by: Petar Quaresma No, I believe the map, the figures and the facts. As a roleplayer who owns no space, your opinion is roughly as valid as Jade Constantine. That is to say, you know nothing about Eve politics and you probably cyber men in virtual brothels. Looking at the map, constellation by constellation; factoring in sov 4 fuel mechanics; factoring in NPC space circumstances; factoring in proximity to empire; factoring in Stain eventually if we want to use it or Catch should we assault it; factoring in the growing pointlessness of the titan race and a lack of need for massive massive sums of moon revenue (although we have far more than before for reimbursements and new programs that we don't even need); factoring in the density of the space versus what we were forced to live under before, it becomes quite clear that you are just a pubbie who doesn't know what he's talking about. AAA got some moons. Ok, that's your major point? So what. We got the best space in the game for an alliance our size and all of the station constellations have been built up for us without even having to invest in them ourselves. adorable! but... u mad? Yes, furious. I can't stop myself from posting. Actually, I never stop posting as a general rule, so it is difficult for me to tell if I am so angry that I am posting about it or if I am just posting because I post and that is what I do (post). Please, continue to make threads, though, because the insights of roleplayers are always very amusing. Tell us about what it is like to sorta kinda almost live in Providence.
Poopsock Alarmclock Minmatar GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.26 21:02:00 - [396] Originally by: O Thief u mad? cultural victory detected
Scatim Helicon Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.26 22:41:00 - [397] Originally by: Petar Quaresma Yes, furious. I can't stop myself from posting. Actually, I never stop posting as a general rule, so it is difficult for me to tell if I am so angry that I am posting about it or if I am just posting because I post and that is what I do (post). The Never Stop Posting rule doesn't apply to bad posters. (you are a bad poster) ((Stop Posting))
Petar Quaresma Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.26 22:58:00 - [398] Originally by: Scatim Helicon Originally by: Petar Quaresma Yes, furious. I can't stop myself from posting. Actually, I never stop posting as a general rule, so it is difficult for me to tell if I am so angry that I am posting about it or if I am just posting because I post and that is what I do (post). The Never Stop Posting rule doesn't apply to bad posters. (you are a bad poster) ((Stop Posting)) - rep
Lunas Feelgood Gallente S.A.S Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.26 23:46:00 - [399] Originally by: Prez21 Originally by: Lunas Feelgood What I wanna know who resurrected Kenny? For someone whos has done so little ingame but talks like they have achieved so much, why dont you get off bobs ** and stop being an emo got fanboy wow you mad here is a /hug Originally by:* Jade Constantine You can't expect seasoned Eve players with an awareness of history Originally by: BOB "I played EVE for 5 years and all I got left is crappy forum alts"..
fukier Gallente The Unpodable Supermen Antagonistic Bloodthirsty Cutthroats	Posted - 2009.03.27 00:02:00 - [400] Originally by: Joakim Saxon You expect goons NOT to be full of tech 1 crap? What asteroid have you been living under goons are terrible at this game. ter+ri+ble (tr-bl) adj. 1. Causing great fear or alarm; dreadful: a terrible bolt of lightning; a terrible curse. 2. Extremely formidable: terrible responsibilities. 3. Extreme in extent or degree; intense: "the life for which he had paid so terrible a price" Leslie Fiedler. 4. a. Unpleasant; disagreeable: had a terrible time at the party; terrible food. b. Very bad: a terrible actor. IRONIC Remember Your Hell Is Someone Else's Heaven

Karn Mithralia Minmatar Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 06:00:00 - [401] Edited by: Karn Mithralia on 27/03/2009 06:00:17 Originally by: The Mittani iss and uk do know an awful lot about losing conquerable space Wow, never heard that smack before! 10 points for originality. And here was me thinking you were creative ...
Euriti Gallente Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.27 06:21:00 - [402] Originally by: O Thief adorable! but... u mad? You'd reach a broader audience if you simply typed: i hate goonies
SavageBastard Caldari Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.27 06:40:00 - [403] Originally by: Karn Mithralia Edited by: Karn Mithralia on 27/03/2009 06:00:17 Originally by: The Mittani iss and uk do know an awful lot about losing conquerable space Wow, never heard that smack before! 10 points for originality. And here was me thinking you were creative ... And here you are thinking that sarcastic replies were creative.
Futt Bucker Gallente Band of Brothers	Posted - 2009.03.27 08:27:00 - [404] Edited by: Futt Bucker on 27/03/2009 08:29:16 Originally by: O Thief So, er... you actually have less moon income now than before the invasion, along with higher fuel bills, and less overall space. Victory indeed. I'll let you in on a little secret, less space = less fuel. Also, less space doesn't automatically mean less income. We aren't playing ranchers in space after all. It's an honest mistake considering you're in an alliance that doesn't actually have any space so I figured I'd clue you in.
Gneeznow Minmatar North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.27 09:34:00 - [405] Originally by: Prez21 Originally by: Lunas Feelgood What I wanna know who resurrected Kenny? For someone whos has done so little ingame but talks like they have achieved so much, why dont you get off bobs ** and stop being an emo *got fanboy I'm actually gonna agree with this, because lunas never logs on but yet still vomits sunshine all over CAOD like a champ
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 10:06:00 - [406] Originally by: Futt Bucker I'll let you in on a little secret, less space = less fuel. So if I spammed 400 towers in one region, that costs me less than fuelling 300 towers in three regions? Sounds like a devsploit to me ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Tearavygh Quillam Caldari Epsilon Lyr Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2009.03.27 10:10:00 - [407] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Futt Bucker I'll let you in on a little secret, less space = less fuel. So if I spammed 400 towers in one region, that costs me less than fuelling 300 towers in three regions? You're pretty good at shooting yourself in the foot these days.
Algey Caldari The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 10:33:00 - [408] Originally by: The Mittani Originally by: O Thief I know, silly. He forgot the other 4 regions. iss and uk do know an awful lot about losing conquerable space, i suppose you would be an expert~ Hoy, we also lost all of our space in Insurgency as well. Keep up with the catalogue of fail please!
Vladic Ka Minmatar Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.27 10:47:00 - [409] Originally by: Butter Dog So if I spammed 400 towers in one region, that costs me less than fuelling 300 towers in three regions? Sounds like a devsploit to me It will with all those sov 4 systems.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 11:08:00 - [410] Edited by: Butter Dog on 27/03/2009 11:08:29 Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam You're pretty good at shooting yourself in the foot these days. And you're pretty good at failing to read. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05

Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 11:11:00 - [411] Originally by: Vladic Ka Originally by: Butter Dog So if I spammed 400 towers in one region, that costs me less than fuelling 300 towers in three regions? Sounds like a devsploit to me It will with all those sov 4 systems. even if every single one of those towers were in a Sov 4 (not going to be the case), the cost would be equal, not less ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Euriti Gallente Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.27 11:27:00 - [412] Edited by: Euriti on 27/03/2009 11:27:20 Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Vladic Ka Originally by: Butter Dog So if I spammed 400 towers in one region, that costs me less than fuelling 300 towers in three regions? Sounds like a devsploit to me It will with all those sov 4 systems. even if every single one of those towers were in a Sov 4 (not going to be the case), the cost would be equal, not less And who says they'll plant 400 towers in 1 region when they planted 300 in 3 before?
Tearavygh Quillam Caldari Epsilon Lyr Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2009.03.27 12:11:00 - [413] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 27/03/2009 11:08:29 Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam You're pretty good at shooting yourself in the foot these days. And you're pretty good at failing to read. I think you're just playing semantics on me.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 12:15:00 - [414] Originally by: Euriti And who says they'll plant 400 towers in 1 region when they planted 300 in 3 before? Are you not familiar with the POS spam you helped bankroll? Silly. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Euriti Gallente Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion	Posted - 2009.03.27 12:20:00 - [415] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Euriti And who says they'll plant 400 towers in 1 region when they planted 300 in 3 before? Are you not familiar with the POS spam you helped bankroll? Silly. I hear that towers can be unanchored.
Zeph1rus Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.27 13:52:00 - [416] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 27/03/2009 11:08:29 Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam You're pretty good at shooting yourself in the foot these days. And you're pretty good at failing to read. And you're pretty good at being in miserably ****ty alliances.
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 14:42:00 - [417] Originally by: Euriti Originally by: Butter Dog Are you not familiar with the POS spam you helped bankroll? Silly. I hear that towers can be unanchored. thats a great idea! I am sure AAA-wagon/GKC would most certainly not appreciate that ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Shadowsword Gallente Epsilon Lyr Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2009.03.27 15:41:00 - [418] Edited by: Shadowsword on 27/03/2009 15:41:05 Originally by: Butter Dog thats a great idea! I am sure AAA-wagon/GKC would most certainly not appreciate that You post a lot, for someone who sit on the sidelines... Anyway, why holding devle is better than holding 3 other regions: - You can have three thousands systems, you still can only farm one at the same time. And farming in delve is much, much more profitable than farming in, say, Detorid. Bigger spawns, and a chance for officers that very often drop capacitor mods worth 1B and more. Lots of rares ores as well... - Your alliance mates aren't dispersed all over three regions, defending one if much easier. - Delve is within jump range of empire, and you can put jump bridges in most systems->easy logistics. - Number of POSes: insignifiant. What's a measly 40-50B monthly fuel bill when the moon-mining network alone bring something like 100B per week? When TCF took Deklein, we lost lots of space, yet our monthly income increased a lot. This is the same for Delve... ------------------------------------------
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2009.03.27 16:50:00 - [419] Originally by: Shadowsword When TCF took Deklein, we lost lots of space, yet our monthly income increased a lot. This is the same for Delve... I do actually agree with most of your points, however... The goons lost around 300bn a month of moon income from former territories. Delve is a nice region, however once the new moon income has been divided up as per the agreements made with NC etc, Goons are financially worse off than before. As I stated on O Thief, the real winners in both territory and moon income are the AAA-wagon ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Admiral FANTASY Amarr DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.03.27 17:08:00 - [420] Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Shadowsword When TCF took Deklein, we lost lots of space, yet our monthly income increased a lot. This is the same for Delve... I do actually agree with most of your points, however... The goons lost around 300bn a month of moon income from former territories. Delve is a nice region, however once the new moon income has been divided up as per the agreements made with NC etc, Goons are financially worse off than before. As I stated on O Thief, the real winners in both territory and moon income are the AAA-wagon Oh no whatever will goons do without space rolls royces and fur coats, we may have to stop rollin' in all faction fit t2 ships now. Space money has always been our number one goal in EVE how could this have happened?!?!?! EXPLAIN THIS DARIUS.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.