Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 13 post(s) |
Ryans Revenge
League of Legends
42
|
Posted - 2012.05.08 14:50:00 -
[91] - Quote
"All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012."
Does this mean my corp are unable to compete in the alliance tournament as I've only read this devblog today? You gave people 3 days notice to be in an alliance?
I understand this for alliance hopping but I myself was planning to create an alliance for my corp to take part but am now unable to do so as I wasn't around last week.
Thanks |
Firnas
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.09 07:05:00 -
[92] - Quote
Would like to see deadline of pilots joining moved from May 5th to something more like May 10th or 15th.
Giving 3 days from announcement probably wasn't enough for some pilots, I know it wasn't for our guys. We send some pilots into the contract's corporations to help them with defense contracts and I couldn't pull guys out fast enough. |
sevyn nine
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 18:00:00 -
[93] - Quote
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:Faffywaffy wrote:CCP Loxy wrote:Everyone goes into the hat & the much larger auction system which we will post the details of in the next few days. There's never a perfect solution for this but we believe we have the best chance of getting in all the major teams and those that really want a place. This is ridiculous. I don't mind fighting in the qualifiers like everyone else, but not even have a guaranteed spot for the top alliances from last year is stupid. There is a perfect solution: top 4 alliances from last year get a reserved spot in the tournament. I've never seen anyone complain about this before and it seems perfectly reasonable. Why would you even come up with the idea of changing it?? What this guy said - tournament isn't improved by the absence of top teams and your quest for "fairness" is stupid. I'm rather disappointed in you people, obviously haven't learned anything from the mess last time.
I agree (obviously, being the Razor team captain). I am confused and dissapointed by this utterly stupid change. Regardless of the rigging and throwing of matches that went on, you can't deny that the top few teams were strong teams. I'm not sure if we will buy a spot or let luck dictate our participation.
I want to lose in the first round of the actual tourney, not the first round of the qualifiers! |
Raging Beaver
CBC Interstellar Fidelas Constans
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.15 18:22:00 -
[94] - Quote
sevyn nine wrote:Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:Faffywaffy wrote:CCP Loxy wrote:Everyone goes into the hat & the much larger auction system which we will post the details of in the next few days. There's never a perfect solution for this but we believe we have the best chance of getting in all the major teams and those that really want a place. This is ridiculous. I don't mind fighting in the qualifiers like everyone else, but not even have a guaranteed spot for the top alliances from last year is stupid. There is a perfect solution: top 4 alliances from last year get a reserved spot in the tournament. I've never seen anyone complain about this before and it seems perfectly reasonable. Why would you even come up with the idea of changing it?? What this guy said - tournament isn't improved by the absence of top teams and your quest for "fairness" is stupid. I'm rather disappointed in you people, obviously haven't learned anything from the mess last time. I agree (obviously, being the Razor team captain). I am confused and dissapointed by this utterly stupid change. Regardless of the rigging and throwing of matches that went on, you can't deny that the top few teams were strong teams. I'm not sure if we will buy a spot or just let luck dictate our participation.
I don't think anyone's trying to deny that the top 4 last year were good. I think that things are this way, as the 2 teams that would theoretically deserve to be handed spots in this year's tournament the most, meaning the champions and vice champions, would have to be excluded according to the new rules. It's these guys you should thank IMHO. |
IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 03:45:00 -
[95] - Quote
Andrea Griffin wrote:CCP Loxy wrote:The neater solution of course being a flash player that had multiple audio selection. This would be awesome - is this something you will be able to do? When the videos are uploaded to YouTube, is it possible to have multiple audio streams there as well?
They could just put different audio on the left and right channels. It's a messy solution and only allows 2 options with a stereo audio track - but it works. Pan control ftw. Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |
IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.17 03:57:00 -
[96] - Quote
Faffywaffy wrote:CCP Loxy wrote:Everyone goes into the hat & the much larger auction system which we will post the details of in the next few days. There's never a perfect solution for this but we believe we have the best chance of getting in all the major teams and those that really want a place. This is ridiculous. I don't mind fighting in the qualifiers like everyone else, but not even have a guaranteed spot for the top alliances from last year is stupid. There is a perfect solution: top 4 alliances from last year get a reserved spot in the tournament. I've never seen anyone complain about this before and it seems perfectly reasonable. Why would you even come up with the idea of changing it??
Only the previous years winning team should be guaranteed a chance to defend their title. Everyone else should just be randomly drawn. Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |
Trip Phaze
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 09:37:00 -
[97] - Quote
CCP Loxy wrote:Dinta Zembo wrote:Will we have live streams for the qualifiers this time? Yes, as a result of last year's experiment and the reaction from the players we identified this as a must have. We will be streaming the qualifiers but it will be low key and simple, at this point we're not sure if there will even be commentary (thoughts?). hmm, EvE world has been affected by the crisis, a year ago there weren't so many waiting for auctions, CCP really wanted to take from us as much isk as they can?. it would be fair to an automatic draw |
Trip Phaze
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 10:00:00 -
[98] - Quote
Trip Phaze wrote:CCP Loxy wrote:Dinta Zembo wrote:Will we have live streams for the qualifiers this time? Yes, as a result of last year's experiment and the reaction from the players we identified this as a must have. We will be streaming the qualifiers but it will be low key and simple, at this point we're not sure if there will even be commentary (thoughts?). hmm, EvE world has been affected by the crisis, a year ago there weren't so many waiting for auctions, CCP really wanted to take from us as much isk as they can?. it would be fair to an automatic draw
I think this part of the community interested in the Tournament should boycott the auction . |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |