| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Feronia
   |
Posted - 2004.08.26 15:27:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Feronia on 17/11/2004 09:39:32
MAGMA MINERAL PRICES
To avoid a lot of confusion about the mineral prices and to give a guideline to buyers/sellers, I will post the price change for all minerals in here every week. Posted prices are the average price of all mineral transactions in the last 4 days in the 3 commercially most important regions.
Week: 47 (17-NOV-2004)
Current price: Change % (previous price)
Tritanium : 1.93 = + 0.00 % (1.93)
Pyerite : 5.42 - 2.69 % (5.57)
Mexallon : 11.07 - 1.95 % (11.29)
Isogen : 82.39 + 3.86 % (79.33)
Nocxium : 333.71 - 0.39 % (335.03)
Zydrine : 3791.43 - 3.49 % (3928.54)
Megacyte : 4889.89 + 1.34 % (4825.22)
Morphite : 24426.07 - 2.50 % (25052.15)
Month-to-date price: Change to current price %
Tritanium : 1.91 + 1.05 %
Pyerite : 5.58 - 2.87 %
Mexallon : 11.28 - 1.86 %
Isogen : 80.40 + 2.48 %
Nocxium : 337.77 - 1.20 %
Zydrine : 3811.75 - 0.53 %
Megacyte : 4816.55 + 1.52 %
Morphite : 25700.32 - 4.96 %
Year-to-date price: Change to current price %
Tritanium : 1.02 + 89.22 %
Pyerite : 3.95 + 37.22 %
Mexallon : 14.40 - 23.13 %
Isogen : 63.25 + 30.26 %
Nocxium : 222.10 + 50.25 %
Zydrine : 1838.20 + 106.26 %
Megacyte : 10723.69 - 54.40 %
Morphite : N/A
MAGMA INDEX
Based on the total mineral price of a tier 2 Battleship (with Morphite added). Reflects the inflation/deflation of player manufactured equipment. Index startvalue: 1000 at game release (with NPC prices).
Week: 47 (17-NOV-2004)
Current Index: Change % (previous index)
Magma Index: 1594.87 - 1.21 % (1614.39)
Month-to-date Index: Change to current Index %
MTD Magma Index value: 1607.73 - 0.80 %
Year-to-date Index: Change to current price %
YTD Magma Index value: 1290.54 + 23.58 %
All Magma mineral prices are also available on this website (ingame browser compatible): http://www.magmaindex.uni.cc
Click here for link.
Disclaimer:
This information is only intended to be a market research service to the EVE community. Magma Industries shall under no circumstances have any responsibility or liability for the outcome of decisions based on the material provided in this post.
Have fun. 
|
Feronia
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 15:27:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Feronia on 17/11/2004 09:39:32
MAGMA MINERAL PRICES
To avoid a lot of confusion about the mineral prices and to give a guideline to buyers/sellers, I will post the price change for all minerals in here every week. Posted prices are the average price of all mineral transactions in the last 4 days in the 3 commercially most important regions.
Week: 47 (17-NOV-2004)
Current price: Change % (previous price)
Tritanium : 1.93 = + 0.00 % (1.93)
Pyerite : 5.42 - 2.69 % (5.57)
Mexallon : 11.07 - 1.95 % (11.29)
Isogen : 82.39 + 3.86 % (79.33)
Nocxium : 333.71 - 0.39 % (335.03)
Zydrine : 3791.43 - 3.49 % (3928.54)
Megacyte : 4889.89 + 1.34 % (4825.22)
Morphite : 24426.07 - 2.50 % (25052.15)
Month-to-date price: Change to current price %
Tritanium : 1.91 + 1.05 %
Pyerite : 5.58 - 2.87 %
Mexallon : 11.28 - 1.86 %
Isogen : 80.40 + 2.48 %
Nocxium : 337.77 - 1.20 %
Zydrine : 3811.75 - 0.53 %
Megacyte : 4816.55 + 1.52 %
Morphite : 25700.32 - 4.96 %
Year-to-date price: Change to current price %
Tritanium : 1.02 + 89.22 %
Pyerite : 3.95 + 37.22 %
Mexallon : 14.40 - 23.13 %
Isogen : 63.25 + 30.26 %
Nocxium : 222.10 + 50.25 %
Zydrine : 1838.20 + 106.26 %
Megacyte : 10723.69 - 54.40 %
Morphite : N/A
MAGMA INDEX
Based on the total mineral price of a tier 2 Battleship (with Morphite added). Reflects the inflation/deflation of player manufactured equipment. Index startvalue: 1000 at game release (with NPC prices).
Week: 47 (17-NOV-2004)
Current Index: Change % (previous index)
Magma Index: 1594.87 - 1.21 % (1614.39)
Month-to-date Index: Change to current Index %
MTD Magma Index value: 1607.73 - 0.80 %
Year-to-date Index: Change to current price %
YTD Magma Index value: 1290.54 + 23.58 %
All Magma mineral prices are also available on this website (ingame browser compatible): http://www.magmaindex.uni.cc
Click here for link.
Disclaimer:
This information is only intended to be a market research service to the EVE community. Magma Industries shall under no circumstances have any responsibility or liability for the outcome of decisions based on the material provided in this post.
Have fun.
|
Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 17:39:00 -
[3]
Nice... very nice.
Not to be indelicate but could you contact me. I don't think it comes as any surprise that I would be interested in encouraging, and sponsoring, such excellent work. ([email protected])
Eve Guardian - Former Reporter
|
Shar Tegral
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 17:39:00 -
[4]
Nice... very nice.
Not to be indelicate but could you contact me. I don't think it comes as any surprise that I would be interested in encouraging, and sponsoring, such excellent work. ([email protected])
Eve Guardian - Former Reporter
|
Odet
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 18:54:00 -
[5]
agreed...excellent job.
I dont even do anything with minerals i just kill ppl but i can really appreciate this fine work.
=This podding has been brought to you by Odet, the only way to fry.= |
Odet
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 18:54:00 -
[6]
agreed...excellent job.
I dont even do anything with minerals i just kill ppl but i can really appreciate this fine work.
=This podding has been brought to you by Odet, the only way to fry.= |
PreTender
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 21:13:00 -
[7]
we want a sticky :)
nice job indeed
__________________________
http://www.eve-extra.com |
PreTender
|
Posted - 2004.08.26 21:13:00 -
[8]
we want a sticky :)
nice job indeed
__________________________
http://www.eve-extra.com |
EviL ElecTricIaN
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 02:31:00 -
[9]
nice work guy
|
EviL ElecTricIaN
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 02:31:00 -
[10]
nice work guy
|
Calleb
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 09:07:00 -
[11]
This is superb work - i agree, it needs a sticky but its going in my favourites anyway, keep up the good work.
|
Calleb
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 09:07:00 -
[12]
This is superb work - i agree, it needs a sticky but its going in my favourites anyway, keep up the good work.
|
Rodge
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 10:30:00 -
[13]
Yeah Feronia,
I hope you can work something out with Shar.
I'd love to see your detailed mineral prices report on Eve-Guardian.
[ 2005.04.17 00:34:30 ] Nagilam > u better leave Rodge, u will not gank any1 else 2nite......
|
Rodge
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 10:30:00 -
[14]
Yeah Feronia,
I hope you can work something out with Shar.
I'd love to see your detailed mineral prices report on Eve-Guardian.
[ 2005.04.17 00:34:30 ] Nagilam > u better leave Rodge, u will not gank any1 else 2nite......
|
voidvim
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 11:00:00 -
[15]
quite useful thanks
|
voidvim
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 11:00:00 -
[16]
quite useful thanks
|
Gallas Armodyous
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 11:40:00 -
[17]
great piece of work
Deserves a sticky and thanks
|
Gallas Armodyous
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 11:40:00 -
[18]
great piece of work
Deserves a sticky and thanks
|
Nums
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 11:57:00 -
[19]
we need more of this useful information in eve.... I find it interesting how the price of trit is increasing when it can easily be mined in empire (unlike zy). i remember the days i used to sell trit at 1.2 isk! |
Nums
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 11:57:00 -
[20]
we need more of this useful information in eve.... I find it interesting how the price of trit is increasing when it can easily be mined in empire (unlike zy). i remember the days i used to sell trit at 1.2 isk! |
Claus
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 13:33:00 -
[21]
The prices look like they come from regions which are heavy on nocx and light on isogen (as in Minmatar space has plenty of omber but not pyroxeres -- Caldari is the other way around). Correct? In that case a better index would cover 1 nocx region and 1 isogen region.
-------------
You have to go out of your mind from time to time to stay sane. |
Claus
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 13:33:00 -
[22]
The prices look like they come from regions which are heavy on nocx and light on isogen (as in Minmatar space has plenty of omber but not pyroxeres -- Caldari is the other way around). Correct? In that case a better index would cover 1 nocx region and 1 isogen region.
-------------
You have to go out of your mind from time to time to stay sane. |
Feronia
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 15:49:00 -
[23]
Thanks guys for all the positive responses 
To Shar Tegral:
I'll mail you when I get home from work.
To Claus:
It was my initial intention to make the average mineral price based on 4 regions (one of every race), but decided not to, for 2 reasons:
1. The volume of high end minerals is too low in the 2 other regions
2. I would have to write down 672 numbers every week 
Right now, prices are based on 1 omber and 1 pyroxeres containing region.
However, I did write them down just once, for all 4 regions. Looking at them, I can confirm there isn't any relationship between the average mineral price and the ore found in the region. Don't forget there are a lot of mineral traders who like to whipe out every price difference between regions.
Highest average price difference between regions was 7.60% for isogen and only 2.78 % for nocxium.
If I would rank them from highest to lowest average price:
Isogen:
- Caldari
- Gallente
- Minmatar
- Amarr
Nocxium:
- Amarr
- Minmatar
- Gallente
- Caldari
|
Feronia
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 15:49:00 -
[24]
Thanks guys for all the positive responses
To Shar Tegral:
I'll mail you when I get home from work.
To Claus:
It was my initial intention to make the average mineral price based on 4 regions (one of every race), but decided not to, for 2 reasons:
1. The volume of high end minerals is too low in the 2 other regions
2. I would have to write down 672 numbers every week
Right now, prices are based on 1 omber and 1 pyroxeres containing region.
However, I did write them down just once, for all 4 regions. Looking at them, I can confirm there isn't any relationship between the average mineral price and the ore found in the region. Don't forget there are a lot of mineral traders who like to whipe out every price difference between regions.
Highest average price difference between regions was 7.60% for isogen and only 2.78 % for nocxium.
If I would rank them from highest to lowest average price:
Isogen:
- Caldari
- Gallente
- Minmatar
- Amarr
Nocxium:
- Amarr
- Minmatar
- Gallente
- Caldari
|
Claus
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 16:28:00 -
[25]
Feronia,
I stand corrected It is a great initiative (should have said that in my first post). Personally I found it particularly interesting to see the price rises over year-to-date.
Keep up the good work,
Claus
-------------
You have to go out of your mind from time to time to stay sane. |
Claus
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 16:28:00 -
[26]
Feronia,
I stand corrected It is a great initiative (should have said that in my first post). Personally I found it particularly interesting to see the price rises over year-to-date.
Keep up the good work,
Claus
-------------
You have to go out of your mind from time to time to stay sane. |
J'Maybe Keens
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 18:32:00 -
[27]
nice work and I hope you dont mind a shameless plug of one of my articles on eve guardian
Trit pricing
As it does bear relevance to this interesting work done by Feronia.
********
AUTHOR of the COMPLETE mineral and ore Price guide, updated weekly, see Eve Guardian for details
|
J'Maybe Keens
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 18:32:00 -
[28]
nice work and I hope you dont mind a shameless plug of one of my articles on eve guardian
Trit pricing
As it does bear relevance to this interesting work done by Feronia.
********
AUTHOR of the COMPLETE mineral and ore Price guide, updated weekly, see Eve Guardian for details
|
Siroc
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 21:31:00 -
[29]
Edited by: Siroc on 27/08/2004 21:33:48
great work. too bad they have no XML feed with this data from eve-online.com directly that could be integrated into the website and provide real time info.
I think trit prices are growing because more and more people getting into the combat as ex-miners of 0.0 who can not mine any more because of harder NPCs and wars moving into mission running and pvp. More people in combat = more ships lost and ammo spent. Sales of ships and ammo had increased a lot since last few patches. No surprize that trit that required there started to become more and more expencive. Economy needs to rebalance itself.
|
Siroc
|
Posted - 2004.08.27 21:31:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Siroc on 27/08/2004 21:33:48
great work. too bad they have no XML feed with this data from eve-online.com directly that could be integrated into the website and provide real time info.
I think trit prices are growing because more and more people getting into the combat as ex-miners of 0.0 who can not mine any more because of harder NPCs and wars moving into mission running and pvp. More people in combat = more ships lost and ammo spent. Sales of ships and ammo had increased a lot since last few patches. No surprize that trit that required there started to become more and more expencive. Economy needs to rebalance itself.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |