EVE Search - Is blaster tracking broken?

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Is blaster tracking broken?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Lilith Velkor Minmatar OVERLOAD. Dead Terrorists	Posted - 2009.04.13 19:50:00 - [31] Quote: Anyway shooting AT optimal+falloff is just silly, no Vaga pilot does that. That depends on what you are fighting, if its frigates (what the vagabond excels at killing) you'll be at the edge of disruptor range, i.e. 24km. If its a large engagement you might very well find yourself fighting at even longer ranges, thats why pimped Vagabonds use 28km disruptors these days. Quote: I'm still not convinced of your autocannon/ blaster tracking logic, tho I do agree that pulses rule a bit too much atm. I'm a Blaster guy so I talk about them tbh. Again, I wasnt really saying autocannons need a tracking boost compared to blasters, its just that if I see people calling for the opposite, i.e. boosting blaster tracking compared to ACs gets me really boiling. It just displays they got zero clue about how the autocannons work and how they are used in combat. So take what I said about "blasters tracking already too good" as a bit of overexaggeration, imo both systems are perfectly in line with each other.
Allen Ramses Caldari Typo Corp	Posted - 2009.04.13 20:28:00 - [32] They can start working on blasters once they start working on missiles and large projectiles. Until then, stop your *****ing. You know perfectly well why. ____________________ CCP: Catering to the cowards of a cold, harsh universe since November, 2006.
Raimo Gallente Wrath of Fenris	Posted - 2009.04.13 22:53:00 - [33] Edited by: Raimo on 13/04/2009 22:53:01 Now that NMX is here and it's going to be an useless threadnaught, won't hurt me posting this here as well. Check EVE-Kill's FOTM top 20 lists: (I think they have most of EVE PVP there already so the lists are probably rather accurate) Top 20 weapons, notice that only 2 of 3 light blasters are here, no mediums or heavies Top 20 ships, Ranis is here with it's lights but only other blasterboat is the Mega, and if you look at the weapons list they are fitting rails... Hmm. Quite a bit of projectile and missile boats and weapons on there as well... I wonder if it's still a case of medium and large blasters and their platforms needing a boost? ---
Lilith Velkor Minmatar OVERLOAD. Dead Terrorists	Posted - 2009.04.13 23:26:00 - [34] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 13/04/2009 23:36:57 Killboard stats are misleading at best tbh. From my personal experience, weapons used is a completely worthless stat, as I'm pretty sure my warp disruptor II doesnt do any damage, but my killmails regularly say I killed (and scored damage) with it. So we can dismiss the "weapons used" part as totally inaccurate already, more so since most ships have gun/missile hardpoints and dronebay, which skews the stats. Seeing that the first battleship to show up on the list at rank 5 is in fact a Megathron, large blaster platforms cant be all that bad (at least according to that statistic). But as I said, worthless statistic is worthless.
Skjorta	Posted - 2009.04.14 01:29:00 - [35] Should be a simple formula for weapons like... Range Damage (damage multiplier & rate of fire) Tracking Pick 2. Currently. Ac's = mediocre at all. Pulse = good at all Blasters = good at 1
Lilith Velkor Minmatar OVERLOAD. Dead Terrorists	Posted - 2009.04.14 03:14:00 - [36] Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 14/04/2009 03:19:12 Originally by: Skjorta Currently. Ac's = mediocre range (falloff =/= optimal), good tracking, bad damage Pulse = good range, good damage, good tracking (only due to range!) Blasters = good damage, good tracking, bad range Thats more like it actually.
Raimo Gallente Wrath of Fenris	Posted - 2009.04.14 04:15:00 - [37] Originally by: Lilith Velkor Edited by: Lilith Velkor on 13/04/2009 23:44:27 From my personal experience, weapons used is a completely worthless stat, as I'm pretty sure my warp disruptor II doesnt do any damage, but my killmails regularly say I killed (and scored damage) with it. So we can dismiss the "weapons used" part as totally inaccurate already, more so since most ships have gun/missile hardpoints and dronebay, which skews the stats. Seeing that the first battleship to show up on the list at rank 5 is in fact a Megathron, large blaster platforms cant be all that bad (at least according to that statistic). Like said Mega seems to be up there fitting Rails, I guess it still does a passable sniper and it's what a lot of people have trained. No warp disruptors or webs on there m8. ---
Liang Nuren No Salvation PuPPet MasTers	Posted - 2009.04.14 04:31:00 - [38] Edited by: Liang Nuren on 14/04/2009 04:31:48 Originally by: NightmareX 1. Did you forget that i was talking about the tracking in the Neutrons optimal range?. I was not talking about how good the Lasers was with the tracking at med ranges, i was talking about how the tracking was at 5 km for Pulses, like when someone is close to you. No, but I'm trying to point out that what you're talking about is useless. You don't compare pulse lasers to blasters at blaster optimal and say that pulse lasers are broken because they don't track as well at that range! You compare pulse lasers at pulse laser optimal and blasters at blaster optimal to see how their tracking is against similar targets. You see how much damage can be applied not only at that range but at nearby ranges. You see how much distance and time is required to both get under and get away from their guns. And in this case, pulse lasers have hella better tracking than blasters! Quote: 2. I have tried a geddon & Abaddon with pulses and compared them to a Neutron Mega. I then got someone in a Hurricane to orbit me at 5 km. Then i webbed the Hurricane with all of the ships and did shoot the Hurricane. I did kill the Hurricane though. The really sad thing here is that you were able to kill the Hurricane at all - and also shows how pathetic and unrealistic your sisi comparison was. Just how close do you have to get in order to get under pulse tracking anyway? Obviously 5km isn't close enough. To put this in perspective, Neutrons would have to be hitting at 1500 meters - and unless your target's sitting still, they don't. Simply put, pulse lasers are way out of line, and in this case, the right answer is BOOST BLASTER TRACKING and ADD AC FALLOFF. In the end, though, you haven't tried anything worth talking about because all your combat experience is prearranged bullcrap on Sisi. What a waste of time - on Sisi everything essentially costs you the time it takes to fit the ship. On TQ you have to go grind missions, market ***, or mine to make up the ships you keep losing. Originally by:** NightmareX When you find out that the tracking, DPS, EHP, sig radius, speed, resists, slot layout, capacitor, drones and the rest of the stats and things are exact the same on Sisi as it is on TQ, then i will not call you for stupid. Those things are the same, but the style in which PVP is done is entirely different. Until you get that through your head, pretty much everyone that's ever engaged in TQ combat - from the 2 month old noob to the 4 year vet is going to think you're a total sisi noob. Sorry man - it's the truth. And the more you troll these boards with your terrible analysis (BUT I CANT TRACK AS WELL WITH PULSE LASERS AS BLASTERS AT BLASTER OPTIMAL THEREFORE BLASTERS DONT NEED HELP) the more you prove that either you have a terrible bias (got an Amarr alt by chance?) or you simply have no clue about how this game actually works and why. Originally by: NightmareX The point was not that i had much experience in flying them on TQ, the WHOLE point is that the tracking, DPS etc etc is the same on TQ and Sisi, so i don't need to waste isk and probably risk a ship just to test how the tracking is on TQ, when i can do it on Sisi for free. The point is that the tracking is the same but the piloting and situations are different. Also, the "facts" you spew about "DPS, EHP, and Tracking" are utter rubbish because they're misapplied and taken out of context. -Liang -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire www.kwikdeath.org
Rhadamantine Game Community	Posted - 2009.04.14 09:25:00 - [39] Originally by: Liang Nuren Good post..... -Liang I think you made my point quite eloquently, better than I could anyway. Thank you.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.04.14 09:53:00 - [40] Edited by: NightmareX on 14/04/2009 09:55:05 Originally by: Liang Nuren Lots of talk about Sisi and optimal range Ok to answer you again on your things over Liang. 1. So if your getting a Hurricane up on your ass that orbits you at either 2.5 km or 5 km. When things like that CAN happen, then i'm comparing the tracking on Blasters and Pulses at those 2 ranges. I can't just start to compare the the tracking at the lasers optimal range then. Because the comparsion would be totally wrong then if i want to find out how the tracking is for the Mega, Abaddon and Armageddon when shooting a target at 2.5 km or 5 km. Now i hope you get that, because that's what i have been doing. 2. Yes i was able to kill it with no problems. My skills are very nice in Blasters, so i have had no problems with them at all after the web and speed nerf. I have still been able to hit smaller targets in the Neutron Mega pretty good that are orbiting me. Like the time when i had the Megathron Federate Issue on sisi and when i tried against a Pilgrim with 2x Tracking Disruptor II's on me. What do you think happened when he was orbiting me at like 5 km and was orbiting me at like 250 m/s?. Yes this was right after the web and speed nerf. Yes i'm going to tell you that i was still hitting him, but i wasn't hitting him good enough though. But it just shows that a Mega can track hell of a good. And then you think i can't hit a Hurricane who are bigger than the Pilgrim that are orbiting me at 5 km at normal speed?. LOL. 3. I don't bring in PVP experience from TQ here when i'm finding out what kind og ship that have the best tracking. Getting one in a Hurricane to orbit your Mega, Abaddon or Armageddon and then find out how the tracking is, is something that is fully acceptable to do on Sisi, because it would be the exact same if i had done the same on TQ. I don't need to be on TQ to just test out the tracking. 4. See point 3. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 10:17:00 - [41] Originally by: NightmareX 1. So if your getting a Hurricane up on your ass that orbits you at either 2.5 km or 5 km. When things like that CAN happen, then i'm comparing the tracking on Blasters and Pulses at those 2 ranges. I can't just start to compare the the tracking at the lasers optimal range then. Because the comparsion would be totally wrong then if i want to find out how the tracking is for the Mega, Abaddon and Armageddon when shooting a target at 2.5 km or 5 km. Now i hope you get that, because that's what i have been doing. Stupid comparison because in gang combat (TQ combat) the cane will be well and truly webbed. The rest is pretty much a pointless rant so not worth responding to. Getting spanked in public by your own alliance is embarresing
Ad Valorem	Posted - 2009.04.14 11:01:00 - [42] Well between NoobmareX derailing another thread and the usual suspects coming into a BLASTER thread to whine about missiles or Projectiles it seems this thread will also degenerate into a crapfest. A simple appeal: can we stay on topic? IMO Blaster tracking is only noticably a problem on battleships. This is because the tracking formula means that a low range requires vastly better tracking, and although blasters have the best tracking its not enough for the low range they operate at, with current game mechanics. Fix is to either increase tracking, increase range, increase damage or (best solution) fix the tracking formula. Projectile thread (yes AC's need some love) that way -----> <----- Missiles thread that way (whine moar noobs) NoobmareX gtfo
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.04.14 11:27:00 - [43] Edited by: NightmareX on 14/04/2009 11:37:15 Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX 1. So if your getting a Hurricane up on your ass that orbits you at either 2.5 km or 5 km. When things like that CAN happen, then i'm comparing the tracking on Blasters and Pulses at those 2 ranges. I can't just start to compare the the tracking at the lasers optimal range then. Because the comparsion would be totally wrong then if i want to find out how the tracking is for the Mega, Abaddon and Armageddon when shooting a target at 2.5 km or 5 km. Now i hope you get that, because that's what i have been doing. Stupid comparison because in gang combat (TQ combat) the cane will be well and truly webbed. The rest is pretty much a pointless rant so not worth responding to. 1. And if i'm more of a solo PVPer who like to sit at gates to catch lone targets, then what?. I really need something that can punch out some really nice DPS and at the same time have a very good tracking if the target decide to get close to me to try and out track me. Yes it's alot of risk to camp a gate alone, but no risk = no fun. 2. Says the best rant / whiner king in EVE. Originally by: Ad Valorem Well between NoobmareX derailing another thread and the usual suspects coming into a BLASTER thread to whine about missiles or Projectiles it seems this thread will also degenerate into a crapfest. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Idh1yr1SJNA&fmt=18 Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Seishomaru	Posted - 2009.04.14 11:32:00 - [44] Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX 1. So if your getting a Hurricane up on your ass that orbits you at either 2.5 km or 5 km. When things like that CAN happen, then i'm comparing the tracking on Blasters and Pulses at those 2 ranges. I can't just start to compare the the tracking at the lasers optimal range then. Because the comparsion would be totally wrong then if i want to find out how the tracking is for the Mega, Abaddon and Armageddon when shooting a target at 2.5 km or 5 km. Now i hope you get that, because that's what i have been doing. Stupid comparison because in gang combat (TQ combat) the cane will be well and truly webbed. Sorry But now you crippled completely your own argument. If TQ fights the target is always trully webbed. Up to the point that a hurricane at 2 km won't be a problem for pulses.. WHY IN HELLL ARE YOU COMPLAINIGN ABOUT BLASTERS TRACKING??? Sorry but now You did dig your own grave...
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 12:11:00 - [45] Edited by: Childstar on 14/04/2009 12:15:04 Originally by: Seishomaru Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX 1. So if your getting a Hurricane up on your ass that orbits you at either 2.5 km or 5 km. When things like that CAN happen, then i'm comparing the tracking on Blasters and Pulses at those 2 ranges. I can't just start to compare the the tracking at the lasers optimal range then. Because the comparsion would be totally wrong then if i want to find out how the tracking is for the Mega, Abaddon and Armageddon when shooting a target at 2.5 km or 5 km. Now i hope you get that, because that's what i have been doing. Stupid comparison because in gang combat (TQ combat) the cane will be well and truly webbed. Sorry But now you crippled completely your own argument. If TQ fights the target is always trully webbed. Up to the point that a hurricane at 2 km won't be a problem for pulses.. WHY IN HELLL ARE YOU COMPLAINIGN ABOUT BLASTERS TRACKING??? Sorry but now You did dig your own grave... Im not complaining about blaster tracking, its the dmg at 10-20km and cou/pg on the blaster ships thats the problem imho. NoobmareX getting spanked in public by his own alliance.
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 12:14:00 - [46] Edited by: Childstar on 14/04/2009 12:15:44 Originally by: NightmareX 1. And if i'm more of a solo PVPer who like to sit at gates to catch lone targets, then what?. It's not like the Hurricane is going to be truly webbed then fool. Your not a solo pvper though, in fact your not even a TQ pvper of any description and if you were you would not be sitting solo on a gate in a BS of any description you total tool. NoobmareX getting spanked in public by his own alliance.
Brixer Dai Dai Hai	Posted - 2009.04.14 12:36:00 - [47] Edited by: Brixer on 14/04/2009 12:36:47 I fit T2 autocannons on my myrmidon. As does a lot of others. But I do that only to have guns that don't use cap.. yeah, right That's a perfect ship for testing autocannons vs blasters btw, as it got no bonus for either. Main problem when comparing the two is damage types applied when using highest damage ammo in both. You need a target with well balanced resists to get any kind of comparable results.
Liang Nuren No Salvation PuPPet MasTers	Posted - 2009.04.14 15:35:00 - [48] Originally by: NightmareX 1. So if your getting a Hurricane up on your ass that orbits you at either 2.5 km or 5 km. When things like that CAN happen, then i'm comparing the tracking on Blasters and Pulses at those 2 ranges. I can't just start to compare the the tracking at the lasers optimal range then. Because the comparsion would be totally wrong then if i want to find out how the tracking is for the Mega, Abaddon and Armageddon when shooting a target at 2.5 km or 5 km. Now i hope you get that, because that's what i have been doing. NMX, my point is that this test is utterly invalid. Here are some of the reasons why (there are more): - Competent cane pilots will not orbit a blaster BS at its optimal. WTF. - Competent cane pilots might try to orbit a laser BS at 5km, but they're far more likely to load Hail M/RF EMP M and go to town - Faction ammo is hard to come by on Sisi - Gang situations would make the tracking of a single BS irrelevant, regardless of it being 'webbed to hell'. The implication here is that the laser BS's effectiveness goes up rather more dramatically than blaster BS's. Here are the points that stand out as WTF-able: - You don't mention how you attempted to minimize transversal (so we assume you didn't), but the laser BS was still tracking at 5km. - The laser BS still hit and killed the Cane even though it was orbiting at a third of optimal. You constantly argue that smaller ships should be able to get under even a Mega's tracking, yet you're fine with it being well nigh unto impossible to get under lasers. Quote: 2. Yes i was able to kill it with no problems. My skills are very nice in Blasters, so i have had no problems with them at all after the web and speed nerf. I have still been able to hit smaller targets in the Neutron Mega pretty good that are orbiting me. This is not a claim that you can substantiate because you lack credible PVP experience. PVP on TQ like the rest of us and then come back to talk about how you have no problems with blasters. Remember: Sisi is invalid because while tracking is the same, situations are not. And situation is everything. Quote: the Megathron Federate Issue Nobody cares. Seriously. Unless you plan to PVP on TQ with it, I don't care what exploits you had on Sisi. Yes, yes, I know, you're the smartest person in Eve and anyone that can't make inferior weapons pwn like you is just a loser idiot with a 5 IQ. Whatever. Quote: But it just shows that a Mega can track hell of a good when it' in the 5 km range. And it's ALOT more than Lasers can do at this range. What lasers do at this range is alot more than they should do at this range, TBQFH. Quote: 3. I don't bring in PVP experience from TQ here when i'm finding out what kind og ship that have the best tracking etc etc. Getting one in a Hurricane to orbit your Mega, Abaddon or Armageddon and then find out how the tracking is, is something that is fully acceptable to do on Sisi, because it would be the exact same if i had done the same on TQ. I don't need to be on TQ to just test out the tracking. You are wrong. Sure, if someone were to orbit you at 5km then you would get similar results - but people don't mindlessly click the orbit button and walk away from their keyboard on TQ. Remember: situation is everything - and you lack the situational awareness to even know that you're wrong. NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. Also, the "point the first" business is really frustrating. At least quote or make note of relevant sections of a post so that we know what you're on about this time. -Liang -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire www.kwikdeath.org
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 15:56:00 - [49] Originally by: Liang Nuren NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. This is the most accurate thing ever posted on the internet let alone eve forums. NoobmareX getting spanked in public by his own alliance.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.04.14 15:58:00 - [50] Edited by: NightmareX on 14/04/2009 16:01:13 Originally by: Liang Nuren NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. Then explain to me why many of the tests i do on sisi have alot to say for me on TQ?. I'm testing stuffs like this on sisi because it's a damn good reason for it. It let me have a much much easier life on TQ when i'm gonna choose a ship etc etc. If the tests i have done or do on sisi doesn't had anything for me to say on TQ, then i would do the tests either. It's simple. Originally by: Childstar Edited by: Childstar on 14/04/2009 12:27:57 Originally by: NightmareX 1. And if i'm more of a solo PVPer who like to sit at gates to catch lone targets, then what?. It's not like the Hurricane is going to be truly webbed then fool. Your not a solo pvper though, in fact your not even a TQ pvper of any description and if you were you would not be sitting solo on a gate in a BS of any description you total tool. Why dont you just crawl back to sissi and post your pimped navy mega fit in local im sure the noobs will be impressed, until they realise you have had it for at least 7-8 months and never had the balls to fly it on TQ. Still im sure when you get it moved again on the next mirror there will be more noobs to waggle it at and try to impress.... Oh look, the tears. Can i have more tears to?. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
JadeMako Industrial Mite	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:00:00 - [51] Originally by: Liang Nuren NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. (golf clap) Oh, well played sir, also well spotted - ladies and gentlmen we have an accurate diagnosis!
JadeMako Industrial Mite	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:03:00 - [52] Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Liang Nuren NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. Then explain to me why many of the tests i do on sisi have alot to say for me on TQ?. Nobody can thats the point nightmare, you simply can't understand - read the wiki. It is simply impossible to explain it to you because you refuse to accept any other outcome. Incompetent is a harsh word but eerily accurate.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:04:00 - [53] Edited by: NightmareX on 14/04/2009 16:07:48 Originally by: JadeMako Originally by: Liang Nuren NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. (golf clap) Oh, well played sir, also well spotted - ladies and gentlmen we have an accurate diagnosis! I don't have anything against that IF that's the case. But one thing is for sure though, if i have it, then for sure Childstar have it to. Originally by: JadeMako Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Liang Nuren NMX, you're (IMO) displaying symptoms of the Dunning-Kruger effect. See, you're so incompetent at the game that you just don't understand why the tests you're running on Sisi are irrelevent - despite virtually everyone in Eve telling you how and why. Then explain to me why many of the tests i do on sisi have alot to say for me on TQ?. Nobody can thats the point nightmare, you simply can't understand - read the wiki. It is simply impossible to explain it to you because you refuse to accept any other outcome. Incompetent is a harsh word but eerily accurate. Still, the reason i use sisi is because i'll do tests there that can help me in many many ways on TQ when it's about PVP and when it's about different ships and setups. Why use tons of isk to waste on testing ships on TQ when you can do it for free on Sisi?. And if there is a PVP style that i know it's common on TQ, then i can just ask someone to do that style against me to see how the ships i'm using is performing against them. I can test EVERY possible ways that have with PVP to do on Sisi. So don't tell me that the tests i do on sisi doesn't have anything for me to say, because it have ALOT to say, for me. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
JadeMako Industrial Mite	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:04:00 - [54] Edited by: JadeMako on 14/04/2009 16:04:29 double post sorry
Another Whine Caldari P E E N U T	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:04:00 - [55] 8/10 (9/10) for effort fyi you have no idea what you are talking about i fly both races and the ONLY thing thats is ****ed with the gallente blaster boats was and still is the speed nerf nothing else
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:06:00 - [56] Originally by: NightmareX Oh look, the tears. Can i have more tears to?. Are these the best comments you can up with when ppl are trying to help you with your condition?... The NightmareX-Sissi effect. NoobmareX getting spanked in public by his own alliance.
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:09:00 - [57] Edited by: NightmareX on 14/04/2009 16:09:30 Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX Oh look, the tears. Can i have more tears to?. Are these the best comments you can up with when ppl are trying to help you with your condition?... The NightmareX-Sissi effect. And what about your condition then?. You clearly have the exact same symptoms. So don't cheast beast on how more awesome you are then. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:10:00 - [58] Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX Oh look, the tears. Can i have more tears to?. Are these the best comments you can up with when ppl are trying to help you with your condition?... The NightmareX-Sissi effect. No u...... Is this all you have to say?... The NightmareX-Sissi effect. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1016708&page=60#1791NoobmareX ge
NightmareX Celtic Anarchy Force Of Evil	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:12:00 - [59] Edited by: NightmareX on 14/04/2009 16:13:28 Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX Oh look, the tears. Can i have more tears to?. Are these the best comments you can up with when ppl are trying to help you with your condition?... The NightmareX-Sissi effect. No u...... Is this all you have to say?... And this is all you can say to my reply?. To scared to just admit it that you have the same symptoms lol?. Anyways. Don't take this topic into a new whine fest with butt load of off topics posts Child. Check out my new flash web page: Dark Paradise
Childstar Minmatar Republic University	Posted - 2009.04.14 16:16:00 - [60] Edited by: Childstar on 14/04/2009 16:16:22 Originally by: NightmareX Originally by: Childstar Originally by: NightmareX No u...... Is this all you have to say?... And this is all you can say to my reply?. To scared to just admit it that you have the same symptoms lol?. I quote stats and reralistic scenarios, you talk about sissi pimped fits, faction ships with stupid faction fits and unrealistic 1 v 1 scenarios.... There is no comparison. The NightmareX-Sissi effect. The NightmareX-Sissi effect. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1016708&page=60#1791NoobmareX ge

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.