| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mu-Shi Ai
Ai Capital
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.06 22:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
Mars:
And yet, nobody is forcing you to buy that bait once you see it. There is no rule that says you must purchase that massively overpriced crap conspicuously sitting there on sell orders, and then attempt to sell it to that juicy buy order, which is for some reason set even higher, that just so happens to have a minimum unit limit on it.
This is a COMPLETELY psychological trick. The whole thing turns on placing the bait, expecting a random mark to respond to it psychologically (in this case via the rush of finding a "good deal that can make me a lot of money"), and then pulling the rug out from under them at the last minute. If people weren't overly greedy, and generally unaware of what products are really worth, then this simply would not happen.
By the way, I've never once used this "scam." I use Margin Trading every day (if you have it, you use it, that's how the skill works) for cash flow purposes. I trade at a region-wide level always pushing the maximum number of orders. The overall velocity of trade is slower than Jita, meaning that under normal conditions, my cash would stay out of commission a lot longer than I'd like it to.
It seems to me that you're bitter because it took you so long to find out what Margin Trading actually was. And the net result is that you hate the skill because of a usage that is, relative to all the other uses of it (again, this skill is always on once you train it, not something you CHOOSE to use in a given situation) fairly uncommon, albeit particularly annoying if you get duped, and very easy to place the blame on a skill rather than on your own psychological missteps.
I'm not here to downplay the reality that it would be quite obnoxious to lose money this way. All I'm saying is that it's basically impossible to fall for this if you do your market research. It's always been a core element of trading in EVE that if something looks off or suspicious, that's because it probably is. A red flag should go up in your mind. Tasty deals don't just sit around in the wild waiting to be jumped on like that.
Also, as I noted before, nobody in this game has the right for their sell-to-buy arbitrage to play out, even if there's no Margin Trading rug waiting to be pulled out from under them. An order could just as easily be filled mere seconds before you attempt to fill it, thereby leaving you with goods that you can no longer sell to it. Would that be a scam, too? Or would it just be the dumb luck of market trading? How can you really tell the difference? |

Mu-Shi Ai
Ai Capital
124
|
Posted - 2012.05.06 22:29:00 -
[32] - Quote
Callduron wrote:Problem with Margin Trading scams is that it's at least half a UI issue. It's simply unbelievable to have a 50b order for widgets displaying with no money to cover it (after someone removes their own escrow). It's not immersive, the way the mechanic functions in the game is utterly counter-intuitive. If Eve is a story this is a piece of badly written narrative.
Compare with, say, the Jita contract scammers where anyone paying 900m for 2 plex without reading closely what the contract is really offering deserves to lose.
Also I'm not a big fan of mechanics that specifically advantage older players just for learning an idiosyncracy of the interface against clueless newbies. I'm fine with older players victimising newbies, I'd just prefer they didn't do it simply because the software is badly written.
It's not badly-written code. The skill is working as intended. If Margin Trading does not allow you to keep less than the covering amount on-hand, then not only is it no longer useful for the purposes of this "scam," it's also no longer useful for people like myself who use it in regionwide, slow-trading operations where it's not really necessary to always have the covering amount on hand. If you always have to be able to cover a buy order, then the skill is perfectly useless. It literally would have no function whatsoever, beyond the superficial detail of not technically having all that money in escrow. It would basically be in de facto escrow, but still sitting in your wallet. Which would, of course, make the skill more of an annoyance than a help. |

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
179
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 05:28:00 -
[33] - Quote
Mu-Shi Ai wrote:Mars:
And yet, nobody is forcing you to buy that bait once you see it. There is no rule that says you must purchase that massively overpriced crap conspicuously sitting there on sell orders, and then attempt to sell it to that juicy buy order, which is for some reason set even higher, that just so happens to have a minimum unit limit on it.
This is a COMPLETELY psychological trick. The whole thing turns on placing the bait, expecting a random mark to respond to it psychologically (in this case via the rush of finding a "good deal that can make me a lot of money"), and then pulling the rug out from under them at the last minute. If people weren't overly greedy, and generally unaware of what products are really worth, then this simply would not happen.
By the way, I've never once used this "scam." I use Margin Trading every day (if you have it, you use it, that's how the skill works) for cash flow purposes. I trade at a region-wide level always pushing the maximum number of orders. The overall velocity of trade is slower than Jita, meaning that under normal conditions, my cash would stay out of commission a lot longer than I'd like it to.
It seems to me that you're bitter because it took you so long to find out what Margin Trading actually was. And the net result is that you hate the skill because of a usage that is, relative to all the other uses of it (again, this skill is always on once you train it, not something you CHOOSE to use in a given situation) fairly uncommon, albeit particularly annoying if you get duped, and very easy to place the blame on a skill rather than on your own psychological missteps.
I'm not here to downplay the reality that it would be quite obnoxious to lose money this way. All I'm saying is that it's basically impossible to fall for this if you do your market research. It's always been a core element of trading in EVE that if something looks off or suspicious, that's because it probably is. A red flag should go up in your mind. Tasty deals don't just sit around in the wild waiting to be jumped on like that.
Also, as I noted before, nobody in this game has the right for their sell-to-buy arbitrage to play out, even if there's no Margin Trading rug waiting to be pulled out from under them. An order could just as easily be filled mere seconds before you attempt to fill it, thereby leaving you with goods that you can no longer sell to it. Would that be a scam, too? Or would it just be the dumb luck of market trading? How can you really tell the difference?
The only thing I really resent about your posting is calling people greedy for trying to make good trades. Is it greedy to expect a 6 month return on an investment of 2.5 billion ISK to be 1 billion ISK? That's more or less 170 million per month for the effort of managing your market orders and putting up the initial investment which takes you roughly 3 months to get back at minimum.
The thing about these MT scams is that the market history shows buying and selling of these products. Price History as you put it, and that price history supports the trade. They are also not all that profitable in most cases, with-as I said-months to recover the investment and roughly 10-30% profit expected in the end.
It's not as simple as just look and you will see it's fake. It may be as simple as knowing the value of every tradeable item in EVE though. Frankly, I still don't and it keeps changing every day. Alliance Auction - EVE Rogues: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1215438#post1215438 |

Zelda Wei
New Horizon Trade Exchange
107
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 05:39:00 -
[34] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote: Margin Tradings is fckd. I lost 4 billion to it last year
No. You lost because of your own greed and stupidity. |

Mo Fizzle
The Player Haters Corp
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 05:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
Wait, people fall for margin trading tricks  
Every time it crosses my mind I decide against it thinking, "nah, people dumb enough to fall for this probably can't even manage to log into eve".  |

Mu-Shi Ai
Ai Capital
126
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 06:18:00 -
[36] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:The only thing I really resent about your posting is calling people greedy for trying to make good trades. Is it greedy to expect a 6 month return on an investment of 2.5 billion ISK to be 1 billion ISK? That's more or less 170 million per month for the effort of managing your market orders and putting up the initial investment which takes you roughly 3 months to get back at minimum.
The thing about these MT scams is that the market history shows buying and selling of these products. Price History as you put it, and that price history supports the trade. They are also not all that profitable in most cases, with-as I said-months to recover the investment and roughly 10-30% profit expected in the end.
It's not as simple as just look and you will see it's fake. It may be as simple as knowing the value of every tradeable item in EVE though. Frankly, I still don't and it keeps changing every day.
Well, I'm not trying to be mean here, but quite honestly, the classic "Margin Trading scam" involves goods priced possibly in the hundreds percent higher than normal being bought by a mark and sold to an impossibly higher priced buy order. When tools like Eve-Central, not to mention well-known avenues for price checking in game, exist, it's hard to feel sympathy for anybody who falls for this scam. It really is. That's not me being mean. That's me being real.
What bugs me is that people who fall for this scam almost universally believe that an entire game mechanic should be changed just so people like themselves can never be duped again. The lack of understanding these people have of the Margin Trading skill only fuels their determination further for making that happen. So what we have is a campaign that springs from ignorance and gets all its conviction from ignorance. One bad experience, to them, means that other players shouldn't be able to have a useful skill. Does that sound rational to you? |

Wyehr
Magister Corp Talocan United
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 17:40:00 -
[37] - Quote
I would be, I think, pretty much trivial to inactivate any buy orders that don't have sufficient backing to cover the minimum quantity at the stated amount, and that would be pretty reasonable. It would even allow margin trading to continue to be used for legitimate purposes.
Why should the market display orders that it knows cannot be completed? |

Barakach
R-ISK Shadow Operations.
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 19:18:00 -
[38] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote:Perramas wrote:This sounds like the old I was scammed scam looking for some bleeding heart to drop a bunch of ISK on you. If I am wrong the OP will be a valuable lesson to the newer players. Agree I'm not posting this because I want ISK, really I'm bad at managing it as you can tell by my post, this is a warning to others who continue with market trading. BUY orders can be ficticious so trade carefully.
I have 10bil+ of buy orders and 4bil in my wallet. If a large portion of my orders attempted to fill at once, I would go negative and the rest of my orders would instantly call cancel.
Working as intended. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
294
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 19:26:00 -
[39] - Quote
No, as many would fill as possible and then the rest would fail and cancel. It is not possible to go negative with margin trading. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
18
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 19:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
Liberty Eternal wrote:cyndrogen wrote:If I had any stuff left I would give it away, my time in eve has concluded.
Thanks for the fun times but I have to move on.
Cyndrogen 2009-2012 It sucks that the game is designed in this way. It's true that EVE is a game where you can lose to a thief everything you've built up over years of gameplay in a single moment. But just because it is that way, doesn't mean it should be that way.
That is WHY I play EVE and not WOW or AOC. |

Barakach
R-ISK Shadow Operations.
67
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 20:02:00 -
[41] - Quote
corestwo wrote:No, as many would fill as possible and then the rest would fail and cancel. It is not possible to go negative with margin trading.
I was under the impression that you got fined for not covering your orders and this fine would cause you to go negative to some small fixed amount.
My wording was a bit off. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
295
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 20:38:00 -
[42] - Quote
Nope. Doesn't work that way. The order simply fails...if you happen to be online, it will tell you that you don't have enough isk to complete that operation, but that's about it. |

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 20:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Mu-Shi Ai wrote:corestwo wrote:Tell you the truth, I've never scammed in my life. I have all of three suicide ganks to my name, ever. All of my beating up on carebears is done out in 0.0, where they're implicitly consent to PvP, whether they think they have or not.
I still hold that eve should be the way it is, that things like this scam, and thievery in general, and suicide ganking, and so on, should be possible. If you want a game where that kinda stuff isn't allowed, go find one. This one isn't it.
e: Lets be clear here, you're saying that the game, which CCP has designed from day one to allow for the unwary player to lose everything, should not be a game in which you can lose everything. So uh, yeah. I basically agree with you, and yet I don't think that's the reason why this "scam" should be allowed to continue. The reason why it should be allowed to continue is because the game mechanic in question is fully usable for "legitimate" purposes, and really the scam itself has very little functionally to do with the Margin Trading mechanic. It's a totally psychological game, and one that could be played (albeit a bit more time-intensively) even without Margin Trading. Just to give an example of something I'm glad was greatly diminished: Contract scamming. The reason why is because those were mostly scams perpetrated with the help of really poor graphical UI. There was no reason for the UI and graphical elements to be so horrible that they actually contributed to scamming. I'm sure a lot of old contract scammers moaned when the changes hit, but the net result was an actual benefit to players in the form of a more informative UI. With Margin Trading, if we gimped the mechanic in order to satisfy these bitter scam victims, we'd be wrecking the game for a lot of legit players who use Margin Trading for non-scammy purposes. That's why Margin Trading should stay the way it is, not because we need to "preserve the scams" or whatever.
Are you against an info box that says "The following ITEM you are trying to buy has a lack of funds to complete the trade?:"
|

Lauren Hellfury
Full Pocket Aggro
332
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 20:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
Which would be pointless as by then you'd already purchased the seriously overpriced stuff. All it would achieve is stating a reason why it failed rather than the generic "... failed to find a match" one. Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs:-áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 The Full Pocket Aggro blog:-á http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ Now showing: The incursion situation |

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 20:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
Lauren Hellfury wrote:Which would be pointless as by then you'd already purchased the seriously overpriced stuff. All it would achieve is stating a reason why it failed rather than the generic "... failed to find a match" one.
Well, how am I suppose to know then that the BUY order does not have enough funds to cover the trade? What's the point of trading and market orders if the amount shown is not valid? How can I make a good decsion on a buy order when I have no way to tell that the item listed is not covered.
I wish plex could also be margin traded. Man would CCP fail as a company fast! Just think how many people would get to play for free!
This is flat out as bad as RMT in my opnion I see no difference. |

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
Mu-Shi Ai wrote:cyndrogen wrote:very very effective. Can anything be done to get my ISK back or is that it? Nope. No rules were broken. Think about it rationally for a moment and you'll realize that you were the victim of your own greed, and nothing else.
False, I was the victim of an unknown and undocumented game mechanic. I think the real greed is people who margin trade with funds they don't have to try and scam people who do. They are lazy and don't want to run missions and put their time in, and so they get to play for free because the game allows for such activity.
RMT was also a problem and still is with eve online and I think margin trading is just as bad. Because it allows people with little experience and NO ISK to scam and steal from people who pay or put the time into playing the game,.
You can try and argue it all you want but the fact remains that margin trading is just a bad game mechanics because it allows players to put up ficticious buy and sell orders with little to no risk. |

Decidivus Jones
Harriman Trust
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote: Well, how am I suppose to know then that the BUY order does not have enough funds to cover the trade?
"BUY order is placed for 80,000 with a minimum of 20,000 units (also happens to be the total amount needed, )"
This is usually a good indicator... 
cyndrogen wrote:What's the point of trading and market orders if the amount shown is not valid? How can I make a good decsion on a buy order when I have no way to tell that the item listed is not covered.
I still haven't seen a good response to Mu-Shi Ai's comment yet. How do you know someone didn't fill the order before you?
Mu-Shi Ai wrote: If somebody had just happened to fill that order legitimately mere seconds before you did, it would have been the same exact outcome for all you know. There is never any guarantee that a juicy buy order is still going to be there by the time you get around to filling it, whether the order is legit or set up to fail. |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
318
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:08:00 -
[48] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote:False, I was the victim of an unknown and undocumented game mechanic.
False.
|

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:10:00 -
[49] - Quote
Darth Tickles wrote:cyndrogen wrote:False, I was the victim of an unknown and undocumented game mechanic. False.
where is it documented by CCP?
Please point me to the wiki page. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3072
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:11:00 -
[50] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:cyndrogen wrote:False, I was the victim of an unknown and undocumented game mechanic. False. where is it documented by CCP? Please point me to the wiki page. in the text of the skill you nitwit |

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:12:00 -
[51] - Quote
Decidivus Jones wrote:cyndrogen wrote: Well, how am I suppose to know then that the BUY order does not have enough funds to cover the trade?
"BUY order is placed for 80,000 with a minimum of 20,000 units (also happens to be the total amount needed, )" This is usually a good indicator...  cyndrogen wrote:What's the point of trading and market orders if the amount shown is not valid? How can I make a good decsion on a buy order when I have no way to tell that the item listed is not covered. I still haven't seen a good response to Mu-Shi Ai's comment yet. How do you know someone didn't fill the order before you? Mu-Shi Ai wrote: If somebody had just happened to fill that order legitimately mere seconds before you did, it would have been the same exact outcome for all you know. There is never any guarantee that a juicy buy order is still going to be there by the time you get around to filling it, whether the order is legit or set up to fail.
Because the station that placed the BUY order was empty when I docked. THey had to DELIVER the goods in order to collect the ISK placed on the market, since I had bought all of the items in system NO one could have beat me to the order.
PLUS, WHile I was docked the order was still up, meaning no one else could have filled it.
|

Decidivus Jones
Harriman Trust
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
papamike wrote:I dont believe a 3yr old player would be dumb enough to pour every last bit of isk into a single market order and have nothing left to fall back on
Im calling a troll/ melodramatic rage post from someone who isnt in fact 'quiting eve'
If you arent trolling or embellishing your rage-quit, honestly youre a **** and probably wont be missed by anyone.
+1 |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3072
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:13:00 -
[53] - Quote
eve is a game that properly allows those with an information edge to exploit ignorant savages
as you've been exploited i guess we know which side of the divide you fall on |

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:13:00 -
[54] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:cyndrogen wrote:Darth Tickles wrote:cyndrogen wrote:False, I was the victim of an unknown and undocumented game mechanic. False. where is it documented by CCP? Please point me to the wiki page. in the text of the skill you nitwit
Nothing in the text warns about any possible scam genius or that orders will be cancelled. It's very poorly explained and therefore not documented.
Logic try it. |

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
296
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:14:00 -
[55] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote:RMT was also a problem and still is with eve online and I think margin trading is just as bad. Because it allows people with little experience and NO ISK to scam and steal from people who pay or put the time into playing the game,. at margin trading V you still put 23.73% of the isk required for the order's full value into escrow, thus the need for a minimum quantity > 23.73% of the order's value to prevent a savvy player from simply selling them 23% of the order.
next bad argument please? |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
318
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote:Because the station that placed the BUY order was empty when I docked. THey had to DELIVER the goods in order to collect the ISK placed on the market, since I had bought all of the items in system NO one could have beat me to the order.
PLUS, WHile I was docked the order was still up, meaning no one else could have filled it.
1) rofl 2) i call bullshit 3) ignoring 2, the product could be there already and remotely sold 4) wolololol
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3072
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:15:00 -
[57] - Quote
cyndrogen wrote: Nothing in the text warns about any possible scam genius or that orders will be cancelled. It's very poorly explained and therefore not documented.
Logic try it.
interestingly the "give isk" function doesn't contain a long list of ways you might not want to use that option either
guess all scams that involve you giving isk are also "not documented" |

cyndrogen
Occultum Scientia
62
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:17:00 -
[58] - Quote
corestwo wrote:cyndrogen wrote:RMT was also a problem and still is with eve online and I think margin trading is just as bad. Because it allows people with little experience and NO ISK to scam and steal from people who pay or put the time into playing the game,. at margin trading V you still put 23.73% of the isk required for the order's full value into escrow, thus the need for a minimum quantity > 23.73% of the order's value to prevent a savvy player from simply selling them 23% of the order. next bad argument please?
Or they already thought of this, made the order twice as large, and sold to it (losing a little in taxes on the way).
So the Escrow is now completely empty.
|

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3072
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
that you were not led by the hand through all permutations that game mechanics could be used is not them being "undocumented"
ccp has been horrible on documentation for some time but here the issue is you're just a moron
would you like to join goonfleet: we have great newbie programs that will help you avoid common scams
just contract me your stuff to move to deklein and put in an app saying "weaselior applicant" |

Lauren Hellfury
Full Pocket Aggro
332
|
Posted - 2012.05.07 21:18:00 -
[60] - Quote
So you were docked in an empty station and you think that there is no way for anyone else to have sold items at that station without being there....... You really, *really* *REALLY* need to brush up on trading. I'd suggest starting with reading the descriptions of the skills in the trade section of the skill market.
edit: You know you can trust W's offer because he didn't ask for a security deposit. Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs:-áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 The Full Pocket Aggro blog:-á http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ Now showing: The incursion situation |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |