| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Shevar
   |
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:17:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: ErrorS
I'd rather them allow smartbombs in 0.0 around gates.. but add turrets to protect the gates. So once people start smartbombing and hurting the gates, turrets attack whoever is doing it. It doesn't make sense why these people would build gates in these systems without protecting them.
Gate battles are lame. I joined eve to get into some of these large fleet battles you see in videos, but was disapointed when I found out one side most likely camped a gate and waited for someone to jump through, so they could own them before the other side got done loading the system.
I'd be happy if when you go through a jump gate you come out at the other side at a random part in the system nowhere near the gate.. when people wanna fight, they can do it at a station, belt or whatever safespot they're at (i hate safespots :()
havent thought this through completely.. so bleh
Ehm and why and what would you be fighting for exactly? The reason why gates are being used to fight at is well, you use them to travel around block the gates and you block a region basicly. So removing that would make it even more impossible to do any form of controling for example alliance space, or even attacking an alliance since they will have absolutely no troubles what so ever with traveling while you are trying to get them to fight.
Anyways bad bad move to nerf smartbombs, not really usefull if you cant use em 5km from a gate/station and the smartbomb already had horrific limited uses  .
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:17:00 -
[2]
Originally by: ErrorS
I'd rather them allow smartbombs in 0.0 around gates.. but add turrets to protect the gates. So once people start smartbombing and hurting the gates, turrets attack whoever is doing it. It doesn't make sense why these people would build gates in these systems without protecting them.
Gate battles are lame. I joined eve to get into some of these large fleet battles you see in videos, but was disapointed when I found out one side most likely camped a gate and waited for someone to jump through, so they could own them before the other side got done loading the system.
I'd be happy if when you go through a jump gate you come out at the other side at a random part in the system nowhere near the gate.. when people wanna fight, they can do it at a station, belt or whatever safespot they're at (i hate safespots :()
havent thought this through completely.. so bleh
Ehm and why and what would you be fighting for exactly? The reason why gates are being used to fight at is well, you use them to travel around block the gates and you block a region basicly. So removing that would make it even more impossible to do any form of controling for example alliance space, or even attacking an alliance since they will have absolutely no troubles what so ever with traveling while you are trying to get them to fight.
Anyways bad bad move to nerf smartbombs, not really usefull if you cant use em 5km from a gate/station and the smartbomb already had horrific limited uses .
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:18:00 -
[3]
Originally by: cashman
EVE Online is not only a PVP game.
Tell me 5 features which have nothing to do with pvp (direct or indirect)?
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:18:00 -
[4]
Originally by: cashman
EVE Online is not only a PVP game.
Tell me 5 features which have nothing to do with pvp (direct or indirect)?
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:35:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Shevar on 01/09/2004 13:37:02
Originally by: Lady Amira
Avon. that was just plain flinging insults from miso
People only tend to throw insults around when they cant think of a decent arguement
Your point being?
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:35:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Shevar on 01/09/2004 13:37:02
Originally by: Lady Amira
Avon. that was just plain flinging insults from miso
People only tend to throw insults around when they cant think of a decent arguement
Your point being?
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:39:00 -
[7]
Originally by: cashman
That is bullcrap. That is twisting my words.
Because you were refering to a comment about the so called "easiness of avoiding pvp" (see combat pvp). You know this, so please. Use your common sense.
That goes for you too Shevar & Schroni.
But what exactly does this have to do with me?
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
Shevar
|
Posted - 2004.09.01 13:39:00 -
[8]
Originally by: cashman
That is bullcrap. That is twisting my words.
Because you were refering to a comment about the so called "easiness of avoiding pvp" (see combat pvp). You know this, so please. Use your common sense.
That goes for you too Shevar & Schroni.
But what exactly does this have to do with me?
--------
-The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs
|
| |
|