| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
   |
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
Where is the new?
T3 just seemed to have died along with many of CCP's features.
T3 has been out for too long without any new things.... When do we get new toys? |
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
168
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Where is the new?
T3 just seemed to have died along with many of CCP's features.
T3 has been out for too long without any new things.... When do we get new toys?
 Still have 11 days to wait for mine. 
+1 in local |
Nephilius
Knights of Athena
Star Council
410
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
The forum sez...
Ohnomnomnomomnom...delicious poast!
*ahem*
As I was trying to say a minute ago...
When you break ALL of the old toys.
I giggle like a mongoloid midget with a case of the hooker tickles when I see PvP alliances that have built their wealth on PvE endeavors complain about carebears. |
Tillin Sylph
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
46
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 20:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Only Goons get new toys now silly. |
Jack Miton
Bite Me inc
Exhale.
250
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) ) |
Eternum Praetorian
Malum Crusis
783
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )
Yes, let us add more game breaking items to EVE's inventory.
|
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 21:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )
Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS?
Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp.
And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges.
Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Epiphaniess wrote:Jack Miton wrote:I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) ) Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS? Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp. And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges. Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it.
They had planned t3 modules and other t3 stuff, typical CCP, once its a new feature, its patched to nerfinity then let rot. |
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic
Tragedy.
1633
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other.
EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
TECH 3 not TIER 3. *facepalms* |
Gaia Ma'chello
V.I.C.E.
Comic Mischief
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:14:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP stopped adding major new features after Incarna when everyone complained that CCP was wasting time on new features when there was so much broken stuff.
Maybe its time to have a little balance? Say equal effort on:
New features
Improving game play
Iterating existing features
Fixing bugs |
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Epiphaniess wrote:Jack Miton wrote:I loled :D
(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) ) Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS? Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp. And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges. Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it. They had planned t3 modules and other t3 stuff, typical CCP, once its a new feature, its patched to nerfinity then let rot.
It does appear at times that CCP has a habit of putting something in the game then forgetting about it. What it really is it takes them a really long time to get back to it. I don't know if that is bad or good or both but it is frustrating. Ask the Faction Warfare people. But it may not be so bad, you don't want to break the game to much to often for that will frustrate people as well.
It would be nice to see some T3 modules and other T3 stuff. But the reason we have not yet is that anything like that would probably out shine T1 so much and make T2 the ugly red head middle child, that it would cause a whole lot of issues.
T3 modules would need to be a whole new distinct entity, not just better preforming versions of what we got currently.
Maybe the player base should think of suggestions? |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:20:00 -
[13] - Quote
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:CCP stopped adding major new features after Incarna when everyone complained that CCP was wasting time on new features when there was so much broken stuff.
Maybe its time to have a little balance? Say equal effort on:
New features
Improving game play
Iterating existing features
Fixing bugs
Uhh this was long before Incarna. AND we are heading right back to Incarna, take a look at SiSi, more new NEX items.
YELLOW FONT business plan is still in effect, microtransactions are on the way again. |
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
354
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.
In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now". |
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other.
That might be one of the reasons why CCP is planing on moving away from the Tier system. In the future revamping of all the ships.
|
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Epiphaniess wrote:Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other. That might be one of the reasons why CCP is planing on moving away from the Tier system. In the future revamping of all the ships.
Guess I will sell all my ships now then. |
Miss Yanumano
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise. In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now".
Their current road map seems to say "We're going back to fix all this **** that have accumulated over the years", which is also one of the most requested "feature" of all time, seems all good to me, when they're done fixing most **** they can add new content, otherwise all you get is buggy feature creep. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Miss Yanumano wrote:Miilla wrote:Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise. In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now". Their current road map seems to say "We're going back to fix all this **** that have accumulated over the years", which is also one of the most requested "feature" of all time, seems all good to me, when they're done fixing most **** they can add new content, otherwise all you get is buggy feature creep.
Ahh yes, that's why there is new NEX pants on SiSi right now. |
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
354
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:25:00 -
[20] - Quote
They have a small dedicated team for the avatar experience and they would continue to put in new NEX items or update avatars as they get down with features like arm tattoos. This has been known, this is not news, this started out as a almost valid topic for once yet now its just down to whining at CCP per usual. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
309
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:26:00 -
[21] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:They have a small dedicated team for the avatar experience and they would continue to put in new NEX items or update avatars as they get down with features like arm tattoos. This has been known, this is not news, this started out as a almost valid topic for once yet now its just down to whining at CCP per usual.
Just like you are doing right now. Whining about my threads as usual, don't like em, don't read em. |
Miss Yanumano
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:26:00 -
[22] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Miss Yanumano wrote:Miilla wrote:Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise. In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now". Their current road map seems to say "We're going back to fix all this **** that have accumulated over the years", which is also one of the most requested "feature" of all time, seems all good to me, when they're done fixing most **** they can add new content, otherwise all you get is buggy feature creep. Ahh yes, that's why there is new NEX pants on SiSi right now.
You realize CCP have different departments for different feature sets right?
|
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
512
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.
The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.
Modular POS...LOL that has been talked about and on the "list" for so long, it must be in the same area of revamping mining and a few other legacies.
But it is something that would be nice and probably should be done. |
BuckStrider
Gladiators of Rage
Intrepid Crossing
59
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 22:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Where is the new?
T3 just seemed to have died along with many of CCP's features.
T3 has been out for too long without any new things.... When do we get new toys?
They'll address this in 18 monthsGäó |
Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal
Terran Commonwealth
104
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 23:03:00 -
[25] - Quote
I hate the principle of T3, Why train a Cerberus when I can get a tengu with twice the tank and 4 times the damage at only a slight reduction in range? T3 is putting a lot of ships into the waste basket. I could fly a tengu in less than 2 hours, and fly it well in a few weeks. |
Boomhaur
46
|
Posted - 2012.05.10 23:48:00 -
[26] - Quote
I want a T3 Frigate, mine as well the cruisers were overpowered mine as well give us the Frigs and BC's. And I say don't show any love the BS's with the rate were going those things would only replace Titans and motherhships anyway. |
Markus Reese
Debitum Naturae
ROMANIAN-LEGION
172
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 01:43:00 -
[27] - Quote
I am sure T3 are coming after all the other many outdated things they are currently working on. FW overhaul, long over due. Soundwave talked the modular pos.
I guess nobody flogged a dead horse long enough to see that it actually can come to life, hopefully as a mythological god of hellfire!
Other ships need long time balancing.
Then T3 again. |
Tobiaz
Spacerats
393
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 11:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
T3 should have been endgame stuff. Instead everyone and their mom can fly them now and this leaves everyone bored.
Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!-á Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt
Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors! |
OmniBeton
OmniBeton Metatech
8
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 11:31:00 -
[29] - Quote
Demanding a new toy is a sign that :
a) Old toys were crappy
b) You are big child that don't know what he really want ... oh wait |
Lexmana
Imperial Stout
431
|
Posted - 2012.05.11 11:31:00 -
[30] - Quote
Next new ship is almost certainly a destroyer hull - maybe even as a surprise in Inferno - so they can introduce the new ship lines. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |