| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Loki Farseer
F9X
Wildly Inappropriate.
   |
Posted - 2009.12.29 08:30:00 -
[331]
Nope no Scorps needed either.
|
Akaike
The Bentusi Legacy
|
Posted - 2009.12.29 08:38:00 -
[332]
Hells yes, supported
|
Tappits
Priory Of The Lemon
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.12.29 11:56:00 -
[333]
Supported.
What gets me is that Privateer Alliance are the ones asking for this yet there the ones i see use this the most.
----------------------------------------------
I fail At forums
٩๏̯͡๏)۶ |
Jared Ulfsuun
|
Posted - 2009.12.29 17:08:00 -
[334]
|
Cearain
|
Posted - 2009.12.29 18:17:00 -
[335]
Spas
I see the point you made and would be open to the idea that if you are repping someone in your corp or alliance the rules should be different. I mean from a scouting perspective the enemy could see you had those reppers before engaging.
However, I still think repping someone who is engaged in combat should be counted as aggression. Maybe there could be a rule that would say that repping someone that is not aggressing (other than by repping) would not trigger a new agression countdown. In other words make it so reppers are in the fight at least as much as the guy they are repping but not necessarily more than that. There are various ways they could work that out. But I'm not sure its necessary or good. I'm just saying there are other options.
Heres an example of how it might work. You and your corpmates are in a rr bs gang on a gate. Some sniping bses come and hit one of your gang. As long as he doesn't attack them you guys would all be able to rep him and still jump through the gate. But if he starts firing back and then you all rep him you are all then agressed.
Your situation could have various rules that apply. I would suggest that repping itself does not trigger a new aggression countdown *unless* the person you repped still had an aggression countdown based on the current agro rules. So if you rep someone who has 2 seconds left on their aggro pursuant to the current rules you would earn yourself a whole new timer. But when you rep that person in your next cycle say 10 seconds later that rep would not add to your timer at all. If someone repped you and you were only repping then they would inherit the same countdown you have - no more no less.
The current mechanic is so bad anything would be an improvement. However, I think if they are going to fix this they should just get it right.
|
Arcane Azmadi
First Flying Wing Inc
Primary.
|
Posted - 2009.12.30 03:02:00 -
[336]
Edited by: Arcane Azmadi on 30/12/2009 03:03:32
Supported. For all intents and purposes, remote repping alts are virtually an exploit at the moment- blatant abuse of a glaringly obvious oversight in the game design.
|
Zeveron
Destructive Influence
IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.12.30 11:48:00 -
[337]
Not that I care much but it currently it seems broken.
Supported.
________________________________________________
|
Jugger Takashi
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 18:49:00 -
[338]
Oh yeah
|
flakeys
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 18:51:00 -
[339]
Fully support this
|
S'Way
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 18:56:00 -
[340]
Supported. |
Shodai
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 18:59:00 -
[341]
I aggree all the way!!! Supported
|
Er4lyn
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 20:58:00 -
[342]
Fully supported! I'd also like to see something done to those who use nuet Orcas to avoid losses. If a hostile docks in a nuet Orca, the Orca should gain aggression.
|
CyberGh0st
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2010.02.18 16:18:00 -
[343]
This sounds logical, supported
http://www.mmodata.net
Favorite MMO's : DAoC Pre-TOA-NF / SWG Pre-CU-NGE |
Zommari Jiruga
Security Status Negative
Cookie Nation
|
Posted - 2010.02.18 16:57:00 -
[344]
|
The PitBoss
Caldari
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:36:00 -
[345]
Back to the top for the NEW CSM to take a look at this ...
Thank-You,
The Pitboss (Space between The & Pitboss)
Signatures by: Kalen Vox |
Xa'leb
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 16:27:00 -
[346]
Supported
|
tezza22
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 16:27:00 -
[347]
i support this 100%
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises
Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 16:40:00 -
[348]
This was passed almost a year ago.
Anyone have a status update on it?
This signature is useless, but it is red.
|
Lord Molly
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 16:57:00 -
[349]
supported 100%
|
Xe na
Privateers
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 17:10:00 -
[350]
|
darkdecyple
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 17:15:00 -
[351]
Edited by: darkdecyple on 06/05/2010 17:16:41
 |
Oni Tweak
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 17:35:00 -
[352]
Supported
|
Yusei Fudo
Minmatar
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 17:56:00 -
[353]
I agree, anyone that helps a target under a act of agression needs to be flagged aswell. Last that I know a -10 pirate can't get support from a alt/ rr cause the support gets flagged to and nuked by sentrys cause you are helping an Outlaw. So its ok for the good guys to have 100+ alts with rr setups to hunt Outlaws and suffer no crimial flags. LoL, lil unfair and exploit. And especially in Empire Warfare
/support
|
nautix
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 19:35:00 -
[354]
100% behind this idea.
|
Jin'Mei Caste
Garoun Investment Bank
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 20:33:00 -
[355]
1000% supported
|
RedFiber
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 20:56:00 -
[356]
1001% supported
|
Eva Glentis
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 22:12:00 -
[357]
|
Lmagno
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 22:27:00 -
[358]
Supported
|
Rico Felix
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 22:39:00 -
[359]
|
Amrikan
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 23:20:00 -
[360]
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |