| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
The PitBoss
Caldari
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
   |
Posted - 2009.05.19 17:04:00 -
[1]
Edited by: The PitBoss on 19/05/2009 17:05:35
Please look into the mechanics of Neutral/Alt remote repping and their Aggression.
Current Game Mechanic
A Neutral/Alt remote repper can rep someone under attack.
The repper is aggro'd to the attacker.
The repper DOES NOT get an aggression timer in the effect that they may DOCK UP -or- JUMP through a gate leaving them half assed free for sticking their nose into a fight.
There is no real risk for the repper and he may disengage after turning the tide of a battle at ANY TIME.
Suggested Fix
NORMAL aggression timer when concerning DOCKING & Gate JUMPING.
Thank-You,
The Pitboss (Space between The & Pitboss)
Signatures by: Kalen Vox |
Fille Balle
Dissolution Of Eternity
Ethikos Trade Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 14:40:00 -
[2]
Suggested fix that is already implemented:
1. stop pvp'ing in empire
2. stop playing station games
3. ??????????????????????????
4. profit!
No need for additional fixes.
Not supported.
|
Tyleritus
Pigs In Space United Proletariat
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:40:00 -
[3]
Supported
60 Day GTC's |
Dimension Overlord
Pigs In Space United Proletariat
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:45:00 -
[4]
supported 100% |
McAcabtr
Pigs In Space United Proletariat
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:47:00 -
[5]
I heard this was classed as common sense is this why its not been implemented with the rest of the aggression mechanics? |
sukmanobov
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:48:00 -
[6]
Edited by: sukmanobov on 20/05/2009 23:49:08
supported.
Repping alts have a easy life. time to shake it up alittle buy giving them agrrestion timers,
don't forget that RR ships don't need guns if your just repping so you can have a huge tank to wait out the agression timer.
I don't see the problem with them getting agression timers.
Adding and abetting the enemy!
|
ElvisKlump
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:50:00 -
[7]
Adding my support i'm looking forward to starting eve 100% and when I do i'm going to War Dec. |
Sombra Escarlate
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:51:00 -
[8]
1.war declarations are there to allow PvP in empire woot woot but your belief that we only PvP in empire is wrong to start with 
2.so i suppose no one EVER camps a station in low sec or 0.0 mmm o.0
3.
4.thx for the lootz \o/
i support this so that anyone getting involved in a fight has the same jeopardy as anyone else involved in the war
|
V0rtigern
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:55:00 -
[9]
If you interfere with a PVP action you deserve the same consequence this is EvE after all, actions must have a consequence! |
XapiD
|
Posted - 2009.05.20 23:59:00 -
[10]
Supported.
|
|
|
morpherio
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 00:17:00 -
[11]
makes sense!
|
Angela Constantine
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 01:14:00 -
[12]
|
Kretin
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 01:23:00 -
[13]
Definitely supported
|
Yarik Mendel
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 02:08:00 -
[14]
supported
|
Kilz0r
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 02:50:00 -
[15]
this is so broken right now, anyone can screw with anyone's fight without a shred of consequence.
supported.
|
Greenlike ish
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 05:05:00 -
[16]
I support
|
Ignition SemperFi
The Arrow Project
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 05:40:00 -
[17]
supported as long as its only docking and gate jumping aggression that comes into play.
just like if you rep someone with a GCC, the remote repper gets a gcc.
It shouldnt bring concord though if you rep someone, due to abuse, just the aggression timer
----
People Say Im paranoid because I have a gun, I say I dont have to be paranoid because I have a gun.
Space Vikings |
Brother Agenos
Radioactive Battle Bunnies
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 08:19:00 -
[18]
supported
|
Gigolo Jo
Gallente
Method of Destruction
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 09:51:00 -
[19]
supported
|
Hardin
Imperial Dreams
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 11:36:00 -
[20]
 Originally by: Ignition SemperFi
supported as long as its only docking and gate jumping aggression that comes into play.
just like if you rep someone with a GCC, the remote repper gets a gcc.
It shouldnt bring concord though if you rep someone, due to abuse, just the aggression timer
Agreed and supported
-----
Alliance Creation/Corp Expansion Services
http://internetspacewars.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
Soldis
Privateers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 12:23:00 -
[21]
supported
|
Lee Dalton
Beyond Suppression
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 12:37:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Lee Dalton on 21/05/2009 12:37:02
Supported yet again.
***
You're only as good as your last fight. |
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 12:41:00 -
[23]
Dear God supported!
---
Zombie Apocalypse Guitar-Wielding Superteam |
Xiaodown
Guiding Hand Social Club
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 13:20:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Hardin
Originally by: Ignition SemperFi
supported as long as its only docking and gate jumping aggression that comes into play.
just like if you rep someone with a GCC, the remote repper gets a gcc.
It shouldnt bring concord though if you rep someone, due to abuse, just the aggression timer
Agreed and supported
Supporting this because it needs to be supported. And because Hardin is cool.
--
|
boardin
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 14:37:00 -
[25]
Supported
|
Johncrab
Covenant of Asylum
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 14:44:00 -
[26]
Agreed, supported and shouting for changes
|
Fille Balle
Dissolution Of Eternity
Ethikos Trade Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 15:38:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Sombra Escarlate
1.war declarations are there to allow PvP in empire woot woot but your belief that we only PvP in empire is wrong to start with
2.so i suppose no one EVER camps a station in low sec or 0.0 mmm o.0
3.
4.thx for the lootz \o/
i support this so that anyone getting involved in a fight has the same jeopardy as anyone else involved in the war
1. Never said any such thing. Whatever you're smoking, stop smoking it. I just said stop doing it in empire.
2. Lowsec is also part empire fyi. Many systems in 0.0 don't have stations in them, and you can shoot whoever you like in 0.0, without worrying about concord. Besides, I never said any such thing. I said: stop playing station games. Problem solved.
3. Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to startle you
4. As long as you're in empire, you won't get any of my loot
0/10 try again
|
Political Prisoner
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 15:41:00 -
[28]
risk -vs- reward ... imbalance here ... support
Respectfully,
Political Prisoner
|
Sacha Sinclair
Twilight Fleet
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 17:26:00 -
[29]
|
spinarax
Method of Destruction
Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.05.21 17:30:00 -
[30]
/supported
Originally by: Fille Balle
Suggested fix that is already implemented:
1. stop pvp'ing in empire
2. stop playing station games
3. ??????????????????????????
4. profit!
No need for additional fixes.
Not supported.
this also involves gates and do you even understand agro mechanics? this have nothing to do with where you pvp.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |