Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Bienator II
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
130
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 21:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
any progress on that one? http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=910 http://eve-search.com/thread/1519112/page/9#262 rocket science is kindergarden. Thats serious spaceship business! |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 22:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
I too would love to know the status of this highly desired feature |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
91

|
Posted - 2011.09.15 22:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'll go fish and get back to you tomorrow  CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
88
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 22:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I'll go fish and get back to you tomorrow  Got a shark bait? Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Crasniya
Dragon's Legion of New Eden
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 22:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Adding support for badly desired feature. |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
32
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 22:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
Wasn't there also a possibility of BM brackets in space?
Either way, this is a much needed feature. |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 23:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
<3 CCP Guard!! Thanks, this is definitely something we need. Aligning to bookmarks was a great start - but they really do belong as an overview setting as well.
Looking forward to it... |

Spurty
V0LTA VOLTA Corp
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.15 23:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bring back bookmarking missiles!
Nothing like using a cerb's only weapon system against him ;-)
Actually would like to be able to warp to drones as well now I thinkn of it ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Sadayiel
Inner Conflict
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 00:07:00 -
[9] - Quote
didn't some dev said there was some issue with about how Bm works and that there should be a full redo of them??
Altought i'm not 100% sure if it was about Bm on overview or about remove th wtz feature |

Levarris Hawk
Axis of Blood
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 00:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I'll go fish and get back to you tomorrow 
By this he is admitting he will be dodging work in order to go fishing tomorrow, someone alert his boss. |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
33
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 11:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
How was the fishing? |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
104

|
Posted - 2011.09.16 12:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Razin wrote:How was the fishing?
It was pleasant thank you.
We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when".
I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P
*bites tongue* CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|

KaarBaak
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 12:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue*
You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype.
EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation.
Stop talking, start doing. |

Crasniya
Dragon's Legion of New Eden
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 12:58:00 -
[14] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype.
If they might be about to announce a revamp of the bookmarks system, it'd be worth the wait. |

Komen
Capital Enrichment Services
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 13:11:00 -
[15] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue* You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype. EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation. Stop talking, start doing.
This. Well said. The list of 'promised vs. delivered features' is really, at this point, appalling. CCP could make entire expansions of the 'left on the drawing board features' that never made it in. Stuff that the playerbase was really, REALLY eager for (and some not so much, but still).
Also I'd like to re-iterate my position now, which I might just make into a sig, that the proposed null-sec revamp is fine, dandy, great, whatever. But within that re-vamp, low-sec should be included and have distinct characteristics/activities assigned as well. Otherwise it will be left as it currently is - a broken area of the game with the worst attributes of null-sec and high-sec combined. |

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 13:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
You guys would prefer CCP downplays or vilifies everything it does instead?
I can just see it now...
"Guys, we have a few features coming out at some point before hell freezes over, you will probably all claim you hate it anyways, yet somehow we will find you logged on every night hitting it like a hot prom date in a hotel room. But that is neither here nor there, /yawn. Anyways, stuff, sometime, I'm bored already. Later."

I always adore all the 'Do not advertise your own product you fools!" responses from people.
Classic. ...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie. |

KaarBaak
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 13:38:00 -
[17] - Quote
Mendolus wrote:"Guys, we have a few features coming out at some point before hell freezes over, you will probably all claim you hate it anyways, yet somehow we will find you logged on every night hitting it like a hot prom date in a hotel room. But that is neither here nor there, /yawn. Anyways, stuff, sometime, I'm bored already. Later."  I always adore all the 'Do not advertise your own product you fools!" responses from people. Classic.
Yes...the truth hurts when you say it out loud. You'd rather they continue to blow smoke up your ass?
I like the game. I don't like devs over-hyping upcoming updates. That's what creates the cynicism.
|

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.16 13:49:00 -
[18] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:Mendolus wrote:"Guys, we have a few features coming out at some point before hell freezes over, you will probably all claim you hate it anyways, yet somehow we will find you logged on every night hitting it like a hot prom date in a hotel room. But that is neither here nor there, /yawn. Anyways, stuff, sometime, I'm bored already. Later."  I always adore all the 'Do not advertise your own product you fools!" responses from people. Classic. Yes...the truth hurts when you say it out loud. You'd rather they continue to blow smoke up your ass? I like the game. I don't like devs over-hyping upcoming updates. That's what creates the cynicism.
You missed the point, sorry.
...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie. |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
49
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 19:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mendolus wrote:KaarBaak wrote:Mendolus wrote:"Guys, we have a few features coming out at some point before hell freezes over, you will probably all claim you hate it anyways, yet somehow we will find you logged on every night hitting it like a hot prom date in a hotel room. But that is neither here nor there, /yawn. Anyways, stuff, sometime, I'm bored already. Later."  I always adore all the 'Do not advertise your own product you fools!" responses from people. Classic. Yes...the truth hurts when you say it out loud. You'd rather they continue to blow smoke up your ass? I like the game. I don't like devs over-hyping upcoming updates. That's what creates the cynicism. You missed the point, sorry. That's 'cause your point had shit-all to do with reality. As per usual. |

Andrea Griffin
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 19:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
I hope that the bookmarks-in-space system will allow me to specify which bookmarks I would like to see in space. In some systems I have 20+ bookmarks (sorry CCP, I abuse your database terribly, I hope I'm not a bad person) but only regularly use a few of them. |

Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
206
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 19:19:00 -
[21] - Quote
Mendolus wrote: You missed the point, sorry.
Your point was dumb so it's ok.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
511
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 19:19:00 -
[22] - Quote
Mendolus wrote: You missed the point, sorry.
Your point was dumb so it's ok.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum
96
|
Posted - 2011.09.26 19:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:SoonGäó*
*SoonGäó can mean anywhere from 18 months to 5 years or never.
Fyp
|

Chuck Do Ceti
4 Corners Trading Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.01 04:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
It's now October, still no word? |

mkint
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.01 07:05:00 -
[25] - Quote
Andrea Griffin wrote:I hope that the bookmarks-in-space system will allow me to specify which bookmarks I would like to see in space. In some systems I have 20+ bookmarks (sorry CCP, I abuse your database terribly, I hope I'm not a bad person) but only regularly use a few of them. This.
I'm not sure why people don't see this being an issue nerfing the usability of the proposed feature. In all honesty, I'll probably leave it turned off if it's a simple overview thing, except for the rare instances I have more than 2 or 3 bookmarks on grid. P&P will still be the easiest way to use bookmarks, especially with an overview full of moving ships. P&P also has the benefit of sorting by folders (btw CCP, I still think it was a jackass move to take away our other folders and replace them with *labels*... I ignore the feature in gmail and it's just as crappy in EVE.) Not saying the bookmarks on overview will be bad... just saying I don't think it's going to be as useful as people seem to think it's going to be, unless the bookmark overhaul is even bigger than previously discussed. |

Griznatch
Xicron Syndicate
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 21:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
Any word on this? |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.17 21:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
Komen wrote:KaarBaak wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue* You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype. EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation. Stop talking, start doing. This. Well said. The list of 'promised vs. delivered features' is really, at this point, appalling. CCP could make entire expansions of the 'left on the drawing board features' that never made it in. Stuff that the playerbase was really, REALLY eager for (and some not so much, but still). Also I'd like to re-iterate my position now, which I might just make into a sig, that the proposed null-sec revamp is fine, dandy, great, whatever. But within that re-vamp, low-sec should be included and have distinct characteristics/activities assigned as well. Otherwise it will be left as it currently is - a broken area of the game with the worst attributes of null-sec and high-sec combined.
While I am in COMPLETE agreement with the last paragraph of your post, I must point out that just because something in mentioned to be on the drawing board, or something they are considering, or "it would be nice if we could" does NOT make it a promise.
This board has a very nasty habit of taking an offhand comment and turning it into a promise CCP hand chiseled into stone tablets.
This point is more directed at KaarBaak than it is at you, as he appears to not only be a master of making a promise out of a casual mention... but also of the deadly art of pulling creatively made up "internet statistics" out of his ass.
To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

TaterRoller
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
Any word on this feature CCP Guard? |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
38
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:
If they might be about to announce a revamp of the bookmarks system, it'd be worth the wait.
If you check back on various Dev Blogs and Posts you'll find several devs stating less than impressed comments on the current BM system.
However they have also admitted that revamping the BM system wouldn't be that much of a revamp, it would be take down and rewrite.
So it's all about allocating dev resources to redo something that doesn't (initially) adds that much new, just cleans up "less than impressive design decitions" from the past.
We know that as Carbon(tm) and we also know a bit of the funky side effects (ie wierd bugs) that such rewrite normally gives us ;)
|

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
80
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 14:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: This board has a very nasty habit of taking an offhand comment and turning it into a promise CCP hand chiseled into stone tablets.
The BMs in overview feature was not an "offhand comment". It was a promise made by CCP Soundwave back in the spring of this year. This was touted as an important item of one of the team BFF signature patches, somewhat delayed due to 'stuff' at the time. |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
435
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:07:00 -
[31] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:
Yes...the truth hurts when you say it out loud. You'd rather they continue to blow smoke up your ass?
I like the game. I don't like devs over-hyping upcoming updates. That's what creates the cynicism.
I agree completely. My frustration over the Faction Warfare debacle isn't that they aren't fixing it fast enough, its that they keep mentioning it, than refusing to release any details. Players at this point feel like they're giving feedback to a brick wall.
It'd be a lot easier if they just said, "we're too busy right now, maybe in the future...." instead of mentioning it in a list than not following through or even talking about it.
|

Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:You see....we're planning. BIG time!
dang! Am I the only one that's excited over this? |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
90
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 17:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
KaarBaak wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue* You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype. EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation. Stop talking, start doing.
Clearly you have not worked in a software development role before.
Believe me, it always seems easy but when you get down to the code, it takes longer.
Then comes testing - whereby you have to make sure you didn't break anything.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
194
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 18:18:00 -
[34] - Quote
Razin wrote:Ranger 1 wrote: This board has a very nasty habit of taking an offhand comment and turning it into a promise CCP hand chiseled into stone tablets.
The BMs in overview feature was not an "offhand comment". It was a promise made by CCP Soundwave back in the spring of this year. This was touted as an important item of one of the team BFF signature patches, somewhat delayed due to 'stuff' at the time.
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
The post was in response to someone pretty much going off the deep end, making wild accusations and generalizations about a lot of things (not just the bookmark issue)... so I'm going to stand by the point I made. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
80
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 18:46:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
It was in the patch notes for a May 2011 BFF patch. Then it was removed with a "will be added in a later patch" explanation from Fallout; and that's when CCP Soundwave added that they are "fixing it as we speak though". Pretty much a promise.
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
194
|
Posted - 2011.11.03 19:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Razin wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
It was in the patch notes for a May 2011 BFF patch. Then it was removed with a "will be added in a later patch" explanation from Fallout; and that's when CCP Soundwave added that they are "fixing it as we speak though". Pretty much a promise.
In that particular case agreed. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

KaarBaak
140
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 00:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Razin wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:
I remember it being mentioned, I did not remember it being promised... at least not promised to be delivered within a specific time frame. You could very well be correct, it's been awhile.
It was in the patch notes for a May 2011 BFF patch. Then it was removed with a "will be added in a later patch" explanation from Fallout; and that's when CCP Soundwave added that they are "fixing it as we speak though". Pretty much a promise. In that particular case agreed.
Apology accepted.
|

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
138
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
You guys notice corp bookmarks on sisi? |

Bienator II
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
248
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:08:00 -
[39] - Quote
non judgement wrote:You guys notice corp bookmarks on sisi? yes but thats off topic You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
138
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 01:10:00 -
[40] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:non judgement wrote:You guys notice corp bookmarks on sisi? yes but thats off topic Its only slightly off topic. At least it shows they are doing things with bookmarks. |

Mistress Lilu
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:37:00 -
[41] - Quote
This feature would be awesome...make it happen CCP, what do I pay your for. |

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
139
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 02:52:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mistress Lilu wrote:This feature would be awesome...make it happen CCP, what do I pay your for. Why are you asking what do you pay their for? If you paid their for something, I'd think you'd know what you paid.
You pay a private company for game time. They use the money for lots of things. One of those things happens to be developing things for you. If I remember correctly the money that you gave them went to CCP people who moderate the forums. |

Algathas
Drama Llamas
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 05:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
Yes please! I was in a situation just the other day where I was thinking "what happened to that proposed bookmarks on overview feature". |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
98
|
Posted - 2011.11.13 19:49:00 -
[44] - Quote
Sill no word from CCP... How about it Sounwave, it was your promise. |

Shaera Taam
Minmatar Death Squad Broken Chains Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 02:42:00 -
[45] - Quote
yeah, it would be nice to hear /something/ esp after guard's remarks back in september sigh...
Thus Spake the Frigate Goddess! |

Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises The Silent One's
113
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 04:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
I would like to have bookmarks show up as HUD icons, like other celestials/stations/etc |

Komen
Capital Enrichment Services
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 14:20:00 -
[47] - Quote
Not empty bumpin'.
Ranger1, I agree, a lot of people conflate 'proposed features' with 'promises'. The trouble is that CCP has had the bad habit of giving out a list of features in development early on, then some drop, then some more, then more still. What we end up with at the end, in the published expansion, seems like pretty thin gruel.
Crucible, on the other hand, is an expansion with excellent advertising. A couple of features haven't made the final cut (assault frigs being the one I can think of) but lots, and lots, and lots of stuff appears to be on Sisi right now, and even in functional, working condition.
Anyways...CCP Guard! I summon thee! Go fishing please! We hunger for updates! |

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
148
|
Posted - 2011.11.20 15:37:00 -
[48] - Quote
Komen wrote:KaarBaak wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Razin wrote:How was the fishing? It was pleasant thank you. We are going to finish this feature and put it on TQ, the only question right now is "when". I spoke to Team BFF who own this feature and as I suspected, an ETA is hard to get right now for the exact same reason that ETAs on other feature have been hard to come by in the last couple of weeks. You see....we're planning. BIG time! And we basically can't wait to tell you more about all that. But right now it's hard to give substantial information about specific features so I'm just gonna bite my tongue and keep you all in suspense for just a LITTLE while longer. Sorry about that :P *bites tongue* You guys say this ALL the time. It has yet to live up to the hype. EDIT: 50% of the BIG things get pulled prior to patch. 30% make it ti Sisi, but not TQ. 15% make it to patch notes, but then get pushed off for unforeseen problems (eg this thread) never to be seen again. 5% make it to TQ bugged. Leaving us with maybe 10% of the original plan making it into the game. Not to mention the things that break as a result of that implementation. Stop talking, start doing. This. Well said. The list of 'promised vs. delivered features' is really, at this point, appalling. CCP could make entire expansions of the 'left on the drawing board features' that never made it in. Stuff that the playerbase was really, REALLY eager for (and some not so much, but still). Also I'd like to re-iterate my position now, which I might just make into a sig, that the proposed null-sec revamp is fine, dandy, great, whatever. But within that re-vamp, low-sec should be included and have distinct characteristics/activities assigned as well. Otherwise it will be left as it currently is - a broken area of the game with the worst attributes of null-sec and high-sec combined.
I agree, and they should name the patch Crucible.
It's not Rocket Surgery |

Komen
Capital Enrichment Services
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 15:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
Zagdul wrote:I agree, and they should name the patch Crucible.
I see what you did thar.  |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |