Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
El Liptonez
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 16:47:00 -
[61]
No support. Delay local if you don't want macros.
|
Oarta
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 17:44:00 -
[62]
Covert Ops Cloaks should not be able to be scanned down. The ships which fit them have their specific roles and the drawback in defense.
However, I support a difficult method of probing down the other types of cloak. It should not be easy, but it should be possible. The strategic value of having intel and causing fear in system by just being present and cloaked is quite valuable. However, the drawbacks of the Non-Covert Ops cloaking devices are not severe enough for the additional combat gain you can have by fielding an invisible gang. This is especially enforced on ships which do not need to actually target like HICs or Interdictors.
Normal Defense would allow for use of choke points, like stations or gates, to spot or tackle Non-Covert Ops ships. This defense is nullified if a player can just stage themselves cloaked in a system.
Increase the risk of detection to balance out the benefits afforded.
|
Hester Shaw
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 18:14:00 -
[63]
Not fussed about high-skills probing of basic cloakers.
However, you should NOT be able to probe down someone using a covert ops cloak. End of story.
|
Bellum Eternus
Gallente Death of Virtue MeatSausage EXPRESS
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 19:42:00 -
[64]
Not supported. Power creep isn't needed.
Bellum Eternus Inveniam viam aut faciam.
Death of Virtue is Recruiting
|
Sir Muffoon
Debitum Naturae
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 19:50:00 -
[65]
Not supported. This completely destroys the point of being cloaked. |
Lord Aftermath
The Aftermath.
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 20:12:00 -
[66]
Absolutely not.
|
Aniel Zaar
Gallente Light of Orion
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 22:37:00 -
[67]
Ships using Covert Ops cloak should be able to remain hidden for as long as they please, since scouting is their intended role. Other ships using different cloaks - not sure. Other cloaks already have huge battle drawbacks, I don't think they need to be further nerfed. *-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^*-*^-^ By the way, I am an Ishtar and T2 sentries fan. Fight to make the sentry damage rig work for all drones. |
Stil Harkonnen
|
Posted - 2009.08.10 22:43:00 -
[68]
lol. no
|
W3370Pi4
|
Posted - 2009.08.12 05:50:00 -
[69]
_______ Join the "Legit Trading"Channel *Scam Free Trading Channel* |
Hanster Maluki
|
Posted - 2009.08.12 13:18:00 -
[70]
Not supported!
|
|
Czar Vilinous
A Fortiori
|
Posted - 2009.08.13 17:59:00 -
[71]
No support.
This and the fuel idea are bad ideas. |
159Pinky
Trans-Solar Works Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2009.08.14 10:27:00 -
[72]
Maybe for non-specific ships yes, but for those ships who are created to operate "behing enemy lines" ( such as black ops, recons, covert ops and stealth bombers ) I don't think it should work. These could have a special hull to absorb the waves of your scanning device to render them unscannable whilst their cloack is activated. For other ships, sure why not?
|
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.08.14 10:48:00 -
[73]
Originally by: 159Pinky For other ships, sure why not?
Because those other ships are already incurring massive penalties from the cloak. It's already balanced. ~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |