Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. Sticky:[Citadels] Capital Q&A - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Esteban Dragonovic wrote: Any thoughts about the Capital Remote Armor/Shield/Energy transfer skills? Considering the logistics role is being stripped from carriers entirely, most carrier pilots (those that didn't intend ...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.11.16 04:57:37
|
2. Sticky:[Citadels] Capital Q&A - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Thanks for answering some more questions. Hope you guys will keep up feeding us information.
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.11.13 17:13:13
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Building your Citadel, one block at a time - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
aldhura wrote: Valterra Craven wrote: Ytterbium, much like the industry changes a while back I have big concerns with how you guys are handling the new rigs. I really think you guys need to go back to the drawing board on that one. You hav...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.11.08 11:50:08
|
4. Attention Leaders of CFC - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
You forgot our glorious leader, troll, industrialist and mass miner: Massadeath Also, it's Erebus, not Erabus. So if you want to pretent to know it all. Get your facts right. Or nobody will take you as a credible source.
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.11.01 15:45:58
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
While you are at it: are you looking into cyno's as well? Maybe it's worth adding a certain mass cap to what one cyno ( ship module, not pos mod ) can handle.
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.10.30 19:10:45
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Reworking Capital Ships: And thus it begins! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Interesting new features. Will add a whole new layer to the current dull capital warfare. A few questions: - The new Force Auxilary (FA): will they be in the price range of carriers or dreads or will they be more expensive? - What range of local...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.10.25 15:17:40
|
7. Sticky:Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kitagawa Mika wrote: Really cool idea, would love to see this implemented sooner rather than later. This is a good way to help new players and to make eve a viable option for new players. As it stands now, someone coming in to EVE as a new play...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.10.17 10:07:18
|
8. Sticky:Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So, why on earth have you even spent time on this? The forums are filled with questions and grievances from players about stuff (tm) that needs fixing. Yet you guys come up with something we didn't ask for, nor need. Moreover you'll make the ***...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.10.15 18:12:51
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Citadels, sieges and you v2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
These things are supposed to be important structures for the entities holding them. They shouldn't be trow away items in some foreign region only to be forgotten ( I assume this ). So why not link the vulnerability windows to the amount of that t...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.18 16:26:18
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Looking behind and looking ahead - update from CCP Sea... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Xiomaro Puxi wrote: about the same number of people playing now as in 2008. bang up job! how about giving players what they want instead of all this pvp content? Missions were nerfed. mining nerfed. exploration nerfed and made sooooo complicate...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.18 02:49:22
|
11. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: 159Pinky wrote: Or some groups feel, that if they bring this the other side will just drop more and more ships. Right now they already drop supers and titans on bomber and cormorrant fleet. Why on earth would I bring a T3 en...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.12 14:25:10
|
12. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Casandra Elise McIntire wrote: Ravcharas wrote: 159Pinky wrote: So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort i...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.12 07:33:12
|
13. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dreiden Kisada wrote: CCP Masterplan wrote: xttz wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Reserved for FAQ Will there be a 'self-destruct' option for outposts that puts them into freeport mode? Something like a 'Abandon ownership' option? We don'...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.11 20:32:56
|
14. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: 159Pinky wrote: So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances ...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.11 20:28:20
|
15. Sticky:Dev Blog: Next set of Sov and Capital Movement Iterations - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So, now that all gates will be bubbled to **** to prevent entosis. When will you start add a limited timer for bubbles to be in space? SO ppl at least have to put an effort in to keeping their entrances bubbled
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.09.11 20:18:29
|
16. Get rid of Vulnerability Kiting - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nope, just get control of the grid. And get rid of the opposing team. If you can't form in the last 15 minutes of your vulnerability window than that's your problem. They put effort into into it. So should you.
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.07.21 20:18:21
|
17. Inverting the Jump Drive Mechanics between Ships and Cynos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sure, add this range defining option to the cyno ships. With the same range restrictions as we currently have
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.07.21 20:14:48
|
18. Give Mordus Legion Locator Agents - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Barrogh Habalu wrote: While we are at it, is there some sort of logic behind current locator placement? CCP decisions and logic? I LOL'd As FT Diomedes said, give more NPC corp stations in null locator agents, not just Mordus
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.07.21 07:55:37
|
19. FozzieSov and the future of entosising - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No: For one this will make the game too complicated. Two, there are so many workarounds: like you said make a small holder alliance with active chars to catch pings from getting entosissed ( or whatever you call it ) and fuel stuff. Then you form...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.07.20 15:48:27
|
20. Announcement:Aegis release - Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
So are we getting official apologies from CCP for this? This is not a small mix up this is a big screw up...
- by 159Pinky - at 2015.07.07 12:13:19
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |