She doesn't say how the players should come together.

players join together this summer like they did over CCPs plans to exploit players using microtranactions

But is that what she is trying to effect with this push for a mass unsub? A ban of a very large group of players who are playing entirely within the game rules?

Uh, yes she does.



I'm pretty sure that players joined together to mass unsub.

They're not playing the way she and the ~silent majority~ (always hard to hear those guys) want, isn't that enough?

A bunch of people unsub, then a bunch of people get banned, it's a winning combination.

Uh, yes she does.



I'm pretty sure that players joined together to mass unsub.

Sounds really good for the game, just how a CSM member should be thinking. Ah, the proponents of the Butthurt AgendaGäó always have the big picture in mind don't they?

It speaks of players coming together, not how.

It speaks of players coming together, not how.

Only as long as the big picture includes a big butt that is hurt.

Next they'll say that Issler actually meant only shooting a statue in Jita.

I'm active enough that my butt doesn't get hurt.

~Cavernous Depths~

I'm active enough that my butt doesn't get hurt.

~Cavernous Depths~

Trying to infer something that isn't there. Nice try. Your butthurt. It shows.

I don't really see how that is inferring anything. The intent is right there.

You've posted in this thread enough to prove exactly what it is and how it hurts. It is your butt and it hurts.

I have the Elite Butt Tanking Certificate. Others may be butthurting, but I certainly am not.

Everyone is crying tears over everyone else's tears. Are there no original tears anymore?

I have the Elite Butt Tanking Certificate. Others may be butthurting, but I certainly am not.

Everyone is crying tears over everyone else's tears. Are there no original tears anymore?

You're reading an intent for Issler to unite high sec players, you are inferring an intent to get people to unsub over the problems. Intent is there. Intent to get people to unsub is not.

Your fishing for tears is unsuccessful

Well, I'm sorry (no I'm not), you're wrong. Very very wrong. The words are there plain as day. If she didn't mean for people to join together like they did after Incarna (which the actions they used were to unsub), then why did she say it?

Do I need to get my tear fishing skill up to 450, and also have a +150 skill lure on my tear fishing pole before I can successfully fish for tears?

She said that she wanted to bring the players together in a unified force. She did not say what she wanted that unified force to do. It is simply not there. She said it because she does not like you and your friends, apparently.

If she didn't intend for a mass unsub, then why did she use the mass unsub after Incarna as an example?

By the way, it wasn't just high-sec dwellers that were mad after incarna, it was everyone.

The only real tears in this thread were quoted in the alliance mail quoted in the OP.

ask CCP

What was the reason for that 30 day ban? OH YEA breach of EULA lol

Keep trying

You may not submit any content to any chat room or other public forum within the Game that is harassing, abusive, threatening, harmful, obscene, libelous or defamatory, encourages conduct that could constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liabilities, or is unlawful in any other way, including without limitation the submission of content that infringes on a third-partyGÇÖs intellectual property rights.

The players came together in more way than simply unsubbing after incarna. She didn't use the unsub itself as an example.


Irrelevant. She wants to unify players against goons.



Well apparently you're still crying about it enough to post this much.

In what way is saying something in REAL LIFE, no matter how objectionable, a breach of a EULA that covers IN GAME speech and activities?

Really, point to the part of the EULA that covers out of game conduct.



Emphasis mine.

So posting automatically means I'm shedding tears?

If she wants to unify the players against the goons then i wish her luck, but considering the fact that corps are leaving her alliance like rats from a sinking ship, I think she's going to have a hard time organizing that.

And as for her platform for getting elected to the CSM, I wish her luck in effecting that change when she turned her back on her colleagues.

In what way is saying something in REAL LIFE, no matter how objectionable, a breach of a EULA that covers IN GAME speech and activities?

Really, point to the part of the EULA that covers out of game conduct.



Emphasis mine.

If she wants to unify the players against the goons then i wish her luck, but considering the fact that corps are leaving her alliance like rats from a sinking ship, I think she's going to have a hard time organizing that.

And as for her platform for getting elected to the CSM, I wish her luck in effecting that change when she turned her back on her colleagues.