Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
2369

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 13:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Alliance Tournament draws closer and the random draw results are in! Please read CCP Navigator's new dev blog on the matter and watch the video of the random draw right here. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Nirnaeth Ornoediad
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
115
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Where's PL?
Oh, and first! "The Mittani isn't even gone for a day and CCP's management is already making bad decisions."
THE MITTANI for CEO of CCP 1-800-273-8255 |

Karl Planck
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
167
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
were is PL indeed?
also, RvB? Is this one alliance now or is an exemption to include both parties? If you don't like it, you should go and ride your Emo high-horse all the way back to WoW.
|

Katrina Bekers
Rim Collection RC Test Alliance Please Ignore
106
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Today the random draw of ATX, tomorrow the world! << THE RABBLE BRIGADE >> |

NTRabbit
Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
I could feel the love, Soundwave |

Spartan dax
0utbreak Outbreak.
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it. |

DeBingJos
Avalon Project Shadow Rock Alliance
255
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:15:00 -
[7] - Quote
*\o/* Cheering for the space p0lice!!!! Fix FW ! |

Karl Planck
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
167
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it.
umadbro? If you don't like it, you should go and ride your Emo high-horse all the way back to WoW.
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1225

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
Karl Planck wrote:were is PL indeed?
also, RvB? Is this one alliance now or is an exemption to include both parties?
Pandemic Legion were not successfully drawn from the hat for the random draw but, like many others, they can gain access through the auction letr this week.
Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|

Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
728
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
How many alliances did you had to take part in the random draw in total ? |
|

Professor Clio
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:20:00 -
[11] - Quote
RvB would like a clarification regarding our status, when Red Federation was drawn you indicated that we would only be represented by a single alliance but we plan on entering both Red and Blue, we asked and got the situation cleared when the rules regarding B teams came out. Here is the relevant post by CCP Loxy : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1233498#post1233498
As of this moment we plan on bidding for a spot with Blue Republic. |
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1225

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:20:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it.
You didn't know who was in the helmet last year and yet I don't remember you complaining. Interesting.
The draw was monitored by the Alliance Tournament team and every team who applied and were eligible were in the hat.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1225

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:21:00 -
[13] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:How many alliances did you had to take part in the random draw in total ?
77.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|

Professor Clio
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
23
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:21:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Karl Planck wrote:were is PL indeed?
also, RvB? Is this one alliance now or is an exemption to include both parties? Pandemic Legion were not successfully drawn from the hat for the random draw but, like many others, they can gain access through the auction letr this week. Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
This conflicts with that CCP Loxy told us previously
And if that is the case, would blue and red members be able to fly in this "purple" team |
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1225

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
Professor Clio wrote:RvB would like a clarification regarding our status, when Red Federation was drawn you indicated that we would only be represented by a single alliance but we plan on entering both Red and Blue, we asked and got the situation cleared when the rules regarding B teams came out. Here is the relevant post by CCP Loxy : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1233498#post1233498As of this moment we plan on bidding for a spot with Blue Republic.
CCP Loxy is in the process of discussing this with the CEO of both RvB corporations. Once those discussions are complete we will update accordingly.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Loxy
C C P C C P Alliance
91

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Professor Clio wrote:RvB would like a clarification regarding our status, when Red Federation was drawn you indicated that we would only be represented by a single alliance but we plan on entering both Red and Blue, we asked and got the situation cleared when the rules regarding B teams came out. Here is the relevant post by CCP Loxy : https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1233498#post1233498As of this moment we plan on bidding for a spot with Blue Republic.
We have mailed your executor explaining the situation and apologize again publicly for having to reverse the decision. It's best if your executor shares the email with you rather then us posting here. Video Producer |
|

Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
172
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:28:00 -
[17] - Quote
Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it.
Stop whining you moron. - |

Spartan dax
0utbreak Outbreak.
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:29:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it. You didn't know who was in the helmet last year and yet I don't remember you complaining. Interesting. The draw was monitored by the Alliance Tournament team and every team who applied and were eligible were in the hat.
Never paid any attention before is the reason why. It's just good practice to do that sort of thing you know and it does seem like an obvious thing to do.
Congratulations to the teams drawn. |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
3570
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:31:00 -
[19] - Quote
So it begins
|
|

Kumq uat
Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:38:00 -
[20] - Quote
Blaster Moas are a go! |
|

Arydanika
134
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
Congratulations to the first 32 teams drawn for Alliance Tournament X and good luck to those bidding for a spot in the upcoming auctions. Looking forward to a spectacular event this year by CCP Loxy and the AT team and can't wait to see the player commentators and participating alliances in action. . |

EvilweaselSA
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
72
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:47:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it. You didn't know who was in the helmet last year and yet I don't remember you complaining. Interesting. The draw was monitored by the Alliance Tournament team and every team who applied and were eligible were in the hat. could you confirm goonswarm was actually in the hat and mittens didn't send 20 plex to the wrong alliance again |
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
1007

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:54:00 -
[23] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it. You didn't know who was in the helmet last year and yet I don't remember you complaining. Interesting. The draw was monitored by the Alliance Tournament team and every team who applied and were eligible were in the hat. could you confirm goonswarm was actually in the hat and mittens didn't send 20 plex to the wrong alliance again
Confirmed. Plexes sent correctly. |
|

DENWIR
The First Foundation SOLAR FLEET
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 14:59:00 -
[24] - Quote
Random its so stupid system. Many real cool and interested in pvp alli does not have slot. But noname and low-pvp-skilled ali get it. AT should be an example of an elite, skilled and beautiful pvp, and not a place for advertising alliances, who does not even have kb.
   |
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1229

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it. You didn't know who was in the helmet last year and yet I don't remember you complaining. Interesting. The draw was monitored by the Alliance Tournament team and every team who applied and were eligible were in the hat. could you confirm goonswarm was actually in the hat and mittens didn't send 20 plex to the wrong alliance again
Goonswarm were in the hat and applied correctly.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|

Lord Saradomin
Nex Exercitus Raiden.
1
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
Awh Crap....never knew we were disbanded :(
Thanks for the "news" Navigator! :-D |

NTRabbit
Guiding Hand Social Club Dystopia Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:04:00 -
[27] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:the hat
Can those who got into the tournament get the hat as an item in our Steam TF2 Inventory? |

Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
77
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:05:00 -
[28] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:[quote=Karl Planck]RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
So as it turns out, Purple requires two colours to make, not 1.
Although I cannot say more as I have been told not to post here and get all stroppy. (Or tweet for that matter). Mangala is not FC, yet another randomly updated EVE blog.
http://mangala.rvbganked.co.uk/ |

Rico Ramos
STARMINE inc Solaris Mortis
7
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Lord Saradomin wrote:Awh Crap....never knew we were disbanded :(
Thanks for the "news" Soundwave! :-D
edit: wrong dev lol
You been soloing it this whole time? 
Whats up with the spoilers!!!! LOL Internet Space Ships is Serious Business |

Nirnaeth Ornoediad
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
115
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:10:00 -
[30] - Quote
CCP Soundwave wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Spartan dax wrote:They weren't in the helmet. Oh right, we don't know that because we don't know who was in the helmet, how many was in the helmet and we don't know who was left in the helmet after the draw.
Maybe FIFA could have done a worse draw procedure but I doubt it. You didn't know who was in the helmet last year and yet I don't remember you complaining. Interesting. The draw was monitored by the Alliance Tournament team and every team who applied and were eligible were in the hat. could you confirm goonswarm was actually in the hat and mittens didn't send 20 plex to the wrong alliance again Confirmed. Plexes sent correctly.
Stop giving financial intel about my allies. "The Mittani isn't even gone for a day and CCP's management is already making bad decisions."
THE MITTANI for CEO of CCP 1-800-273-8255 |
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
32
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:14:00 -
[31] - Quote
RvB!!! Whoooo, i love you Mangala. |

Kaeda Maxwell
Black Rebel Rifter Club
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote: Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
From the rules;
3. All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012. 4. All alliance members are eligible to compete in any match in which their alliance is taking part, subject to all applicable rules; teams do not have to remain the same between games.
In relation to rule 3; Can you please confirm that this applies the same to RvB as it does to everybody else? What I mean is that somebody that switched from Red to Blue or vice versa after this date is not eligible to compete.
And in relation to rule 4; That any one team fielded by RvB during any one match 'under the Purple flag' during the alliance tournament will consist exclusively of either only Blue or Red pilots?
I'm bringing this up because since all other players in other Alliances are subject to these rules and making an exception for RvB would reek quite heavily of favouritism from CCP. |

Charles37
Enaphy Excessum.
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:17:00 -
[33] - Quote
This draw was obviously rigged, unfair, and stacked. I know this because [my favorite alliance] didn't get drawn from the hat while noname nobody alliance [insert alliance] was picked and because [insert alliance I hate] is in cahoots with CCP. Because of this egregious miscarriage of justice I will now [cry/tweet angrily/scam people in Jita/make a Threadnaught].
It was fun watching the video, although you probably should have also posted an extended version where you show that all the names actually got into the hat.
Anyways though, looking forward to the tournament! |

ovenproofjet
The Illuminatii Mildly Intoxicated
47
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:23:00 -
[34] - Quote
\o/
~Does silly dance~ |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1405

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:28:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Navigator wrote: Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
From the rules; 3. All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012. 4. All alliance members are eligible to compete in any match in which their alliance is taking part, subject to all applicable rules; teams do not have to remain the same between games. In relation to rule 3; Can you please confirm that this applies the same to RvB as it does to everybody else? What I mean is that somebody that switched from Red to Blue or vice versa after this date is not eligible to compete. And in relation to rule 4; That any one team fielded by RvB during any one match 'under the Purple flag' during the alliance tournament will consist exclusively of either only Blue or Red pilots? I'm bringing this up because since all other players in other Alliances are subject to these rules and making an exception for RvB would reek quite heavily of favouritism from CCP.
They are being viewed as a single entity but those rules were in effect prior so should remain and not effect their team compositions as they have the exact same eligible pilot pool to choose from.
The matches may consist of red or blue pilots and we're working out the details.
I would love an explanation of the favoritism charge because were that the case we'd have just let them compete as two separate teams. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1405

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:29:00 -
[36] - Quote
Charles37 wrote:This draw was obviously rigged, unfair, and stacked. I know this because [my favorite alliance] didn't get drawn from the hat while noname nobody alliance [insert alliance] was picked and because [insert alliance I hate] is in cahoots with CCP. Because of this egregious miscarriage of justice I will now [cry/tweet angrily/scam people in Jita/make a Threadnaught].
It was fun watching the video, although you probably should have also posted an extended version where you show that all the names actually got into the hat.
Anyways though, looking forward to the tournament!
We're not going to cater to the ridiculous. All of the names went into the hat and that's how it is and all we have to say on the subject. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Charles37
Enaphy Excessum.
13
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:38:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Charles37 wrote:This draw was obviously rigged, unfair, and stacked. I know this because [my favorite alliance] didn't get drawn from the hat while noname nobody alliance [insert alliance] was picked and because [insert alliance I hate] is in cahoots with CCP. Because of this egregious miscarriage of justice I will now [cry/tweet angrily/scam people in Jita/make a Threadnaught].
It was fun watching the video, although you probably should have also posted an extended version where you show that all the names actually got into the hat.
Anyways though, looking forward to the tournament! We're not going to cater to the ridiculous. All of the names went into the hat and that's how it is and all we have to say on the subject.
Perhaps I phrased my post poorly, but it was intended to be humorous, not to actually make an accusation of bias or rigging the draw. I suggested the extended video showing names going into the hat because it would not have been difficult and would have firmly put to rest any suspicious of interference by CCP in what is a big event for many pilots. |

Fish Brain
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:39:00 -
[38] - Quote
PL, Hydra, 0utbreak, R0nin, Darkside, Paisti, SOLAR, Rote Kapelle, Black Legion, Nulli, Circle of Two, Negative Ten and a bunch of other top teams not being drawn is gonna make for some hardcore auctioning.
Congrats to the lucky teams that don't have to deal with the next few days. |

VaL Iscariot
The Concilium Enterprises Spectrum Alliance
38
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:40:00 -
[39] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Charles37 wrote:This draw was obviously rigged, unfair, and stacked. I know this because [my favorite alliance] didn't get drawn from the hat while noname nobody alliance [insert alliance] was picked and because [insert alliance I hate] is in cahoots with CCP. Because of this egregious miscarriage of justice I will now [cry/tweet angrily/scam people in Jita/make a Threadnaught].
It was fun watching the video, although you probably should have also posted an extended version where you show that all the names actually got into the hat.
Anyways though, looking forward to the tournament! We're not going to cater to the ridiculous. All of the names went into the hat and that's how it is and all we have to say on the subject.
I think he was commenting on the cookie cutter responses of some because their favorite team wasn't picked. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1405

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
Charles37 wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Charles37 wrote:This draw was obviously rigged, unfair, and stacked. I know this because [my favorite alliance] didn't get drawn from the hat while noname nobody alliance [insert alliance] was picked and because [insert alliance I hate] is in cahoots with CCP. Because of this egregious miscarriage of justice I will now [cry/tweet angrily/scam people in Jita/make a Threadnaught].
It was fun watching the video, although you probably should have also posted an extended version where you show that all the names actually got into the hat.
Anyways though, looking forward to the tournament! We're not going to cater to the ridiculous. All of the names went into the hat and that's how it is and all we have to say on the subject. Perhaps I phrased my post poorly, but it was intended to be humorous, not to actually make an accusation of bias or rigging the draw. I suggested the extended video showing names going into the hat because it would not have been difficult and would have firmly put to rest any suspicious of interference by CCP in what is a big event for many pilots.
Sorry didn't mean to appear to take offense and I understand your perspective but I really don't see the value in increasing our efforts and work simply to appease the tinfoil hat crowd. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
184
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:44:00 -
[41] - Quote
Fish Brain wrote:PL, Hydra, 0utbreak, R0nin, Darkside, Paisti, SOLAR, Rote Kapelle, Black Legion, Nulli, Circle of Two, Negative Ten and a bunch of other top teams not being drawn is gonna make for some hardcore auctioning.
Congrats to the lucky teams that don't have to deal with the next few days.
100B isk ready for auction On holiday. -áIn some other world. Where the music of the radio was a labyrinth of sonorous colours. To a bright centre of absolute convicton where the dripping patchouli was more than scent, It was a sun-á |

Mangala Solaris
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
78
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:46:00 -
[42] - Quote
Fish Brain wrote:PL, Hydra, 0utbreak, R0nin, Darkside, Paisti, SOLAR, Rote Kapelle, Black Legion, Nulli, Circle of Two, Negative Ten and a bunch of other top teams not being drawn is gonna make for some hardcore auctioning.
Congrats to the lucky teams that don't have to deal with the next few days.
Very much +1ing this.
The amount of isk that I can imagine will be slung round is going to be immense. Mangala is not FC, yet another randomly updated EVE blog.
http://mangala.rvbganked.co.uk/ |

Kaeda Maxwell
Black Rebel Rifter Club
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:50:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Navigator wrote: Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
From the rules; 3. All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012. 4. All alliance members are eligible to compete in any match in which their alliance is taking part, subject to all applicable rules; teams do not have to remain the same between games. In relation to rule 3; Can you please confirm that this applies the same to RvB as it does to everybody else? What I mean is that somebody that switched from Red to Blue or vice versa after this date is not eligible to compete. And in relation to rule 4; That any one team fielded by RvB during any one match 'under the Purple flag' during the alliance tournament will consist exclusively of either only Blue or Red pilots? I'm bringing this up because since all other players in other Alliances are subject to these rules and making an exception for RvB would reek quite heavily of favouritism from CCP. I would love an explanation of the favoritism charge because were that the case we'd have just let them compete as two separate teams.
That quite simply while you may view them as one entity they are not so in game they are two separate alliances, if you allow somebody that switched between them to compete, then why would you not allow somebody that switched from say the Goons to TEST after that date to compete or from Outbreak to Hydra?
Right now it looks like you are trying to facilitate the rules around RvB's command structure in order to make sure they don't break rule number 5. It seems to me that RvB's command structure is the problem of RvB and not of the rules which should be universal and apply to everybody equally in a competitive environment.
Why exactly is it that RvB could not simply either enter Red or Blue and get the pilots they want to fly in the AT into the correct alliance before May 5th. Had they done this then neither rule 3 or 4 would have needed 'bending' and rule 5 wouldn't have been relevant at all. Now it looks suspiciously much like CCP is trying to cater to RvB's specific needs while there should have been no need for that all.
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1406

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 15:57:00 -
[44] - Quote
Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Navigator wrote: Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
From the rules; 3. All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012. 4. All alliance members are eligible to compete in any match in which their alliance is taking part, subject to all applicable rules; teams do not have to remain the same between games. In relation to rule 3; Can you please confirm that this applies the same to RvB as it does to everybody else? What I mean is that somebody that switched from Red to Blue or vice versa after this date is not eligible to compete. And in relation to rule 4; That any one team fielded by RvB during any one match 'under the Purple flag' during the alliance tournament will consist exclusively of either only Blue or Red pilots? I'm bringing this up because since all other players in other Alliances are subject to these rules and making an exception for RvB would reek quite heavily of favouritism from CCP. I would love an explanation of the favoritism charge because were that the case we'd have just let them compete as two separate teams. That quite simply while you may view them as one entity they are not so in game they are two separate alliances, if you allow somebody that switched between them to compete, then why would you not allow somebody that switched from say the Goons to TEST after that date to compete or from Outbreak to Hydra? Right now it looks like you are trying to facilitate the rules around RvB's command structure in order to make sure they don't break rule number 5. It seems to me that RvB's command structure is the problem of RvB and not of the rules which should be universal and apply to everybody equally in a competitive environment. Why exactly is it that RvB could not simply either enter Red or Blue and get the pilots they want to fly in the AT into the correct alliance before May 5th. Had they done this then neither rule 3 or 4 would have needed 'bending' and rule 5 wouldn't have been relevant at all. Now it looks suspiciously much like CCP is trying to cater to RvB's specific needs while there should have been no need for that all.
The May 5th rule still applies we're just viewing them both as a single entity? Even if they switched internally the May 5th rule still applies.
:edit: Alliance switching is alliance switching. RvB is a unique case when compared to some others because they've been allowed to compete separately and did so fairly in the past unlike many many others. We're forcing them to compete as a single entity under the same rules as everyone else and that seems quite fair to me. We wouldn't have that problem in many other cases because the rule exists to combat entities which exist for the sole purpose of having multiple shots at the tournament. In this case we prevented that from happening by combining them as one for the purpose of entry from our perspective. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Kaeda Maxwell
Black Rebel Rifter Club
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Navigator wrote: Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
From the rules; 3. All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012. 4. All alliance members are eligible to compete in any match in which their alliance is taking part, subject to all applicable rules; teams do not have to remain the same between games. In relation to rule 3; Can you please confirm that this applies the same to RvB as it does to everybody else? What I mean is that somebody that switched from Red to Blue or vice versa after this date is not eligible to compete. And in relation to rule 4; That any one team fielded by RvB during any one match 'under the Purple flag' during the alliance tournament will consist exclusively of either only Blue or Red pilots? I'm bringing this up because since all other players in other Alliances are subject to these rules and making an exception for RvB would reek quite heavily of favouritism from CCP. I would love an explanation of the favoritism charge because were that the case we'd have just let them compete as two separate teams. That quite simply while you may view them as one entity they are not so in game they are two separate alliances, if you allow somebody that switched between them to compete, then why would you not allow somebody that switched from say the Goons to TEST after that date to compete or from Outbreak to Hydra? Right now it looks like you are trying to facilitate the rules around RvB's command structure in order to make sure they don't break rule number 5. It seems to me that RvB's command structure is the problem of RvB and not of the rules which should be universal and apply to everybody equally in a competitive environment. Why exactly is it that RvB could not simply either enter Red or Blue and get the pilots they want to fly in the AT into the correct alliance before May 5th. Had they done this then neither rule 3 or 4 would have needed 'bending' and rule 5 wouldn't have been relevant at all. Now it looks suspiciously much like CCP is trying to cater to RvB's specific needs while there should have been no need for that all. The May 5th rule still applies we're just viewing them both as a single entity? Even if they switched internally the May 5th rule still applies.
So if you went from Red to Blue on May 6th you're not eligible to compete?
Also I'd much appreciate an answer to my last paragraph, why this and not just limiting it to either entering red or blue? |

Clolo
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:02:00 -
[46] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:How many alliances did you had to take part in the random draw in total ? 77.
Do you have to have participated in the "random draw" to be eligible to bid in the auction? |

Kadesh Priestess
Scalding Chill
201
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:02:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kaeda Maxwell wrote:Right now it looks like you are trying to facilitate the rules around RvB's command structure in order to make sure they don't break rule number 5.
RvB isn't a special case in many regards. Rules assure us that as long as direct AT participants (those whom you see on the stream) are controlled by distinct real people, they should be fine.
Adding exclusions based on non-AT specific things sounds new to me. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1406

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:08:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Kaeda Maxwell wrote:CCP Navigator wrote: Red Federation and Blue Republic share a common CEO so they are unable to field separate teams as per our new rule of no B or C teams. RvB will remain a single entity for this tournament and this fits with their theme of running 'Purple' during war situations.
From the rules; 3. All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012. 4. All alliance members are eligible to compete in any match in which their alliance is taking part, subject to all applicable rules; teams do not have to remain the same between games. In relation to rule 3; Can you please confirm that this applies the same to RvB as it does to everybody else? What I mean is that somebody that switched from Red to Blue or vice versa after this date is not eligible to compete. And in relation to rule 4; That any one team fielded by RvB during any one match 'under the Purple flag' during the alliance tournament will consist exclusively of either only Blue or Red pilots? I'm bringing this up because since all other players in other Alliances are subject to these rules and making an exception for RvB would reek quite heavily of favouritism from CCP. I would love an explanation of the favoritism charge because were that the case we'd have just let them compete as two separate teams. That quite simply while you may view them as one entity they are not so in game they are two separate alliances, if you allow somebody that switched between them to compete, then why would you not allow somebody that switched from say the Goons to TEST after that date to compete or from Outbreak to Hydra? Right now it looks like you are trying to facilitate the rules around RvB's command structure in order to make sure they don't break rule number 5. It seems to me that RvB's command structure is the problem of RvB and not of the rules which should be universal and apply to everybody equally in a competitive environment. Why exactly is it that RvB could not simply either enter Red or Blue and get the pilots they want to fly in the AT into the correct alliance before May 5th. Had they done this then neither rule 3 or 4 would have needed 'bending' and rule 5 wouldn't have been relevant at all. Now it looks suspiciously much like CCP is trying to cater to RvB's specific needs while there should have been no need for that all. The May 5th rule still applies we're just viewing them both as a single entity? Even if they switched internally the May 5th rule still applies. So if you went from Red to Blue on May 6th you're not eligible to compete? Also I'd much appreciate an answer to my last paragraph, why this and not just limiting it to either entering red or blue?
Yes if you moved from red to blue on May 6th you cannot compete as would have been the case were we to allow them to compete individually so absolutely nothing has changed. I believe I've just answered that last paragraph twice but maybe I'm not the swiftest boat in the channel so could you try rephrasing it if I haven't?
:edit: Ok I might get it. The "No B-Teams" rule is new this year. That means we've had to adjust it a bit as we've worked through what a B-team is (It's not always obvious) and how we've seen the need to apply the rule. We told RVB they were ok earlier on because of their past participation, but after applying the rule in other places realized that we hadn't applied it properly to them in retrospect. In order to be fair to them this is the workaround. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1406

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:09:00 -
[49] - Quote
Clolo wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:How many alliances did you had to take part in the random draw in total ? 77. Do you have to have participated in the "random draw" to be eligible to bid in the auction?
The random draw took place after the deadline for your alliance to "apply" so yes. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Clolo
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
17
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:14:00 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Clolo wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:How many alliances did you had to take part in the random draw in total ? 77. Do you have to have participated in the "random draw" to be eligible to bid in the auction? The random draw took place after the deadline for your alliance to "apply" so yes.
Great news, thanks! |
|

Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
177
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:15:00 -
[51] - Quote
I feel both Red Federation and Blue Republic should be allowed to have separate teams participate. I don't think that the intention behind the rules was ever to prevent to groups of people that have close ties from competing against each other, but instead to prevent them from colluding with each other outside the spirit of the tournament.
The presence of referees accounts for the second possibility anyway since their job is to monitor and react to any group that tries to work with another to manipulate results in their favour.
tl;dr Let them have their teams. - |

Kaeda Maxwell
Black Rebel Rifter Club
92
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:20:00 -
[52] - Quote
Thank you Sreegs , I missed the edit before hence my re-asking the same question. No that explains it all quite satisfactory now.
Though my personal opinion is that rules should be designed and applied universally and not to combat specific cases of meta-gaming only to then be made an exception on because of somebodies good behaviour in the past.
For the record; I quite like RvB and what they do in game, but clarity is a good thing hence my poking. |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
184
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:29:00 -
[53] - Quote
RvB should have had an internal tourney to see who gets to go to the Eve Tourney. But since they were given the OK weeks ago by CCP that they could have separate entries, CCP should honor that. On holiday. -áIn some other world. Where the music of the radio was a labyrinth of sonorous colours. To a bright centre of absolute convicton where the dripping patchouli was more than scent, It was a sun-á |

Faffywaffy
Fremen Sietch DarkSide.
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:37:00 -
[54] - Quote
Funny. RvB (who played fairly last year) are allowed to only field one team while Outbreak and Hydra (who went as far EULA violations to win) can field two. |

Raivi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
123
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:49:00 -
[55] - Quote
Faffywaffy wrote:Funny. RvB (who played fairly last year) are allowed to only field one team while Outbreak and Hydra (who went as far EULA violations to win) can field two.
As far as I know there has not been any official annoucnement on the status of Hydra and Outbreak. I'd wait until CCP announces their decision before drawing conclusions. |

Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere
179
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 16:52:00 -
[56] - Quote
Faffywaffy wrote:Funny. RvB (who played fairly last year) are allowed to only field one team while Outbreak and Hydra (who went as far EULA violations to win) can field two.
Shouldn't you be busy running level 4s so you can afford the auction m8? - |

Raivi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
123
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 17:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:Faffywaffy wrote:Funny. RvB (who played fairly last year) are allowed to only field one team while Outbreak and Hydra (who went as far EULA violations to win) can field two. Shouldn't you be busy running level 4s so you can afford the auction m8?
Be nice Duncan. At least he only needs to win the auction for half as many teams as you do. ;) |

Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere
185
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 17:32:00 -
[58] - Quote
Raivi wrote:Duncan Tanner wrote:Faffywaffy wrote:Funny. RvB (who played fairly last year) are allowed to only field one team while Outbreak and Hydra (who went as far EULA violations to win) can field two. Shouldn't you be busy running level 4s so you can afford the auction m8? Be nice Duncan. At least he only needs to win the auction for half as many teams as you do. ;)
Actually, thanks to the new rules Hydra only has to worry about winning half as many matches this year. o7 2 u - |

Desert Ice78
Cobra Kai Dojo WHY so Seri0Us
125
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 17:32:00 -
[59] - Quote
Screw all that ^
FIRST!!!!!  
Prepare to be schooled PL!!! I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg
CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused. |

TheButcherPete
Specter Syndicate Persona Non Gratis
194
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 17:33:00 -
[60] - Quote
I'm impregnated with excitement over the fact that Dystopia will be in ATX.
Who wants to help me father this sensation? My moncole doubles as a cigarette lighter, a flashlight, a laser and x-ray goggles. If you haven't noticed yet, I'm in love with Punkturis. -á-á-á
|
|
|

CCP Loxy
C C P C C P Alliance
98

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 17:50:00 -
[61] - Quote
On the case of RvB.
We acknowledge that we initially allowed an exception for the two sides of RvB to compete in the tournament as two separate teams. On further review of that decision and the b and c team rule we found that to make such an exception and exclude other teams would raise serious questions. While we respect both sides of RvB who have both fought in the tournament before we must see them as one alliance in the eyes of the tournament.
We have been in contact with the executor of both alliances and have reached a decision that will allow both sides to compete together. This decision is now final and is a special case, it will have no impact on any other judgement with the b and c team rule on other alliances.
- Both RvB - Red Federation and RvB - Blue Republic will compete as one alliance during the tournament, they will be referred to as "Red Vs Blue" in all matters related to the tournament.
- Members of both alliances will be eligible for the joint team and should stay in their own alliance.
- Members in either alliance must still have been a part of their alliance from downtime the 5th of May. Switching from one to the other will break this rule and make them ineligible.
Video Producer & Director of EVE Tv |
|

i hatechosingnames
SUNDERING Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 18:27:00 -
[62] - Quote
Prize wouldn't be a new Battleship would it? Maybe a Scorpion Ishukone Watch? |

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
77
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 18:40:00 -
[63] - Quote
Interesting draw, well if nobody enters the auction at all, ATX's final will actually be worse than AT9's.
Hint hint. |

ShadowMaster
40
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 18:41:00 -
[64] - Quote
CCP Loxy wrote:On the case of RvB. We acknowledge that we initially allowed an exception for the two sides of RvB to compete in the tournament as two separate teams. On further review of that decision and the b and c team rule we found that to make such an exception and exclude other teams would raise serious questions. While we respect both sides of RvB who have both fought in the tournament before we must see them as one alliance in the eyes of the tournament. We have been in contact with the executor of both alliances and have reached a decision that will allow both sides to compete together. This decision is now final and is a special case, it will have no impact on any other judgement with the b and c team rule on other alliances.
- Both RvB - Red Federation and RvB - Blue Republic will compete as one alliance during the tournament, they will be referred to as "Red Vs Blue" in all matters related to the tournament.
- Members of both alliances will be eligible for the joint team and should stay in their own alliance.
- Members in either alliance must still have been a part of their alliance from downtime the 5th of May. Switching from one to the other will break this rule and make them ineligible.
Thank you for the clarification Loxy. Really looking forward to the tournament. :D |

Rock UrWerld
Turnbull AC's
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 18:50:00 -
[65] - Quote
its been a wonder to me all these years why they "limit" the entries at all. Sure I know that there are hundreds of alliances that MIGHT want to participate.....why not let anyone willing to pay a LARGE entry fee get in?
Think of the process like the way UEFA does its "champions league" in football/soccer. The actual tournament that you see on EVE TV would only be 32 teams (or 24 or 16) but you can have qualifying tournaments throught the month of May to get to those final 16/24/32
Teams would enter the tournament at various rounds based on whatever factor you want..... alliance size or isk bids or ? you can put your favorite 4/8/16 teams directly into the final group stage via the "auction".
Everyone would get to play if the had the entry fee....alliances like red vs blue wouldnt have issues, Hydra Pandemic Legion and others wouldnt be mysteriously ommited by the UNSEEN "random" draw.
It would truly be an OPEN tournament that EVERY PAYING SUBSCRIBER can one day hope to be a part of.
|

MisterNick
The Sagan Clan Persona Non Gratis
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 19:08:00 -
[66] - Quote
Cheering for Suddenly Spaceships \o\ \o/ /o/ "Fools! I'll show them all!"
What do you mean that one's already taken? |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
1409

|
Posted - 2012.05.23 19:38:00 -
[67] - Quote
Rock UrWerld wrote:its been a wonder to me all these years why they "limit" the entries at all. Sure I know that there are hundreds of alliances that MIGHT want to participate.....why not let anyone willing to pay a LARGE entry fee get in?
Think of the process like the way UEFA does its "champions league" in football/soccer. The actual tournament that you see on EVE TV would only be 32 teams (or 24 or 16) but you can have qualifying tournaments throught the month of May to get to those final 16/24/32
Teams would enter the tournament at various rounds based on whatever factor you want..... alliance size or isk bids or ? you can put your favorite 4/8/16 teams directly into the final group stage via the "auction".
Everyone would get to play if the had the entry fee....alliances like red vs blue wouldnt have issues, Hydra Pandemic Legion and others wouldnt be mysteriously ommited by the UNSEEN "random" draw.
It would truly be an OPEN tournament that EVERY PAYING SUBSCRIBER can one day hope to be a part of.
We've already explained that the amount of work requires forces us TODAY to limit teams. To give you a bit of insight the past 2 years (and there was discussion before that) we've seriously discussed a number of scenarios for this. We simply haven't been able to find a way to handle it given how we operate today.
re: the drawing dig; You conspiracy theorists are going to have to pick an alliance we're cheating for and be consistent. It's a big drain on our time even reading this drivel and we can't be cheating for alliance A when they win or do something and alliance B when they win or do something when both of them are at odds. I hope this helps you formulate more coherent conspiracies in the future. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|

Edward Olmops
Sirius Fleet Bruderschaft der Pilger
11
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 20:33:00 -
[68] - Quote
Who says a good conspiracy theory has to be consistent? :-D But actually, I have no idea why people come up with such ideas... is this a result of hanging around in space for too long? Must be the gamma rays or something. Or could be warping too much does something to the brain.
Maybe someone of these theorists can analyze the video of the draw and find out whether there were REALLY 77 strips of paper in that helmet? Should keep you busy for awhile... |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Test Alliance Please Ignore
81
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 20:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
Watched the video. Thought "huh, no PL or Hydra..." grabbed my tinfoil hat and a bag of popcorn for the comments thread.
WAS NOT DISAPPOINTED.
10/10 Would read again. |

Shandir
Indigo Archive
149
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 21:00:00 -
[70] - Quote
And if someone could count the pixel ratios in the names given, and make sure that they weren't all blank bits of paper with the 'correct' names photoshopped in, I'd appreciate it. /sarcasm |
|

Raze Zindonas
Asgard. Exodus.
6
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 21:03:00 -
[71] - Quote
Excited \o/ |

Intigo
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
12
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 21:17:00 -
[72] - Quote
Sreegs, I know you're just explaining, but don't take the trolls to heart, m888~ No one with a clue thinks any tampering was done (nor that the team limit could reliably be increased for this AT), we're just looking forward to getting the auctions done with and getting the fights going. |

Saulc Neslo
0utbreak Outbreak.
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 22:14:00 -
[73] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:It's good to see new names, who will be this year's dark horse?
Wtf, get that smooth talking soft ass out of here. Seeing this after you commin on the the outbreak forums gagging ppl left and right, because of a little harmless trolling just makes me sick and it makes my brain tired.
Now Spartan is gagged as well, why the **** is this? He's totally right every inch of the way, no matter who is left in the poll or not. This poll is complete and utter bs, they might just as well have given out a list instead of this stupid video, why is it not allowed to address the pink elephant in the room?
I know you think that CCP is going Apeshet like a friggin 7 yo with a magnifying glass on ants, because of what you and Garmon did last year. But hey its not about "not giving a damn", as we discussed when I made you cry on ts, its about not being scared.
Not being scared is also why I have to post this, being bullied into submission - and being so by old friends that could simply say please, well it just makes me drop my jaw.
- Im out (Probable guessed that) |

Duncan Tanner
Genos Occidere
185
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 22:27:00 -
[74] - Quote
Saulc Neslo wrote:Duncan Tanner wrote:It's good to see new names, who will be this year's dark horse? Wtf, get that smooth talking soft ass out of here. Seeing this after you commin on the the outbreak forums gagging ppl left and right, because of a little harmless trolling just makes me sick and it makes my brain tired. Now Spartan is gagged as well, why the **** is this? He's totally right every inch of the way, no matter who is left in the poll or not. This poll is complete and utter bs, they might just as well have given out a list instead of this stupid video, why is it not allowed to address the pink elephant in the room? I know you think that CCP is going Apeshet like a friggin 7 yo with a magnifying glass on ants, because of what you and Garmon did last year. But hey its not about "not giving a damn", as we discussed when I made you cry on ts, its about not being scared. Not being scared is also why I have to post this, being bullied into submission - and being so by old friends that could simply say please, well it just makes me drop my jaw. - Im out (Probable guessed that)
I'm not sure if it was intentional but this is an amazing post Saulc. - |

Saulc Neslo
0utbreak Outbreak.
4
|
Posted - 2012.05.23 22:32:00 -
[75] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:I'm not sure if it was intentional but this is an amazing post Saulc.
All my posts are amazing. Yours used to be too. Now go and win that tournament, but stop being bad. |

Shiroi Okami
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
54
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 01:21:00 -
[76] - Quote
It's going to be a busy auction. I am wondering though, is there a particular logic behind allowing people who were not in the random draw to participate in the auction? Do you think this ability will be utilised? My Latest Video: Freestyle II |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
644
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 05:25:00 -
[77] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: It's a big drain on our time even reading this drivel ...
You don't read the forums, stop pretending. 
Mimidae Risk Solutions Recruiting |

MisterNick
The Sagan Clan Persona Non Gratis
60
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 09:13:00 -
[78] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:re: the drawing dig; You conspiracy theorists are going to have to pick an alliance we're cheating for and be consistent. It's a big drain on our time even reading this drivel and we can't be cheating for alliance A when they win or do something and alliance B when they win or do something when both of them are at odds. I hope this helps you formulate more coherent conspiracies in the future.
CCP Sreegs, seen here doing it right 
"Fools! I'll show them all!"
What do you mean that one's already taken? |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
143
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 11:19:00 -
[79] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: re: the drawing dig; You conspiracy theorists are going to have to pick an alliance we're cheating for and be consistent. It's a big drain on our time even reading this drivel and we can't be cheating for alliance A when they win or do something and alliance B when they win or do something when both of them are at odds. I hope this helps you formulate more coherent conspiracies in the future. the point of most conspiracies is to make the conspirators win no matter what "free decision" the public arrives at. |

ROXGenghis
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
20
|
Posted - 2012.05.24 13:21:00 -
[80] - Quote
Saulc Neslo wrote:Duncan Tanner wrote:It's good to see new names, who will be this year's dark horse? Wtf, get that smooth talking soft ass out of here. Seeing this after you commin on the the outbreak forums gagging ppl left and right, because of a little harmless trolling just makes me sick and it makes my brain tired. Now Spartan is gagged as well, why the **** is this? He's totally right every inch of the way, no matter who is left in the poll or not. This poll is complete and utter bs, they might just as well have given out a list instead of this stupid video, why is it not allowed to address the pink elephant in the room? I know you think that CCP is going Apeshet like a friggin 7 yo with a magnifying glass on ants, because of what you and Garmon did last year. But hey its not about "not giving a damn", as we discussed when I made you cry on ts, its about not being scared. Not being scared is also why I have to post this, being bullied into submission - and being so by old friends that could simply say please, well it just makes me drop my jaw. - Im out (Probable guessed that) Hydra psyops FTW! |
|

Lady Naween
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
21
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:59:00 -
[81] - Quote
any result on the auctions? |

Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
87
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:04:00 -
[82] - Quote
Hmm, you know, I just had a thought: maybe it would be better to have the random draw after the auctions. Join in game channel/mailing list: New Eden Racing Sub-warp racing event thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=107164 |

Maz Ngomo
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.05.29 15:39:00 -
[83] - Quote
It's great to see some new blood in the tourney instead of the same familiar (but getting a bit stale) names we've seen over the past few years. Mixing it up is as good for the tourney as it is for the game, and it'll certainly be interesting to see what the 'new guys' can do. Who knows, maybe one of these alliances we've never heard of might be the next tournament powerhouse of the future. 
Also, I think the decision to field RvB as a single alliance was a good compromise. They have a strong pool of pilots to choose from, and a fair amount of experience as long as they don't forget they're on the same side in the tourney hah. Good luck RvB!
This should be an awesome tournament, I for one will be tuning in. *orders a big bucket of popcorn and a case of beer or five* |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |