EVE Search - The amazing Pithum C-type medium Shield Booster

All Channels

Missions & Complexes

The amazing Pithum C-type medium Shield Booster

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Velladona	Posted - 2009.07.31 11:40:00 - [1] In the last month i have seen a BIG increase of aivailable Pithum C-type medium SB, the market is really burden and the price went down big time. Maybe people don't realise what you can do with it and don't buy them that much. For example you can really easily set a perma boost raven/CNR with it, with 4 active hardeners, a boost amp, a DCU and 3 BCS. This fit can roll over all lvl 4 missions while the shield NEVER fall under 70%. You don't have to have godly skills to do that. You have to buy this module ASAP !
SFM Hobb3s Frontier United Corp Klan	Posted - 2009.07.31 12:30:00 - [2] Found 4 of these in the last two months, and not only are they more available, they're far cheaper than they used to be. My first two sold for over 600 mil but I see many on contract for around 450 mil.
Gavin DeVries	Posted - 2009.07.31 13:15:00 - [3] Most people who are running CNR/Golem for L4s looking to pimp them out with hi-power/energy-efficient deadspace boosters are using dual Pithi-B smalls. Two of those are still cheaper than a single Pithum C-type. Those who really want power drop 2 billion on the Pithum A-type medium. I was thinking about a Pithum C-type for a Tengu, though. ______________________________________________________ Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you?
Ghengis Tia	Posted - 2009.07.31 13:32:00 - [4] Originally by: Gavin DeVries Most people who are running CNR/Golem for L4s looking to pimp them out with hi-power/energy-efficient deadspace boosters are using dual Pithi-B smalls. Two of those are still cheaper than a single Pithum C-type. Those who really want power drop 2 billion on the Pithum A-type medium. I was thinking about a Pithum C-type for a Tengu, though. ^^This^^ Bought my Pithi Smalls for 25-30m ea, they work like a charm. They're in the 60m range now I think.
Major Veers	Posted - 2009.07.31 14:06:00 - [5] Originally by: Gavin DeVries Most people who are running CNR/Golem for L4s looking to pimp them out with hi-power/energy-efficient deadspace boosters are using dual Pithi-B smalls. Two of those are still cheaper than a single Pithum C-type. Those who really want power drop 2 billion on the Pithum A-type medium. I was thinking about a Pithum C-type for a Tengu, though. The a-type is around just over a billion atm.
Veebring Greetings	Posted - 2009.07.31 15:59:00 - [6] Nothing but X-Large boosters on battleships. And then you want the Gistii types as high peak output isn't needed for missions. All of the fittings in proposed in this thread have been for freaks
Taua Roqa Minmatar junQtion	Posted - 2009.07.31 16:02:00 - [7] pithum ctype does rock (lets you plop an AB or whatever on yer CNR) and is a lot more affordable than they used to be, but loads of them appearing for some reason
fmercury Queens of the Stone Age Rote Kapelle	Posted - 2009.07.31 16:06:00 - [8] Originally by: Gavin DeVries Most people who are running CNR/Golem for L4s looking to pimp them out with hi-power/energy-efficient deadspace boosters are using dual Pithi-B smalls. Two of those are still cheaper than a single Pithum C-type. Those who really want power drop 2 billion on the Pithum A-type medium. I was thinking about a Pithum C-type for a Tengu, though. A-types are down considerably, from 1.9b to barely 1b. Almost all pith stuff has crashed, while DG mods are going up (invuln, BCU). I guess DG is going up beacuse CN is going up, but no idea why pith is crashing.
Mistress Izanami	Posted - 2009.07.31 16:22:00 - [9] Originally by: fmercury Originally by: Gavin DeVries Most people who are running CNR/Golem for L4s looking to pimp them out with hi-power/energy-efficient deadspace boosters are using dual Pithi-B smalls. Two of those are still cheaper than a single Pithum C-type. Those who really want power drop 2 billion on the Pithum A-type medium. I was thinking about a Pithum C-type for a Tengu, though. A-types are down considerably, from 1.9b to barely 1b. Almost all pith stuff has crashed, while DG mods are going up (invuln, BCU). I guess DG is going up beacuse CN is going up, but no idea why pith is crashing. Renters in NC space. Since NC had to go fight, they got all the plexes.
Dandy Lyon	Posted - 2009.07.31 16:25:00 - [10] Originally by: Veebring Greetings Nothing but X-Large boosters on battleships. And then you want the Gistii types as high peak output isn't needed for missions. All of the fittings in proposed in this thread have been for freaks For some reason, people believe that ships should be "cap stable" with everything running. That's a real shame, cause it really limits your tank.
Mahke Aeon Of Strife Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2009.07.31 17:01:00 - [11] Originally by: SFM Hobb3s Found 4 of these in the last two months, and not only are they more available, they're far cheaper than they used to be. My first two sold for over 600 mil but I see many on contract for around 450 mil. Friendly price conscious reseller here just to tell everyone they are just returning to old historical prices, and in fact are still higher than they used to be. I resold a few on the way up, great mod. Although personally, I prefer to both use in missioning and trade pith b-type larges these days; mainly for price reasons. Although really, anything that can tank a level 4 and go perma in case of disconnects easily is a good shield tanking mod for a mission boat, so makes sense to just go as cheap as possible and still get the job done.
Mahke Aeon Of Strife Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2009.07.31 17:04:00 - [12] Originally by: Dandy Lyon For some reason, people believe that ships should be "cap stable" with everything running. That's a real shame, cause it really limits your tank.[/quote cap stable = easier + much, much lower risk of death if you get a disconnect while missioning. Higher tank = who cares? If it can handle the mission without a warpout, its good, if it can't, its bad. Either it works or it doesn't, adding more tank to something that works isn't any real benefit unless it allows you to fit more damage mods (and all the cheapo deadspace fits that are popular DO let you fit 3 damage mods).
Abrazzar	Posted - 2009.07.31 17:07:00 - [13] WTT: Offering 2x Pithi B-Type Small Shield Booster for a Pithum C-Type Medium Shield Booster. -------- Ideas for: Mining
FroschForscher	Posted - 2009.07.31 17:26:00 - [14] permatanking a raven is soo fail
fmercury Queens of the Stone Age Rote Kapelle	Posted - 2009.07.31 18:16:00 - [15] Originally by: Mistress Izanami Originally by: fmercury Originally by: Gavin DeVries Most people who are running CNR/Golem for L4s looking to pimp them out with hi-power/energy-efficient deadspace boosters are using dual Pithi-B smalls. Two of those are still cheaper than a single Pithum C-type. Those who really want power drop 2 billion on the Pithum A-type medium. I was thinking about a Pithum C-type for a Tengu, though. A-types are down considerably, from 1.9b to barely 1b. Almost all pith stuff has crashed, while DG mods are going up (invuln, BCU). I guess DG is going up beacuse CN is going up, but no idea why pith is crashing. Renters in NC space. Since NC had to go fight, they got all the plexes. The 1.9b price i quoted was at the height of the delve war. Unless i'm much mistaken NC was gone then, too. And why would renters ***** plexes more than the owners?
fmercury Queens of the Stone Age Rote Kapelle	Posted - 2009.07.31 18:17:00 - [16] Originally by: Dandy Lyon Originally by: Veebring Greetings Nothing but X-Large boosters on battleships. And then you want the Gistii types as high peak output isn't needed for missions. All of the fittings in proposed in this thread have been for freaks For some reason, people believe that ships should be "cap stable" with everything running. That's a real shame, cause it really limits your tank. Cap stability in pve ships is nice because it's one less thing to think about. If you can get a tank that works for 0 effort for a little bit extra isk, why not do it?
Ace Secunda Aperture Harmonics	Posted - 2009.07.31 18:26:00 - [17] This is not a critacism of anyone doing it any other way but......... Does no-body enjoy feathering the X-Large booster anymore, just using a T2 X-Large or even DG/Navy X-Large and using it when you need too, it makes the mundane, crappy, done 1000000000 times missions a little more bareable actually being an active part of flying the ship. Having a ship perma run everything for these missions just makes it a more colourful version of mining, activate mods, activate weapons, pop back every 30 seconds to a minute to switch between BS's BORING ha ha :D 'If I can't blow it up It don't exsist'
Gavin DeVries	Posted - 2009.07.31 18:52:00 - [18] Personally, I use a DG large. However, it's not that they don't want to pulse the booster that makes them go for the 2x Pithi or 1x Pithum setups. The fact that those boosters go so easy on capacitor while still providing equal tank allows you to drop all your cap recharge modules and go full gank. You find setups like the CNR with dual Pithi Bs running 3x Rigor Catalyst rigs and 4x CN Ballistic Controls, which you just can't get away with if you use a Large/XL booster. ______________________________________________________ Isn't it enough to know that I ruined a pony making a gift for you?
Velladona	Posted - 2009.07.31 18:56:00 - [19] Personaly i don't do lvl 4's for fun anymore, i do them for the great isk income. For the simple reason i don't want to loose my isk income, i run it perma boosted. That way i can leave the ship alone in the mission if the police is ringing at my door. Really handy if you are scramed.
Tippia Raddick Explorations	Posted - 2009.07.31 19:33:00 - [20] Originally by: Ace Secunda Having a ship perma run everything for these missions just makes it a more colourful version of mining, activate mods, activate weapons, pop back every 30 seconds to a minute to switch between BS's BORING ha ha :D That's why you don't do them in a ~~sissy~~battleship. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki
Maverick Aeldrin	Posted - 2009.07.31 22:03:00 - [21] clearly the OP just found one and is ****ed that the supply is higher and demand is down
Velladona	Posted - 2009.08.01 06:25:00 - [22] It's so clear that i wonder why you said it. Btw i've found more than one of them.
Carniflex Caldari Fallout Research Fallout Project	Posted - 2009.08.01 07:31:00 - [23] Originally by: Gavin DeVries Personally, I use a DG large. However, it's not that they don't want to pulse the booster that makes them go for the 2x Pithi or 1x Pithum setups. The fact that those boosters go so easy on capacitor while still providing equal tank allows you to drop all your cap recharge modules and go full gank. You find setups like the CNR with dual Pithi Bs running 3x Rigor Catalyst rigs and 4x CN Ballistic Controls, which you just can't get away with if you use a Large/XL booster. Mine has XL booster, painter and 4 BCU's. I also have heavy cap injector and with 5 in booster alltogehter 20 x800 charges on me. It's not like it's bright idea to loot in your missionrunning ship so having full cargo when going out is not a problem. I would say my injector fueled tank is stronger than those double small or medium plus boost amp tanks. Regadless of that I have died in the past in level 4 missions with that kind of setup (in regular Raven). Had 6 points on me and they killed me in approx 1 min 20 seconds over XL booster going full speed and rat specific hardeners. Sometimes stuff just happens, even if you know what you are doing. Smalls or medium are also ok, as most missions put out rather pathetic amount of damage. And CNR's also have rather tick shield buffer. But there are situations out there where those smalls or medium just dont cut it. All it takes is one of your drones going haywire and jumping on something improper. For example some lowly delta frigate in one particular not so popular mission.
Veebring Greetings	Posted - 2009.08.01 12:41:00 - [24] Edited by: Veebring Greetings on 01/08/2009 12:43:19 Originally by: Gavin DeVries Personally, I use a DG large. However, it's not that they don't want to pulse the booster that makes them go for the 2x Pithi or 1x Pithum setups. The fact that those boosters go so easy on capacitor while still providing equal tank allows you to drop all your cap recharge modules and go full gank. You find setups like the CNR with dual Pithi Bs running 3x Rigor Catalyst rigs and 4x CN Ballistic Controls, which you just can't get away with if you use a Large/XL booster. Not confirmed. CNR with 3x Missile Rigor rigs (1 T2), XL Booster+Amp, 4x CN BCU Will tank AE bonus room np
Veldya Guristari Freedom Fighters	Posted - 2009.08.01 14:04:00 - [25] Originally by: Velladona In the last month i have seen a BIG increase of aivailable Pithum C-type medium SB, the market is really burden and the price went down big time. Maybe people don't realise what you can do with it and don't buy them that much. For example you can really easily set a perma boost raven/CNR with it, with 4 active hardeners, a boost amp, a DCU and 3 BCS. This fit can roll over all lvl 4 missions while the shield NEVER fall under 70%. You don't have to have godly skills to do that. You have to buy this module ASAP ! Not sure why you would spend so much on a Pith medium when you can just use an XL T2 and just turn it on when your shields are down below 25% and turn it off at 75%.
Velladona	Posted - 2009.08.01 15:21:00 - [26] Maybe for this ? Originally by: Mahke cap stable = easier + much, much lower risk of death if you get a disconnect while missioning. Higher tank = who cares? If it can handle the mission without a warpout, its good, if it can't, its bad. Either it works or it doesn't, adding more tank to something that works isn't any real benefit unless it allows you to fit more damage mods (and all the cheapo deadspace fits that are popular DO let you fit 3 damage mods). Or this ? Originally by: fmercury Cap stability in pve ships is nice because it's one less thing to think about. If you can get a tank that works for 0 effort for a little bit extra isk, why not do it? Wait, for this maybe ? Originally by: Velladona Personaly i don't do lvl 4's for fun anymore, i do them for the great isk income. For the simple reason i don't want to loose my isk income, i run it perma boosted. That way i can leave the ship alone in the mission if the police is ringing at my door. Really handy if you are scramed. Note that all that quotes are from this thread and what you say has already been here. I can understand that you need to proove something with your bastard non perma ***cking raven that blast perma boosted ones, but please read the thread before posting.
Veldya Guristari Freedom Fighters	Posted - 2009.08.01 15:53:00 - [27] Originally by: Velladona Maybe for this ? Originally by: Mahke cap stable = easier + much, much lower risk of death if you get a disconnect while missioning. Higher tank = who cares? If it can handle the mission without a warpout, its good, if it can't, its bad. Either it works or it doesn't, adding more tank to something that works isn't any real benefit unless it allows you to fit more damage mods (and all the cheapo deadspace fits that are popular DO let you fit 3 damage mods). Or this ? Originally by: fmercury Cap stability in pve ships is nice because it's one less thing to think about. If you can get a tank that works for 0 effort for a little bit extra isk, why not do it? Wait, for this maybe ? Originally by: Velladona Personaly i don't do lvl 4's for fun anymore, i do them for the great isk income. For the simple reason i don't want to loose my isk income, i run it perma boosted. That way i can leave the ship alone in the mission if the police is ringing at my door. Really handy if you are scramed. Note that all that quotes are from this thread and what you say has already been here. I can understand that you need to proove something with your bastard non perma *cking raven that blast perma boosted ones, but please read the thread before posting. They are **ed reasons for getting the module. If you just posted that you are ****ed and wanted to just waste money and make yourself a target for gankers then I would understand, but the reasons defy logic. I can post whatever I like on any thread and don't need your approval on it. You lazy morons are what give mission runners a bad name and it is why pirates club you like baby seals. Why don't you stick some officer mods on it and you can AFK even better, and make yourself a king size target. They don't bother with T2 fitted ships because there is no money in it.
Velladona	Posted - 2009.08.01 16:03:00 - [28] Well, with only crybabies like you, you can say goodbye to the market, to the pirates and to the game. Keep it on, that's a good job. Stick to your shuttle you won't risk anything.

Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.