EVE Search - A list of Meta 4 items better than their Meta 5 versions

All Channels

Ships and Modules

A list of Meta 4 items better than their Meta 5 versions

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tom Selek	Posted - 2009.09.04 16:41:00 - [1] Boring Friday and I was wondering how many Meta 4 items better than their Meta 5 versions (excluding cost, just comparing fittings & bonuses). I'll start with Rolled Tungsten Plates I > Steel Plates II All ECM Meta 4 > ECM Meta 5 You guys and gals have any others?
Lubomir Penev Dark Nexxus	Posted - 2009.09.04 16:57:00 - [2] All ECCM, same sensor strength boost, less CPU, less cap use. -- 081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner blog
Siigari Kitawa Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:04:00 - [3] F-90 vs SeBo II, 2 less CPU. www.siigarikitawa.com ò www.quafeultra.com ò Buy a GTC
Doomed Predator The Graduates Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:16:00 - [4] Named 100MN MWD(meta 4) > T2 100 MN MWD(meta 5) ,screw the -25% shield penalty meta 4 damage mods> meta 5 damage mods ,less cpu The 'Fendahlian Collective' strikes again
Vasundhara	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:20:00 - [5] Beta Reactor Control: Capacitor Power Relay I 3 CPU Shield Boost Bonus -10% --- Is Better Than --- Capacitor Power Relay II 8 CPU Shield Boost Bonus -11% Same cap recharge bonus
DeFtron Gallente Cooperative Freelance Navigators Association Psychotic Tendencies.	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:22:00 - [6] Edited by: DeFtron on 04/09/2009 17:24:27 Edited by: DeFtron on 04/09/2009 17:23:02 PWNAGE Target Painter > Target Painter II (fitting, cap usage) Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage) Phased Muon Sensor Disruptor > Sensor Dampener II (huge difference in fitting reqs and cap usage) Diminishing Power System Drain > Nosferatu II (huge difference in fitting reqs) Unstable Power Fluctuators > Energy Neutralizers II(huge difference in fitting reqs) Edit: spelling Edit II: i must be tired today
Cmndr Griff Capitalistic Tendencies Red Dwarf Alliance	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:22:00 - [7] * Balmer Series TD has lower CPU requirements, same amount of disruption and lower activation cost. * Best named web and scrambler have lower fitting as well for the same effectiveness as T2 with lower activation costs. * Same story for the best named Target painter and sensor dampener. There are more out there but those are from memory.
Tom Selek	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:27:00 - [8] Edited by: Tom Selek on 04/09/2009 17:28:06 nevermind.
K'uata Sayus	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:30:00 - [9] The Gold Standard - Module Wars - Best Named vs Tech II This may be the definitive, exhaustive exploration of the subject. EVERYONE SEEMS NORMAL UNTIL YOU GET TO KNOW THEM.
Salpad Carebears with Attitude	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:42:00 - [10] Originally by: Tom Selek Boring Friday and I was wondering how many Meta 4 items better than their Meta 5 versions (excluding cost, just comparing fittings & bonuses). I archived this link some time ago: http://www.eve-tribune.com/index.php?no=3_16&page=1 -- Salpad C.E.O., Carebears with Attitude
Mr Ignitious R.E.C.O.N. Minor Threat.	Posted - 2009.09.04 17:57:00 - [11] Originally by: K'uata Sayus The Gold Standard - Module Wars - Best Named vs Tech II This may be the definitive, exhaustive exploration of the subject. out dated - MWD's all have same speed bonus now a days... damn nano nerf. I read the forums assuming there are no trolls, only really stupid people. Originally by: CCP Zulupark WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU?
Guillame Herschel Gallente NME1	Posted - 2009.09.04 22:08:00 - [12] Originally by: DeFtron Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage) But not range. Meta 4 = 7.5km, Meta 5 = 9km -- The crazy tree blooms at every moment of liberal ascendancy.
Ulasim Child Head Injury and Laceration Doctors	Posted - 2009.09.04 23:13:00 - [13] Edited by: Ulasim on 04/09/2009 23:13:40 Originally by: Doomed Predator Named 100MN MWD(meta 4) > T2 100 MN MWD(meta 5) ,screw the -25% shield penalty meta 4 damage mods> meta 5 damage mods ,less cpu lol shield penalty riigghhhtttt and meta 4 damage mods have a 0.02 lower damage mod then T2 Originally by: Guillame Herschel Originally by: DeFtron Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage) But not range. Meta 4 = 7.5km, Meta 5 = 9km Also wrong, scram range increases with meta lvl4, a faint has 9km range
Sith LordX	Posted - 2009.09.05 01:57:00 - [14] Edited by: Sith LordX on 05/09/2009 01:57:05 The difference is in price. T2 is cheaper then T1 meta 4 items.
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2009.09.05 02:12:00 - [15] Originally by: Guillame Herschel Originally by: DeFtron Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler > Warp Scrambler II (fitting, cap usage) But not range. Meta 4 = 7.5km, Meta 5 = 9km not true, look again
Ronin Reborn Wrath of Fenris Gentlemen's Club	Posted - 2009.09.05 04:26:00 - [16] Flat out better due to fitting or cap use Pwnage Painter > TP II Balmer TD > TD II Phased Muon > SD II 'Named' ECM > ECM II Phased Muon Projected ECCM II > Projected ECCM II Named ECCM > ECCM II Fleeting Web > Web II 'Solace' RR > RR II S95a Shield Transporters > ST II Local Hull Mods > Respective Hull Mods II Beta SPR > SPR II Beta CPR > CPR II
AtheistOfDoom Amarr The Athiest Syndicate	Posted - 2009.09.05 05:24:00 - [17] Edited by: AtheistOfDoom on 05/09/2009 05:25:09 Originally by: Doomed Predator meta 4 damage mods> meta 5 damage mods ,less cpu Wrong. t2 >>>>> meta 4 damage mods. less cpu, more damage. Quote: Local Hull Mods > Respective Hull Mods II Not always. Originally by: Chribba
Lunewraith Amarr Ministry of War	Posted - 2009.09.05 12:57:00 - [18] Good thread, bookmarked. Should almost be stickied.
Saulc Neslo	Posted - 2009.09.05 18:52:00 - [19] Originally by: Ronin Reborn 'Solace' RR > RR II The T2 has shorter cycle time. If you can fit a T2 LRAR and handle the extra cap usage its better than the solace.
Lubomir Penev Dark Nexxus	Posted - 2009.09.06 19:14:00 - [20] Originally by: Siigari Kitawa F-90 vs SeBo II, 2 less CPU. Sensor Booster II use less cap/s. So if you can fit it you should fit it. -- 081014 : emoragequit, char transfered to a friend, 090317 : back to original owner blog
Ecky X	Posted - 2009.09.06 19:52:00 - [21] Most plates, best named is the same armor as T2, with less mass penalty, less cpu, and less grid.
Dristra Amarr Idle Haven	Posted - 2009.09.06 22:14:00 - [22] You do know that bringing light to this issue will lead ccp to nerf meta items, not boost tech II, right?
Gawain Hill	Posted - 2009.09.06 22:25:00 - [23] since when was the meta level anything more than a vague but inaccurate extimation of how good something is? meta 0 to 3 not very good meta 4 better than meta 5 but being the best named item means it's very expensive so meta 5 ( i hate that lets call it T2 here from now on) so T2 is cheaper option although it might be more difficult to fit. The only notable exception to T2 being better than best named is in weapons when ALL T2 weapons are better than best named guns thanks to the incresed damage. best named items = very expensive easy to fit T2 items = dirt cheap difficult to fit longer to skill for much greateer supply

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.