| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
   |
Posted - 2009.09.21 08:46:00 -
[1]
If you really want to get people out of NPC corps, then reworking the war dec system and even more importantly the bounty system is really important.
War decs are a confused mess. The bounty system isn't even a joke any more. Neutral remote reppers make a mockery out of such hi-sec PvP as does occur. Armour/shield rigs increasing tank without a corresponding increase in aggro timers mean that stupid docking games are the norm, not the exception.
Empire PvP needs fixing. Urgently
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 09:32:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Lidirt
Are you serious?
Empire PVP has serious consequences already. .
Can you read? If so, try reading what I posted.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 09:49:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Lidirt
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Lidirt
Are you serious?
Empire PVP has serious consequences already. .
Can you read? If so, try reading what I posted.
I read quite carefully what you posted. It makes no sense to me. Docking games occur in high-sec as well as low-sec. They occur even in sovereign space as well. What you're proposing is ludicrous quite frankly.
If anything aggro timers should be removed. How realistic are they? If you shot someone IRL you would be able to run your ass off as hard as you were able to, why shouldn't that apply to New Eden?
Which class of space has by far the highest concentration of available stations to dock in?
0.0
lo-sec
hi-sec
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 10:19:00 -
[4]
I dont care where you have lived. The incontestable fact is that tanking ability has hugely increased, while aggro & dock timers have stayed the same.
And you, docking timers were the least of the issues raised in my post. Seriously, stop nit-picking about minor things.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 10:40:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Lidirt
Originally by: Malcanis
I dont care where you have lived. The incontestable fact is that tanking ability has hugely increased, while aggro & dock timers have stayed the same.
And you, docking timers were the least of the issues raised in my post. Seriously, stop nit-picking about minor things.
How has tanking ability increased, precisely?
Are you just trolling or are you really actually that ignorant of the game?
Make a battleship fit in EFT or in game. Look at the EHP. Add 3x trimarks or 3x CDFE rigs and look at the EHP again.
See the difference? I'll make it easy for you. The second number is much larger than than the first number.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 10:55:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Frug
Originally by: Malcanis
War decs are a confused mess.
War decs are fine, and if you can't wrap your head around the current system, you should hire someone who can.
Just saying. Empire PvP is absolutely fine the way it is. Remote reppers are a pain but can be dealt with.
Right so avoiding wardecs by metagaming your way through a merry-go-round of corps is fine is it?
The bounty system is absolutely perfect is it?
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 14:16:00 -
[7]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 21/09/2009 13:44:42
Originally by: Malcanis
Right so avoiding wardecs by metagaming your way through a merry-go-round of corps is fine is it?
ITT 3litE PVPers condemn metagaming... But only metagames that negatively impact them. All other forms are fine  .
Pro-tip: If you're really concerned about metagaming then I suggest you tackle the biggest issue of all; the use of alts to circumvent virtually all mechanics in game.
Examples?
Using alts as intel tools makes gatecamps virtually immune to losses.
The use of alts negates the consequences of being -10.
No serious consequences to scamming
No serious consequences to spying
List goes on and on...
But yeh, this isn't the metagaming you're looking to get fixed now, is it?
CCP, nerf carebearz! Buff 3L1TE PVPrs!! \o/
Gosh, with all those words you're putting in to my mouth, you hardly need me to post at all.
How about a wardec system where an empire corp can post a bond with concord. Anyone wanting to dec them has to match this bond, and if they retract the war, then their ISK is forfeit.
The dec'd corp is free to hire more mercenaries or exert any other kind of in-game pressure on the deccing corp to drop the wardec.
That might dissaude casual, opportunistic griefing?
|
| |
|