| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
363
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
There is a great cry among the miner community due to the fact that they are being griefed and its encouraged from CCPGǪ
In the eyes of CCP miners have no right being in high sec and they should be forced to move to null sec Gǣwhere its supposed to be safe?GǥGǪ
But look how the CSM has manipulated their position when it comes to the war dec formulaGǪ
Apparently if you have more peeps in your corp/alliance it should be more expensive to war dec you!??!?!?
Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killedGǪ
How can it on one hand be unfair to have cheep war dec costs because of the perception that it would be unfair to nullbears due to having high sec no longer be GǣsafeGǥGǪ when the same people say that miners should be targeted and harassed because they have no right to be safe in high sec?
Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE
Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reshipGǪ
Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!
PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |

D3F4ULT
81
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
You dont have to be at war to kill someone in this game. Want to kill them? Go to null and quit crying on the forums while docked. Posting wont solve your problems. Creator of CCP ZULU - Incarna : Pants Online ( http://youtu.be/AObrlCf3Dcs ) |

Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cry more? |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
there's about 60 hisec corps/alliances that have figured out how to wardec us for free eh |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7714
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
The cost of wardecs has zero impact on your ability to attack nullbears.
Hulks are already reasonably safe is they fit a tank.
Increasing sec penalties for ganks has zero impact unless the victims decide to start shooting back (they won't).
Restricting players' use of ships as a function of sec status makes no sense. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
~nullbears~
what the **** does that even mean eh |

Ituhata Saken
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
274
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
I think he meant its not fair that the largest alliances have to pay more to wardec smaller ones. I was aroused and confused but after reading it several times I finally understood.
Seems the players are handling the change just fine and without even issuing a wardec. You know what an answer is? It's a terminus -- an end. Answers are fine, but questions are where it's at. Questions bring us closer to understanding, -áthey can start a conversation or spark a revolution. So you might as well start asking... now.-á ~See you on the other side 6/6/12~ |

TheBreadMuncher
Boxxed Up Industries EPIC Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:~nullbears~
what the **** does that even mean
I think I invented the term while sperging. Essentially, it's a nullsec resident who sits in their POS or outpost whenever a red appears in local, and spends the rest of their time ratting, running complexes or mining. Also whines whenever anything happens to nullsec. A nullsec carebear.
Also - OP? Quit whining. Ain't nobody got time for dat. I only ever emerge from the shadows when my main is banned. |

highonpop
Void.Tech Fatal Ascension
86
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
OP is mad he hasnt figured out how to play EVE yet. THE EVE-O FORUMS GENERAL SECTION = CAREBEAR TEARS CENTRAL Butt Hurt about Harrasment?-áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=88362&find=unread My post was probably full of typos. I don;t care... |

Ituhata Saken
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
274
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
TheBreadMuncher wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:~nullbears~
what the **** does that even mean I think I invented the term while sperging. Essentially, it's a nullsec resident who sits in their POS or outpost whenever a red appears in local, and spends the rest of their time ratting, running complexes or mining. Also whines whenever anything happens to nullsec. A nullsec carebear. Also - OP? Quit whining. Ain't nobody got time for dat.
I must have never been a nullbear. I warped to a safe and cloaked.  You know what an answer is? It's a terminus -- an end. Answers are fine, but questions are where it's at. Questions bring us closer to understanding, -áthey can start a conversation or spark a revolution. So you might as well start asking... now.-á ~See you on the other side 6/6/12~ |

D3F4ULT
81
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
IMO if you really want to be safe go play on sisi and mine. Thats waht you want right? Solo play, Just mine, afford everything on market and not get shot at. Sounds exciting. Creator of CCP ZULU - Incarna : Pants Online ( http://youtu.be/AObrlCf3Dcs ) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
TheBreadMuncher wrote:I think I invented the term while sperging. Essentially, it's a nullsec resident who sits in their POS or outpost whenever a red appears in local, and spends the rest of their time ratting, running complexes or mining. Also whines whenever anything happens to nullsec. A nullsec carebear.
its definition has expanded to "anyone who lives in nullsec"
lmao eh |

March rabbit
Trojan Trolls Red Alliance
194
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:28:00 -
[13] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:~nullbears~
what the **** does that even mean this word is shortcut of goonswarm member who "pvp" in empire suicide killing miners and getting reimbursed by alliance.  |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:30:00 -
[14] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:this word is shortcut of goonswarm member who "pvp" in empire suicide killing miners and getting reimbursed by alliance. 
lmao we can't get a GSF member in the top10 list for hulkageddon and you think we're doing the ganking
"I can pay half of the working class to kill the other half" eh |

Jafit
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
188
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE
Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reshipGǪ
Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!
Forget having to pay attention Forget setting your hulk's tank up properly Forget mining in groups Forget using logistics cruisers Forget mining in battleships Forget moving to lowsec or nullsec Forget mining in cheaper T1 barges
Instead, CCP please change the game so I don't have to do anything different.
Thx. |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
149
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:In the eyes of CCP miners have no right being in high sec and they should be forced to move to null sec Gǣwhere its supposed to be safe?GǥGǪ
... How can it on one hand be unfair to have cheep war dec costs because of the perception that it would be unfair to nullbears due to having high sec no longer be GǣsafeGǥGǪ when the same people say that miners should be targeted and harassed because they have no right to be safe in high sec?
CCP aren't against highsec miners, they've actually defended them against years of nullsec whines that there should be fewer and smaller belts in highsec (and no ice at all). The people trying to force mining out of highsec at the moment tend to be bored nullseccers with nothing better to do than whine, and lazy people who can only win fights against other people when they don't shoot back. The bounties on exhumers from GSF aren't really relevant as any form of income incentive since they only offset the losses from suicide ganking - they don't actually reward it.
The issue with the war dec formula is just another example of the CCP disconnect between what they believe wardecs should be used for (legal PvP between entities in highsec), and what they're actually being used for (griefing small and/or industrial corps). The claim 'more people in a corp means more targets, and that's what you're paying for' sounds good on paper, but since most wardecs are intended for minimum-risk griefing and easy kills it doesn't hold water in the real EVE. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
363
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:TheBreadMuncher wrote:I think I invented the term while sperging. Essentially, it's a nullsec resident who sits in their POS or outpost whenever a red appears in local, and spends the rest of their time ratting, running complexes or mining. Also whines whenever anything happens to nullsec. A nullsec carebear. its definition has expanded to "anyone who lives in nullsec" lmao
this is true due to coalition blocks and isk faucets pvp in null sec is like sisi for everyone else... there is zero risk for loosing your regular ships...
plus things like hulkageddon actually pay for goons reinbursment program...
this is not true for everyone else who plays the game either in faction null sec or the rest of space...
at least in WH space it takes some effort to get ships there...
PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:this is true due to coalition blocks and isk faucets pvp in null sec is like sisi for everyone else... there is zero risk for loosing your regular ships...
plus things like hulkageddon actually pay for goons reinbursment program...
this is not true for everyone else who plays the game either in faction null sec or the rest of space...
at least in WH space it takes some effort to get ships there...
Reimbursement programs only cover PvP losses and are meant to encourage members to reship and get back into fights rather than spending 4 hours ratting up ISK for a new ship
hope this helps eh |

March rabbit
Trojan Trolls Red Alliance
194
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:34:00 -
[19] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:March rabbit wrote:this word is shortcut of goonswarm member who "pvp" in empire suicide killing miners and getting reimbursed by alliance.  lmao we can't get a GSF member in the top10 list for hulkageddon and you think we're doing the ganking this is only measurement of your success and "pvp-skill" 
which doesn't decline your "nullbear-ness" 
|

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
363
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
Jafit wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE
Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reshipGǪ
Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!
Forget having to pay attention Forget setting your hulk's tank up properly Forget mining in groups Forget using logistics cruisers Forget mining in battleships Forget moving to lowsec or nullsec Forget mining in cheaper T1 barges Instead, CCP please change the game so I don't have to do anything different. Thx.
right and the same could be said for local in 0.0...
pretty much you can do a ring sanctum in your nyx half asleep while watching **** and never die...
either high sec is not safe for all or its semi safe for most...
its the double standard that currently exists that makes it unbalanced...
PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:this is only measurement of your success and "pvp-skill"  which doesn't decline your "nullbear-ness" 
The measurement of an alliance's success is its ability to take space and defend it. The alliance you are in, a faded shadow of its former self (which was a shadow of its former self as well, ~heh~), failed miserably at this when Insmother fell. On the other hand, when we faced an invasion, we promptly trapped the hostile supercaps in their staging towers and destroyed all of the progress they had made up until that point.
So please tell me more about "measures of success"
laff eh |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1078
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
what the hell is this crybaby crap? |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1078
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:March rabbit wrote:this is only measurement of your success and "pvp-skill"  which doesn't decline your "nullbear-ness"  The measurement of an alliance's success is its ability to take space and defend it. The alliance you are in, a faded shadow of its former self, failed miserably at this when Insmother fell. On the other hand, when we faced an invasion, we promptly trapped the hostile supercaps in their staging towers and destroyed all of the progress they had made up until that point. So please tell me more about "measures of success" laff Maybe he thought he was joining RvB |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
364
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:March rabbit wrote:this is only measurement of your success and "pvp-skill"  which doesn't decline your "nullbear-ness"  The measurement of an alliance's success is its ability to take space and defend it. The alliance you are in, a faded shadow of its former self, failed miserably at this when Insmother fell. laff
really i thought it was get former members of said alliance to join corp that makes game and then design game mechanics that allow you to have unlimited money and make it so no one can start from scartch and eliminate you...
PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
149
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:40:00 -
[25] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:this is only measurement of your success and "pvp-skill"  which doesn't decline your "nullbear-ness"  Red Alliance, best alliance.  |

Dragon Outlaw
Rogue Fleet
111
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:41:00 -
[26] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:there's about 60 hisec corps/alliances that have figured out how to wardec us for free
They attack them in RL ? |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:42:00 -
[27] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:really i thought it was get former members of said alliance to join corp that makes game and then design game mechanics that allow you to have unlimited money and make it so no one can start from scartch and eliminate you...
Technetium was made the bottleneck mineral in Dominion, when we held Delve, which does not have any tech moons.
What prevents anybody from "starting from scratch and eliminating us?" eh |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1078
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
anyways, I agree with MeBiatch
CCP, turn all of highsec into 0.0 space so that all highsec carebears get access to our super-safe riskfree 'isk faucets' |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion
900
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:45:00 -
[29] - Quote
tl;dr:
1. Incorrect premises 2. Spurious logic 3. Tears 4. ??? 5. Beg CCP for Profit! Here's your sign... |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
626
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:46:00 -
[30] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:MeBiatch wrote:really i thought it was get former members of said alliance to join corp that makes game and then design game mechanics that allow you to have unlimited money and make it so no one can start from scartch and eliminate you...
Technetium was made the bottleneck mineral in Dominion, when we held Delve, which does not have any tech moons. What prevents anybody from "starting from scratch and eliminating us?"
Even more than that, the dominion moon revamp was in effect a goon "nerf" in that goons held the best regions for the then bottlenecked moons, and had no credible threats to this position (except sov bills WOLOLOLOLOLOL).
So, ya, the goondev tech conspiracy theory is so far out of whack that it stands above in a sea of ill-conceived tinfoil theories. |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
149
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:46:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:anyways, I agree with MeBiatch
CCP, turn all of highsec into 0.0 space so that all highsec carebears get access to our super-safe riskfree 'isk faucets'
Quote:our super-safe riskfree 'isk faucets'
(Gò»-¦Gûí-¦n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+ |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
364
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:MeBiatch wrote:really i thought it was get former members of said alliance to join corp that makes game and then design game mechanics that allow you to have unlimited money and make it so no one can start from scartch and eliminate you...
Technetium was made the bottleneck mineral in Dominion, when we held Delve, which does not have any tech moons. What prevents anybody from "starting from scratch and eliminating us?"
you guys were given your current region when TRI mark whatever died by the former NC...
this was after your origional alliance goonswarm failed when your leader weant ona trip and forgot to pay the bills... PLEX FOR PIZZA!
TECH iii MINNING SHIPS! |

Darth Tickles
Dark Sun Consortium
626
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:anyways, I agree with MeBiatch
CCP, turn all of highsec into 0.0 space so that all highsec carebears get access to our super-safe riskfree 'isk faucets' Quote:our super-safe riskfree 'isk faucets' (Gò»-¦Gûí-¦n+ëGò»n+¦ Gö+GöüGö+
o ****, don't start that **** |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
803
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:53:00 -
[34] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:you guys were given your current region when TRI mark whatever died by the former NC...
TCF gave it to us by their own accord. We fought for the majority of the tech moons we currently hold. eh |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1081
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:55:00 -
[35] - Quote
wait is an npc forum alt coward poster seriously complaining about others having wardec immunity? |

Jafit
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
190
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote: right and the same could be said for local in 0.0...
pretty much you can do a ring sanctum in your nyx half asleep while watching **** and never die...
either high sec is not safe for all or its semi safe for most...
its the double standard that currently exists that makes it unbalanced...
Please do go to our killboard and look at the weekly hall of shame to see our most expensive losses this week.
Rhea - 4.86 Billion Rorqual - 2.60 Billion Tengu - 1.68 Billion Vindicator - 1.64 Billion Tengu - 1.53 Billion
This is pretty average. apart from the JF, that is juicy.
I can't think of any Nyxes that we have personally lost, but I could definitely find you some KMs for ratting supers.
You are totally uninformed and you should feel bad for being so wrong. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
806
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:wait is an npc forum alt coward poster seriously complaining about others having wardec immunity?
His main is in UDEAD eh |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
806
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 15:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
Jafit wrote:Vindicator - 1.64 Billion
lost to rats ahahahahaha eh |

Jafit
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
190
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 16:00:00 -
[39] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Jafit wrote:Vindicator - 1.64 Billion
lost to rats ahahahahaha
Yup. That hall of shame is a comedy goldmine. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1081
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 16:03:00 -
[40] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:wait is an npc forum alt coward poster seriously complaining about others having wardec immunity? His main is in UDEAD lol |

BeforetheStorm90
The Sagan Clan Persona Non Gratis
23
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 16:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote: Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
While I appreciate the gesture, I think everyone would be happiest with Goons remaining Goons. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
720
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 16:09:00 -
[42] - Quote
Im a nullsec pvper. I have an alt that does some borign stuff such as Ice mining in nullsec when we organise ops, with defence, security, scouts etc (you know, the way mining ops shoudl happen.)
I also have a couple of hisec toons. One is a miner I use to mine often AFK in near complete safety while I look after my kids, do housework, cook and stuff like that. I have never been ganked.
The difference between how I mine and how the hapless carebears who are crying about getting ganked mine is simple; I think about what Im doing, where Im doing it and worry less about isk/hour and more about keeping my ship and cargo. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
297
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 17:02:00 -
[43] - Quote
OP does not make sense, there is no double standard at work that I can see, and I think Hulkageddon Infinity is a stupid event, so I would be inclined to agree with him if his logic were better. CCP would undoubtedly like to see more players in null sec and low sec, but that has little or nothing to do with the war dec mechanics. Pegging the cost of a war dec to the size of the alliance or corp is just good sense.
I'd like to find more nasty things to say about the Goons, too, but in this case I'll pass. |

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
297
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 17:08:00 -
[44] - Quote
There's a difference between opposition to Hulkageddon Infinity and opposition to ganking in general. The two are discussed here as if they're the same thing, and they're not. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way.
There's no need for a Hulkageddon Infinity to encourage more ganking. The levels of ganking without Hulkageddon are high enough. I don't have any problem with that part.
For the record, my hulk has survived three gank attempts by fleets of 4 destroyers; I know how to tank my hulk and always encouraged my corp mates to do the same. Unfortunately, Eve newbies like most gamers think they know more than anybody else in the world, even in a game as complicated as this one. It was always an uphill battle to convince newer players to tank their hulks. We had to kick one player from our corp - a veteran Eve player - because he refused to stop mining during war decs, choosing to mine in a busy system instead of find something else to do for a week. It's not that easy to get people to do the sensible thing in this game. |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
151
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 17:21:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ban Bindy wrote:There's a difference between opposition to Hulkageddon Infinity and opposition to ganking in general. The two are discussed here as if they're the same thing, and they're not. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way. The flip side to this is that CCP shouldn't be able to demonise a group of players who have found a legal way to manipulate the market and profit (current GSF/OTEC profiteering from T2 ship losses which is what it's really about (along with Mittani's bruised ego)), and that it should be up to the players in-game to organise a counter to it.
As much as I also think it's lame and damaging to the game, it's within CCP's rules so there's nothing we can do about it besides adapt or quit. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
446
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 17:35:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ban Bindy wrote:. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way.. So CCP should have stepped in to halt every major war in the history of Eve then?
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
351
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 17:37:00 -
[47] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way.. So CCP should have stepped in to halt every major war in the history of Eve then?
I wouldn't class shooting unarmed mining ships as a war tbh ??
Tal
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2018
|
Posted - 2012.06.06 17:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:There is a great cry among the miner community due to the fact that they are being griefed and its encouraged from CCPGǪ
In the eyes of CCP miners have no right being in high sec and they should be forced to move to null sec Gǣwhere its supposed to be safe?GǥGǪ
But look how the CSM has manipulated their position when it comes to the war dec formulaGǪ
Apparently if you have more peeps in your corp/alliance it should be more expensive to war dec you!??!?!?
Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killedGǪ
How can it on one hand be unfair to have cheep war dec costs because of the perception that it would be unfair to nullbears due to having high sec no longer be GǣsafeGǥGǪ when the same people say that miners should be targeted and harassed because they have no right to be safe in high sec?
Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE
Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reshipGǪ
Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!
I believe the words you are looking for are "CCP believes there is a certain amount of safety in numbers, and that you can become stronger and accomplish more when you learn to work with others".
Of course, in EVE being larger simply means you are a bigger target. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |

D3F4ULT
83
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 02:52:00 -
[49] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way.. So CCP should have stepped in to halt every major war in the history of Eve then? I wouldn't class shooting unarmed mining ships as a war tbh ?? Tal
A deceleration against a body that represents industrialists.
sounds like war to me. Creator of CCP ZULU - Incarna : Pants Online ( http://youtu.be/AObrlCf3Dcs ) |

Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
1586
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 02:58:00 -
[50] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:
Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killedGǪ
I'm pretty sure TEST currently has a new record for active wardecs at any given time. TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |

RAP ACTION HERO
55
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 05:31:00 -
[51] - Quote
you know if you war dec the gonos, you have like a 6000 all you can eat buffet of potential targets but if you dec some scrub vanity alliance, you only get 5 and 2 online?
prices seems fair to me lol
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
2400
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 06:34:00 -
[52] - Quote
Agree with the OP
+1 like. |

Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1378
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 06:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
Damn! Best thread on GD right now, and I have nothing to add.
Johnny! You don't know |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
831
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 06:41:00 -
[54] - Quote
CCP capped the wardec cost so that huge alliances wouldn't cost several billion to wardec
deal with it eh |

Fleet Me
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 06:55:00 -
[55] - Quote
why does nobody ever thinks of it like this.
FIrst you start in rookie highsec (1.0->0.8 THen you go to Highsec (8.0->0.5 then you go and wonder around in lowsec ALERT DANGEROUS :) (0.4->0.1 wooohoo nulsec!!!!!!! TIME to kill some fleets AND RESET TEST! (0.o)
so everything is just a step to get you into 0.0 space.
They also have a special Haven For carebears (some times with Teeth) called WH
In 0.0 we have something callled Countering (some cases this is blobing) so Hey you little Miner FLoating around in space in your hulk at the Veldspar belt Go buy a small pos online it in A wormhole and start scanning out some gravi sites (c1) You just have to worry about getting fuel and you have your system alone wheir you can Mine all day,
Stop wining about CCP that they are supporting people to kill you becouse if you do you should be blown out of your hulk
Ps; if you go into a c1 could i haz the bookmark one day |

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
30
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:13:00 -
[56] - Quote
Jafit wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Jafit wrote:Vindicator - 1.64 Billion
lost to rats ahahahahaha Yup. That hall of shame is a comedy goldmine.
i lost a coercer to rogue drones in a scanned site.. oh woe was that a depressing day... lol |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Dead On Arrival Alliance
382
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:14:00 -
[57] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:
The issue with the war dec formula is just another example of the CCP disconnect between what they believe wardecs should be used for (legal PvP between entities in highsec), and what they're actually being used for (griefing small and/or industrial corps). The claim 'more people in a corp means more targets, and that's what you're paying for' sounds good on paper, but since most wardecs are intended for minimum-risk griefing and easy kills it doesn't hold water in the real EVE.
Uh huh. So, lets say Goons decs a vanity alliance of 5 guys. It costs sod all, and potentially 6,000 people are grieifing the balls off 5 guys. These 6,000 cads can permacamp the 5 guys in station for ever - I mean, surely Goons can afford an endless dec!
But then, oh, wait, the executor man for Vanity alliance logs in and clicks the tickybox "assistance requests enabled". Some dude in MOAR TEARS sees that Goons are at war with some tiny flyspeck alliance, which is looking for help. Double Tap sees this too, when MOAR TEARS man gets in the intel channel and is all like "DAFUQQ DO U SEE DIS?!?!" and the Orphans bloke is like "ME GUSTA!!", MOAR TEARS man is all "INORITE?!?!" and the intel channels blaze into light, and suddenly Vanity Alliance XO, who is crying tears of shame while station spinning in 4-4 has his mail icon flashing like a strobe light, and everyone's offering their help for 0 ISK.
And you know what, he might just accept it.
Given Sudden Buggery was, and this is confirmed, the first corp to lay out and accept an assist in a wardec, I can tell you, a 15 v 50 turned into a 15 v 450 pretty damn quickly once everyone realised you could join wars for free, as long as you were prepared to stick it out till the aggressor decided it was too much of a PITA.
Therefore, sirrah, your argument holds less water than a teabag. I would dare a large entity to pick on a small entity these days without a solid exit strategy lined up.
@ rest of thread: DAFU-Q.Q-Q.Q
The skilful employer of men will employ the wise man, the brave man, the covetous man, and the stupid man. Sun Tzu localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Kyra Yaken
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:16:00 -
[58] - Quote
Remove nullsec |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1067
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:20:00 -
[59] - Quote
Maybe just allow a single person to pay a very small war dec fee to - brace yourselves - war dec another single person. What alliance and corp they are in is irrelevant. I guess your friends can come to remote rep you or whatever like now, but at least it would not be a situation where super large alliances are immune to war decs unless by the insanely rich.
I am drinking right now and I am sure the above is terrible, but thought I would toss it out there anyways. Please poke a ton of holes in it so tomorrow when I read it, I will know how bad of an idea it was. Also point out any good parts so i dont' feel as bad.
Ok off to pass out.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
94
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:23:00 -
[60] - Quote
Dear OP.
Look in the current wars tab under corporation in alliance you don't like. Find a current war where the "null bear alliance" you do not like is the aggressor. Offer to help the defender as an ally. Well done free war against any "null bear alliance" . |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
834
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:23:00 -
[61] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:i lost a coercer to rogue drones in a scanned site.. oh woe was that a depressing day... lol
that's a learning experience with a cheap disposable ship, not an embarrassment with a 2bn faction battleship eh |

ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
94
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:24:00 -
[62] - Quote
regards Moderated to Silence
o7o7o7 |

ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
94
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 07:25:00 -
[63] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Agree with the OP
+1 like.
The OP is completely inaccurate. Do you agree with his sentiment or his statements? |

Kyshonuba
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 08:24:00 -
[64] - Quote
ModeratedToSilence wrote:Dear OP.
Look in the current wars tab under corporation in alliance you don't like. Find a current war where the "null bear alliance" you do not like is the aggressor. Offer to help the defender as an ally. Well done free war against any "null bear alliance" .
Look in the current wars tab and check assistence request ..... we are probaply talking about an industrial corp which is focussed on money making . Doing High Sec-PvP for an industrial corp means loosing time and money for them, hence paying money for merchenary support seems to be the better solution.
Links to dev bloggs regarding war mechanics
With friends like these ... the new ally system Changes to war mechanics
Attitude of CCP regarding "high sec wars"
SoniClover wrote:
As always it is very difficult to create a system that supports legal PvP in a one-size-fits-all manner, as people have different playstyles, needs and expectations. With the changes currently in the pipeline we do realize that wars become a bit more hardcore and harder to avoid. But the line that is being drawn in the sand here is that if youGÇÖre in a player run corporation, then war is something you must be prepared to tackle. The ally system and the surrender with enforced peace do give options beside just duking it out (or docking for a week), but if you absolutely do not want to be war decced, then the only option right now is to be in a NPC corp. This is not an optimal solution and we might iterate here in the future, but this is the direction weGÇÖre taking right now.
hope that helps  |

The Groundskeeper
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
127
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 09:38:00 -
[65] - Quote
"We are on the cusp of breaking our all-time subscriber record right now," Olafsson told me. - http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/06/05/e3-2012-ccp-says-it-wants-eve-to-be-around-in-10-20-30-years/
Eve is healthier than it has been for years and subscriptions are up, up up... Good luck with the whining and begging, empire scum. |

Uinuva Karma
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 09:43:00 -
[66] - Quote
I can prove that I have double D standards, but it will cost you 500mil per handful.
Only for nullbears, carebears have hairy and dirty hands.
|

Yolanta Geezenstack
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 10:04:00 -
[67] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:"I can pay half of the working class to kill the other half"
Using that quote in this circumstance is vicious on so many levels - brilliant. 
|

Potrondal Morrison
The Scope Gallente Federation
37
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 10:10:00 -
[68] - Quote
Everytime i read one of these "high sec is so unfare to miners" posts, i think, YEEEHHAAAAAA, CRY BABY, CRY THOSE TEARS, MORE,MORE,MORE, etc.
|

Roxie Mars
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 10:52:00 -
[69] - Quote
I wish I could fly around null sec risk free. What skills do I need to train for that? |

Spurty
D00M. Northern Coalition.
283
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 11:08:00 -
[70] - Quote
Roxie Mars wrote:I wish I could fly around null sec risk free. What skills do I need to train for that?
Quit corp ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
122
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 11:16:00 -
[71] - Quote
@OP
If you want to kill nullbears, go there and kill them.
brb |

Kyshonuba
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 14:10:00 -
[72] - Quote
Be careful guys ! CCP just confirmed that some notorious forum trolls accidently venomed themselves with high sec tears.  |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1988
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 14:17:00 -
[73] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:There is a great cry among the miner community due to the fact that they are being griefed and its encouraged from CCPGǪ
In the eyes of CCP miners have no right being in high sec and they should be forced to move to null sec Gǣwhere its supposed to be safe?GǥGǪ
But look how the CSM has manipulated their position when it comes to the war dec formulaGǪ
Apparently if you have more peeps in your corp/alliance it should be more expensive to war dec you!??!?!?
Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killedGǪ
How can it on one hand be unfair to have cheep war dec costs because of the perception that it would be unfair to nullbears due to having high sec no longer be GǣsafeGǥGǪ when the same people say that miners should be targeted and harassed because they have no right to be safe in high sec?
Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE
Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reshipGǪ
Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!
If you'd care to form a corporation I invite you to join our war against Goonswarm for absolutely ZERO isk.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
160
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 18:13:00 -
[74] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Given Sudden Buggery was, and this is confirmed, the first corp to lay out and accept an assist in a wardec, I can tell you, a 15 v 50 turned into a 15 v 450 pretty damn quickly once everyone realised you could join wars for free, as long as you were prepared to stick it out till the aggressor decided it was too much of a PITA. This is the important part of your post. The aggressor still has all the power and is the only decider in when a wardec ends. The defender can't lock the aggressor into the dec as a reprisal or force an end to it, and if the aggressor wants to they can just dock up and keep all parties locked into a pointless wardec indefinitely.
There is still no balance or real risk in declaring wardecs, despite the press releases of a company that obviously doesn't play its own game. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1106
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 18:21:00 -
[75] - Quote
I love suggesting "turn all of highsec into 0.0 so everyone will be supersafe like you say" in these whine threads because I get to watch the OP immediately slink away and abandon the thread every time. |

Jin'an Tonika
Hedion University Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 19:35:00 -
[76] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:March rabbit wrote:this is only measurement of your success and "pvp-skill"  which doesn't decline your "nullbear-ness"  The measurement of an alliance's success is its ability to take space and defend it. The alliance you are in, a faded shadow of its former self (which was a shadow of its former self as well, ~heh~), failed miserably at this when Insmother fell. On the other hand, when we faced an invasion, we promptly trapped the hostile supercaps in their staging towers and destroyed all of the progress they had made up until that point. So please tell me more about "measures of success" laff
Look at this Nullbear talking like he's got some war stories to share. He hasn't ganked a high sec industrialist in over a year. Keep talking Darth Failbear. Take that stupid hood off or go back to Nerds of the Old Republic |

Djana Libra
The Black Ops
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 19:40:00 -
[77] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:~nullbears~
what the **** does that even mean
Look on killboards, they are the ****rds in capitals that get killed with an NPC as highest damage dealer |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
854
|
Posted - 2012.06.07 19:46:00 -
[78] - Quote
Jin'an Tonika wrote:Look at this Nullbear talking like he's got some war stories to share. He hasn't ganked a high sec industrialist in over a year. Keep talking Darth Failbear. Take that stupid hood off or go back to Nerds of the Old Republic
npc alts lma0
also that covetor kill was a canflip, it was hilarious, he said i have no ~honour~ eh |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1008
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 09:07:00 -
[79] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:I love suggesting "turn all of highsec into 0.0 so everyone will be supersafe like you say" in these whine threads because I get to watch the OP immediately slink away and abandon the thread every time. Actually...
...
That's a damn good way to do it. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
662
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 09:10:00 -
[80] - Quote
Carebears are everywhere. 0.0 residents that fight call them "the fat" of an alliance. Often it is shed during hardship and conflict and regain in peace.
They are despised in every way, yet who is fat and who isn't evolves often during alliances. Fat cats often sponsers other to fight with ships and/or money. Others are just here for the free ride and are no different to the ones in high sec. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1008
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 09:23:00 -
[81] - Quote
Spurty wrote:Roxie Mars wrote:I wish I could fly around null sec risk free. What skills do I need to train for that? Quit corp But anyone could just kill you then.
Except those Providence people, I hear they don't shoot neutrals on sight...
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
189
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 10:09:00 -
[82] - Quote
It's the perpetual ridicule that gets to me. Normal people only put up with that for so long. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg-_HeVNYOk
Save Derpy! |

Easthir Ravin
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
30
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 12:11:00 -
[83] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Roisin Saoirse wrote:this is true due to coalition blocks and isk faucets pvp in null sec is like sisi for everyone else... there is zero risk for loosing your regular ships...
plus things like hulkageddon actually pay for goons reinbursment program...
this is not true for everyone else who plays the game either in faction null sec or the rest of space...
at least in WH space it takes some effort to get ships there... Reimbursement programs only cover PvP losses and are meant to encourage members to reship and get back into fights rather than spending 4 hours ratting up ISK for a new ship; the assets (moons) used to fund reimbursement programs are generally gained through, well, PvP hope this helps
Greetings
Now you've done it... Using logic in a concise argument stating cause and effect? On the EVE forums? We can not afford using logic now, just stop it, before someone gets hurt.
vr East IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES: -á" I drank WHAT?!" |

Virgil Travis
GWA Corp Unified Church of the Unobligated
315
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 12:14:00 -
[84] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Spurty wrote:Roxie Mars wrote:I wish I could fly around null sec risk free. What skills do I need to train for that? Quit corp But anyone could just kill you then. Except those Providence people, I hear they don't shoot neutrals on sight...
Unless they put you on their fearsum KOS list  Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
382
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 00:37:00 -
[85] - Quote
hate to say i told you so... but
Quote:GÇó Ally contracts have fixed length of two weeks GÇó Allies can not be part of mutual wars GÇô defender cannot hire allies into mutual wars and existing ally contracts are cancelled (with a 24 hour grace period) GÇó Cap on War Dec cost GÇô it will never have a base price of more than 500 mill regardless of corp/alliance membership (still affected by the number of wars you have declared) GÇó New UI control for War options in war lists GÇó Added cost for hiring multiple allies for a war GÇô hiring more than one ally now incur a cost that goes to CONCORD. The cost rises exponentially the more allies are hired into the same war. PLEX FOR PIZZA!
tech III industrial ships! |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
79
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 00:43:00 -
[86] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:hate to say i told you so... but Quote:GÇó Ally contracts have fixed length of two weeks GÇó Allies can not be part of mutual wars GÇô defender cannot hire allies into mutual wars and existing ally contracts are cancelled (with a 24 hour grace period) GÇó Cap on War Dec cost GÇô it will never have a base price of more than 500 mill regardless of corp/alliance membership (still affected by the number of wars you have declared) GÇó New UI control for War options in war lists GÇó Added cost for hiring multiple allies for a war GÇô hiring more than one ally now incur a cost that goes to CONCORD. The cost rises exponentially the more allies are hired into the same war.
But... what? What were you telling us?
Is it because infinite allies can't join a war for free?
Or maybe it's because a corporation can't wardec every nullsec alliance at the same time without incurring massive costs? |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
382
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 00:51:00 -
[87] - Quote
the results are the same its just the methods that have changed... PLEX FOR PIZZA!
tech III industrial ships! |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
79
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 00:52:00 -
[88] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:the results are the same its just the methods that have changed... This does not make sense. What is it you are trying to say?
Take some time, think out a well worded, eloquent post. I'm going to the store, I want to see a good post when I come back. Self-appointed forums hallway monitor |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
383
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 01:00:00 -
[89] - Quote
the problem is on one hand ccp is saying that numbers do not matter i.e. large alliance attacks 50 man high sec corp... they can pretty much perma grief dec this corp... but on the other hand the defending corp/alliance number do matter... and right not you can get as many allies to join in and help you out... pretty much even the odds...
what will happen is now said small corp can no longer afford all that help and they are perma griefed.
this is not good and something i dont think ccp is consitering...
so what can be done well?
there shoud be measurable surrender options like payouts and what nots...
if you want to bring in more allies then lets say 4ish then the war changes and the aggressor can now bring in his own allies to assist...
the clear thing is you need a victory condition.... how many tons of ships destroyed... pods killed and so on... PLEX FOR PIZZA!
tech III industrial ships! |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
551
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 01:03:00 -
[90] - Quote
Are we still doing this really!?
The topic this week is: Dongues vs. Buttes, get with the program. . |

Bluddwolf
Minmatar Death Squad Broken Chains Alliance
40
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 02:58:00 -
[91] - Quote
Ituhata Saken wrote:I was aroused and confused
I was confused at your arousel, and after closer inspection of your avatar, I lost interest. EVE Online Fan ... Looking for "End Game" since 2006 ... Happily, I still havn't found it
|

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
346
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 03:00:00 -
[92] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:There is a great cry among the miner community due to the fact that they are being griefed and its encouraged from CCPGǪ
In the eyes of CCP miners have no right being in high sec and they should be forced to move to null sec Gǣwhere its supposed to be safe?GǥGǪ
But look how the CSM has manipulated their position when it comes to the war dec formulaGǪ
Apparently if you have more peeps in your corp/alliance it should be more expensive to war dec you!??!?!?
Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killedGǪ
How can it on one hand be unfair to have cheep war dec costs because of the perception that it would be unfair to nullbears due to having high sec no longer be GǣsafeGǥGǪ when the same people say that miners should be targeted and harassed because they have no right to be safe in high sec?
Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grataGǪ every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effectiveGǪ
Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE
Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reshipGǪ
Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!
so wait.
You want to war dec cheaper so you can fight a null-sec alliance...?
And you need a war dec to defend yourself from suicide gankers...?
So, what you're saying is that, after I cut up your food, I should chew it for you too?  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

loki energon
Voodoo Children Workers Trade Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 03:08:00 -
[93] - Quote
AHAHHAHAH are there really 5 pages of this crap? i tried, and couldnt get past the 1st page..........troll, off. kill em all. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
89
|
Posted - 2012.06.12 03:08:00 -
[94] - Quote
OPs name should actually be "I, biatch". Self-appointed forums hallway monitor |
|

ISD Stensson
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2

|
Posted - 2012.06.12 03:15:00 -
[95] - Quote
Excessive off-topic posts. Thread locked. ISD Stensson Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |