| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
102
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:43:00 -
[91] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:EVE Roy Mustang wrote:wtf NOT a James315 thread?
And you got it backwards. the gankers are risk averse cause they cant be prevented from doing what they want by being killed first. Also the whole attacking ppl with no weapons.
as far as CONCORD, thats called a business expense. Not a risk. They arent risking their ships as its a certainty that they WILL be destroyed.
They absolutely can be stopped. Either alpha the dessies as they go GCC or suicide the Nados before they fire (one Nado can kill 3-4 gank Nados before getting concorded itself). Or shoot the outlaw gankers as they land. Miners are just too lazy to stop their pet gankers Quote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:Once again a moron completely fails to understand what it is that players are actually averse to.
Carebears are averse to loss.
Gankers don't care about loss at all. But are averse to failure.
Carebears risk loss, gankers risk failure. So everyone is risk averse then? Nope. You don't actually understand what the word "risk" means. Exactly my point, too.
That gankers risk failure instead of loss is no less of a risk. Further, the ganker actually chooses to engage in the risky behavior. The high-sec miner drones on in the deluded belief that he is protected and that because he presents himself with no defenses or weapons he is therefore a dishonorable target.
Nobody gives a rat's ass about honor. Give us your T2 salvage and spend more on Tech-infused Hulks, please. |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:54:00 -
[92] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote: Is crap. You don't even need to tank a retreiver,
False. The typical retriever (newb) user even with a shield extender will have an hard time suriving a 3 frig spawn at 0.6 sec and 0.5 sec. I guarantee if CCP came out and said that everything is working as intended and that miners have the ability to protect themselves by either utilizing thier fittings in a way that would make it impossible for someone to suicide gank them, or to start working with others, that you guys would tell CCP they were wrong, that there's no way to stop someone from ganking you, and that CCP needs to make the hulk impossible to be blown up in hi sec or remove the ability to suicide gank. . Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post.
I pretty much prefer the status quo because the mineral prices are higher and there's a lot fewer people out there competing with me for asteroids. I also haven't lost a single ship to suicide ganking in the last year. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
911
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:57:00 -
[93] - Quote
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Then I submit you do not know how to execute a proper gank. If you have scanned the miner and it does not have any ECM then it is dead 100% as in no chance if the ganker is skilled in his trade. Only chance under this scenario is if the miner is not there when the gankers arrive. Now again this is not risk because you did not get a chance to open fire and your ships did not get concorded for nothing. You live to find another target. Neither side lost anything.
What else?
Because every suicide gank attempt occurs with only two actors present, right?
You already saw a nerf to suicide ganking in Crucible with the removal of insurance for ships killed by CONCORD - what more do you want? eh |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
911
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:57:00 -
[94] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post.
So, uh, what ships in the game are impossible to suicide gank? eh |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:02:00 -
[95] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post. So, uh, what ships in the game are impossible to suicide gank?
Technically, you can Suicide Gank an Online POS. You just have to do it in two waves.
The suggestions we make to miners are: Fit your ship to make ganking you less profitable and harder, thus less likely. This requires sacrificing some yield. OR Fly your ship actively to make ganking you next to impossible. This takes some effort. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:02:00 -
[96] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post. So, uh, what ships in the game are impossible to suicide gank? Those concord ships floating around? Maybe?
Seriously why are you asking me? I'm the one that said there isn't a fit that is impossible to suicide gank. |

baltec1
1394
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:03:00 -
[97] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Then I submit you do not know how to execute a proper gank. If you have scanned the miner and it does not have any ECM then it is dead 100% as in no chance if the ganker is skilled in his trade. Only chance under this scenario is if the miner is not there when the gankers arrive. Now again this is not risk because you did not get a chance to open fire and your ships did not get concorded for nothing. You live to find another target. Neither side lost anything.
What else? Because every suicide gank attempt occurs with only two actors present, right? You already saw a nerf to suicide ganking in Crucible with the removal of insurance for ships killed by CONCORD - what more do you want?
Nothing short of perfect safety. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:05:00 -
[98] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post. So, uh, what ships in the game are impossible to suicide gank? I'm guessing titans maybe?
Technically True. But that's because they aren't allowed in HS, thus there is no CONCORD to make it a Suicide Gank. It's a function of the space rather than the fit/ship. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
102
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:06:00 -
[99] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Then I submit you do not know how to execute a proper gank. If you have scanned the miner and it does not have any ECM then it is dead 100% as in no chance if the ganker is skilled in his trade. Only chance under this scenario is if the miner is not there when the gankers arrive. Now again this is not risk because you did not get a chance to open fire and your ships did not get concorded for nothing. You live to find another target. Neither side lost anything.
What else? Because every suicide gank attempt occurs with only two actors present, right? You already saw a nerf to suicide ganking in Crucible with the removal of insurance for ships killed by CONCORD - what more do you want? They want to bloat their wallets in total safety and seclusion, not interacting with other players while they gain an economic advantage over people they want nothing to do with. They want to be able to do this in such safety and seclusion that they can go do laundry at the laundromat and then go out for ice cream and come home with more currency than they left with because of the improbable RMT scheme that becomes possible in this ludicrous pipe-dreamworld.
I think that about covers it. |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:15:00 -
[100] - Quote
Disregard That wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Herr Hammer Draken wrote:Then I submit you do not know how to execute a proper gank. If you have scanned the miner and it does not have any ECM then it is dead 100% as in no chance if the ganker is skilled in his trade. Only chance under this scenario is if the miner is not there when the gankers arrive. Now again this is not risk because you did not get a chance to open fire and your ships did not get concorded for nothing. You live to find another target. Neither side lost anything.
What else? Because every suicide gank attempt occurs with only two actors present, right? You already saw a nerf to suicide ganking in Crucible with the removal of insurance for ships killed by CONCORD - what more do you want? They want to bloat their wallets in total safety and seclusion, not interacting with other players while they gain an economic advantage over people they want nothing to do with. They want to be able to do this in such safety and seclusion that they can go do laundry at the laundromat and then go out for ice cream and come home with more currency than they left with because of the improbable RMT scheme that becomes possible in this ludicrous pipe-dreamworld. I think that about covers it. Yeah how dare people buy all those PLEXes.. It's completely unfair!!!! There should be a limit on the number of PLEXes you're allowed to buy a month.! |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
102
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:17:00 -
[101] - Quote
What is this I don't even
Edit: I was not talking about buying plexes as an RMT scheme.
The scheme I'm talking about is much more improbable. It's not intended by CCP.
And they will never create an environment where it can happen.
So enjoy getting ganked in unaligned untanked Hulks. Buy more please, OTEC thanks you.
Also, thanks for the T2 salvage. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1409
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:17:00 -
[102] - Quote
Natsett Amuinn wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Morganta wrote:yeah, while I have to say I fully support the ganking of mining boats the whole "you have slots, use em" argument is misleading
a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker
now if CCP buffed the CPU or power to the point of them being better then a frigate people may have the chance to tank or go active defense, but really the ORE classes have crap grid and CPU and can't tank much more than rats with a good fit.
I wouldn't mind miners being a little harder to nab and to stand a fighting chance to do more than just get on the concord killmails and lose an expensive boat, hell they may even like it and make the jump to skirmish warfare. This This Is crap. You don't even need to tank a retreiver, let alone a hulk, to deal with rats in hi sec. 3 drones will kill the rats for you, with not a single module installed to provide you any bit of extra defense. Why do you guys keep trying to perpetrate this myth that it's impossible to tank a hulk to deal with the ONE guy trying to blow you up in hi sec. CCP knows you guys are full of crap, as does anyone else who has the openmindedness to actually read what everyonehas been saying in every single thread about this. Instead you guys just keep coming up with one excuse after the other to say that it's not possible. First it's OMG, WTF, YEILD!! Then it's OMG, WTF, ISK PER HOUR!!! Then you got OMG, WTF, CONCORD DOESN'T ACTUALLY PROTECT ME!!!! Then you'll move on to OMG, WTF, IT'S GREIFING!!!!! Then we get OMG, WTF, WE HAZ ALL THE RISK!!!!!! Now you're saying OMG, WTF, THE SHIP DOSNT HAZ THE CPU AND POWERZ!!!!!!! I look forward to the next excuse.
apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"
what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading.
I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear 
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:17:00 -
[103] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post. So, uh, what ships in the game are impossible to suicide gank? I'm guessing titans maybe? Technically True. But that's because they aren't allowed in HS, thus there is no CONCORD to make it a Suicide Gank. It's a function of the space rather than the fit/ship. I was going for the technicality but considering the level of discourse I abandoned that angle because I didn't expect anyone to be quick enough mentally to pick up on it. |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
102
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:21:00 -
[104] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:Morganta wrote:yeah, while I have to say I fully support the ganking of mining boats the whole "you have slots, use em" argument is misleading
a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker
now if CCP buffed the CPU or power to the point of them being better then a frigate people may have the chance to tank or go active defense, but really the ORE classes have crap grid and CPU and can't tank much more than rats with a good fit.
I wouldn't mind miners being a little harder to nab and to stand a fighting chance to do more than just get on the concord killmails and lose an expensive boat, hell they may even like it and make the jump to skirmish warfare. This This Is crap. You don't even need to tank a retreiver, let alone a hulk, to deal with rats in hi sec. 3 drones will kill the rats for you, with not a single module installed to provide you any bit of extra defense. Why do you guys keep trying to perpetrate this myth that it's impossible to tank a hulk to deal with the ONE guy trying to blow you up in hi sec. CCP knows you guys are full of crap, as does anyone else who has the openmindedness to actually read what everyonehas been saying in every single thread about this. Instead you guys just keep coming up with one excuse after the other to say that it's not possible. First it's OMG, WTF, YEILD!! Then it's OMG, WTF, ISK PER HOUR!!! Then you got OMG, WTF, CONCORD DOESN'T ACTUALLY PROTECT ME!!!! Then you'll move on to OMG, WTF, IT'S GREIFING!!!!! Then we get OMG, WTF, WE HAZ ALL THE RISK!!!!!! Now you're saying OMG, WTF, THE SHIP DOSNT HAZ THE CPU AND POWERZ!!!!!!! I look forward to the next excuse. apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear  CONCORD forbid miners both tank -and- mine aligned in High-sec.
You know, like they didn't want to be ganked or something. |

adam smash
University of Caille Gallente Federation
98
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:21:00 -
[105] - Quote
Ganking is no risk... don't listen to the nullbears... I wish life was as risky as ganking.
Know you are going to lose X isk, know you are going to make at least X + Y isk.
Go pop out to null rofl do a scan.
Orca Orca Hulk Hulk Hulk Hulk Hulk
That's a SMALL little op I found from a low sec > null wh... rofl..
All this ganking is to make the null bears more money.
I like to see these people gank or kick their own hulks... O rite... again comes back to this is ALLLLLLLL to make the null bears isk. |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
102
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:25:00 -
[106] - Quote
adam smash wrote:Ganking is no risk... don't listen to the nullbears... I wish life was as risky as ganking.
Know you are going to lose X isk, know you are going to make at least X + Y isk.
Go pop out to null rofl do a scan.
Orca Orca Hulk Hulk Hulk Hulk Hulk
That's a SMALL little op I found from a low sec > null wh... rofl..
All this ganking is to make the null bears more money.
I like to see these people gank or kick their own hulks... O rite... again comes back to this is ALLLLLLLL to make the null bears isk. You are so wrong you have no idea.
First, your real world analogy is utterly moronic.
Ganking is more like a lottery than any sort of business.
You WILL pay for the attempt with your ship.
You MAY get nice loot and drops.
You ALSO may get nothing but a miner laughing at your failure.
To accomplish this the miner can either warp away or tank his Hulk.
That the miner does neither one in a statistically overwhelming majority of cases is the only reason ganking appears to have no risk.
Sorry if this is too complicated. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:27:00 -
[107] - Quote
Morganta wrote:apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear 
Tanking your Hulk will make it a breakeven (at best) proposition to gank you. Especially in the higher security bands. 30k EHP vs ~600dps*20s(CONCORD response in .5) per 5m ISK Catalyst means 3 Catalysts are needed to gank you (4 if you use ECM drones). Your Hulk is likely to drop 10m in loot and 10m in salvage. Without the GSF bounty, that's a breakeven gank. With it, it's 2.5m Isk per pilot.
An untanked Hulk only costs 2 catalysts worth 10m to guarantee a gank and the gang can be hitting 2 targets per 15min gcc cycle instead of 1.
Flying your mining ship actively and avoiding gankers all together is an even better option. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Yuda Mann
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:31:00 -
[108] - Quote
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=1293 I'm also against the lack of danger and the awful boring times when you are just chugging along and nothing threatens you. -CCP Oveur, 2004.07.01
http://eve-search.com/thread/528360/page/1#29 EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for. -CCP Wrangler, 2007.05.29 |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
912
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:31:00 -
[109] - Quote
adam smash wrote:Ganking is no risk... don't listen to the nullbears... I wish life was as risky as ganking.
Know you are going to lose X isk, know you are going to make at least X + Y isk.
Go pop out to null rofl do a scan.
Orca Orca Hulk Hulk Hulk Hulk Hulk
That's a SMALL little op I found from a low sec > null wh... rofl..
All this ganking is to make the null bears more money.
I like to see these people gank or kick their own hulks... O rite... again comes back to this is ALLLLLLLL to make the null bears isk.
because nullsec miners in grav sites compete with hisec miners mining veldspar eh |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:32:00 -
[110] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:RubyPorto wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:Your theory is great and all but it's not possible to utilize your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank so you pretty much have no point to your post. So, uh, what ships in the game are impossible to suicide gank? I'm guessing titans maybe? Technically True. But that's because they aren't allowed in HS, thus there is no CONCORD to make it a Suicide Gank. It's a function of the space rather than the fit/ship. I was going for the technicality but considering the level of discourse I abandoned that angle because I didn't expect anyone to be quick enough mentally to pick up on it.
Your initial statement was that it was impossible to use "your fittings to be impossible to suicide gank"
Nobody disagrees with that.
Further stating that that means fitting a tank is useless is pants-on-head idiocy.
A POS can be Suicide Ganked. I have never, ever, ever heard of someone doing so (POS Mods, yes, the tower, No). Fitting a tank clearly has some deterrent effect. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
912
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:34:00 -
[111] - Quote
Yuda Mann wrote:that's what hello kitty online is for.
in HKO we burned down some dude's farm and killed his livestock for kicks and proceeded to salt the earth
****'s hardcore
(not really) eh |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
1409
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:35:00 -
[112] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Morganta wrote:apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear  Tanking your Hulk will make it a breakeven (at best) proposition to gank you. Especially in the higher security bands. 30k EHP vs ~600dps*20s(CONCORD response in .5) per 5m ISK Catalyst means 3 Catalysts are needed to gank you (4 if you use ECM drones). Your Hulk is likely to drop 10m in loot and 10m in salvage. Without the GSF bounty, that's a breakeven gank. With it, it's 2.5m Isk per pilot. An untanked Hulk only costs 2 catalysts worth 10m to guarantee a gank and the gang can be hitting 2 targets per 15min gcc cycle instead of 1. Flying your mining ship actively and avoiding gankers all together is an even better option.
yes, of course it is
Just don't be so quick to attack any suggestion that the system could be improved a little to allow for a touch more diversity it doesn't mean "mining should be safer" miners should have to use all the tools available to them to survive just like the rest of us, they just seem to have a pretty ****** toolkit
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
103
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:38:00 -
[113] - Quote
Morganta wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Morganta wrote:apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear  Tanking your Hulk will make it a breakeven (at best) proposition to gank you. Especially in the higher security bands. 30k EHP vs ~600dps*20s(CONCORD response in .5) per 5m ISK Catalyst means 3 Catalysts are needed to gank you (4 if you use ECM drones). Your Hulk is likely to drop 10m in loot and 10m in salvage. Without the GSF bounty, that's a breakeven gank. With it, it's 2.5m Isk per pilot. An untanked Hulk only costs 2 catalysts worth 10m to guarantee a gank and the gang can be hitting 2 targets per 15min gcc cycle instead of 1. Flying your mining ship actively and avoiding gankers all together is an even better option. yes, of course it is Just don't be so quick to attack any suggestion that the system could be improved a little to allow for a touch more diversity it doesn't mean "mining should be safer" miners should have to use all the tools available to them to survive just like the rest of us, they just seem to have a pretty ****** toolkit Posting to confirm that there is plenty of time to gank a Hulk if it mines aligned and warps on neutral or red contact.
The CFC controls TiDi and we make sure every aligned Hulk gets TiDi'd to ****. |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:20:00 -
[114] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Morganta wrote:apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear  Tanking your Hulk will make it a breakeven (at best) proposition to gank you. Especially in the higher security bands. 30k EHP vs ~600dps*20s(CONCORD response in .5) per 5m ISK Catalyst means 3 Catalysts are needed to gank you (4 if you use ECM drones). Your Hulk is likely to drop 10m in loot and 10m in salvage. Without the GSF bounty, that's a breakeven gank. With it, it's 2.5m Isk per pilot. An untanked Hulk only costs 2 catalysts worth 10m to guarantee a gank and the gang can be hitting 2 targets per 15min gcc cycle instead of 1. Flying your mining ship actively and avoiding gankers all together is an even better option. catalyst should be doing over 700 DPS hot and you can force extend the response time of concord to well beyond 20 seconds in .5 space. Come on people learn a little or at least do a little testing before making comments about stuff.
An untanked hulk is easy prey for a well setup catalyst even in .9 space (1.0 space should be easy too but it's no guarantee). |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:21:00 -
[115] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Morganta wrote:apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear  Tanking your Hulk will make it a breakeven (at best) proposition to gank you. Especially in the higher security bands. 30k EHP vs ~600dps*20s(CONCORD response in .5) per 5m ISK Catalyst means 3 Catalysts are needed to gank you (4 if you use ECM drones). Your Hulk is likely to drop 10m in loot and 10m in salvage. Without the GSF bounty, that's a breakeven gank. With it, it's 2.5m Isk per pilot. An untanked Hulk only costs 2 catalysts worth 10m to guarantee a gank and the gang can be hitting 2 targets per 15min gcc cycle instead of 1. Flying your mining ship actively and avoiding gankers all together is an even better option. catalyst should be doing over 700 DPS hot and you can force extend the response time of concord to well beyond 20 seconds in .5 space. Come on people learn a little or at least do a little testing before making comments about stuff. An untanked hulk is easy prey for a well setup catalyst even in .9 space (1.0 space should be easy too but it's no guarantee). Again, not if it also mines aligned.
Do bears just not have the ability to string together multiple complete thoughts?
How hard is it to press the align button? |

baltec1
1399
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:26:00 -
[116] - Quote
Disregard That wrote: Again, not if it also mines aligned.
Do bears just not have the ability to string together multiple complete thoughts?
How hard is it to press the align button?
About as hard as fitting a tank it would seem. |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:33:00 -
[117] - Quote
Disregard That wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Morganta wrote:apparently you don't read so well nobody said its impossible to tank against one guy in highsec, I said quite the opposite "a tanked hulk is about as good as nothing to anything more then a single ganker"what I said is anything more than that is impossible due to restricted CPU and grid and the notion expressed by people who gank in groups, that tank will help, is very misleading. I'll forget your slip up since you are apparently one of the new recruits and don't know when your calling one of your own allies a bear  Tanking your Hulk will make it a breakeven (at best) proposition to gank you. Especially in the higher security bands. 30k EHP vs ~600dps*20s(CONCORD response in .5) per 5m ISK Catalyst means 3 Catalysts are needed to gank you (4 if you use ECM drones). Your Hulk is likely to drop 10m in loot and 10m in salvage. Without the GSF bounty, that's a breakeven gank. With it, it's 2.5m Isk per pilot. An untanked Hulk only costs 2 catalysts worth 10m to guarantee a gank and the gang can be hitting 2 targets per 15min gcc cycle instead of 1. Flying your mining ship actively and avoiding gankers all together is an even better option. catalyst should be doing over 700 DPS hot and you can force extend the response time of concord to well beyond 20 seconds in .5 space. Come on people learn a little or at least do a little testing before making comments about stuff. An untanked hulk is easy prey for a well setup catalyst even in .9 space (1.0 space should be easy too but it's no guarantee). Again, not if it also mines aligned. Do bears just not have the ability to string together multiple complete thoughts? How hard is it to press the align button? What are you going to do aligned? Sit there and wish you could warp cause you're webbed? Are you seriously advocating the usage of warp core stabilizers now? Even with stabilizers in the 30 seconds it takes for your hulk to get to full speed concord is already there. Are all nullbears this bad at the game or just you? |

baltec1
1402
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:35:00 -
[118] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:what are you going to do aligned? Sit there and wish you could warp cause you're webbed? Are you seriously advocating the usage of warp core stabilizers now? Even with stabilizers in the 30 seconds it takes for your hulk to get to full speed concord is already there. Are all nullbears this stupid or just you?
You dont sit still stupid. |

Greyscale Dash
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:35:00 -
[119] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:What are you going to do aligned? Sit there and wish you could warp cause you're webbed? Are you seriously advocating the usage of warp core stabilizers now? Even with stabilizers in the 30 seconds it takes for your hulk to get to full speed concord is already there. Are all nullbears this bad at the game or just you?
You remind me of someone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7ScG8kUqrY |

ashley Eoner
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:36:00 -
[120] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:what are you going to do aligned? Sit there and wish you could warp cause you're webbed? Are you seriously advocating the usage of warp core stabilizers now? Even with stabilizers in the 30 seconds it takes for your hulk to get to full speed concord is already there. Are all nullbears this stupid or just you?
You dont sit still stupid. You going to orbit the asteroid while aligned somehow? You going to do fly past mining? Seriously? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |