EVE Search - Official Press Release CFS/FA conflict

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Official Press Release CFS/FA conflict

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 19:59:00 - [61] Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 19:59:00 - [62] Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
EternalDark	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:08:00 - [63] Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. People that don't know what they are talking about, probably shouldn't post. Just a suggestion.
EternalDark	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:08:00 - [64] Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. People that don't know what they are talking about, probably shouldn't post. Just a suggestion.
Baun	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:19:00 - [65] Originally by: Zelota Im geting realy iritated by what fa is doing.If this dosent stop then i will get some old friends (ghost fleet) I think its time to break out the big bad FA goblin fleet and the super scary FIX ghoul fleet. Halloween IS approaching fast after all ...... The Enemy's Gate is Down
Baun	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:19:00 - [66] Originally by: Zelota Im geting realy iritated by what fa is doing.If this dosent stop then i will get some old friends (ghost fleet) I think its time to break out the big bad FA goblin fleet and the super scary FIX ghoul fleet. Halloween IS approaching fast after all ...... The Enemy's Gate is Down
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:19:00 - [67] Originally by: EternalDark Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. People that don't know what they are talking about, probably shouldn't post. Just a suggestion. So CA does not charge taxes now? How nice. Then maybe you can accept CFS in to CA, so that they can mine in CA space and let them use your stations for free. Sounds like a good deal to me. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:19:00 - [68] Originally by: EternalDark Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. People that don't know what they are talking about, probably shouldn't post. Just a suggestion. So CA does not charge taxes now? How nice. Then maybe you can accept CFS in to CA, so that they can mine in CA space and let them use your stations for free. Sounds like a good deal to me. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Ogodai John	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:28:00 - [69] Originally by: Metal Dude So CA does not charge taxes now? How nice. Then maybe you can accept CFS in to CA, so that they can mine in CA space and let them use your stations for free. Sounds like a good deal to me. True. After all CA have so much respect for CFS, i would be surprised if they didnt let them have one or two of their regions. Oh wait...
Ogodai John	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:28:00 - [70] Originally by: Metal Dude So CA does not charge taxes now? How nice. Then maybe you can accept CFS in to CA, so that they can mine in CA space and let them use your stations for free. Sounds like a good deal to me. True. After all CA have so much respect for CFS, i would be surprised if they didnt let them have one or two of their regions. Oh wait...
benwallace	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:30:00 - [71] ca tax goes to ca fleet pb taxs doesn't go to our fleet but goes to fa --------------------------
benwallace	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:30:00 - [72] ca tax goes to ca fleet pb taxs doesn't go to our fleet but goes to fa --------------------------
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:36:00 - [73] Originally by: benwallace ca tax goes to ca fleet pb taxs doesn't go to our fleet but goes to fa IÆm not arguing with CFS rights to own their stations. If you can, then do it. IÆm arguing with CA having a say in CFS/FA business after CA have been killing both of them from the time CA was formed. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:36:00 - [74] Originally by: benwallace ca tax goes to ca fleet pb taxs doesn't go to our fleet but goes to fa IÆm not arguing with CFS rights to own their stations. If you can, then do it. IÆm arguing with CA having a say in CFS/FA business after CA have been killing both of them from the time CA was formed. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
benwallace	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:37:00 - [75] tru I didn't mean to flame just stating facts --------------------------
benwallace	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:37:00 - [76] tru I didn't mean to flame just stating facts --------------------------
Drilla	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:46:00 - [77] Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr - * pure moinage *
Drilla	Posted - 2004.10.27 20:46:00 - [78] Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr - * pure moinage *
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:03:00 - [79] Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:03:00 - [80] Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Mr Blonde	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:35:00 - [81] Originally by: Hessi As someone totally unrelated to this issue: inÀvaÀsion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-vzhn) n. The act of invading, especially the entrance of an armed force into a territory to conquer. Does CFS honestly claim that CA came to their space to conquer it or just to create trouble? If the latter is true, there is no reason for CFS to cry foul at all. Maybe your diplomats should have pushed to use the term incursion, but i doubt FA would then have accepted that deal. This guy just owned the UFS and the following of CA-Wannabee-Propaganda-Warriors so badly that its off the scale. __________________________________________ Are you gonna bark all day, little doggy, or are you gonna bite??
Mr Blonde	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:35:00 - [82] Originally by: Hessi As someone totally unrelated to this issue: inÀvaÀsion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-vzhn) n. The act of invading, especially the entrance of an armed force into a territory to conquer. Does CFS honestly claim that CA came to their space to conquer it or just to create trouble? If the latter is true, there is no reason for CFS to cry foul at all. Maybe your diplomats should have pushed to use the term incursion, but i doubt FA would then have accepted that deal. This guy just owned the UFS and the following of CA-Wannabee-Propaganda-Warriors so badly that its off the scale. __________________________________________ Are you gonna bark all day, little doggy, or are you gonna bite??
Desire Evenmore	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:41:00 - [83] Originally by: Raindrop Since the terms like invasions etc aren't defined in that treaty that YOU agreed upon. Your interpretation of the word invasions is as such irrelivant. If CFS percieves it as an invasion then it is. Just because you think that simply taking the stations is discussing them doesn't mean that it is a dicussion. If you don't like the open interpretation then you could declare the whole treaty void i guess. But it's what you agreed upon. Since the terms like invasions etc aren't defined in that treaty that YOU agreed upon. Your interpretation of the word invasions is as such irrelivant. If FA does not percieves(sic) it as an invasion then it isn't. Now, is my statement anymore valid as yours, Raindrop? No, they are both equally valid. The thing you don't seem to understand is that your CFS governing body should have contacted FA's governing body and worked this out diplomatically instead of voiding or breaking the treaty, which CFS did. Two parties signed this treaty, your(CFS) interpretation of the treaty does not hold precedent over FA's interpretation. I hope you understand this. Don't know how many more ways I can explain it to you.
Desire Evenmore	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:41:00 - [84] Originally by: Raindrop Since the terms like invasions etc aren't defined in that treaty that YOU agreed upon. Your interpretation of the word invasions is as such irrelivant. If CFS percieves it as an invasion then it is. Just because you think that simply taking the stations is discussing them doesn't mean that it is a dicussion. If you don't like the open interpretation then you could declare the whole treaty void i guess. But it's what you agreed upon. Since the terms like invasions etc aren't defined in that treaty that YOU agreed upon. Your interpretation of the word invasions is as such irrelivant. If FA does not percieves(sic) it as an invasion then it isn't. Now, is my statement anymore valid as yours, Raindrop? No, they are both equally valid. The thing you don't seem to understand is that your CFS governing body should have contacted FA's governing body and worked this out diplomatically instead of voiding or breaking the treaty, which CFS did. Two parties signed this treaty, your(CFS) interpretation of the treaty does not hold precedent over FA's interpretation. I hope you understand this. Don't know how many more ways I can explain it to you.
crice	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:54:00 - [85] Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. True, most of us don't mine. We monoplize the Tech II market and jack the prices, we also let others own stations that we have no presence near and charge them tax. It works out wonderful.
crice	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:54:00 - [86] Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. True, most of us don't mine. We monoplize the Tech II market and jack the prices, we also let others own stations that we have no presence near and charge them tax. It works out wonderful.
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:57:00 - [87] Originally by: crice Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. True, most of us don't mine. We monoplize the Tech II market and jack the prices, we also let others own stations that we have no presence near and charge them tax. It works out wonderful. HEHE. You forgot 'If someone don't like it, we shoot them' The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
Metal Dude	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:57:00 - [88] Originally by: crice Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. True, most of us don't mine. We monoplize the Tech II market and jack the prices, we also let others own stations that we have no presence near and charge them tax. It works out wonderful. HEHE. You forgot 'If someone don't like it, we shoot them' The truth will set you free * Proud to be ATUK *
crice	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:59:00 - [89] Edited by: crice on 27/10/2004 22:03:22 Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: crice Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. True, most of us don't mine. We monoplize the Tech II market and jack the prices, we also let others own stations that we have no presence near and charge them tax. It works out wonderful. HEHE. You forgot 'If someone don't like it, we shoot them' Silly Metal, we are undercover pirates, so we just kill every color of the spectrum, and then remind them it is in their best interests. Leader of the FA
crice	Posted - 2004.10.27 21:59:00 - [90] Edited by: crice on 27/10/2004 22:03:22 Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: crice Originally by: Metal Dude Originally by: Drilla Originally by: Metal Dude Yea, the same CA that charges their own members 20% Tax. Ahh - that must be the smartest ATUK posting on the boards ever - because it was complete rubbish. We do not tax our members with 20%. yarr Sorry, not being CA nor having any spies in CA, last I heard CA tax was 20%. If it changed, I didnÆt hear about it, so enlighten me if IÆm wrong. How much does CA tax miners now? Oh wait. ItÆs a PVP alliance, so you donÆt mine. OK. My bad. True, most of us don't mine. We monoplize the Tech II market and jack the prices, we also let others own stations that we have no presence near and charge them tax. It works out wonderful. HEHE. You forgot 'If someone don't like it, we shoot them' Silly Metal, we are undercover pirates, so we just kill every color of the spectrum, and then remind them it is in their best interests. Leader of the FA

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.