the texture glitch under the tempest cockpits (and all its variants) is still there. filed a bug report.
when you are working on texture and shader stuff why not fix that too?
moreover the texture of the tempest "necks" (again, all other tempest ships have also this issue) is very. very low res. same is true for the polygone count of that region. i guess the bad texture aplifies the missing detail?
the main body is fine and looks really nice.

I haven't checked those yet, but god damnit, I already can sense the overcompensation from all the whiners complaining that the amarr ships were too dark because they only looked at them in the preview window.

You did good filing a bug report. The V3 project includes varying degrees of redoing stuff- some ships have been practically rebuilt, some with nothing more than touchups, decals, and new mask textures painted. However one of the results of V3 is that our content is in a reliable and consistent condition- for you, this means defects are easier to find and fix, so there should be less of these annoying minor problems that are not worth fixing (they should become very simple to fix). Previously there was no telling how deep the rabbit hole on some of these art glitches went, that's under control now (for V3'ed content).

On the other hand, some of the ships are in a bad need for a redesign and we're constantly redesigning and redoing the worst offenders, so if a defect is on a ship marked for death, we're more likely to de-prioritize the defect. So I can't answer your questions directly but I can give some insight into how we work and why things are why they are.

On the other hand, some of the ships are in a bad need for a redesign and we're constantly redesigning and redoing the worst offenders, so if a defect is on a ship marked for death, we're more likely to de-prioritize the defect.

I don't believe that TriLambda just forgot about this stuff without any good reason

...

On the other hand, some of the ships are in a bad need for a redesign and we're constantly redesigning and redoing the worst offenders, so if a defect is on a ship marked for death, we're more likely to de-prioritize the defect. So I can't answer your questions directly but I can give some insight into how we work and why things are why they are.

I take this as total, absolute confirmation that a new Tempest is coming.

You did good filing a bug report. The V3 project includes varying degrees of redoing stuff- some ships have been practically rebuilt, some with nothing more than touchups, decals, and new mask textures painted. However one of the results of V3 is that our content is in a reliable and consistent condition- for you, this means defects are easier to find and fix, so there should be less of these annoying minor problems that are not worth fixing (they should become very simple to fix). Previously there was no telling how deep the rabbit hole on some of these art glitches went, that's under control now (for V3'ed content).

On the other hand, some of the ships are in a bad need for a redesign and we're constantly redesigning and redoing the worst offenders, so if a defect is on a ship marked for death, we're more likely to de-prioritize the defect. So I can't answer your questions directly but I can give some insight into how we work and why things are why they are.

Posting to confirm only you ever had the idea to undock. The rest of us are just a bunch of drooling idiots uncapable of thought like "I wonder how this looks like in space?"

That said, Gallente look awful now, leaving not a glimmer of doubt how low-res the diffuse layer of the texture really is. I noticed more visible artifacts on other hulls too. Anything with high contrast looks worse on Sisi now IMO.

I really don't understand why this color change !?
why not use the tornado color ?
and seriously why this camouflage design ??
I think clarify the brown is a very bad idea
with all due respect for your work frankly it's ugly
and again why camo ? why ?

LEAVE MY HUGINN CAMO ALONE ITS SEXY!

Confirming, the new Huginn is wtfbbq sexy.

Also, why not camo?

You did good filing a bug report. The V3 project includes varying degrees of redoing stuff- some ships have been practically rebuilt, some with nothing more than touchups, decals, and new mask textures painted. However one of the results of V3 is that our content is in a reliable and consistent condition- for you, this means defects are easier to find and fix, so there should be less of these annoying minor problems that are not worth fixing (they should become very simple to fix). Previously there was no telling how deep the rabbit hole on some of these art glitches went, that's under control now (for V3'ed content).

On the other hand, some of the ships are in a bad need for a redesign and we're constantly redesigning and redoing the worst offenders, so if a defect is on a ship marked for death, we're more likely to de-prioritize the defect. So I can't answer your questions directly but I can give some insight into how we work and why things are why they are.

Agreed, the generic T1 hullcolor is perhaps a tad too bright,

T2 wise Core complexion ships look good, Boundless creation ships have a cool camoflage and Thukker mix are also okay.

But, what the HELL have you done to the Vaga?

You have removed the wings and the spikes and made it look like a freakin' Fleet Stabber! Herecy!!!!

I thought someone said the tempest on SiSi was remodeled?

Please, correct logos for all Minma Tech II ships (Boundless creations, core complexion and Thukker Mix).

Frontal solar panels (ears) for vagas.

Squared solar panels for fleet tempest.

*still thinks that color of sand or wave of it added on hulls(tribal markings even) is way more pro/lore/awesome than this in space hide in a bushes camouflage will ever be.

I cant even begin to justify thinking beyond it it is simply r**@***d sry...also tempest fleet issue solar thingy give it back plz.

Also ship bridge is decade old joke.