EVE Search - The Greatest Political Event Of Your Life: Larkonis: CSM 4

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

The Greatest Political Event Of Your Life: Larkonis: CSM 4

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Larkonis TrassIer Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate	Posted - 2009.10.16 18:47:00 - [1] Greetings renegades, rogues, pirates, scammers, trolls and dullards. I am Larkonis Trassler and I want to run for CSM 4. I am a pirate by trade but in my time in Eve I have mined, missioned, fought in Hisec wars, killed pirates, died horribly in bubble camps, flown capitals, lost capitals and fought and FC'ed numerous :goodfights: Wait... Aren't you that who resigned from the last CSM due to less than honourable actions? Yes, yes I am. I made a tremendous error of judgement which was a result of a slightly hilarious chain of events. I let down those of you who voted for me and CCP. Regardless it's water under the bridge (which is where all you trolls should stay too). Have you no shame? Not really. I'm hoping to be re elected to the CSM in a Peter Mandelson-esque return to glory albeit without a Portuguese Manboy at my side and the penchant for buggery. So what did you get done last time around? I championed many issues and brought forward a few of my own. Among them: Boosting Web Strength on Minmatar Recons and EAS Fixing Logoffski A few tweaks to GCC mechanics and sentries Pirate Faction Ship Improvements TO NAME BUT A FEW However, as a CSM virgin one felt slightly overwhelmed by it all and not really sure of our role. Yes there is plenty of documentation out there but just like the art of love my first time round was akin to a few hesitant gropes followed by a few half hearted thrusts and a trail of bodily fluids stretching from a hip to an inner thigh. There is much more to do and so much more to achieve. The CSM is in it's infancy. People are expecting the world from this body of 'internet spaceships politicians', that's simply not going to happen for the moment. Delegates are not devs, they're players pure and simple, there in some part to bridge the gap between CCP and the playerbase. So... what are you standing for this time around? A greater passage of information between CCP and the CSM and the CSM and the playerbase. It's been pretty woeful this term with the 'monthly' Q&A's becoming more like 'annual' Q&A's. I took some time out from trolling the forums and put in some time reading them and contributing to assorted discussions, however I often didn't take the time to respond to Evemails and convos. This time around I'll make more time to do so. As far as game changes go: EWAR: ECM is still overpowered (more in terms of the mechanic, not the strength or range of the modules) and other EWAR needs shaking up badly. Damps were overnerfed and target painters are underused and undervalued. Lowsec: Despite discussions conducted by CSM 3 Lowsec is and will continue to be the ginger stepchild of the universe for some time. I want to further push for changes to lowsec and how it operates. Faction Warfare: FW needs a distinct shake up. Increased LP rewards are great but there's so much room for improvement. Occupancy still means nothing and there is no benefit to being victorious beyond personal gain. I'm all for introducing economic knock on effects for empires who perform well and those that perform badly. Small gang PVP: At the moment there is nothing to incentivise this at all. With the majority of ISK on a vessel being tied up in the hull and rigs even maintaining say a 10:1 k/d ratio the average PVPer is going to struggle to make a profit. A rebalance to the system so that more ISK is tied up in the mods and less in the hull would benefit everyone. I'd also like to see revisions to loot drops whereby mods have a higher % chance to drop if there are less opponents on the KM. Hisec Wardecs: Are easily avoided and under certain mechanics alliances are able to become all but immune to the effects of them. While wardecs should not become a griefing tool I would like to see changes to the system to make it harder to avoid a fight if someone comes and picks one with you. I'd also like to see a reversal of the 'Alliance P' 'nerf'
Larkonis TrassIer Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate	Posted - 2009.10.16 18:51:00 - [2] I'll reiterate that the CSM are not devs, they can merely suggest changes if they have popular backing. I'll also say that I'm willing to support anyone's issue if they approach me directly and I agree with it, even if it's not part of my 'platform'. Hold on... you can suggest all this stuff on the Assembly Hall what can YOU offer the CSM? Continuity; with (I believe) only two other previous members running again this term I believe I can share my knowledge of the system and how it works with the CSM newbies much like an experienced older partner. Solid no nonsense approaches: I don't mince my words, if I don't like you I'll say so, if I think you're talking out of your backside then I'll bung a cork in it. On a personal side I'd perhaps like the chance to redeem myself a little. I hope to further develop what has already been a cracking and productive 18 months and be part of the process which helps evolve the CSM concept.
Jonny 101 Cruoris Seraphim Exalted.	Posted - 2009.10.16 18:54:00 - [3] You've got my vote (all 3 of them!), I for one think you were framed by vicious carebears! Signature needs to be more EVE related. Zymurgist
Chainsaw Plankton IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE	Posted - 2009.10.16 18:58:00 - [4] Originally by: Jonny 101 You've got my vote (all 3 of them!), I for one think you were framed by vicious carebears! oh well if johnny is in, Im in!
Kane Rizzel NovaKane Incorporated	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:09:00 - [5] Will vote again. A Pirates Perspective
z0de Gallente The Bastards The Bastards.	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:10:00 - [6] Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer I championed many issues and brought forward a few of my own. Among them: Boosting Web Strength on Minmatar Recons and EAS Fixing Logoffski A few tweaks to GCC mechanics and sentries Pirate Faction Ship Improvements TO NAME BUT A FEW Apart from the faction ships, did anything else change? á á
Dawts The Order of the EyE	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:21:00 - [7] Confirming that you'll get at least 1 vote from me.
Lucia Antonius Amarr	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:22:00 - [8] You have my votes. Good luck to your campaign. _________________________________________ Always look on the bright side of life...
Larkonis TrassIer Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:26:00 - [9] Originally by: z0de Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer I championed many issues and brought forward a few of my own. Among them: Boosting Web Strength on Minmatar Recons and EAS Fixing Logoffski A few tweaks to GCC mechanics and sentries Pirate Faction Ship Improvements TO NAME BUT A FEW Apart from the faction ships, did anything else change? The Iceland summit was only six weeks ago broski. Just because you are not getting instant gratification doesn't mean you won't get it at some point. Think of the CSM as more of a tantric experience, do not judge it by your Western standards. I'll reiterate for those of you that are unaware of how this works: Issue raised in Assembly Hall. Issue Championed by a CSM delegate. Issue Debated in a CSM only online meating and voted on. If voted 'No' then QQ. If yes: Issue goes to Iceland Summit or a CSM/CCP online meeting. CCP say either: 1. That's cool, we were working on it, lets see if we can prioritise it a bit more. (See it in 3-12 months) 2. That's cool, we never thought of that, we'll add it to the backlog (See it in 6-18 months). 3. That's not really what we have in mind for the game. 4. Not technically possible right now but we like the idea and maybe look into it a little. 5. Not technically possible at all. 6. GRAND SLAM: Your idea isn't at all technically feasable and it's completely awful, who elected you and what are you doing here? Go and mix up a ****tail of whiskey and sleeping pills for yourself. Obviously there's room for a little debate with reference to points 3 and 4 and we were able to sway them on more than one or two issues in Iceland.
Pajama Sam Umbrella Mega Corp. Black Mesa Project	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:35:00 - [10] I'll be voting for you (again).

Marko Riva Adamant Inc.	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:41:00 - [11] People who make SUCH a mistake knowing they're putting their candidacy on the line for something silly are not worth to be voted for. All the "but it's the piraty thing to do" bullcrap is just that, bullcrap. The CSM is already a joke but if at all possible I'd to have some people there who think about what they're doing. ----------- ADM-I
AdmiralJohn Gallente The Unknown Bar and Pub	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:43:00 - [12] I endorse this product and/or service.
voogru Gallente Massive Damage United Corporations Against Macros	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:51:00 - [13] Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer Yes, yes I am. I made a tremendous error of judgement which was a result of a slightly hilarious chain of events. I let down those of you who voted for me and CCP. 1. Post with your main. 2. Anybody who votes for you is an idiot. You took advantage of multiple systems during your CSM. I don't think you can be trusted to do anything honorable, even though I generally agree with some of your viewpoints, I don't think you can deliver anything else except total fail, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP actually denied you to even be a part of the CSM. Hate Farmers? Click Here
Davinel Lulinvega	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:54:00 - [14] Originally by: Jonny 101 You've got my vote AND MY AXE Originally by: CCP Tuxford Now the op looks like a weirdo that can't read kekekeke! inb4 stealth edit
Shigsy Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:55:00 - [15] Originally by: voogru Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer Yes, yes I am. I made a tremendous error of judgement which was a result of a slightly hilarious chain of events. I let down those of you who voted for me and CCP. 1. Post with your main. 2. Anybody who votes for you is an idiot. You took advantage of multiple systems during your CSM. I don't think you can be trusted to do anything honorable, even though I generally agree with some of your viewpoints, I don't think you can deliver anything else except total fail, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP actually denied you to even be a part of the CSM. Took advantage of multiple systems? Unless you call the young boys in his corp systems then I'm not sure what you're talking about... Will be getting my votes again. (Official Lark CSM4 sig, add it to your sigs for monster support)
Dr Cron Northern Lights Number 5	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:56:00 - [16] I voted for you last time and you embarrassed yourself and the pirate community, so no.
Isaac Starstriker Amarr Imperial Shipment	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:57:00 - [17] Plan on breaking more NDAs made my CCP? Which I might add, is REAL LIFE contracts? Sheesh. You lost my respect for your actions. Trust in-game is one thing, but you broke CCP's trust on you out-of-game which is a far worse offense than any piracy or scam you've ever done. Those who vote for you...well...wow. Just WOW people. tbh, hope they reject you out of hand when your application gets put up. --Isaac Isaac's Haul*Mart - Closed
lollerwaffle Sileo In Pacis THE SPACE P0LICE	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:59:00 - [18] Edited by: lollerwaffle on 16/10/2009 19:59:45 You have my sword! (and my vote too) Don't balls it up again like last time BTW, are you running on Trassler or TrassIer? edit: can't say c o c k -_-
Jonny 101 Cruoris Seraphim Exalted.	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:59:00 - [19] Originally by: Isaac Starstriker Plan on breaking more NDAs made my CCP? Which I might add, is REAL LIFE contracts? Sheesh. You lost my respect for your actions. Trust in-game is one thing, but you broke CCP's trust on you out-of-game which is a far worse offense than any piracy or scam you've ever done. Those who vote for you...well...wow. Just WOW people. tbh, hope they reject you out of hand when your application gets put up. --Isaac I'm sorry, but are you accusing Lark of behaving like a politician? Signature needs to be more EVE related. Zymurgist
Arathon Theimies Platypi United	Posted - 2009.10.16 19:59:00 - [20] Originally by: Shigsy Took advantage of multiple systems? Unless you call the young boys in his corp systems then I'm not sure what you're talking about... Will be getting my votes again. (Official Lark CSM4 sig, add it to your sigs for monster support) Confirming 50, Under and I are systems. He will be getting my votes. Truth and Honour, Larkonis Trassler for CSM!!!

Larkonis TrassIer Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:01:00 - [21] Originally by: voogru Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer Yes, yes I am. I made a tremendous error of judgement which was a result of a slightly hilarious chain of events. I let down those of you who voted for me and CCP. 1. Post with your main. 2. Anybody who votes for you is an idiot. You took advantage of multiple systems during your CSM. I don't think you can be trusted to do anything honorable, even though I generally agree with some of your viewpoints, I don't think you can deliver anything else except total fail, I wouldn't be surprised if CCP actually denied you to even be a part of the CSM. You know who my main is. Unfortunately my main is enjoying a 6 month forum vacation due to over zealous e stalkers who reported my every post in mock offense. I would like to know the multiple systems I took advantage of. I seem to recall only acting on one piece of information and being caught soon after. If anything you could say (especially in these days of politician's and expense scandals) I was the most cost effective member of CSM 3 as I got all my main issues discussed in person at the Iceland summit but CCP didn't have to spend money on a flight to fanfest or accomodation for me. Savings that they can pass on to YOU the player.
Isaac Starstriker Amarr Imperial Shipment	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:04:00 - [22] Originally by: Jonny 101 Originally by: Isaac Starstriker Plan on breaking more NDAs made my CCP? Which I might add, is REAL LIFE contracts? Sheesh. You lost my respect for your actions. Trust in-game is one thing, but you broke CCP's trust on you out-of-game which is a far worse offense than any piracy or scam you've ever done. Those who vote for you...well...wow. Just WOW people. tbh, hope they reject you out of hand when your application gets put up. --Isaac I'm sorry, but are you accusing Lark of behaving like a politician? And what? That's OK for ppl to behave like that? --Isaac Isaac's Haul*Mart - Closed
Jonny 101 Cruoris Seraphim Exalted.	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:05:00 - [23] Originally by: Isaac Starstriker Originally by: Jonny 101 Originally by: Isaac Starstriker Plan on breaking more NDAs made my CCP? Which I might add, is REAL LIFE contracts? Sheesh. You lost my respect for your actions. Trust in-game is one thing, but you broke CCP's trust on you out-of-game which is a far worse offense than any piracy or scam you've ever done. Those who vote for you...well...wow. Just WOW people. tbh, hope they reject you out of hand when your application gets put up. --Isaac I'm sorry, but are you accusing Lark of behaving like a politician? And what? That's OK for ppl to behave like that? --Isaac Well it is how we run the entire western world, and if you don't like it young man I suggest you move to communist north Korea! Signature needs to be more EVE related. Zymurgist
voogru Gallente Massive Damage United Corporations Against Macros	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:08:00 - [24] Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer You know who my main is. Unfortunately my main is enjoying a 6 month forum vacation due to over zealous e stalkers who reported my every post in mock offense. Ah, I see. So you are evading a forum ban by posting with an alt/alternate account? Wow, that's honor right there! Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer I would like to know the multiple systems I took advantage of. I seem to recall only acting on one piece of information and being caught soon after. If anything you could say (especially in these days of politician's and expense scandals) I was the most cost effective member of CSM 3 as I got all my main issues discussed in person at the Iceland summit but CCP didn't have to spend money on a flight to fanfest or accomodation for me. Savings that they can pass on to YOU the player. The second system I'm referring to is where you entered into the tournament, solely to resell the slot and not fight in it yourself. It was a cheesy thing to do and isnÆt the kind of behavior IÆd want in a CSM candidate. And I donÆt see how they are passing savings on to me, because last I checked my monthly subscription fee was the same amount of money itÆs always been. Hate Farmers? Click Here
Crotch Goblin	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:09:00 - [25] You made broad generalizations on the 3 biggest issues in lowsec. How about you provide details on fixes instead of stating the obvious.
Ballista III 8e5T Co0pRAt10n 1n Ev3 HYDRA RELOADED	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:09:00 - [26] i see you got a new campaign sig banner.....
William Caldon Caldari Golden Cross Enterprises	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:10:00 - [27] Originally by: Jonny 101 Well it is how we run the entire western world, and if you don't like it young man I suggest you move to communist north Korea! wow, your one sad person.
Captain Vampire Caldari None of us are free	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:11:00 - [28] You got my votes. Gief moar ISK value on modules and more drops from small gang encounters.
Jonny 101 Cruoris Seraphim Exalted.	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:11:00 - [29] Originally by: William Caldon Originally by: Jonny 101 Well it is how we run the entire western world, and if you don't like it young man I suggest you move to communist north Korea! wow, your one sad person. Sir, I am a patriot! and if you love jesus you'll vote for Larkonis Trassler! Signature needs to be more EVE related. Zymurgist
Davinel Lulinvega	Posted - 2009.10.16 20:21:00 - [30] Originally by: voogru Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer You know who my main is. Unfortunately my main is enjoying a 6 month forum vacation due to over zealous e stalkers who reported my every post in mock offense. Ah, I see. So you are evading a forum ban by posting with an alt/alternate account? Wow, that's honor right there! Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer I would like to know the multiple systems I took advantage of. I seem to recall only acting on one piece of information and being caught soon after. If anything you could say (especially in these days of politician's and expense scandals) I was the most cost effective member of CSM 3 as I got all my main issues discussed in person at the Iceland summit but CCP didn't have to spend money on a flight to fanfest or accomodation for me. Savings that they can pass on to YOU the player. The second system I'm referring to is where you entered into the tournament, solely to resell the slot and not fight in it yourself. It was a cheesy thing to do and isnÆt the kind of behavior IÆd want in a CSM candidate. And I donÆt see how they are passing savings on to me, because last I checked my monthly subscription fee was the same amount of money itÆs always been. Originally by: voogru Ah, I see. So you are evading a forum ban by posting with an alt/alternate account? Wow, that's honor right there! Originally by: voogru honor lulz Originally by: CCP Tuxford Now the op looks like a weirdo that can't read kekekeke! inb4 stealth edit



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.