EVE Search - New planet textures

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

New planet textures

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Arous Drephius	Posted - 2009.10.28 16:31:00 - [1] Screenshots for people who haven't been on SiSi yet: Linkage Linkage Linkage Linkage and lastly: We didn't want that texture anyway.
Aralieus Amarr Traumark Logistics	Posted - 2009.10.28 16:45:00 - [2] They are awsome Fortune Favors the Bold!!
Hull Blaster Gallente Missions Mining and Mayhem Chain of Chaos	Posted - 2009.10.28 16:46:00 - [3] Sweeeet... both of those planets look awesome. Really good job CCP on texturing them.... I'm guessing you found EVE's first Black Hole on that last one.
Jack bubu Lyonesse. RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2009.10.28 17:19:00 - [4] So are they Handmade like the Prime planets or are they actually procedual generated? and are there more? cant wait to see them my self, patch is still downloading
fab24 Gallente The Scope	Posted - 2009.10.28 17:21:00 - [5] http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/1933/69324542.jpg http://img193.imageshack.us/i/53921736.jpg/ These are jita planet. CCP watch you.
An Anarchyyt Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.10.28 17:36:00 - [6] Originally by: Jack bubu So are they Handmade like the Prime planets or are they actually procedual generated? and are there more? cant wait to see them my self, patch is still downloading They're all over the place now, and they're all procedurally generated. Originally by: CCP Wrangler Second, a gentile is a non jewish person
Jack bubu Lyonesse. RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2009.10.28 17:37:00 - [7] Originally by: An Anarchyyt Originally by: Jack bubu So are they Handmade like the Prime planets or are they actually procedual generated? and are there more? cant wait to see them my self, patch is still downloading They're all over the place now, and they're all procedurally generated. nerdgasmn
An Anarchyyt Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.10.28 17:43:00 - [8] There are also "sandstorm" planets, Gas Giants/Rings, new moons, and perhaps others but I didn't get to take pictures of them before the server went back donw. Originally by: CCP Wrangler Second, a gentile is a non jewish person
Equinox II Nex Exercitus IT Alliance	Posted - 2009.10.28 18:25:00 - [9] Impressive stuff.
Missy Miner85	Posted - 2009.10.28 18:29:00 - [10] Looking very nice. In my area of space they are all currently the red lava type though and some are black so its definetly not fully done i assume.

MJ Maverick IronPig Sev3rance	Posted - 2009.10.28 18:31:00 - [11] Originally by: Arous Drephius and lastly: We didn't want that texture anyway. Haha, very good. -------------------- CCP arse kissing drones are not welcome in my threads. CCP are not perfect.
Reiisha Evolution IT Alliance	Posted - 2009.10.28 19:50:00 - [12] Pretty neat. Comment for the devs: There's glowmaps at night to indicate urban development, but there's nothing on the day side except... Nothing. May be a good idea to try and make cities and stuff aswell? ;p Also note the strange stripe through the glowmap in the lower middle of the planet in the picture. "If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
IceAero Amarr Shadow Company THE KLINGONS	Posted - 2009.10.28 20:31:00 - [13] Only thing left to fix are stars. They are HUGE, even at 100 AU (when they should look almost as small he background stars)
Eran Laude Gallente The Aduro Protocol	Posted - 2009.10.28 21:11:00 - [14] Looks stupidly good, will check it out tomorrow. ----- Originally by: "CCP Whisper" Boo hoo. Cry some more.
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet	Posted - 2009.10.28 22:36:00 - [15] Originally by: Reiisha Pretty neat. Comment for the devs: There's glowmaps at night to indicate urban development, but there's nothing on the day side except... Nothing. May be a good idea to try and make cities and stuff aswell? ;p Also note the strange stripe through the glowmap in the lower middle of the planet in the picture. It is my understanding, that man made structures aren't visible from space. The lights might show on the night side, but you have to zoom very, very close to see anything on the day side.
Alren	Posted - 2009.10.28 22:48:00 - [16] Originally by: Destination SkillQueue Originally by: Reiisha Pretty neat. Comment for the devs: There's glowmaps at night to indicate urban development, but there's nothing on the day side except... Nothing. May be a good idea to try and make cities and stuff aswell? ;p Also note the strange stripe through the glowmap in the lower middle of the planet in the picture. It is my understanding, that man made structures aren't visible from space. The lights might show on the night side, but you have to zoom very, very close to see anything on the day side. This depends on your definiton of 'from space'. Afaik the chinese wall is visible to the naked human eye from the moon (roughly 340000km away), -something- should be visible from a low orbit if there is no cloud cover.
Reiisha Evolution IT Alliance	Posted - 2009.10.29 03:56:00 - [17] Given the amount and density of lighting on the night side of planets, there should be at least a distinction in the structure and color of the urbanized areas. At the moment it's just pure green hills and blue water on the day side, it's far too homogenous, especially if you look at the fact that there seem to be no climate zones or poles. Planets with as little water as depicted on sisi right now would also have a lot less cloud cover aswell as a much less developed weather system due to the lack of ocean currents. Take a look at a picture of Earth, and compare it with what's on sisi right now. I am guessing (and hoping) that this is just a first wave and test of the procedural textures, and that the devs will be finalizing the look of the planets later on. Currently, only the ice planets look good enough, the rest needs serious tweaking. "If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all"
HeliosGal Caldari	Posted - 2009.10.29 04:01:00 - [18] we have lava, earthlike, ice, thunderstorm and sandstorm is all ive found so far ( all seem procedure generated each one is different size and if u look closely landmass layout is different, cloud positonl ocean coverage had one with 30% landmass mostly blue on earthlike another had one little spot of ocean and 90% green) Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00
Cloudheart Mercury Nation House of Mercury	Posted - 2009.10.29 12:31:00 - [19] Originally by: Alren This depends on your definiton of 'from space'. Afaik the chinese wall is visible to the naked human eye from the moon (roughly 340000km away), -something- should be visible from a low orbit if there is no cloud cover. It seems that the Great Wall is not visible from the moon: http://www.snopes.com/science/greatwall.asp However, I certainly think that man made structures should be visible when you are closer to the planet. You would think that empires that span solar systems would have cities large enough that you can see a difference in colour, or "texture", layours of city designs, etc. --- Regular lotteries for all players running at http://evelink.servegame.org/igb/
Dealer bob Gallente The Industrialist's Trade Society	Posted - 2009.10.29 13:30:00 - [20] sigh at you sad gits wanting to see actual cities........ does it matter. really ? do you often stop to look at planets ? there better than what we had before by a million miles. nice 1 ccp.

Blane Xero Amarr The Firestorm Cartel	Posted - 2009.10.29 13:39:00 - [21] Originally by: Dealer bob sigh at you sad gits wanting to see actual cities........ does it matter. really ? do you often stop to look at planets ? Yes. And it is my firm belief planets should be more than a Visual landmark in a system that you have no reason to visit. _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008 Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
Callista Sincera	Posted - 2009.10.29 13:52:00 - [22] Originally by: Destination SkillQueue It is my understanding, that man made structures aren't visible from space. The lights might show on the night side, but you have to zoom very, very close to see anything on the day side. That is just a myth. If a wall was visible, so should be large cities. Neither are. Just head over to google maps, sattelite view and see how far you have to zoom in before manmade structures become visible.
Calhontor	Posted - 2009.10.29 13:59:00 - [23] So we are just missing gas giants and the moons atm. Any word on when we will see them? Also is something gonna be done about the ugly 8 bit nebulas? Cause they look horribly out of place now.
Razin The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.10.29 14:14:00 - [24] Planets look great! One thing that needs tweaking is to add some color and texture variation at the poles, especially for the 'green' planets and generally for planets with water. ...
bassie12bf1	Posted - 2009.10.29 21:25:00 - [25] Earth like planets might need some changes to the coasts and such.
Takatagara	Posted - 2009.10.29 21:36:00 - [26] Out of the 40 or so planets I have warped to on SISI ive seen about 4 different planets and a black hole. Need some variation.
HeliosGal Caldari	Posted - 2009.10.30 03:20:00 - [27] each planet should be unique as far as land mass but ye smore variance and more planet types no mars like ones yet Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00
Venash	Posted - 2009.10.30 04:17:00 - [28] Another problem is that planets seem to lack a depth of field sometimes. Especially with the lava covered ones, because the lighting effects don't really work on the dark side since they're so bright. The planet doesn't look far away and seems more like a billboard. Noticeably varied sizes would also be nice.
HeliosGal Caldari	Posted - 2009.10.30 04:36:00 - [29] i note the lava planets would be better if they had mountain ranges u could see, that would add a trick of depth to the eyeball from space even tho we cant land on the planet itself. Would make the eventual dust battlzones a bit more up and down tactical on the ground Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00
John Acer Acer Logistics Support Services	Posted - 2009.10.30 06:31:00 - [30] Originally by: Alren This depends on your definiton of 'from space'. Afaik the chinese wall is visible to the naked human eye from the moon (roughly 340000km away), -something- should be visible from a low orbit if there is no cloud cover. Its not. If it were, you'd see every highway from space. And, as someone said, somethings being visible from space very much depends on how close you are to it. But judging from the pics and the visit from Sisi, where you can see only coast lines, you'd only see the dome from the Truman Show from space. So I think, CCP is fine with having no man made stuff visible on daylight sides.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.