|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
baltec1
1443
   |
Posted - 2012.06.14 16:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Selissa Shadoe wrote:
So, you support a Hulk nerf? I don't, I think that's going about it the wrong way.
Amusingly your sig has the quote 'GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥' .. which is what a lot of industrial/miner ppl on here are trying to do :)
How is this a hulk nerf? |
baltec1
1443
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:baltec1 wrote:Selissa Shadoe wrote:
So, you support a Hulk nerf? I don't, I think that's going about it the wrong way.
Amusingly your sig has the quote 'GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥' .. which is what a lot of industrial/miner ppl on here are trying to do :)
How is this a hulk nerf? If you use expanded cargo holds, and/or cargo rigs on a hulk, then this is looking like a big operational nerf/headache. I would love to get some clarification on hulk bay changes and the forcing of mined ore into ore bays.
So you have to empty the hold a bit more. These things are ment to be used in goups you know. Worst case is you just warp to the station and back a bit more but then again, a smart miners fits a tank and does this anyway. If you want a massive hold then use a retriver/mack. |
baltec1
1443
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:
No, they are meant to be used as I like. In this case, I usualy mine alone. Anyways, mining in groups doesnt change the problem I am pointing out. you have to empty the ore much more often if this change goes thru. Mining in a big group only changes it from 1 guy emptying a bay more often, to a group of miners emptying bays more often.
I want my megathrons turrets to hit frigates. Because thats what I want them to do.
As for the rest, christ suck it up. You have to empty your hold slightly more than you used to. Its not the end of the world. |
baltec1
1444
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Swearte Widfarend wrote:
How does providing the option to expand the size of an ore bay break the "design philosophy mentioned earlier"?
You put the hauling hauler out of work and reduce jetcans which also puts can flippers out of work. We cant do that |
baltec1
1444
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:So if I want to semi-afk mine ore in highsec, I have to use a mackinaw now. and its my problem? mining ore in a mackinaw? that just seems pants on head ********.
also I can mine in a cargo expanded hulk and not be called stupid. Thanks guys... I know gankers exist. My problem, not yours. If i want more lasers cycles before I have to empty the hold, why shouldn't I still be able to fit for that?
Face it, you now have to make choices. You people whined for the barges to be "fixed" and now they have. The rest is up to you. |
baltec1
1444
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Maul555 wrote:If ccp adds ore hold expanders and rigs, this would fix a lot of problems. also add a lot more options to orcas...
They arn't |
baltec1
1444
|
Posted - 2012.06.14 17:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:I figured this would eventually end up as some sperg-fest with miners claiming "tears" and making all sorts of baseless, idiotic claims, and I'm sad to see I'm right. Oh well, guess I'll just wait for all this to hit Sisi.
Definitely going to train for that mining frigate though, at the very least just to fly it around.
Ironicly its miners who are shedding the most tears |
|
|
| |
|