EVE Search - [MERC SERVICES] Underworld Excavators

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Crime and Punishment

[MERC SERVICES] Underworld Excavators - Now Taking Contracts

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Niclas Solo Amarr	Posted - 2009.11.20 17:12:00 - [31] Originally by: Le Soltueur Originally by: FarFae Dundee Weird! I posted a reply to this, it was seen by a bunch of people and now it's gone. Basically, it was marveling at how you control griefers by deccing them for 4 days, let them kick your ass, then retract the war, and then boast in your little post here about how you controlled them. Awesomeness! The Space Borderline - you took 6 ship losses and 1 pod, and you got 4 kills. It also went on to say that you guys are maybe good enough to hire for kid's parties. Maybe you can handle pony rides. If the kids give you too much trouble, if they are actually looking for a pony ride and you had to do some actual work, you can always take your pony and run off home. Hi Niclas. Post with your main instead of posting with your alt. Let me help you. The contract is listed as ♫ Keep on pushin' my love ♫. Since you're obviously too stupid to realize that it's a PAST contract, the link should help you out. Yeah, SPB won that engagement alright. with a what... 36% efficiency against us. Yeh, I'd declare that as a victory too. The war was rescinded at the client's request after you so aptly dropped yours against them after 4 days, and 2 major engagements - both of which saw SPB running for the hills. Don't worry, I've blogged about that too. Also, please don't lie about kid parties. We all know the ponies and balloons are for you. Anything else? I have not posted with an alt only my main, so sorry :/ How about that time you tried to jump us with 8 T2 cruisers and BC but when you notice our big fleet of 6 T1 cruisers and you had to run, but you lost a harbi. you won one fight there you killed 2 bs when it was 6 vs 9 bs? and F-OFF or whatever their name is that you had to hire for RR had 2 guardians and 3 RR BS since then we didnt see you anymore, you cancel the war and i podded that noob, i guess f-off was too busy with their own things so you had to cancel because of that. We did not cancel the war against the hunt because of you, our 3rd week run out and they was camping in stations so it was no point to pay for another week, so dont think you had anything to do with it. If anyone would need mercs i would recommend shadow legion. they was hire the week before you and they was good atleast. Redec and we make it mutual.
Le Soltueur Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.20 17:38:00 - [32] @ Ong / Niclas You lost the war. We played it better than you did and you're butthurt. It's ok. Cry all you like. The more attention you give us here, the more it reinforces that we've done our job. In case you haven't figured it out, we don't work for you. We work for the client. And when the client posts: Originally by: Stromchaser I would highly recommend Le Soltueur and the Underworld Excavators gents. They were professional and Listened to our concerns. I am very happy with the results they achieved and in the time frame they said. I wouldn't hesitate to use them again. Thank you for your services. I guess that means they were happy with the results. At the end of the day, that's all I really care about. Not you, or what you think. Toodles, noodles.
Awesome Possum Imperium Signal Corps	Posted - 2009.11.20 17:47:00 - [33] Originally by: Niclas Solo How about that time you tried to jump us with 8 T2 cruisers and BC obvious lie.. UE doesn't even have 8 pilots capable of t2 cruisers! ...wait ♥ Wreck Disposal Services
Milli' Dace	Posted - 2009.11.20 17:59:00 - [34] Edited by: Milli'' Dace on 20/11/2009 18:04:44 You guys are not a epic merc corp... you are fail. Without your RR alt corp you suck majorly! We are not bad losers if we are beaten with skill then we appreciate that and aknowledge it. If we are beaten because you bring more support than you do fighters then we have problems! and we didnt even lose, anyone who would like proof can check the killboards we have more kills than them :) Feel free to dec us again if you actually want to fight properly ... but you won't because you know we are better :) FAIL FAIL FAIL!
FarFae Dundee	Posted - 2009.11.20 18:01:00 - [35] Originally by: Le Soltueur @ Ong / Niclas You lost the war. We played it better than you did and you're butthurt. It's ok. Cry all you like. The more attention you give us here, the more it reinforces that we've done our job. In case you haven't figured it out, we don't work for you. We work for the client. And when the client posts: Originally by: Stromchaser I would highly recommend Le Soltueur and the Underworld Excavators gents. They were professional and Listened to our concerns. I am very happy with the results they achieved and in the time frame they said. I wouldn't hesitate to use them again. Thank you for your services. explain how 4 kills and 7 losses including a pod is a win? I don't know of another instance where this would be seen as a win. is EVE that different? you came, you lost, you ran. you paid for one week of war, and retracted before it was over. That is Chicken Poop. You showed up, you took your lumps like big boys and girls and you got paid. I guess you could call that a win. The endorsement from Stromchaser is epic. He is known as a pilot of very high standards. His post carries a great deal of weight and should inspire your future clients. After suffering 91 losses against SPB and making 5 kills, he hires you guys. You get 4 kills in 4 days and he's delighted enough to A) post that, and B) request that you retract the war and not let it run it's natural course? A glowing endorsement indeed. we too got a reply in our forum from Stromchaser. I guess that means they were happy with the results. At the end of the day, that's all I really care about. Not you, or what you think. Toodles, noodles.
Ong	Posted - 2009.11.20 18:09:00 - [36] Originally by: Le Soltueur @ Ong / Niclas You lost the war. We played it better than you did and you're butthurt. It's ok. Cry all you like. The more attention you give us here, the more it reinforces that we've done our job. In case you haven't figured it out, we don't work for you. We work for the client. And when the client posts: Originally by: Stromchaser I would highly recommend Le Soltueur and the Underworld Excavators gents. They were professional and Listened to our concerns. I am very happy with the results they achieved and in the time frame they said. I wouldn't hesitate to use them again. Thank you for your services. I guess that means they were happy with the results. At the end of the day, that's all I really care about. Not you, or what you think. Toodles, noodles. I never said you were bad mercs, my point was that you lack skill. Every fight that you did not vastly outnumber us you lost. I am simply trying to point this out to potential clients, if they hired you against someone like Privateers or repo that can out blob/neut rr you, they would not get much bang for their buck
Le Soltueur Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.20 19:10:00 - [37] Originally by: Milli' Dace Edited by: Milli'' Dace on 20/11/2009 18:04:44 You guys are not a epic merc corp... you are fail. Without your RR alt corp you suck majorly! We are not bad losers if we are beaten with skill then we appreciate that and aknowledge it. If we are beaten because you bring more support than you do fighters then we have problems! and we didnt even lose, anyone who would like proof can check the killboards we have more kills than them :) Feel free to dec us again if you actually want to fight properly ... but you won't because you know we are better :) FAIL FAIL FAIL! All you need is cheese to go with that whine.
Zedrik Cayne Gallente Standards and Practices	Posted - 2009.11.20 19:13:00 - [38] Originally by: Ong I never said you were bad mercs, my point was that you lack skill. Every fight that you did not vastly outnumber us you lost. I am simply trying to point this out to potential clients, if they hired you against someone like Privateers or repo that can out blob/neut rr you, they would not get much bang for their buck What is Butt Hurt and attempted e-peen re-inflation failure for $200 Alex? What is Failed smear campaing for $200 Alex? Potential clients are not interested in your justifications. They are interested in previous clients and contract history. Not how you could have won if the Underworld Excavators were not as good at what they do as they are. -- Originally by: "RedSplat" You're the internet equivalent of a Deepfried Mars bar filled with stupid.
Le Soltueur Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.20 19:23:00 - [39] Originally by: Ong I never said you were bad mercs, my point was that you lack skill. Every fight that you did not vastly outnumber us you lost. I am simply trying to point this out to potential clients, if they hired you against someone like Privateers or repo that can out blob/neut rr you, they would not get much bang for their buck You must have missed something important here. Let me help you with your confusion. You're a previous target we were hired against. It's your job to whine and complain (which by $diety you and your corp have done a crapload of so far). However (this is the important word - it's like the TSN turning point) your opinion doesn't amount to crap. You see, it's not you that I have to answer to, it's the client. They're the ones that pay us to go after idiots like you. So it's their opinion of our performance that actually matters. Picture this: You go for a job interview and the employer calls your recent ex-girl/boyfriend for a reference instead of anyone for whom you worked before. Makes about as much sense as you do right now. Do the rest of the C&P community a favour. STFU and move along. It's better to have people think you're an idiot than open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Milli' Dace	Posted - 2009.11.20 19:38:00 - [40] Anyone who is considering hiring this corp for any merc jobs contact my CEO or any of our directors and we will do it for half the price amd get better results. ;) I also have some pretty good fraps footage if you want any clarification.

FarFae Dundee	Posted - 2009.11.20 19:52:00 - [41] Originally by: Le Soltueur Originally by: Ong I never said you were bad mercs, my point was that you lack skill. Every fight that you did not vastly outnumber us you lost. I am simply trying to point this out to potential clients, if they hired you against someone like Privateers or repo that can out blob/neut rr you, they would not get much bang for their buck You must have missed something important here. Let me help you with your confusion. You're a previous target we were hired against. It's your job to whine and complain (which by $diety you and your corp have done a crapload of so far). However (this is the important word - it's like the TSN turning point) your opinion doesn't amount to crap. You see, it's not you that I have to answer to, it's the client. They're the ones that pay us to go after idiots like you. So it's their opinion of our performance that actually matters. Picture this: You go for a job interview and the employer calls your recent ex-girl/boyfriend for a reference instead of anyone for whom you worked before. Makes about as much sense as you do right now. Do the rest of the C&P community a favour. STFU and move along. It's better to have people think you're an idiot than open your mouth and remove all doubt. Still looking for clarification on how 7 losses including a pod, and only 4 kills can be considered a win. To the untrained eye, it looks like the other guys had a field day. Reading through your posts here, you seem adamant that you won. I am therefore probably wrong. I'd just like to know how. !!!! it's like Golf!!! right? the lower score wins? please help. Thank you.
Ong	Posted - 2009.11.20 19:54:00 - [42] Originally by: Le Soltueur Originally by: Ong I never said you were bad mercs, my point was that you lack skill. Every fight that you did not vastly outnumber us you lost. I am simply trying to point this out to potential clients, if they hired you against someone like Privateers or repo that can out blob/neut rr you, they would not get much bang for their buck You must have missed something important here. Let me help you with your confusion. You're a previous target we were hired against. It's your job to whine and complain (which by $diety you and your corp have done a crapload of so far). However (this is the important word - it's like the TSN turning point) your opinion doesn't amount to crap. You see, it's not you that I have to answer to, it's the client. They're the ones that pay us to go after idiots like you. So it's their opinion of our performance that actually matters. Picture this: You go for a job interview and the employer calls your recent ex-girl/boyfriend for a reference instead of anyone for whom you worked before. Makes about as much sense as you do right now. Do the rest of the C&P community a favour. STFU and move along. It's better to have people think you're an idiot than open your mouth and remove all doubt. Aaaawwww did I hit a nerve? My point was that you are a one trick poney, when said target does that trick bigger then you, I dont think you will have much of a comeback, and thus your client will have wasted isk. Skilled mercs dont just default to bs with neut rr, they mix things up a little and every time you did, you died. So no I will not STFU I am simply pointing out that despite your alt posting and positive comments from those you obviously have naped, maybe...........just maybe.....your not as good as your ego thinks.
Awesome Possum Imperium Signal Corps	Posted - 2009.11.20 20:04:00 - [43] Originally by: FarFae Dundee Still looking for clarification on how 7 losses including a pod, and only 4 kills can be considered a win. 7 losses for a whopping 180 mill damage taken. 4 kills for a whopping 318 mill damage dealt. Quote: To the untrained eye, it looks like the other guys had a field day. You blobbed a laser vigil with 2 frigs, a hac, and 3 cruisers and you're on here whining? seriously, did that pilgrim loss butthurt you that much? Quote: Reading through your posts here, you seem adamant that you won. I am therefore probably wrong. I'd just like to know how. 7 losses for a whopping 180 mill damage taken. 4 kills for a whopping 318 mill damage dealt. Quote: !!!! it's like Golf!!! right? the lower score wins? please help. Thank you. Welcome to C&P... Love, Possum .......now go home. ♥ Wreck Disposal Services
Milli' Dace	Posted - 2009.11.20 20:38:00 - [44] Yes I did lose a pilgrim... however it was 2 spb vs 6 UE you were all in cloaky ships and we actually have the ball to come out of our stations when we are out numbered or even equal... the fact you have to have a 20 man fleet before you even think about engaging 6 of us shows how bad you guys are. What would happen if someone paid you to dec a big corp ....? I am pretty sure you would decline it because you dont have the skill to handle it.
FarFae Dundee	Posted - 2009.11.20 20:38:00 - [45] Originally by: Awesome Possum Originally by: FarFae Dundee Still looking for clarification on how 7 losses including a pod, and only 4 kills can be considered a win. 7 losses for a whopping 180 mill damage taken. 4 kills for a whopping 318 mill damage dealt. Quote: To the untrained eye, it looks like the other guys had a field day. You blobbed a laser vigil with 2 frigs, a hac, and 3 cruisers and you're on here whining? seriously, did that pilgrim loss butthurt you that much? Quote: Reading through your posts here, you seem adamant that you won. I am therefore probably wrong. I'd just like to know how. 7 losses for a whopping 180 mill damage taken. 4 kills for a whopping 318 mill damage dealt. Quote: !!!! it's like Golf!!! right? the lower score wins? please help. Thank you. Welcome to C&P... Love, Possum .......now go home. Oh man. This is the best yet! " Whopping 318 mill" Whopping? you are kidding right? we call them disposable battleships, and you call them whopping. and this is how you think 7 losses is a success with only 4 kills. you were out gunned, out skilled, out played, out smarted, and you think 138 mil (a day of AFK missioning) isk differential makes it a win? bless.
Milli' Dace	Posted - 2009.11.20 20:57:00 - [46] Originally by: FarFae Dundee Originally by: Awesome Possum Originally by: FarFae Dundee Still looking for clarification on how 7 losses including a pod, and only 4 kills can be considered a win. 7 losses for a whopping 180 mill damage taken. 4 kills for a whopping 318 mill damage dealt. Quote: To the untrained eye, it looks like the other guys had a field day. You blobbed a laser vigil with 2 frigs, a hac, and 3 cruisers and you're on here whining? seriously, did that pilgrim loss butthurt you that much? Quote: Reading through your posts here, you seem adamant that you won. I am therefore probably wrong. I'd just like to know how. 7 losses for a whopping 180 mill damage taken. 4 kills for a whopping 318 mill damage dealt. Quote: !!!! it's like Golf!!! right? the lower score wins? please help. Thank you. Welcome to C&P... Love, Possum .......now go home. Oh man. This is the best yet! " Whopping 318 mill" Whopping? you are kidding right? we call them disposable battleships, and you call them whopping. and this is how you think 7 losses is a success with only 4 kills. you were out gunned, out skilled, out played, out smarted, and you think 138 mil (a day of AFK missioning) isk differential makes it a win? bless. You forget... fail mercs dont get good pay
Awesome Possum Imperium Signal Corps	Posted - 2009.11.20 21:05:00 - [47] Originally by: FarFae Dundee Oh man. This is the best yet! " Whopping 318 mill" Whopping? you are kidding right? we call them disposable battleships, and you call them whopping. and this is how you think 7 losses is a success with only 4 kills. you were out gunned, out skilled, out played, out smarted, and you think 138 mil (a day of AFK missioning) isk differential makes it a win? bless. mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrow!! ♥ Wreck Disposal Services
Zedrik Cayne Gallente Standards and Practices	Posted - 2009.11.20 21:09:00 - [48] Originally by: FarFae Dundee Oh man. This is the best yet! " Whopping 318 mill" Whopping? you are kidding right? we call them disposable battleships, and you call them whopping. and this is how you think 7 losses is a success with only 4 kills. you were out gunned, out skilled, out played, out smarted, and you think 138 mil (a day of AFK missioning) isk differential makes it a win? bless. The argument goes both ways..you oh so pwned them for pocket change . What is still lame for $200 Alex. -- Originally by: "RedSplat" You're the internet equivalent of a Deepfried Mars bar filled with stupid.
Awesome Possum Imperium Signal Corps	Posted - 2009.11.20 21:13:00 - [49] I miss Zed and all of the ninja alliance chat :( ♥ Wreck Disposal Services
Le Soltueur Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.20 21:27:00 - [50] Originally by: FarFae Dundee Still looking for clarification on how 7 losses including a pod, and only 4 kills can be considered a win. To the untrained eye, it looks like the other guys had a field day. Reading through your posts here, you seem adamant that you won. I am therefore probably wrong. I'd just like to know how. !!!! it's like Golf!!! right? the lower score wins? please help. Thank you. Let me help you, since you obviously haven't the brain capacity to figure it out on your own. More kills does not = win. Damage inflicted = win. What you killed was a bunch of crap ships. What we killed was 2 recons and 2 battleships. ISK value at the end of the day was much more significantly in our favour - to the tune of 64%. Here's another way to look at it. Out of the total damage that was done to both sides, we caused 64% of it. Yeah, you might have killed 6 ships and pod. Whoop-de-ding-dong, tra-la-la boy. You still lost the efficiency race. But I guess that's no big surprise.

Zavulon Sukkot Imperium Signal Corps Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.21 01:23:00 - [51] Y'know. Suddenly Ninjas I think puts up a better fight than most of these targets yapping on these here forums. Just sayin'. NATI.
Harrigan VonStudly Imperium Signal Corps Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.21 01:41:00 - [52] First the whiners accuse UE of having more neutral rr than pilots of our own. Then they accuse us of blobbing them. I'll take make up your mind for $1000 Alex
FarFae Dundee	Posted - 2009.11.21 02:00:00 - [53] Originally by: Le Soltueur Originally by: FarFae Dundee Still looking for clarification on how 7 losses including a pod, and only 4 kills can be considered a win. To the untrained eye, it looks like the other guys had a field day. Reading through your posts here, you seem adamant that you won. I am therefore probably wrong. I'd just like to know how. !!!! it's like Golf!!! right? the lower score wins? please help. Thank you. Let me help you, since you obviously haven't the brain capacity to figure it out on your own. More kills does not = win. Damage inflicted = win. What you killed was a bunch of crap ships. What we killed was 2 recons and 2 battleships. ISK value at the end of the day was much more significantly in our favour - to the tune of 64%. Here's another way to look at it. Out of the total damage that was done to both sides, we caused 64% of it. Yeah, you might have killed 6 ships and pod. Whoop-de-ding-dong, tra-la-la boy. You still lost the efficiency race. But I guess that's no big surprise. Sorry man, we don't really give a poop about the isk. We just want to kill more ships. That's all. And pods! More kills = what we're going for = win. isk = not a concern of ours in the slightest. And please don't mistake our laughing at you for whining. what's to whine about? Yet another successful campaign on our kill board. You were hired to put a hurt on us. Instead, you took heavy losses for a few kills and ran away = LOL. You go on to brag about it = LOL. There's no whining here. Efficiency race = LOL! 7 kills 4 losses = pretty efficient. it's precisely what we set out to do. 300 whatever mil isk at killboard prices is chump change. Hardly a big score on your part.
Le Soltueur Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.21 02:05:00 - [54] Originally by: FarFae Dundee Sorry man, we don't really give a poop about the isk. We just want to kill more ships. That's all. And pods! More kills = what we're going for = win. isk = not a concern of ours in the slightest. And please don't mistake our laughing at you for whining. what's to whine about? Yet another successful campaign on our kill board. You were hired to put a hurt on us. Instead, you took heavy losses for a few kills and ran away = LOL. You go on to brag about it = LOL. There's no whining here. Efficiency race = LOL! 7 kills 4 losses = pretty efficient. it's precisely what we set out to do. 300 whatever mil isk at killboard prices is chump change. Hardly a big score on your part. You're obviously clueless. I'm glad you don't give a poop about the isk. The client got what he wanted. Nuff said. If you insist on making a complete ass of yourself, carry on. I'm done with you.
FarFae Dundee	Posted - 2009.11.21 02:44:00 - [55] Originally by: Le Soltueur Originally by: FarFae Dundee Sorry man, we don't really give a poop about the isk. We just want to kill more ships. That's all. And pods! More kills = what we're going for = win. isk = not a concern of ours in the slightest. And please don't mistake our laughing at you for whining. what's to whine about? Yet another successful campaign on our kill board. You were hired to put a hurt on us. Instead, you took heavy losses for a few kills and ran away = LOL. You go on to brag about it = LOL. There's no whining here. Efficiency race = LOL! 7 kills 4 losses = pretty efficient. it's precisely what we set out to do. 300 whatever mil isk at killboard prices is chump change. Hardly a big score on your part. You're obviously clueless. I'm glad you don't give a poop about the isk. The client got what he wanted. Nuff said. If you insist on making a complete ass of yourself, carry on. I'm done with you. You're clueless, and you're an ass. stomp foot petulantly. Is this what you're reduced to? Name calling? As I mentioned before, your client has stunningly low expectations and requirements. I would have loved to hear the conversation as he hired you: "They killed us 91 times, so, I want to hire you to kill them FOUR times, then retract the war. And, I want you to do NO LESS than 300 mil isk damage. I need you to hit them hard in the pocket!!!" And you have a chubby because you got out after 4 days with only 7 losses. Man, that is seriously funny. The only post on this forum I've ever posted on... because it made me LOL. Thanks for that. Seriously. Thanks. Carry on.
FarFae Dundee	Posted - 2009.11.21 02:54:00 - [56] http://uncasolty.com/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=72 Another awesome campaign. Was this client singing your praises, too? How about the WT? Staggering under the weight of your immense win? I'll bet they ran like scalded dogs when they saw you coming and wept with relief when you retracted after 1 week and 1 day... wait... you paid for a second week... and then because you were winning so hard, you retracted 1 day into that second week? I don't know what's more frightening, your pvp abilities or your fiscal responsibility. And... I get the feeling that you guys are kinda serious. It's people like you guys that make me keep on coming back to this game. Thanks for being there, for being entertaining and for being so gosh darned positive!
Gregor Vernof Imperium Signal Corps Underworld Excavators	Posted - 2009.11.21 05:43:00 - [57] Originally by: FarFae Dundee we don't really give a poop about the isk. We just want to kill more ships. That's all. And pods! More kills = what we're going for = win. isk = not a concern of ours in the slightest. And please don't mistake our laughing at you for whining. what's to whine about? Yet another successful campaign on our kill board. You were hired to put a hurt on us. Instead, you took heavy losses for a few kills and ran away = LOL. You go on to brag about it = LOL. There's no whining here. Efficiency race = LOL! 7 kills 4 losses = pretty efficient. it's precisely what we set out to do. 300 whatever mil isk at killboard prices is chump change. Hardly a big score on your part. A lot of we/ours there. At least your fellow Corp mates had the where-with-all to post with their mains. Now although I'll give you that your measuring of success can/may be different than others I think you'll unfortunately (for your defense) find that anyone that really matters in a discussion of hiring Mercs will care about damage inflicted and efficiencies. But once again lets agree to disagree, and you can march to your different drum. I'm sure that anyone willing to listen to your drivel will be happy for your assessment. Continuing your flame/troll attacks actually only diminishes your position.
Nisstyree Chimera Raiders MeatSausage EXPRESS	Posted - 2009.11.21 06:13:00 - [58] Came here looking for flames and tears, wasn't dissapointed. WTS popcorn
Gorky Sthukulov	Posted - 2009.11.21 06:19:00 - [59] Got any T3 popcorn?
Miyamoto Isoruku Caldari The Phoenix Enclave	Posted - 2009.11.21 06:21:00 - [60] C+P poll: Who's worse, Maru Ka'ge or the dumbasses trolling Solty? Bonus points for justifications provided in haiku form.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.