EVE Search - Stealthy Ships of war need fixing!! NAO!

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Stealthy Ships of war need fixing!! NAO!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lady Aja Caldari	Posted - 2009.12.15 00:11:00 - [1] Right.. So.. once more Germany has implimented something that annoys me off tremendously. The issue lies in the fact that in the Atlantic.. 25 ships at sea.. and then 2 of which are U-Boats, don't get me wrong.. we all love sitting in hostile waters giving intel on EVERYTHING that goes on. But this one bothers me. The thing with U-Boats is that they can sit there ALL day.. doing nothing.. under water 100% safe.. with 200 hostiles.. and give intel on everything, at no expense.. There is a major issue in that sailing in home shores is compramised by these little U-Boats.. all it takes is for one to get in position.. and then 1 misses misses some intel for what ever reason and you have people crying over a sinkign ship. Now, I've been in this war for a hell of a long time and there are only a select few issues that have bugged me to this extent, and U-Boats are one of them. 6 U-Boats.. yes 6 SUBMARINES sit in hostile waters.. waiting for anything they feel they can take down and you can't stop them.. all you can do is inform your leaders that there are U-Boats are under water.. they are rediculously powerful disruption tactics and they need a nerf. kill the U-Boats, make it Need Oxygen or summit and cost Desiel to run. fix it Winston churchhill get rid of the 50 U-Boats spread about the english channel and Atlantic.
Liang Nuren No Salvation War.Pigs.	Posted - 2009.12.15 00:13:00 - [2] Edited by: Liang Nuren on 15/12/2009 00:14:01 What you are REALLY complaining about is LOCAL ITSELF. You would be fine if you didn't even know they were there - which would really be a much better analogy anyway! -Liang Ed: CCP has said that they don't want local to be a source of intel for people. But that REALLY goes both ways. You have intel on their numbers, and when they enter/leave system. In "reality" they should be able to have a 200 man dread fleet in your system taking down a POS, and if a director from that corp isn't online then no one **ing knows a thing. -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire www.kwikdeath.org
Dungheap Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2009.12.15 16:54:00 - [3] this is the official 'afk cloaker' whine thread. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1217512 thanks for starting another one, anyway... while i'm not a big fan of analogies, yours is a bit amusing. history recalls that, despite the unknown danger, the convoys rolled on. they did not sit in home port, posting about how unfair submerged submarines were. if they had, they soon wouldn't have had a port to call home.
Zilberfrid	Posted - 2009.12.15 16:59:00 - [4] Well, ships under water matter little to us pod people, so what is your problem?
Dr Fighter	Posted - 2009.12.15 17:00:00 - [5] Originally by: Liang Nuren Edited by: Liang Nuren on 15/12/2009 00:14:01 What you are REALLY complaining about is LOCAL ITSELF. You would be fine if you didn't even know they were there - which would really be a much better analogy anyway! -Liang Ed: CCP has said that they don't want local to be a source of intel for people. But that REALLY goes both ways. You have intel on their numbers, and when they enter/leave system. In "reality" they should be able to have a 200 man dread fleet in your system taking down a POS, and if a director from that corp isn't online then no one **ing knows a thing. as much as i like the idea here, with the new sov system, wouldnt getting rid of local work a treat if it was only 'available' to the corp/allince that controls that system. Their beacon flag thingy having a scanner that provides the local system owners wiht reports of ship types and names of pilots only. (not locations obviously)
snake133	Posted - 2009.12.15 17:08:00 - [6] Originally by: Lady Aja Right.. So.. once more Germany has implimented something that annoys me off tremendously. The issue lies in the fact that in the Atlantic.. 25 ships at sea.. and then 2 of which are U-Boats, don't get me wrong.. we all love sitting in hostile waters giving intel on EVERYTHING that goes on. But this one bothers me. The thing with U-Boats is that they can sit there ALL day.. doing nothing.. under water 100% safe.. with 200 hostiles.. and give intel on everything, at no expense.. There is a major issue in that sailing in home shores is compramised by these little U-Boats.. all it takes is for one to get in position.. and then 1 misses misses some intel for what ever reason and you have people crying over a sinkign ship. Now, I've been in this war for a hell of a long time and there are only a select few issues that have bugged me to this extent, and U-Boats are one of them. 6 U-Boats.. yes 6 SUBMARINES sit in hostile waters.. waiting for anything they feel they can take down and you can't stop them.. all you can do is inform your leaders that there are U-Boats are under water.. they are rediculously powerful disruption tactics and they need a nerf. kill the U-Boats, make it Need Oxygen or summit and cost Desiel to run. fix it Winston churchhill get rid of the 50 U-Boats spread about the english channel and Atlantic. omg another emo rage i hate cloaker rage troll... agreed remove local problem fixed. oh ya as a note u can fit eccm and be essentialy cloaked aswell unable to be seens so tossing in oxygen to runa claok jst makes ppl use eccm sig radius method which doesn use anything but cap. oh btw nice larp.
Liang Nuren No Salvation War.Pigs.	Posted - 2009.12.15 17:54:00 - [7] Originally by: Dr Fighter as much as i like the idea here, with the new sov system, wouldnt getting rid of local work a treat if it was only 'available' to the corp/allince that controls that system. Their beacon flag thingy having a scanner that provides the local system owners wiht reports of ship types and names of pilots only. (not locations obviously) TBH giving ship type is WAAAAAAY too much information. Also, the information should flow both ways - you know what ship I'm in, and I know what ship you're in (and whether you're docked). -Liang -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire www.kwikdeath.org
James Tritanius	Posted - 2009.12.15 18:02:00 - [8] To all the idiots out there, this is a direct parody of the cloaker whine thread found here. Though the mistake is excusable as the attempt at humor is not at all funny.
Mire Stoude The Undesirables	Posted - 2009.12.15 18:08:00 - [9] I think this belongs in out of pod experience? Moderators should move it.
Zaius Caine	Posted - 2009.12.15 18:13:00 - [10] I'm surprised nobody has done it already but I'm calling Troll on this one. 2/10.

Regat Kozovv Caldari Alcothology	Posted - 2009.12.15 18:20:00 - [11] Edited by: Regat Kozovv on 15/12/2009 18:19:46 I think what we need is an ocean-wide detection system (say, when we get Sov III) that instantly detects all cloake er, submarines. Edit: Oh, wait.
James Tritanius	Posted - 2009.12.15 18:23:00 - [12] Originally by: Zaius Caine I'm surprised nobody has done it already but I'm calling Troll on this one. 2/10. Because it's so ****ing obvious?
Sokratesz	Posted - 2009.12.15 18:57:00 - [13] I like how liang molded it into a 'nerf local' rather than 'nerf cloakers' whine.
Scatim Helicon GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.12.15 20:15:00 - [14] :it is a world war II analogy: -----------------
War Kitten	Posted - 2009.12.15 20:25:00 - [15] Geez so many people, so few clues. Good post OP. Just the right flavor of sarcasm and wit. "Here's your sign." - Bill Engvall
Jack Icegaard The Omega Project	Posted - 2009.12.15 20:55:00 - [16] Using IRL comparison is not really relevant and if it was it would probably backfire for the OP. For example, one carrier is several hundred times more expensive than a submarine and yet, one torpedo salve that hits home will likely take out a carrier for good. A modern diesel-electric AIP-submarine can stay submerged for weeks and it can probably run rings around most carrier groups as it is very hard to detect. I like my SBs but I'm not sure if i want them to be able to kill carriers in one salvo. Might be a tad overpowered
Trader20	Posted - 2009.12.15 21:29:00 - [17] You know this works both ways. They gather your intel so go gather their's. It's war dude, thats the way it works. Also I think I'm being trolled.......
James Tritanius	Posted - 2009.12.15 22:26:00 - [18] Originally by: Trader20 Also I think I'm being trolled....... Because it's so ****ing obvious?
Borun Tal Minmatar	Posted - 2009.12.15 22:58:00 - [19] So the game mechanics need to change because you're a spoiled little whelp who can't adapt your gameplay to what others are obviously doing better? 1/10
Grimpak Gallente Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group	Posted - 2009.12.16 00:36:00 - [20] obvious troll is so **ing obvious --- Quote:** The more I know about humans, the more I love animals. ain't that right.



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.