Originally by: Agaue

---

Originally by: EdFromHumanResources

---

Since some of yall may not be aware of the new sov mecahnics you guys do have to do those big ops 3-4 days in a row to take a system, not just one night.

---

I think everyone can agree the new sov mechaniocs are completely ******ed. having to dominate the defenders for 4 consecutive days in the defenders preferred timezone is ludicrously difficult. Not to mention that if forces are relatively even the defenders have the advantage of being able to attack their choice of SBU, each of which has significantly less hitpoints then ihub/station.

For any strong and well organised alliance it should be extremely easy to defend, especially when there is a timezone difference between the attacking/defending membership base.

This is not a shot at goons/friends (congrats on defending 49-), it is a shot at CCP for not thinking this system through before implementing it. It is better than POS wars, but it definitely favours the defenders too much imo.

---

Originally by: Trishtan DeMore

---

Edited by: Trishtan DeMore on 11/01/2010 06:04:29

Originally by: EdFromHumanResources

---

Almost like you have to have superiority over the enemy to take their system. ****ing amazing concept.

---

BS. you basically only have to have a 1/3 of a day superiority to defend. AAA + appendix has a 2/3 of a day superiority vs you and all that helps you is the fact that US TZ is strong. so the concept is basically broken.

it should be like the POS stront timer were. a certain amount of hours from the time it is shot into RF. if shield is below 50% you can kite it. Then it is fair that a 16h/day covering group can overcome a 8h/day covering group.

---

Originally by: King Dave

---

Originally by: Naomi Ashikaga

---

Originally by: Bedrock

---

Originally by: Petar Quaresma

---

How would you know about sov mechanics? All the systems you claimed were basically handed to you without a fight.

---

Yup no ships died in that Fountain Campaign

Name Start dateKillsISK (B)
Fountain of Kills2009-10-0110224952.77

---

good job quoting a post about sov mechanics and countering with killboard stats

tri never changes

---

"You guys took station's with no superbattles"
*Proves superbattles...
"Look at you trying to show off how much you superbattle"

/facepalm

---

Originally by: Agaue

---

Originally by: EdFromHumanResources

---

So I guess what youre saying is when yall lost sov in delve it didnt really hurt the defense of it at all because the old system wasn't geared for defenders?

---

that isnt what I was saying at all. but mad props for trying.

/double facepalm

all I am saying now is that your reading comprehension sucks

---

Originally by: Agaue

---

Originally by: EdFromHumanResources

---

Sorry that you couldn't comprehend I was only mocking you and your alliance.

---

I forgive you.

pro tip: Next time if you want to mock my alliance, actually use something that my alliance was involved in like "I heard it was easier to lose 100 dreads in syndicate under the old sov mechanics". As IT alliance has never held any space in delve.

---

Originally by: w0rmy

---

Originally by: Petar Quaresma

---

How would you know about sov mechanics? All the systems you claimed were basically handed to you without a fight.

---

Sorry, I missed the first page, are we talking about delve?

---

Originally by: w0rmy

---

Originally by: EdFromHumanResources

---

Originally by: w0rmy

---

Originally by: Petar Quaresma

---

How would you know about sov mechanics? All the systems you claimed were basically handed to you without a fight.

---

Sorry, I missed the first page, are we talking about delve?

---

Sorry dude you should go back a page where your alliance m8m8m8m8m8m8m says your alliance was not involved in Delve.

---

Thats very lovely, completely unrelated to my post, but lovely all the same

---