EVE Search - An open question to CCP Adida

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

An open question to CCP Adida

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:00:00 - [1] Hey, I know by the nature of this topic it will get locked eventually, but I would like some explanation on this that most other forumites seem to be interested in as well. Since you joined the moderating team, Adida, you have been enforcing rule 17 of the forum rules pretty often. I'm interested to know why. Prior to you coming on the team, rule 17 was for most intents and purposes ignored by the other mods. In fact I had to go re-read the rules when you first said it existed because I had forgotten about it. Rules are only rules when they are enforced. Rule 17 was never actively enforced before you joined the team. It was by convention among the players and moderators alike that the rule was disregarded. So I guess my final point is this. Either go back to treating Rule 17 the way it was treated before you came on, or be consistent and lock ALL threads about other games, because right now you seem to be locking them at random (Mass Effect 2 thread?) And also consider this my post to show my support for the removal of rule 17 entirely.
Irida Mershkov Gallente Capsuleers of Doom Opticon Alliance	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:02:00 - [2] Because enforcing the rules are the mods job, no matter how silly the rule is.
Jago Kain Amarr Ramm's RDI Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:16:00 - [3] Silence!! Ve ask zer qvestions!!! ___________________________________________________ The game will never be over, because we're keeping the meme alive.
Mikelio Raijan Celtic Anarchy	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:18:00 - [4] Edited by: Mikelio Raijan on 27/03/2010 17:27:51 General Rules. 17. All posts must be about or related to Eve Online. Posts about other games or game companies, products or services not related to Eve are not permitted. OOP Experience rules. 1. Unless amended in this set of rules, the EVE Forum rules apply in this forum. 2. Unlike all other forums on the website, all posts here do not have to be related to EVE. In fact, they should not be related to EVE. The purpose of this forum is for all posts not related to EVE. Learn to read stickies please CCP Adida.
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:29:00 - [5] Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 17:29:22 Originally by: Mikelio Raijan Learn to read stickies please CCP Adida. Originally by: CCP Zymurgist 5. You are not allowed to discuss other games in Out of Pod experience Umm, so do you apparently
Mikelio Raijan Celtic Anarchy	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:39:00 - [6] Well actually arn't we campaigning for removal of Rule #5 of OOP then? Seeing as rule #17 of general is totally countered by rule #2 of OOP.
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:44:00 - [7] Originally by: Mikelio Raijan Well actually arn't we campaigning for removal of Rule #5 of OOP then? Seeing as rule #17 of general is totally countered by rule #2 of OOP. While technically true, whenever CCP Adida locks a thread because of other game discussion, they reference rule 17 for all the forums instead of rule 5 for OOP. Not too mention I think it shouldn't just be rule 5 removed. Mentioning other games in the other subforums isn't a problem, it just shows insecurity on CCP's part for upholding a rule like that.
Kirra Liu Echelon Holdings Echelon.	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:54:00 - [8] I have no problem with the mod's enforcing the rules as that is why they are here but when we have been able to discuss other games in this section for years without any trouble then the rules could do with a review to bring them up to date and make things clear. Also considering that moderators, developers and games masters have joined in on discussions about games on here including I think even making threads themselves about other games then it certainly needs looking at. Right now people just feel there is mixed messages on the matter. We should be allowed to discuss other games here as this section is for non-Eve related topics. The no politics and religion discussion rules are fair but a ban on games discussions just seems petty. Kirra Liu / Lord Windu
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.27 17:57:00 - [9] Kirra, i'm adding your post as a quote into the OP, i agree completely with everything you just said
Kirra Liu Echelon Holdings Echelon.	Posted - 2010.03.27 18:01:00 - [10] Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen Kirra, i'm adding your post as a quote into the OP, i agree completely with everything you just said That's because I am always right..... well no ok but thanks, I can do well when I'm not raging in my posts. Kirra Liu / Lord Windu
Sidus Isaacs Gallente	Posted - 2010.03.27 18:24:00 - [11] I demand she uphold rule 34 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html
Dalmont Delantee Gallente Fidelis Discordia	Posted - 2010.03.27 18:36:00 - [12] I want rule 69 enforced! Take comfort in knowing that its probably some pimply faced twit, or 40 year old virgin, who gleens everytime mommy offfers to take them to needle point lessons
Blane Xero Amarr The Firestorm Cartel	Posted - 2010.03.27 19:54:00 - [13] Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 17:29:22 Originally by: Mikelio Raijan Learn to read stickies please CCP Adida. Originally by: CCP Zymurgist 5. You are not allowed to discuss other games in Out of Pod experience Umm, so do you apparently That is a recent change. It used to be "5. You are allowed to discuss other games as long as it is constructive and not related to EVE." _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008 Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
Zeba Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company	Posted - 2010.03.27 19:56:00 - [14] Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 17:29:22 Originally by: Mikelio Raijan Learn to read stickies please CCP Adida. Originally by: CCP Zymurgist 5. You are not allowed to discuss other games in Out of Pod experience Umm, so do you apparently Lulz.. CCP stealth changed that line in the oope rules thread. It used to say discussing other games was fine as long as it was civil and constructive. Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Get off the forums and go kill someone! CCP Shadow's Troll List.
Bodrul Caldari Polaris Rising Black Star Alliance	Posted - 2010.03.27 19:59:00 - [15] postingin support of the first post ........ Buy Animated Talking Video Avatars
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2010.03.27 20:10:00 - [16] http://eve-search.com/thread/1107760/page/1#1 ^ rules page as of eve-search. Yes, there has been indeed some ninja editing going on.. Originally by: CCP Shadow Have you ever wished you could have prevented a train wreck before it actually happened? I need to stop this one before the craziness begins.
Jerreye	Posted - 2010.03.27 20:18:00 - [17] Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 20:14:51 Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 19:49:53 Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 17:57:59 Hey, I know by the nature of this topic it will get locked eventually, but I would like some explanation on this issue that most other forumites seem to be interested in as well. Since you joined the moderating team, Adida, you have been enforcing rule 17 of the forum rules pretty often. I'm interested to know why. Prior to you coming on the team, rule 17 was for most intents and purposes ignored by the other mods. In fact I had to go re-read the rules when you first said it existed because I had forgotten about it. Rules are only rules when they are enforced. Rule 17 was never actively enforced before you joined the team. It was by convention among the players and moderators alike that the rule was disregarded. So I guess my final point is this. Either go back to treating Rule 17 the way it was treated before you came on, or be consistent and lock ALL threads about other games, because right now you seem to be locking them at random (Mass Effect 2 thread?) Also consider this my post to show my support for the removal of rule 17 entirely. Originally by: Kirra Liu I have no problem with the mod's enforcing the rules as that is why they are here but when we have been able to discuss other games in this section for years without any trouble then the rules could do with a review to bring them up to date and make things clear. Also considering that moderators, developers and games masters have joined in on discussions about games on here including I think even making threads themselves about other games then it certainly needs looking at. Right now people just feel there is mixed messages on the matter. We should be allowed to discuss other games here as this section is for non-Eve related topics. The no politics and religion discussion rules are fair but a ban on games discussions just seems petty. I have a question for you: Why do you care? Is mentioning other games on the EVE forums a pastime of yours? Or are you trying to hit your pointless complaints quota for the month?
Blane Xero Amarr The Firestorm Cartel	Posted - 2010.03.27 20:23:00 - [18] Originally by: Jerreye Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 20:14:51 Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 19:49:53 Edited by: Tobias Xiaosen on 27/03/2010 17:57:59 Hey, I know by the nature of this topic it will get locked eventually, but I would like some explanation on this issue that most other forumites seem to be interested in as well. Since you joined the moderating team, Adida, you have been enforcing rule 17 of the forum rules pretty often. I'm interested to know why. Prior to you coming on the team, rule 17 was for most intents and purposes ignored by the other mods. In fact I had to go re-read the rules when you first said it existed because I had forgotten about it. Rules are only rules when they are enforced. Rule 17 was never actively enforced before you joined the team. It was by convention among the players and moderators alike that the rule was disregarded. So I guess my final point is this. Either go back to treating Rule 17 the way it was treated before you came on, or be consistent and lock ALL threads about other games, because right now you seem to be locking them at random (Mass Effect 2 thread?) Also consider this my post to show my support for the removal of rule 17 entirely. Originally by: Kirra Liu I have no problem with the mod's enforcing the rules as that is why they are here but when we have been able to discuss other games in this section for years without any trouble then the rules could do with a review to bring them up to date and make things clear. Also considering that moderators, developers and games masters have joined in on discussions about games on here including I think even making threads themselves about other games then it certainly needs looking at. Right now people just feel there is mixed messages on the matter. We should be allowed to discuss other games here as this section is for non-Eve related topics. The no politics and religion discussion rules are fair but a ban on games discussions just seems petty. I have a question for you: Why do you care? Is mentioning other games on the EVE forums a pastime of yours? Or are you trying to hit your pointless complaints quota for the month? It is fair to say that over half of the threads and discussions that actually reach a decent length beyond five to ten posts is about gaming or other games. We are gamers. This is a forum belonging to a game we all play. Gamers, intuitively, like to discuss other games with people who play the same games they do, and share opinions on possible games to buy in the future. _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008 Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
Kirra Liu Echelon Holdings Echelon.	Posted - 2010.03.27 20:23:00 - [19] Edited by: Kirra Liu on 27/03/2010 20:24:55 Originally by: Jerreye I have a question for you: Why do you care? Is mentioning other games on the EVE forums a pastime of yours? Or are you trying to hit your pointless complaints quota for the month? Well considering that to a number of people the Eve forums is seen as an on-line community of people who share an interest together, people like to discuss a range of topics with each-other and some people even appreciate the opinion of others. Your comment about "pointless complaints" seems to be incorrect in this thread. edit: What Blane said. And you seem to be complaining about people complaining :lol: Kirra Liu / Lord Windu
White Tree	Posted - 2010.03.27 20:52:00 - [20] Mass Effect 2 is incredible CCP really need to deal with it.
Zedic Amarr Universalis Imperium	Posted - 2010.03.27 22:22:00 - [21] I for one, do not welcome our over-moderating overlords. It wouldn't be a messageboard though without some "person" being all, "LETTAR OF TEH LAWZ!!!" on everyone. tl;dr Go away Adida, and take Navigator with you.
Myxx	Posted - 2010.03.27 22:33:00 - [22] Originally by: Zedic I for one, do not welcome our over-moderating overlords. It wouldn't be a messageboard though without some "person" being all, "LETTAR OF TEH LAWZ!!!" on everyone. tl;dr Go away Adida, and take Navigator with you. Shadow > Adida. At least shadow doesn't spam. ---- Originally by: CCP Mitnal I can assure you I won't be keeping ferrets warm in my pants.
Zedic Amarr Universalis Imperium	Posted - 2010.03.27 22:35:00 - [23] Shadow > all. I haven't seen any of the mods come as close to coolness / effectiveness as Shadow. They all fail in comparison. Too bad RL cloning isn't possible, we could demand clones of Shadow and toss the rest out on their ears.
ceaon Gallente	Posted - 2010.03.27 22:41:00 - [24] Aventurine dont have this kind of stupid rules that make mods look like angrey mad kids on steroids examples http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?t=240180 http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?t=240155 http://forums.darkfallonline.com/showthread.php?t=214869 eve onlienm and CCP move step by step to lego online where u can say ** etc lego online have a excuse is made for 10 years old kids BTW awesome post OP you win the forums today Originally by:** CCP Adida The male thread was locked because the discussion turned into transsexuals and man boobs.
Xen Gin Silurian Operations	Posted - 2010.03.27 23:07:00 - [25] Originally by: CCP Zymurgist 5. You are not allowed to discuss other games in Out of Pod experience So you have to close threads related to Dust514? Since that is another game right? ## You got that? Right I'll be back in approximately 300 seconds to retort! ##
Jerreye	Posted - 2010.03.27 23:19:00 - [26] Originally by: Blane Xero ]It is fair to say that over half of the threads and discussions that actually reach a decent length beyond five to ten posts is about gaming or other games. We are gamers. This is a forum belonging to a game we all play. Gamers, intuitively, like to discuss other games with people who play the same games they do, and share opinions on possible games to buy in the future. BS. 99 out of 100 times that other, or any other game is mentioned it's in a terrible comparison, and the entire thread derails into an EVE vs other game discussion. Most people get that, why don't you?
ceaon Gallente	Posted - 2010.03.27 23:29:00 - [27] Originally by: Xen Gin Originally by: CCP Zymurgist 5. You are not allowed to discuss other games in Out of Pod experience So you have to close threads related to Dust514? Since that is another game right? TouchT BTW awesome post OP you win the forums today Originally by: CCP Adida The male thread was locked because the discussion turned into transsexuals and man boobs.
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.27 23:30:00 - [28] Originally by: Jerreye Originally by: Blane Xero ]It is fair to say that over half of the threads and discussions that actually reach a decent length beyond five to ten posts is about gaming or other games. We are gamers. This is a forum belonging to a game we all play. Gamers, intuitively, like to discuss other games with people who play the same games they do, and share opinions on possible games to buy in the future. BS. 99 out of 100 times that other, or any other game is mentioned it's in a terrible comparison, and the entire thread derails into an EVE vs other game discussion. Most people get that, why don't you? Jeez... ok, let me break it down for you: Gamers play games Most gamers play more than one game Gamers thus like to talk and share opinions on games ONLY where other MMOs are concerned, are comparisons drawn with EVE I think you are just looking to get into a forum fight, ye little troll?
Merin Ryskin Peregrine Industries	Posted - 2010.03.27 23:32:00 - [29] Edited by: Merin Ryskin on 27/03/2010 23:33:03 Originally by: Lance Fighter http://eve-search.com/thread/1107760/page/1#1 ^ rules page as of eve-search. Yes, there has been indeed some ninja editing going on.. Lol. If your ****ty moderators lock threads that are explicitly allowed because they don't understand the forum rules, change the rules and pretend that's the way it's always been. Or you could just admit that you made a mistake and stop sucking at your job. -----------
Kirra Liu Echelon Holdings Echelon.	Posted - 2010.03.27 23:36:00 - [30] Originally by: Jerreye BS. 99 out of 100 times that other, or any other game is mentioned it's in a terrible comparison, and the entire thread derails into an EVE vs other game discussion. Most people get that, why don't you? Well considering that most games cannot be compared with Eve I believe you are mistaken. Especially considering what was locked earlier was a thread where someone asked for some suggestions on what to get on his PS3, I really fail to see how that could derail into a (Metal Gear Solid 4 sucks and Eve is much better) scenario, if it did then obviously that would come down to trolling which is another issue entirely. Kirra Liu / Lord Windu
Deviana Sevidon Gallente Panta-Rhei Butterfly Effect Alliance	Posted - 2010.03.28 00:14:00 - [31] OOPE is full of threads about other games, some of them even with CCP staff posting there. Personally I think the rules need to be revisited and clarified. No one can blame Adida for enforcing the rules, because that is her job. But right now, some of them are more then a bit overzealous. Quote: Disclaimer: All mentioned above contains my opinion and is therefore an absolute truth (for me anyway, my universe, muhahaha.....ok, done
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.28 01:45:00 - [32] Considering rule 17, I realized there is a bit of ambiguity behind it that leads it to be open to interpretation. Quote: #17 All posts must be about or related to Eve Online. Posts about other games or game companies, products or services not related to Eve are not permitted. The ambiguity in this is that it doesn't explicitly state that posts containing material about other games (or stuff relating to EVE, for that matter) are not permitted. It states that only posts with the SUBJECT of other games aren't permitted. Technically, this means you could post a thread about how to improve EVE with reference to "random MMO" and still be abiding by the rule. This IS resolved with the special rules for OOPE though through rule 5. Quote: 5. You are not allowed to discuss other games in Out of Pod Experience. In other words, as it stands, according to the exact wording of the current rules, you may ONLY mention other games in the other subforums ONLY when they are not the subject of your posts, while they are COMPLETELY disallowed in OOPE. Alongside this, going through the rules again, I can't find that rule that disallows the discussion on moderation. I know its been used many times before, with mods stating explicitly that it isn't allowed, but out of all the rules there isn't one that specifically says this. I looked into this because I was certain that this thread should be locked at some point, but now im not entirely sure.
Shameless Avenger	Posted - 2010.03.28 05:26:00 - [33] Just for the LOLZ, mods should create an acct called "CCP Mod 13th" with a Jason-like avatar to deal with this topic.
Zeba Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company	Posted - 2010.03.28 05:45:00 - [34] Originally by: Lance Fighter http://eve-search.com/thread/1107760/page/1#1 ^ rules page as of eve-search. Yes, there has been indeed some ninja editing going on.. Originally by: Official OOPE Rules as of yesterday 1. Unless amended in this set of rules, the EVE Forum rules apply in this forum.2. Unlike all other forums on the website, all posts here do not have to be related to EVE. In fact, they should not be related to EVE. The purpose of this forum is for all posts not related to EVE.3. Discussions about politics and religion not allowed, there are other websites with forums for these topics.4. Quit posts are allowed, however we ask you to only post that you are leaving and say goodbye to your friends, rants and non-constructive posts will be removed.5. You are allowed to discuss other games as long as it is constructive and not related to EVE.6. We remind you that forum rule 10 still applies in this forum. The posting of ***ography; discriminatory remarks which are sexually explicit, harmful, threatening, abusive, defamatory, obscene, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive; excessive obscene or vulgar language; posts which discuss or illustrate illegal activity; providing links to sites that contain any of the aforementioned.7. It shouldn't be necessary to do so, but it appears that some players feel the need to inflict their viewpoints on race, religion, politics, and other hot topic opinions on other players. These discussions will not be tolerated anywhere on the EVE forums. Players that cannot follow this guideline can lose their posting privileges immediately. This is the sole warning that will be issued regarding this.8. If you're posting an entry in response to a signature competition or request, you're allowed to link to the image directly.This is only allowed in threads that are obviously about requesting a signature.The posted graphics mustcomply with current signature regulations; in both content and dimension.Multiple images are allowed, but using them to create a bigger image in composite is not allowed.Other than that, enjoy and have fun! So whats next? Fake edit: FFS thats the end of the line. Ordering a new pc to replace this totally funcked up ps3 browser. Originally by:* CCP Zymurgist Get off the forums and go kill someone! CCP Shadow's Troll List.
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2010.03.28 05:52:00 - [35] Originally by: Zeba Originally by: Lance Fighter http://eve-search.com/thread/1107760/page/1#1 ^ rules page as of eve-search. Yes, there has been indeed some ninja editing going on.. Originally by: Official OOPE Rules as of yesterday 1. Unless amended in this set of rules, the EVE Forum rules apply in this forum.2. Unlike all other forums on the website, all posts here do not have to be related to EVE. In fact, they should not be related to EVE. The purpose of this forum is for all posts not related to EVE.3. Discussions about politics and religion not allowed, there are other websites with forums for these topics.4. Quit posts are allowed, however we ask you to only post that you are leaving and say goodbye to your friends, rants and non-constructive posts will be removed.5. You are allowed to discuss other games as long as it is constructive and not related to EVE.6. We remind you that forum rule 10 still applies in this forum. The posting of ***ography; discriminatory remarks which are sexually explicit, harmful, threatening, abusive, defamatory, obscene, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive; excessive obscene or vulgar language; posts which discuss or illustrate illegal activity; providing links to sites that contain any of the aforementioned.7. It shouldn't be necessary to do so, but it appears that some players feel the need to inflict their viewpoints on race, religion, politics, and other hot topic opinions on other players. These discussions will not be tolerated anywhere on the EVE forums. Players that cannot follow this guideline can lose their posting privileges immediately. This is the sole warning that will be issued regarding this.8. If you're posting an entry in response to a signature competition or request, you're allowed to link to the image directly.This is only allowed in threads that are obviously about requesting a signature.The posted graphics mustcomply with current signature regulations; in both content and dimension.Multiple images are allowed, but using them to create a bigger image in composite is not allowed.Other than that, enjoy and have fun! So whats next? Fake edit: FFS thats the end of the line. Ordering a new pc to replace this totally funcked up ps3 browser. i wonder if you can install linux on a ps3... also, I wish the forums would SAY 'post editied by ccp adida on xyz' like it does when we edit crap. Originally by:* CCP Shadow Have you ever wished you could have prevented a train wreck before it actually happened? I need to stop this one before the craziness begins.
Tobias Xiaosen Gallente TX Holdings Company	Posted - 2010.03.28 11:24:00 - [36] So...lets take bets. What will the CCP Dev response be to this thread? Ignore it Lock with no explanation for questions Dev posting in SUPPORT of rule change Dev (preferably Adida) explaining rule(s) (plus lock)
Xen Gin Silurian Operations	Posted - 2010.03.28 11:26:00 - [37] Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen So...lets take bets. What will the CCP Dev response be to this thread? Ignore it Lock with no explanation for questions Dev posting in SUPPORT of rule change Dev (preferably Adida) explaining rule(s) (plus lock) And it begs the question, how many thread about other games can we legitimately make before mod locking them becomes overwhelming. ## You got that? Right I'll be back in approximately 300 seconds to retort! ##
Dray Caldari Euphoria Released	Posted - 2010.03.28 11:55:00 - [38] So apart from a ninja edit there's still no clarification?
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet	Posted - 2010.03.28 12:06:00 - [39] The rule makes perfect sense. Why would a group of gamers want a forum section, where they are free to discuss gaming and other games. Surely after years of being allowed to do that here and it being allowed on every other game forum I've ever visited, it couldn't possibly be seen as a huge and unnecessary ****head move by CCP. Surely. It boggles the mind all the more, since the rules already allowed the closing of non-constructive threads, so why exactly was this new rule necessary? Either CCP is brown nosing to some unknown entity, they have collectively been hit by a bad case of stupid or other games killed the community managers only child and the issue is just too painful for him to handle right now. That or some crazy view that negativity should be minimized here, so they crack down on the most popular topics that people like to argue about. Personally I don't see why it was changed. It seems unnecessary and stupid considering that this is a gaming community. Even more so, since EVE is very niche in what it tries to do and limited in gameplay styles it allows(as are most MMOs), so people will naturally seek out other games to fulfill all their gaming needs.
Marko Riva Adamant Inc.	Posted - 2010.03.28 14:14:00 - [40] I'm going to assume they changed the rules and rule enforcement right about the time STO went live... ----------- I think, therefore I'm single. Want to learn combat/PVP? Alliance creation service
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative.	Posted - 2010.03.28 15:07:00 - [41] Originally by: Marko Riva I'm going to assume they changed the rules and rule enforcement right about the time STO went live... But why? STO was a horrible hilarious failure.
Marko Riva Adamant Inc.	Posted - 2010.03.28 15:09:00 - [42] Dunno but if memory serves me right they started to enforce the "no other games" rule around that time, who ever said that CCP thinks logically. ----------- I think, therefore I'm single. Want to learn combat/PVP? Alliance creation service
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative.	Posted - 2010.03.28 15:13:00 - [43] God knows what this place is going to get like when SW: TOR launches then C'mon CCP, show a little confidence. Censorship of this kind just reeks of insecurity.
King Gore Gore Squad	Posted - 2010.03.28 15:47:00 - [44] I wonder if this is how CCP metagames. >"Hey Adida." <"Yeah"? >"Lock that thread." <"Why"? >"Do it! It'll be funny" (moments later) <"You guys suck!" - "He feeds exclusively off dead bodies. The Destroyer. The Flesh-Eater. When the murderer hides his victims, he likes to keep in physical contact with them. Conserving them. He is a psychopath.
Lance Fighter Amarr	Posted - 2010.03.28 17:52:00 - [45] Originally by: Xen Gin Originally by: Tobias Xiaosen So...lets take bets. What will the CCP Dev response be to this thread? Ignore it Lock with no explanation for questions Dev posting in SUPPORT of rule change Dev (preferably Adida) explaining rule(s) (plus lock) And it begs the question, how many thread about other games can we legitimately make before mod locking them becomes overwhelming. no. it RAISES the question. Originally by: CCP Shadow Have you ever wished you could have prevented a train wreck before it actually happened? I need to stop this one before the craziness begins.
Smagd Encina Technologies Namtz' aar K'in	Posted - 2010.03.28 18:24:00 - [46] The next logical step on the way to dictatorship is banning the use of EVE material in external and therefore uncontrollable resources like EVE Search or Scrapheap Challenge. I'd rather like to see what democracy at work could look like if Chribba ever got banned for providing a better forum experience than CCPs own web team can, voluntarily and at substantial financial involvement for himself - all free of charge. Let's stop the silliness now, please. Thank you.

CCP Adida	Posted - 2010.03.28 19:14:00 - [47] Locking this as it questions a moderator's actions. Like all rules they have to be enforced. Adida Community Rep CCP Hf, EVE Online


Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.