| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

that beast
Disconnected. Choke Point
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:05:00 -
[91] - Quote
Alrighty, so, ignoring the big mess of c*** going on in Delve right now (which yes, is a war by the way), there are plenty of other 0.0 regions/systems.
So why doesn't OP and everyone with him go down to 0.0 and mine (after all, it's where the slightly more expensive minerals are) and then we'll see how safe it really is?
People who currently live in null will have, at some point or other, carebeared and lived in high sec, if only because it's where everyone starts. But people who live in highsec haven't necessarily lived in null, and so, on the scale of things, the people who are more likely to be the best informed about various areas of the game, are the ones who live in null.
I'm not saying either side is right, but I would like to see some of the highsec carebears coming down to mine in null because we could all do with a few more kills. And if you say "Blah but it's not the same for us because we don't have all the POS's and infrastructure and intel" then your original argument becomes a little bit moot with the yno "Null is just as safe". Arguing that the "nullbears" have made it safe for themselves is perfectly valid, and it's fine for them to have done it. It's not really using game mechanics other than that incredibly basic mechanic of "There are players in the game, other plays can interact with them". However, regardless of whether or not they've made it safe, that's still only a localised safety net. It is still dangerous, if you get my drift.
Anyway, if OP is right, then he can come down to null and start mining and make lots more money than he currently is, because he won't die, he won't even get suicide ganked, and he'll get the more valuble ores. So why doesn't he? OP your argument is fundamentally flawed.
TB |

Caitlyn Tufy
Refuge of Hope Lemniskate
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:12:00 -
[92] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote:Bootleg Jack wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:another NPC corp poster regales us with his well-informed and unbiased insights on nullsec another nullbear with nothing usefull to say i do love it when hisec miners talk about "nullbears" i wonder, what defines a "nullbear"
Actually bro, he already defined it:
event 1. neutral/red jumps into 0.0 system event 2. every hulk/raven/cnr/vindicator/maradeur/carrier click on "Warp to POS/SS/DOCK."
That, imo, is a perfect definition of a nullbear, someone who's afraid of his own shadow.
0.0 local actually is a problem, because you're always aware of danger / potential target. It also encourages blobbing (i.e. fighting in huge masses of ships to overwhelm the opponent with sheer numbers), rather than the use of actual tactics (diversions, hit and run attacks on supply lines, battle maneuvers, etc.). By turning 0.0 local into WH-like chat, you'd bring both the opportunity for smaller groups AND the potential risk against good system scanners.
Now, what would happen if there was no 0.0 local? Our nullbear could of course use preventive measures to feel safer (the mighty skills of using D-scan :p ), but there would always be a chance that a cov ops ship could get a drop on him, that an enemy armada is hiding just out of reach, etc.
Truth be told, if one is a 0.0 bloodthirsty fighter, I see absolutely no disadvantages to the introduction of this mechanic - if anything, it would make the battles even more fun. Or am I missing something? (note: I actually prefer WH over 0.0 precisely because of local; it just feels a lot more risky and there's noway to run if someone catches you with your pants down). |

Cebraio
Starfire Oasis
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:12:00 -
[93] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:Well, not that I ever mine, but from my experience in being the flashy red sebo catalyst I can tell you that when me and my buddy warp to our covops and land a k or two away from the hulk, they generally don't have time to say 'wtf' before they're popped, let alone align and warp (they are NEVER aligned already, no idea why, if I were to take a stab at it I'd guess that staying aligned means they go out of rock range) i'm really not going to bother rehashing literally every bit of advice i've given to hisec miners, but there are so many basic steps they could take to avoid getting into a situation where they get targeted for a gank in the first place, i.e. fitting an actual tank rather than whatever it takes to tank pitiful hisec belt rats That generally doesn't help, we bring two cat's for this exact reason. Only so much tank you can get with < 50PG, and cat's are super smexy with their uber dps  If I were going to give any hulk pilots out there any survival tips, it'd be to fit a full rack of ECM bursts, pray, and spam warp.
LOL! Awesome advice from a ganker! ECM bursts in hi sec! So if they don't die to your guns, they'll get CONCORDED in the end. Brilliant!
Also staying aligned during mining is not really feasible. You will move out of mining range sooner or later.
|

The Protato
Protus Correction Facility Inc.
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:24:00 -
[94] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:reinforce their POS, reinforce their station, bring a spy into one of their corps, camp a gate
Get blobbed |

dexington
Lysergic.acid.diethylamide
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:36:00 -
[95] - Quote
that beast wrote:I'm not saying either side is right, but I would like to see some of the highsec carebears coming down to mine in null because we could all do with a few more kills.
Don't think many carebears mine in 0.0 without renting a system first, and if so the risk difference between mining in 0.0 and hi-sec is pretty small.
The risk reward ratio is not static number, and most of the time you can reduce risk by reducing reward, this is also true in 0.0. It should not be possible to reduce risk to zero, without reducing reward to zero as well, but it's not impossible to turn a small part of 0.0 into the risk equivalent of hi-sec, after all there is as chance that you get suicide ganked in hi-sec.
A lot of people choose to live in hi-sec because it suites their play style better, some people just dislike being told what to do and when to do it, others have very limited or specific play times that makes living in hi-sec much easier. Don't think most people live in hi-sec because they fear loosing a ship, but because their play style it less suited for 0.0. |

that beast
Disconnected. Choke Point
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 10:42:00 -
[96] - Quote
Mmmm, I can see what you're saying, and I suppose there is a lack of places to go for someone new to null, what with the lack of useable stations, but for the limited play times, you can just log and provided you don't have aggression, people aren't going to find you. Logging back in again is little different to jumping into the system, only you come out somewhere where they're less likely to expect you.
As for renting a system, that doesn't necessarily reduce their risk, because they still have to learn how to use said system effectively, what with the whole warpy-warpy run away. Also, people will still kill them, because there's no use having lots of ore if you can't get it to somewhere that people are willing to buy it.
Main point is that whilst null might not be suited to people's playstyles, there are more people in high who shouldn't be commenting on null because they're never really been there (and so don't KNOW that it isn't suited to their playstyle), whereas everyone in null has played in highsec. |

Generals4
966
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:13:00 -
[97] - Quote
Cloned S0ul wrote:Nullbears hate Highsecbears and vice versa this is true competition.
Actually to my knowledge highsecbears don't care about nullbears but are forced to hate them by the hate nullbears throw at them "High sec is OP" "Nerf high sec" "Kill all the hulks in high!" etc.
But than again this is good entertainment.
More on topic. Null and highsec have different kind of "costs". Sov Null indeed provides a LOT of safety but its safety requires a lot of organisation. The safety provided in High sec might be lesser but it also requires 0 efforts. Like it or not running huge alliances and blocks to control and keep control over space in null isn't without efforts. The risk in sov null is mainly the possibility you suddenly get steamrolled by a huge blob and that all the isks and efforts you injected into your sov space just dissapears. -Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:23:00 -
[98] - Quote
The Protato wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:reinforce their POS, reinforce their station, bring a spy into one of their corps, camp a gate Get blobbed bring a fleet |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:25:00 -
[99] - Quote
Generals4 wrote:Cloned S0ul wrote:Nullbears hate Highsecbears and vice versa this is true competition. Actually to my knowledge highsecbears don't care about null. read who wrote the OP, revise your knowledge.
|

Theodoric Darkwind
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
166
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:39:00 -
[100] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote: While his ideas are derptarded, the basic premise that nullbearing is currently as safe or safer than hisec bearing is a valid one.
you have clearly never lived in null.
There is nearly ZERO risk in highsec overall, mission running is absolute zero risk (dont fly something expensive enough to attract gankers and ignore can flippers and its zero risk), mining is pretty low risk, contrary to popular belief suicide ganks of miners are still fairly rare as a % of the total hulks out mining (if ganking were that much of an issue then the economy would be suffering hyperinflation due to low supply of highsec minerals, and highsec mineral prices are still reasonable).
There is always some risk in 0.0, yes you normally POS up when non-blues enter local, but sometimes thats not possible due to being scrammed by rats, stuck on roid, being awoxed, etc. Then add in the risks of travel, jump bridges dont eliminate the need to use gates, and even with intel channels you can still jump into an enemy gate camp if it wasn't reported or get bombed/hotdropped on a jump bridge, etc.
If you look at the killboards for most major nullsec alliances you will see that we do indeed lose carebear ships in non-consensual pvp on a pretty regular basis (TEST loses a few ratters a day to roaming gangs pretty consistently).
Sov null in most regions is definitely safer than lowsec or npc null (as it should be), but its in no way safer than highsec if you have even the slightest bit of sense (how many pimped out mission boats die in highsec each day to people stupid enough to mission while wardecced lol) |

Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams Ninja Unicorns with Huge Horns
274
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:51:00 -
[101] - Quote
Cebraio wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:Richard Desturned wrote: i'm really not going to bother rehashing literally every bit of advice i've given to hisec miners, but there are so many basic steps they could take to avoid getting into a situation where they get targeted for a gank in the first place, i.e. fitting an actual tank rather than whatever it takes to tank pitiful hisec belt rats
That generally doesn't help, we bring two cat's for this exact reason. Only so much tank you can get with < 50PG, and cat's are super smexy with their uber dps  If I were going to give any hulk pilots out there any survival tips, it'd be to fit a full rack of ECM bursts, pray, and spam warp. LOL! Awesome advice from a ganker! ECM bursts in hi sec! So if they don't die to your guns, they'll get CONCORDED in the end. Brilliant! Also staying aligned during mining is not really feasible. You will move out of mining range sooner or later. Yes, I know they'll go out of range, I already said that, y ouquoted me saying it in fact...
Also confirming that CONCORD will destroy you for ECM bursting people agressed to you 
Unless of course you are mining in a belt surrounded by neutral miners, in which case go back to square one and learn how to mine.
Theodoric Darkwind wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote: While his ideas are derptarded, the basic premise that nullbearing is currently as safe or safer than hisec bearing is a valid one.
you have clearly never lived in null. And you are clearly incapable of reading a thread in it's entirety, or clicking a character to check it's employment history.
Tell me, how many years of schooling did you have to repeat before settling for a GED? There should be a rather awesome pic here |

Generals4
966
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 13:52:00 -
[102] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Generals4 wrote:Cloned S0ul wrote:Nullbears hate Highsecbears and vice versa this is true competition. Actually to my knowledge highsecbears don't care about null. read who wrote the OP, revise your knowledge.
If you would have kept on reading you would have noticed why that is so. Nullbears have dedicated their existence to ruining the ones of highsecbears (kinda exagerating but just think of hulkagedon or the Goon funded bounties on mining barges and all the whining about any lucrative high sec activities (like incursions and level 4 missions). Surely it is normal that those who are targeted by so much love send some back? Just think about it, why would a highsecbear care about the life of a nullbear? No reason at all. However nullbears have often enough explained why they hate highsecbears, because they aren't shooting targets in nullsec like the nullbears would like them to be. -Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:00:00 -
[103] - Quote
Generals4 wrote:If you would have kept on reading you would have known the reason why that is so according to me. How's it our fault NPC corp posters endlessly create dumb threads about buffing CONCORD and nerfing 0.0 and other places they've never played in? |

Generals4
966
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:05:00 -
[104] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Generals4 wrote:If you would have kept on reading you would have known the reason why that is so according to me. How's it our fault NPC corp posters endlessly create dumb threads about buffing CONCORD and nerfing 0.0 and other places they've never played in?
Maybe subsidizing the suicide ganking on them? Maybe because for every thread calling for a null nerf there are 5 calling for a high sec nerf? And how is a demand on buffing concord somehow showing hatred towards nullseccers? Concord doesn't exist in null.
Anyway, this is OT and i'll leave it at that. But please refrain from quoting the first sentence out of posts and than asking something which is answered in the content that followed that sentence. -Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:07:00 -
[105] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:another NPC corp poster regales us with his well-informed and unbiased insights on nullsec While his ideas are derptarded, the basic premise that nullbearing is currently as safe or safer than hisec bearing is a valid one. Except for the fact that you can warp your bestower full of PI loot straight into a Sabre. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:15:00 -
[106] - Quote
Generals4 wrote: Maybe because for every thread calling for a null nerf there are 5 calling for a high sec nerf? All I see is this thread, and threads like this. |

Werst Dendenahzees
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
49
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:18:00 -
[107] - Quote
Theodoric Darkwind wrote: contrary to popular belief suicide ganks of miners are still fairly rare as a % of the total hulks out mining (if ganking were that much of an issue then the economy would be suffering hyperinflation due to low supply of highsec minerals, and highsec mineral prices are still reasonable).
Funny you should talk about that
Please check trit and pyerite prices TIA |

Cebraio
Starfire Oasis
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:24:00 -
[108] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:Also confirming that CONCORD will destroy you for ECM bursting people agressed to you  Of course CONCORD does not act in that case. But only in that unlikely case that you jam nothing neutral. It would be hilariously easy to trap miners with ECM bursts by warping a neutral, not aggressed, alt with the attackers. So yes, still a brilliant advice.
Regarding the alignment, it was not specifically directed towards you. Just wanted to point it out.
PS: "miners with ECM bursts" shall be my next corp name.
|

Valek Noor
Eternal Phoenix Rises Dark Phoenix Rising.
12
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:28:00 -
[109] - Quote
this age old long winded argument basically comes to one thing if you stand far enough back
the ability to go AFK
folks in empire seem to think they should be safe as houses if they leave there PC for a while, carry on mining/hauling AFK while they go do something else, CCP and the game should protect them while they make ooodles of isk risk free
Null sec folks know different- leave PC while not safe = death
Stupid enough not to warp when red comes into local when mining = death
null sec folks ganking in empire are merely trying to help educate those in empire to the higher aspects of the game.........
It really is as clear as mud when you look at it
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:30:00 -
[110] - Quote
|

Taurich Vorsel
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 14:44:00 -
[111] - Quote
Cebraio wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:Also confirming that CONCORD will destroy you for ECM bursting people agressed to you  Of course CONCORD does not act in that case. But only in that unlikely case that you jam nothing neutral. It would be hilariously easy to trap miners with ECM bursts by warping a neutral, not aggressed, alt with the attackers. So yes, still a brilliant advice. Regarding the alignment, it was not specifically directed towards you. Just wanted to point it out. PS: "miners with ECM bursts" shall be my next corp name. Oh I'm sorry, is it common practice for gankers to bring neutral alts with them?
Eh? It's not?
Then use the damn tactic...
Besides what do you care anyway, a hulk isn't going to survive a gank from multiple catalysts whether you tank it or not, your dead either way. Does it matter if CONCORD is the one that gets you? Seems worth it to me for a chance to evade otherwise certain death
And you KNOW you'll look like the hardest motherfracker in EVE when people see you suicide ganking catalysts in a hulk
Copine Callmeknau wrote:Theodoric Darkwind wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote: While his ideas are derptarded, the basic premise that nullbearing is currently as safe or safer than hisec bearing is a valid one.
you have clearly never lived in null. And you are clearly incapable of reading a thread in it's entirety, or clicking a character to check it's employment history. Tell me, how many years of schooling did you have to repeat before settling for a GED? I was in the middle of editing this before being rudely interrupted by ISD
I took the time to check out your employment history One day lad, you'll understand EVE and be able to make accurate statements about it's gameplay If you're seeing my faceless ass posting in your forums, it means Copine Callmeknau is drunk or banned ;) *COMING SOON* -- A face |

Cebraio
Starfire Oasis
147
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
Oh hello, nice alt. 
Taurich Vorsel wrote:Cebraio wrote:Copine Callmeknau wrote:Also confirming that CONCORD will destroy you for ECM bursting people agressed to you  Of course CONCORD does not act in that case. But only in that unlikely case that you jam nothing neutral. It would be hilariously easy to trap miners with ECM bursts by warping a neutral, not aggressed, alt with the attackers. So yes, still a brilliant advice. Regarding the alignment, it was not specifically directed towards you. Just wanted to point it out. PS: "miners with ECM bursts" shall be my next corp name. Oh I'm sorry, is it common practice for gankers to bring neutral alts with them? In cases where they expect valuable loot drops, yes. In cases like Hulk ganks, probably not.
Taurich Vorsel wrote: Then use the damn tactic...
No thanks. Why would I listen to you anyway? I'm not a miner and I'm not that stupid. I just like to point out when people make silly suggestions and present them as solutions for surviving a gank. These kind of suggestions happen a lot on that topic.
There are many ways to avoid ganks or increase survivability. This one is probably the worst. Also, as soon as miners would use this tactic (lol), gankers would surely bring neutral alts.
Taurich Vorsel wrote: Seems worth it to me for a chance to evade otherwise certain death
Then go ahead and prove to us that it works. Good luck.
|

Joe Skellington
Sarz'na Khumatari THE UNTHINKABLES
68
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:04:00 -
[113] - Quote
Copine Callmeknau wrote:strenif wrote:I'm a 0.0 guy and I'm out here not because it's 'safer' (it isn't) but because the threats are clearly marked.
When I have to make a run to highsec I'm more nervous when I get then then when I'm flying through null. Anyone of the hundred people in local could be a suicide ganker or they could be a normal person. I equate the scenario to a solder being on the beaches of Normandy vs the streets of Baghdad. In the former, the bad guys are waring uniforms. The later the bad guys look like the noncombatants that surround you on a daily basis. Which do you think is safer and which do you think is less nerve wracking? Exactly this I suppose the safety in all levels of EVE is the same: You can be shot anytime, anywhere, by anyone But the perceived security is different across different areas in space. And for me at least, the perceived security is higher in nullsec than in highsec. There are also more perceived threats in highsec than nullsec Basically what I'm saying is that you're all a massive bunch of pussies and REAL MEN with REAL BAWLS live in lowsec  You know I'm right and you're just jelly that you ain't a BAWS
It's only safer in Nullsec if you have good people in your alliance, otherwise your in deep hocky doodoo.
Please note that ASCII art is not permitted in the forum signatures. Spitfire |

Shameless Avenger
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
127
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:06:00 -
[114] - Quote
If you don't know how to blow up ships in empire, you are doing it wrong. |

TotalCareBear
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:06:00 -
[115] - Quote
Valek Noor wrote:this age old long winded argument basically comes to one thing if you stand far enough back
the ability to go AFK
folks in empire seem to think they should be safe as houses if they leave there PC for a while, carry on mining/hauling AFK while they go do something else, CCP and the game should protect them while they make ooodles of isk risk free
Null sec folks know different- leave PC while not safe = death
Stupid enough not to warp when red comes into local when mining = death
null sec folks ganking in empire are merely trying to help educate those in empire to the higher aspects of the game.........
It really is as clear as mud when you look at it
As the topic creator, I never asked for any buffs to highsec. What I did ask for, was serious nerfs to 0.0 carebears.
0.0 always talk stories about "REAL EVE" and "harsh 0.0 spaceship sandbox" - however, when you look at the actual mechanics, you can see that these stories are simply not true, and far too many game mechanics protect them from anything dangerous from happening to them. Yes, AFKing in 0.0 space is more dangerous, but that is about it. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:12:00 -
[116] - Quote
make all of highsec into 0.0 so everyone can be as safe as us nullsec dwellers let all of the autopiloting freighters see how safe it is |

TotalCareBear
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:30:00 -
[117] - Quote
that beast wrote:Alrighty, so, ignoring the big mess of c*** going on in Delve right now (which yes, is a war by the way), there are plenty of other 0.0 regions/systems.
So why doesn't OP and everyone with him go down to 0.0 and mine (after all, it's where the slightly more expensive minerals are) and then we'll see how safe it really is?
People who currently live in null will have, at some point or other, carebeared and lived in high sec, if only because it's where everyone starts. But people who live in highsec haven't necessarily lived in null, and so, on the scale of things, the people who are more likely to be the best informed about various areas of the game, are the ones who live in null.
I'm not saying either side is right, but I would like to see some of the highsec carebears coming down to mine in null because we could all do with a few more kills. And if you say "Blah but it's not the same for us because we don't have all the POS's and infrastructure and intel" then your original argument becomes a little bit moot with the yno "Null is just as safe". Arguing that the "nullbears" have made it safe for themselves is perfectly valid, and it's fine for them to have done it. It's not really using game mechanics other than that incredibly basic mechanic of "There are players in the game, other plays can interact with them". However, regardless of whether or not they've made it safe, that's still only a localised safety net. It is still dangerous, if you get my drift.
Anyway, if OP is right, then he can come down to null and start mining and make lots more money than he currently is, because he won't die, he won't even get suicide ganked, and he'll get the more valuble ores. So why doesn't he? OP your argument is fundamentally flawed.
TB
Please, tell me, how do you counter this:
Quote: event 1. neutral/red jumps into 0.0 system event 2. every hulk/raven/cnr/vindicator/maradeur/carrier click on "Warp to POS/SS/DOCK."
Local is a problem, remove it from the game.
As to the "we make it safe ourselves" - yeah, you do, because EVE 0.0 sov mechanics(and local) make it too easy and too safe to do so. When CCP started adding some "cool" sov mechanics such as Sov 4, JB or Cynojammers - This made 0.0 even safer for alliances, even though, it was quite obvious there were major flaws in 0.0 mechanics before those changes. I never saw any 0.0 far easier and safer. |

TotalCareBear
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:31:00 -
[118] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:make all of highsec into 0.0 so everyone can be as safe as us nullsec dwellers let all of the autopiloting freighters see how safe it is
remove local from game, let's see all the 0.0 bears see what unconsensual pvp is then. |

TotalCareBear
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:32:00 -
[119] - Quote
Joe Skellington wrote:It's only safer in Nullsec if you have good people in your alliance, otherwise your in deep hocky doodoo. So, in essence... if you suck at EVE, you're not safe anywhere. This thread is pointless.
Looking at local takes great skill and great allies. c/d? |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1412
|
Posted - 2012.07.06 15:36:00 -
[120] - Quote
TotalCareBear wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:make all of highsec into 0.0 so everyone can be as safe as us nullsec dwellers let all of the autopiloting freighters see how safe it is remove local from game, let's see all the 0.0 bears see what unconsensual pvp is then. Sure, turn all of EVE into sov 0.0 and turn off local should be fun
but I mean really, if we're all so safe like you've been claiming, you should have no problem with all of highsec being turned into 0.0 and thus everyone enjoying equal safety, right? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |