| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Kno'Bah Dhee
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 18:50:00 -
[1]
This is me just putting out wild rumors and speculations, but as I was going over the minutes from the last CSM meeting, I noticed that the topic of ghost harvesting of datacores popped up. All of the sudden there is a bunch of "Redacted per NDC (non-disclosure agreement)" showing up everywhere... There was more redacting and censoring going on in there than there was in the Kennedy Assassination. Of course this makes me wonder.
Apparently the CSM's know a little something about the future of T2 production, and CCP isn't letting them let the cat out of the bag. It makes me wonder if a nerf of T2 BPO's is going to happen. Any higher ups care to comment? The people want to know. 
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 19:00:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kno'Bah Dhee I was going over the minutes from the last CSM meeting, I noticed that the topic of ghost harvesting of datacores popped up. All of the sudden there is a bunch of "Redacted per NDC (non-disclosure agreement)" showing up everywhere [...] It makes me wonder if a nerf of T2 BPO's is going to happen.
Much more likely, ghost datacore harvesting is going to stop, and nothing else. If even that much. If GDH is stopping or the possibility of it stopping is being considered seriously, datacore prices will shoot up in the short term, and that means people could make a lot of profit by manipulating the market starting now as opposed to whenever this gets announced, a lot of people might activate, empty and permanently retire existing GDH characters, and god knows whatever else... espeialy if in the end they decide to NOT go through with it, and you have a reverse backlash that's just as bad, if not worse than the initial upheavals. If GDH is not stopping any time soon, the reason why that won't happen doesn't need to be a public one, and CCP certainly wouldn't want to encourage more people to start GDH now, so leaving it uncertain would at least make people weary of even trying. Bottom line, whatever happens, for now, there's no reason to wash that dirty cloth in public just yet.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Skye Aurorae
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 19:44:00 -
[3]
It's not against rules to post sections from the published CSM minutes is it? -=SNIP=- [ 2010.04.11 17:39:08 ] ElvenLord > Korvin go [ 2010.04.11 17:39:10 ] ElvenLord > ! [ 2010.04.11 17:39:17 ] T'Amber > ! [ 2010.04.11 17:39:38 ] Korvin > *Removed due to NDA* [ 2010.04.11 17:40:11 ] ElvenLord > *Removed due to NDA* [ 2010.04.11 17:40:12 ] Korvin > and ccp liked this idea afaik [ 2010.04.11 17:40:18 ] TeaDaze > (Not sure how public that was though) [ 2010.04.11 17:40:27 ] Sokratesz > yeah noah liked that very much [ 2010.04.11 17:40:34 ] Song Li > I don't think it's public at all [ 2010.04.11 17:40:41 ] T'Amber > it is now lols. [ 2010.04.11 17:40:43 ] ElvenLord > TD these last comments do not go in meeting minutes :D [ 2010.04.11 17:40:46 ] Song Li > Just means more work for TD to delete ;-) [ 2010.04.11 17:40:50 ] T'Amber > hehe [ 2010.04.11 17:40:54 ] ElvenLord > *Removed due to NDA* [ 2010.04.11 17:40:55 ] Mrs Trzzbk > i want my free money [ 2010.04.11 17:41:00 ] Korvin > well, we can cut it down, if its not [ 2010.04.11 17:41:16 ] Korvin > [end] [ 2010.04.11 17:41:19 ] TeaDaze > *Removed due to NDA* [ 2010.04.11 17:41:28 ] Alekseyev Karrde > ! [ 2010.04.11 17:41:34 ] Z0D > ! [ 2010.04.11 17:41:45 ] T'Amber > *Removed due to NDA* [ 2010.04.11 17:41:49 ] ElvenLord > its not in summit meeting minutes so this can not go in minutes from this meeting [ 2010.04.11 17:41:53 ] ElvenLord > @ TD -=SNIP=-
So, not sure that that it would make sense to have the redacted versions saying 'CCP have already planned to do this'. But they could be saying - 'well since t2 BPO's are/aren't getting nerfed'......
Pure speculation of course.
|

Rico Lobo
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 20:55:00 -
[4]
Just a note but they have also NDAed coments when its something they have no intention of doing any time soon. no point in whiping up a lather over something thats not going to happen for over 2 years.
Its also posible that they plan to completly overhaul if not outright replace the T-2 invention system.
|

Barakkus
Caelestis Iudicium
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 21:08:00 -
[5]
So what is ghost datacore harvesting? Is that like the old ghost training where you unsubscribe and continue to get datacores on that account?
Originally by: CCP Dropbear
rofl
edit: ah crap, dev account. Oh well, official rofl at you sir.
|

Rico Lobo
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 21:16:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Barakkus So what is ghost datacore harvesting? Is that like the old ghost training where you unsubscribe and continue to get datacores on that account?
Bascialy. theres been some off again on again rumors that they might change RP to a form of LP that you can use to buy BPC and BPOs directly
|

Driven Marcelli
Minmatar Evil Overhead
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 22:16:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Rico Lobo Edited by: Rico Lobo on 15/04/2010 21:18:07
Originally by: Barakkus So what is ghost datacore harvesting? Is that like the old ghost training where you unsubscribe and continue to get datacores on that account?
Bascialy.
Theres been some off again on again rumors that they might change RP to a form of LP that you can use to buy BPC and BPOs directly but I dont think there has been anything remotly official on it.
You know if people would spend more time in SiSi actualy testing things out that CCP has strongly hinted them wanting to test out, instead of trying to use it as a nice safe place for WOW battleground Fights for cheep, you might know which of thoes rumors were started by the development staff and wich were started by hoplessly cluless !@#$ who are projecting there current wet dreams onto reality.
|

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 23:30:00 -
[8]
Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|

Driven Marcelli
Minmatar Evil Overhead
|
Posted - 2010.04.15 23:34:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
Part of the reason why its broken is that the T2BPOs still exist in there current form thus causing endless whinethreads about them.
|

Enthral
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 00:47:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Driven Marcelli
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
Part of the reason why its broken is that the T2BPOs still exist in there current form thus causing endless whinethreads about them.
I've done the math, and on every item I invent, I earn over three times more profit than a T2 BPO owner can on the same item over the same period of time. That includes the cost of datacores, the negative ME, and negative PE.
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
|

Di Mulle
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 01:16:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Enthral
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
That is perfectly right. Some people like to make billions, some people like to moan.
Actually, I even think the latter may leave the game if their wet dream would come true. They will realize they need need new object for whine threadnaughts, some may not be able to adapt.
|

Breaker77
Gallente Reclamation Industries
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 01:54:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
Confirming that I make billions in profit a month on invention.
CCP I demand that I make trillions per month instead!! Fix it now!!
|

Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 02:03:00 -
[13]
Confirming that the people moaning about T2 bpos are not involved in any t2 production, and are not creative enough to come up with a decent troll.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven this thread is obviously going places
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 02:37:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
[sarcasm] Oh, sure, and the way to "fix" it is NOT to buff invention in some way (or slowly buff it in several different ways, eventually up to a point where it would be close to T2 BPO production cost-wise), but instead to leave invention exactly the way it is now (i.e. horribly slow and wasteful manufacture on top of high BPC cost both in ISK and time in case of larger target item volume) and just remove T2 BPOs, right ? [/sarcasm]
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Enthral
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 02:50:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
[sarcasm] Oh, sure, and the way to "fix" it is NOT to buff invention in some way (or slowly buff it in several different ways, eventually up to a point where it would be close to T2 BPO production cost-wise), but instead to leave invention exactly the way it is now (i.e. horribly slow and wasteful manufacture on top of high BPC cost both in ISK and time in case of larger target item volume) and just remove T2 BPOs, right ? [/sarcasm]
Sarcasm doesn't work with this crowd. They're out for blood, and immune to fact or reason.
If I had my way, I would spawn a T2 BPO for anyone who wanted it, but they can only have any one of their choice, and they will lose their ability to invent or build from an invented T2 BPC from that point on.
|

Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:01:00 -
[16]
If people are so worked up about t2 why don't they get into t3 instead so that they aren't competing with bpo holders?
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven this thread is obviously going places
|

Namdor
Amarr The Gentlemen's Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:04:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Breaker77
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
Confirming that I make billions in profit a month on invention.
CCP I demand that I make trillions per month instead!! Fix it now!!
Ditto.
|

Breaker77
Gallente Reclamation Industries
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:13:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Professor Leech If people are so worked up about t2 why don't they get into t3 instead so that they aren't competing with bpo holders?
Because the people complaining about T2 BPOs don't have the balls to venture out of highsec. They want an easy "I Win" button which will make them billions for doing nothing at all. What these same idiots don't understand is that a T2 BPO does not magically increase a players wallet.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:17:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Breaker77 What these same idiots don't understand is that a T2 BPO does not magically increase a players wallet.
If each and every player complaining now that T2 BPOs should be removed would get a random T2 BPO, most of them would just end up SELLING them in the first month at dumping prices 
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Entgo Ditumi
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:48:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Di Mulle
Originally by: Enthral
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
That is perfectly right. Some people like to make billions, some people like to moan.
Actually, I even think the latter may leave the game if their wet dream would come true. They will realize they need need new object for whine threadnaughts, some may not be able to adapt.
Tell me, what will you do when there are no more whiners to whine about?
|

Gamer4liff
Caldari Metalworks Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:50:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Gamer4liff on 16/04/2010 03:51:32 I have been hoarding RP for years now, haven't spent a single on on datacores, in the hope that someday SOMETHING would be done with them beyond datacores. I sure hope this is evidence of such a thing.
EDIT: Or at the very least a massive appreciation of RP value. -----------
Originally by: CCP Whisper Deal with it.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:50:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Entgo Ditumi Tell me, what will you do when there are no more whiners to whine about?
Start rethinking my position about the existence of an afterlife, because I must have died and gone to heaven.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Professor Leech
Transmetropolitan
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 03:55:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Gamer4liff Edited by: Gamer4liff on 16/04/2010 03:51:32 I have been hoarding RP for years now, haven't spent a single on on datacores, in the hope that someday SOMETHING would be done with them beyond datacores. I sure hope this is evidence of such a thing.
EDIT: Or at the very least a massive appreciation of RP value.
Keep hoarding them until you can completely wreck the market.
Originally by: Crawe DeRaven this thread is obviously going places
|

Nahkep Narmelion
Gallente CALIMA COLLABORATIVE
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 04:32:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Ghoest Contrary to people like Akitas wishes CCP knows that the T2 BPO/INVENTION system is horribly flawed and that the majority of players hate it.
Would you please stop whining. You whine about mineral prices, you whine about T2 BPOs, you whine about invention chances. Eat some cheese with that whine at least for God's sake.
|

Misanthra
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 06:29:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Enthral [ I've done the math, and on every item I invent, I earn over three times more profit than a T2 BPO owner can on the same item over the same period of time. That includes the cost of datacores, the negative ME, and negative PE.
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
You must have off numbers...cause evil bpos ruin all markets, even the ones where there are no bpo's and its all invention
Am a T2 owner (bought mine)...and inventor. Prefer my inventions to be honest.
|

Enthral
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 07:02:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Misanthra
Originally by: Enthral [ I've done the math, and on every item I invent, I earn over three times more profit than a T2 BPO owner can on the same item over the same period of time. That includes the cost of datacores, the negative ME, and negative PE.
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
You must have off numbers...cause evil bpos ruin all markets, even the ones where there are no bpo's and its all invention
Am a T2 owner (bought mine)...and inventor. Prefer my inventions to be honest.
Aye, I have access to four T2 BPO's, one of which I bought. The other three were actually lent to me because the owner never builds from them. (Yeah, that's how much of "isk printing machines" they are.) I've had them for over a year, and I don't build from any of them, either. It might rattle some peoples' brains, but I make so much more isk with invention, that it isn't worth tying up the build slots to use my BPO's.
|

Dana Mownhobbit
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 09:55:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Enthral
I've done the math, and on every item I invent, I earn over three times more profit than a T2 BPO owner can on the same item over the same period of time. That includes the cost of datacores, the negative ME, and negative PE.
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
Hi Enthral, could you share an example calculation for one product with us to illustrate this? I lack the background knowledge/imagination to see, why a BPO owner would make less profit. Do you include the buy price for the BPO into the calculation or what is the catch?
I am tinkering with invention/T2 production for some weeks now and done calculations myself. Basicly I summed up the invention costs (data cores, lab) for the average number of invention attempts, and the material costs for the production. All prices were based on current cheapest sell orders with reasonable volumes. And whatever product I tried, my overall production costs compared to the usual sell prices yielded very little profit or even large losses. I have production efficiency 5, so I can not become any more efficient production-wise. I attribute this mainly to the ME-4 penalty, this is the largest cost factor in my view, also because I have to buy T2 components off the market and have no supply chain which could possibly decrease my opp costs. The market seems largely oversaturated (at least in the amarr empire). The only possible solution I can imagine right now is to sell in other regions with better prices, allthough this would require deliveries of some 40 jumps (and much more time spent), or delivery to dangerous regions like low sec, where prices are probably higher.
So as long as I am calculating with "opportunity costs" and do not perceive my datacores and minerals from loot as beeing free, it hardly seems to be profitable to do invention/production considering the time needed compared to the income I get from missioning which I could do in the same time while I just sell the minerals and datacores.
What am I doing wrong? Are my calculations too conservative, maybe?
Another question to everyone: Which T2 products have been introduced after the invention change, i.e. there are not BPOs for them? Just curious. Would be interesting to see, if there are any differences in the market "landscape" for these products.
|

Entgo Ditumi
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 10:11:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Dana Mownhobbit
Originally by: Enthral
I've done the math, and on every item I invent, I earn over three times more profit than a T2 BPO owner can on the same item over the same period of time. That includes the cost of datacores, the negative ME, and negative PE.
But don't let the facts confuse you. I'll continue to earn billions of isk on this horribly flawed system, and y'all can keep whining about how unfair everything is. 
Hi Enthral, could you share an example calculation for one product with us to illustrate this? I lack the background knowledge/imagination to see, why a BPO owner would make less profit. Do you include the buy price for the BPO into the calculation or what is the catch?
I am tinkering with invention/T2 production for some weeks now and done calculations myself. Basicly I summed up the invention costs (data cores, lab) for the average number of invention attempts, and the material costs for the production. All prices were based on current cheapest sell orders with reasonable volumes. And whatever product I tried, my overall production costs compared to the usual sell prices yielded very little profit or even large losses. I have production efficiency 5, so I can not become any more efficient production-wise. I attribute this mainly to the ME-4 penalty, this is the largest cost factor in my view, also because I have to buy T2 components off the market and have no supply chain which could possibly decrease my opp costs. The market seems largely oversaturated (at least in the amarr empire). The only possible solution I can imagine right now is to sell in other regions with better prices, allthough this would require deliveries of some 40 jumps (and much more time spent), or delivery to dangerous regions like low sec, where prices are probably higher.
So as long as I am calculating with "opportunity costs" and do not perceive my datacores and minerals from loot as beeing free, it hardly seems to be profitable to do invention/production considering the time needed compared to the income I get from missioning which I could do in the same time while I just sell the minerals and datacores.
What am I doing wrong? Are my calculations too conservative, maybe?
Another question to everyone: Which T2 products have been introduced after the invention change, i.e. there are not BPOs for them? Just curious. Would be interesting to see, if there are any differences in the market "landscape" for these products.
You're not factoring in the fact that producers using invented BPCs can produce from many BPCs at once, whereas T2 BPO can only produce from the BPO one job at a time. This the production quantity per hour is much higher for invention.
|

Dana Mownhobbit
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 10:35:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Entgo Ditumi
You're not factoring in the fact that producers using invented BPCs can produce from many BPCs at once, whereas T2 BPO can only produce from the BPO one job at a time. This the production quantity per hour is much higher for invention.
Ah ok, so he meant profit per time, I understood it as ROI i.e. profit in % from the investment done.
Would it be feasible for a T2 BPO owner to create copies from his (well researched) BPO and use these for production, where he could produce several jobs in parallel? Or is the copying process so long that the afterward parallel production doesn't payoff the time spent? Just curious...
|

Voogru
Gallente Massive Damage MACHI MISCHIEF
|
Posted - 2010.04.16 11:05:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Voogru on 16/04/2010 11:06:30
Originally by: Dana Mownhobbit
Originally by: Entgo Ditumi
You're not factoring in the fact that producers using invented BPCs can produce from many BPCs at once, whereas T2 BPO can only produce from the BPO one job at a time. This the production quantity per hour is much higher for invention.
Ah ok, so he meant profit per time, I understood it as ROI i.e. profit in % from the investment done.
Would it be feasible for a T2 BPO owner to create copies from his (well researched) BPO and use these for production, where he could produce several jobs in parallel? Or is the copying process so long that the afterward parallel production doesn't payoff the time spent? Just curious...
It takes longer to make a 1 run T2 BPC than to make 1 T2 item from the BPO. If it was possible to increase production we'd already be doing it. The best we can do is use POS assembly arrays and inventors have access to those too.
Hate Farmers? Click Here |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |