| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
   |
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:16:00 -
[1]
Following on from the CVA's loss of territory in Providence, we note that the Against ALL Authorities alliance seems to be adopting a policy of balkanising the region and allowing a number of other alliances to claim sovereignty there subject to certain pre-conditions.
Since the very first days of Operation Deliverance, PIE has supported the idea that Providence should one day be considered to be a part of the Empire. It is clear that recent events have delayed the pacification of Providence and its eventual absorption into the Empire.
As such, we consider the new occupants of Providence to be acting against the interests of Amarrian expansion.
Therefore, for the duration of -A-'s dominance of Providence, PIE will by default consider all new sovereignty holders there to be anti-Amarrian and therefore KOS. Note that this also applies to any non-Loyalist alliances who may gain sovereignty there in the future even if they have not fought against Loyalist forces to acquire it.
Whist exiting from Providence will not automatically result on a revocation of KOS status, we will of course be happy to enter into private diplomacy to discuss the normalisation of relations with corporations or alliances marked as hostile.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Gaia Aemilia
Amarr
24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:31:00 -
[2]
A bold but necessary move. We cannot allow these animals to defile what is rightfully ours.
And the Lord spake, and said, Lo, my people,
Witness, for I have made the worlds of Heaven;
And these worlds I give to you, My Chosen,
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens.
None shall stand higher than you save the Sefrim,
Who serve Me as others shall serve you,
For all things under Me serve one higher;
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens.
As Garrulor rules the skies; as Frisceas rules the sea;
As Emperor rules Holder; as Holder rules Serf;
Yet all under Heaven serve Me;
So shall Amarr rule the worlds of the Heavens.
- The Scriptures, Book of Reclaiming 3.19 - 3.21
|
Lyris Nairn
Caldari
Hashimoto Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:33:00 -
[3]
Will you also consider those who conduct business, but do not stake claim to Sovereignty, within the bounds of Providence as KOS?
|
Xennith
Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:36:00 -
[4]
And your policy towards neutrals?
I find it entertaining that you just set paxton federation red. |
Sable Schroedinger
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:36:00 -
[5]
Comedy Gold
--------------------------------------------
SF Recruiting |
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:43:00 -
[6]
 Originally by: Xennith
And your policy towards neutrals?
Unlike Ushra'Khan, we see no need to abandon NRDS when entering an area where our enemies may be.
Quote:
I find it entertaining that you just set paxton federation red.
Re-read the statement: "PIE will by default consider all new sovereignty holders there to be anti-Amarrian." The status of those alliances which previously held sovereignty will be considered on an idividual basis. |
Borza Slavak
Minmatar
Mirkur Draug'Tyr
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 20:56:00 -
[7]
Does this mean you'll actually be seen in Providence? Or is this another meaningless empty threat, like your CONCORD-sanctioned war declatation on Ushra'Khan?
We'd love for you to visit.
|
Da Beast
Caldari
The Collective
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 21:10:00 -
[8]
You have been weighed and found wanting.
Goodbye.
|
Azure Skyclad
Amarr
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 21:25:00 -
[9]
This is like a toothless old git announcing to the cluster he is going to take a bite out of an apple........through a tennis racket.
Might contain a chortle or 2. 
http://ultravixen.co.uk/ |
Stratio
Minmatar
Mirkur Draug'Tyr
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 22:08:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Rodj Blake
It is clear that recent events have delayed the pacification of Providence and its eventual absorption into the Empire.
As such, we consider the new occupants of Providence to be acting against the interests of Amarrian expansion.
Another lovely statement by the slavers.
What do you need to do to be considered an enemy? Fight against them? Actively support their enemies?
No, all you need to 'do' is to somehow be in the way of Amarrian expansion.
_____________________
Poreuomai's Spokesman
For Tribe and Honour! |
Butter Dog
Gallente
The Littlest Hobos
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 22:24:00 -
[11]
I look forward to meeting the glorious and relevant PIE fleets deep in 0.0 space. As we exchange broadsides I'm sure I shall be reminded that you are indeed a entity who deserves more than just mockery and dismissal.
----------
~bitter dog~
etc |
Black Necris
Minmatar
Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 22:46:00 -
[12]
So you decide to declare hostilities towards my followers? I can tell you now, that my flock doesn`t seem too worried, maybe because of the inexistant danger on your declaration.
Altho i must say the followers of the New and Improved Church of Providence (NICHUP) are quite happy with this statement, the good news of you to coming to us and saving us all the trouble to go and look for you. Thats of course IF you plan to come (wich i doubt).
The Most Illustrious and Most Reverend
Lord Black Necris
Archbishop of the New and Improved Church of Providence
(NICHUP)
"Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." |
Jade Constantine
Gallente
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2010.04.18 15:58:00 -
[13]
So this is like the Ushra'khan's NBSI in Providence without the courage to say so.
(or the ships and pilots to actually do something in space).
Right.
True Knowledge |
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.04.18 17:34:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 18/04/2010 17:35:35
Originally by: Jade Constantine
So this is like the Ushra'khan's NBSI in Providence without the courage to say so.
Except that we won't be shooting at neutrals.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Evanda Char
Minmatar
Re-Awakened Technologies Inc
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2010.04.18 21:46:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Stratio
No, all you need to 'do' is to somehow be in the way of Amarrian expansion.
That's what happens if you get between Rodj and the dessert trolley.
-Eva-
Electus Matari - taking it one bad guy at a time |
Havohej
Du'uma Fiisi Integrated Astrometrics
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 02:42:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Gaia Aemilia
A bold but necessary move. We cannot allow these animals to defile what is rightfully ours.
According to you, everything is rightfully yours. You'd better set everyone hostile...
Du'uma Fiisi is Recruiting
|
Suitonia
Gallente
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 08:27:00 -
[17]
How do you define "occupant". You will be shooting any organisations that have claimed sovereignty, but will you also be shooting at people whom are living their but make no claim to space? Also, if you encounter a neutral, such as a person just passing through, or even shooting the residents there, how would you handle such a situation.
Will Capsuleers be warned in advance if they are being given "occupant" status (non obvious occupant such as an alliance living in the space provided)?
---
|
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 09:43:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 19/04/2010 09:43:44
Originally by: Suitonia
How do you define "occupant". You will be shooting any organisations that have claimed sovereignty, but will you also be shooting at people whom are living their but make no claim to space? Also, if you encounter a neutral, such as a person just passing through, or even shooting the residents there, how would you handle such a situation.
Just passing though or living in Providence will not in themselves be grounds for being set red.
Quote:
Will Capsuleers be warned in advance if they are being given "occupant" status (non obvious occupant such as an alliance living in the space provided)?
This thread serves as a warning - if you're not loyal to the Empire and you take sovereignty in Providence, you will be set red.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Iva Posavec
Posavec Innovations
Takhar Matari
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 09:51:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Rodj Blake
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 19/04/2010 09:43:44
Originally by: Suitonia
How do you define "occupant". You will be shooting any organisations that have claimed sovereignty, but will you also be shooting at people whom are living their but make no claim to space? Also, if you encounter a neutral, such as a person just passing through, or even shooting the residents there, how would you handle such a situation.
Just passing though or living in Providence will not in themselves be grounds for being set red.
Still does not answer the question that was presented to you.
Alliance Creation |
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 09:54:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Iva Posavec
Originally by: Rodj Blake
Edited by: Rodj Blake on 19/04/2010 09:43:44
Originally by: Suitonia
How do you define "occupant". You will be shooting any organisations that have claimed sovereignty, but will you also be shooting at people whom are living their but make no claim to space? Also, if you encounter a neutral, such as a person just passing through, or even shooting the residents there, how would you handle such a situation.
Just passing though or living in Providence will not in themselves be grounds for being set red.
Still does not answer the question that was presented to you.
Yes it does.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Iva Posavec
Posavec Innovations
Takhar Matari
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 10:00:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Iva Posavec on 19/04/2010 10:00:55
Originally by: Rodj Blake
Originally by: Iva Posavec
Still does not answer the question that was presented to you.
Yes it does.
I stand corrected, don't recall seeing "or living in" before I posted.
Alliance Creation |
Irongut
H A V O C
Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 14:09:00 -
[22]
Someone wake me when the Amarrians have something relevant to say.
--
|
Nightshade Mary
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 14:20:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Irongut
Someone wake me when the Amarrians have something relevant to say.
You must enjoy long naps. ;)
|
Icarus3
Gallente
DAEDALUS X
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 14:56:00 -
[24]
well I hope you don't conveniently forget that PXF are still holding space and to shoot them as well ;-)
|
Suitonia
Gallente
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 15:18:00 -
[25]
They've already declared that they will not be shooting anyone who holds providence in the interest of the Amarr Empire, which Paxton quite clearly are.
---
|
Syn Callibri
Minmatar
Swag Co.
Sandbox Bullies
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 20:15:00 -
[26]
The Amaaran reply to the loss of Providence sounds like the growling and snapping of a dying predator after the arrow has found its mark...a futile attempt to maintain the facade of ferocity even as it draws its final breath, to the observer the attempt looks...pathetic.
FREEDOM FOR ALL MATAR!
"I have just as much authority as the empress, just not as many people that believe it." |
Kazzzi
Amarr
Iniquitous Technologies
Deep Space Engineering
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 20:31:00 -
[27]
PIE's new Provi policy does make perfect sense from an Imperial perspective, now lets see if it has any teeth. |
Rodj Blake
Amarr
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 20:45:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Icarus3
well I hope you don't conveniently forget that PXF are still holding space and to shoot them as well ;-)
Re-read my original statement: "PIE will by default consider all new sovereignty holders there to be anti-Amarrian."
There's a clue in the italicised word.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Gaia Aemilia
Amarr
24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 20:55:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Rodj Blake
Originally by: Icarus3
well I hope you don't conveniently forget that PXF are still holding space and to shoot them as well ;-)
Re-read my original statement: "PIE will by default consider all new sovereignty holders there to be anti-Amarrian."
There's a clue in the italicised word.
Don't waste your breath on these, these things, Admiral Blake. They are unworthy of your time, as their undeveloped brains will never be able to comprehend the Amarrian way.
|
Andreus LeHane
Gallente
Mixed Metaphor
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 21:17:00 -
[30]
The Amarr Empire never had, does not have, and will never have any claim to the Providence region. You had best deal with that.
-----
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |