| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
eleve
   |
Posted - 2010.05.07 11:07:00 -
[1]
What really bothers me that EVE is supposed to be harsh place, but for suicide gankers it really is one ****ing Carebear Online. Just give people only standard insurance payout if they get blown up by concord. It should be enough for newbies too.
PS. How many of us even had insurance when we ****ed up our first ship?
|
eleve
|
Posted - 2010.05.07 15:26:00 -
[2]
My point was that atm you can shoot almost any hauler you want and you won't lose money, even if you just get couple t2 cargo expanders from the wreck. That's what I meant with that Carebear Online for suicide gankers. No matter how ****ed up you play, you probably still make profit. It isn't wise playstyle to shoot first hauler you see carrying just _SOMETHING_, but hell, I have witnessed more than couple times eve pilots doing some really stupid stuff, including twice to suicie gank attempt towards my hauler which had about 15m worth of stuff inside.
Btw. that idea about making cargo scanner illegal activity sounded pretty fun. Eventhought the ships doing the scanning doesn't cost a ****, it would make things little more intresting.
|
eleve
|
Posted - 2010.05.07 15:32:00 -
[3]
Edited by: eleve on 07/05/2010 15:32:30
To be clear, I'm not against suicide ganking. It just should be that you can carry your worhtless stuff around empire without worrying some ****tard blowing it up just because he wasn't sure is there something valuable or not. High value cargo hauling should be dangerous activity and that it would still be after changing insurance policy.
I think it actually would be even make eve better place for newbies who wouldn't get blown up when carrying their couple first cruisers from mission running point a to b.
|
eleve
|
Posted - 2010.05.07 20:05:00 -
[4]
Edited by: eleve on 07/05/2010 20:12:44
 Originally by: Indy Indy
Blah Blah Blah!
Why is every thread about suiciding ganking always the same?
Do people really thinking nerfing insurance is going to stop suicide ganking?
Example with insurance: 2 BS's worth 50mil each gank a hauler hauling 500mil worth of goods. 250 mil worth of goods drop. Insurance pays 45mil per lost bs. so total profit is 240 mil for the gankers!!
Example without insurance: 2 BS's worth 50mil each gank a hauler hauling 500mil worth of goods. 250 mil worth of goods drop. Insurance pays 0 mil per lost bs. so total profit is 150 mil for the gankers!!
Hmm. Still seems worth it to me.
I have an idea to fix the whole issue. Protect your cargo or be smart about how you move it. Stop crying and play.
The point isn't in my opionion to end it, just make it less profitable. In my opionion we have here bunch of suicide-CAREBEAR-campers whining for their income going down if insurance goes down when killed by concord.
As I said before, I have nothing against suicide ganking as a profession, it's just totally unbalanced in my opinion. Transporting valuable cargo throught empire should be dangerous and this wouldn't change that. But ATM if the hauler just drops half of his fit and no cargo the suicide camper can still make profit.
|
| |
|