| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Private Pineapple
Rifterlings Ushra'Khan
226
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey guys, it's me again - the fruity Kingpin.
So I was exercising today and I got all sweaty from biking in the sun and doing small exercises that get your heart going real fast (dumbbell flys, pushups, etc). I stepped into the shower and simultaneously ahh'd and ooh'd as the cold water covered my skin and took away all of that protective shell of warm sweat from my body. During this moment, I realized something.
Something special. Something awesome and unfathomable...
I realized that CONCORD probably doesn't like rats, right? And all of those "rats" are pirates. In pirate ships.
In this way, why are pirate ships allowed in high security space!? Wouldn't a CONCORD pilot's blood pressure increase as he sees that a pirate ship uncloaked next to a high security jumpgate (or is it warpgate...)? I would think so.
Now don't be ridiculous. I, a fruit, am capable of looking at this realization from both sides. So I'll just list why pirate ships would be allowed in highsec space and why pirate ships would not be allowed in highsec space.
Why would they be allowed in highsec space?
- I would say a CONCORD pilot is able to lock onto a ship and identify the pilot and determine whether he is a pirate or not. This must be true due to security status affecting whether a CONCORD ship will go after someone or not. - Another reason would be that there's a lot of pirate rats floating around in highsec space.
Why would they not be allowed in highsec space?
- Maybe CONCORD just doesn't like pirate ships at all. They don't want you to be associated with pirates or their products. This would include some sort of a "counterfeit" or smuggling flag for carrying pirate ammo, modules, or ships. - According to the pirate rat floating around in highsec space thing, they do not appear at gates. So maybe they jump through into some highsec system and evades CONCORD. CONCORD probably suck at probing anyway so the rats are free forever in their complexes and asteroid belts. This is also supported by the fact that pirates rats do appear at gates in lowsec and nullsec (but not highsec - so the difference means something).
I mean, for me I don't really care either way but I thought this would be an interesting topic. It isn't one I have seen before so this is Original Content. I, the fruity Kingpin, will always deliver Original Content to you, the reader. I am the Kingpin of the Crime and Punishment forum.
I am the rightful heir to the CSM 8 throne.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8513
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
They're owned by (reasonably) upstanding citizens and they're doing CONCORD's workGǪ so of course they should be. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Anhenka
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:37:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gameplay changes need a reason.
This has no reason beyond half baked quasi-RP idea.
Removing the ability of people to fly pirate ships in highsec makes nobody at all happy.
Highsec people don't get to fly their uber pimpships.
Nullsec people don't get to sell said uber pimp ships to the people who buy most of said ships, driving down the price of their ship BPC loot drops.
And lowsec? **** em, nobody cares about them and it wouldn't change things much for them anyway. |

Alara IonStorm
2582
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Well lots of missions have secret star gates or private corperation gates. Like the Blockade maybe they get in that way. Perhaps they setup secret jump bridges.
I think Concord ignores capsuleer Pirate Boats because a lot of them are stolen designs from there complexes and they can't track where from. A lot of them are used to hunt High Sec NPC Pirates with efficiency.
That and shady arms deals are pretty much legal unless it isn't small arms for some reason. Wanna buy 20 Rifles illegal and a huge fine. Wanna buy a stack of Nova Nuclear Warhead... Go right a head. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2163
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Concord receives more income from shooting capsuleers that break the occasional law than from shooting pirates that pose a major threat to any that cross their path... thus explaining why you never see Concord ratting in a belt or doing combat missions.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1011
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Concord lets - 5s fly around (those who actually break the laws). I doubt they would care about people in "pirate" ships who are upstanding pilots. |

Private Pineapple
Rifterlings Ushra'Khan
226
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:They're owned by (reasonably) upstanding citizens and they're doing CONCORD's workGǪ so of course they should be.
I tried to think of a real-life analogy to show why this isn't really a good idea but all I could come up with how being an upstanding American citizen would allow you to bring in Cuban cigars (when it's illegal in the US due to a trade embargo JFK signed). But that doesn't work either because I don't think CONCORD controls or even taxes the actual EVE market so there's no embargo or anything anywhere.
But I guess if CONCORD is willing to "let us slide" because we're capsuleers then I guess I'm fine with that justification. It also makes capsuleers more prominent than we already are, too.
Anhenka wrote:Gameplay changes need a reason.
This has no reason beyond half baked quasi-RP idea.
Removing the ability of people to fly pirate ships in highsec makes nobody at all happy.
Highsec people don't get to fly their uber pimpships.
Nullsec people don't get to sell said uber pimp ships to the people who buy most of said ships, driving down the price of their ship BPC loot drops.
And lowsec? **** em, nobody cares about them and it wouldn't change things much for them anyway.
Highsec people have T3 SCs and faction battleships!
I admit the price would fall off since it would be harder for nullsec people to sell them.
Lowsec is not to be ignored nowadays. Lowsec has been very active due to FW changes. Of course, just like nullsec, there are a lot of dead lowsec systems but the FW ones are very much active - some more than others.
Alara IonStorm wrote:Well lots of missions have secret star gates or private corperation gates. Like the Blockade maybe they get in that way. Perhaps they setup secret jump bridges.
I think Concord ignores capsuleer Pirate Boats because a lot of them are stolen designs from pirate complexes and they can't track where they come from. A lot of them are used to hunt High Sec NPC Pirates with efficiency as well.
That and shady arms deals are pretty much legal unless it isn't small arms for some reason. Wanna buy 20 Rifles illegal and a huge fine. Wanna buy a stack of 300 Nova Nuclear Warhead... Go right ahead, no waiting period or background check required.
Secret star gates or not, I'm talking about capsuleers flying pirate ships, not the actual pirates themselves.
Does that mean capsuleers are vigilantes? I realize CONCORD is not *exactly* space police so maybe we are the police itself? If so, then I guess we can use anything we want as long as we get the job done. I am the Kingpin of the Crime and Punishment forum.
I am the rightful heir to the CSM 8 throne.
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
873
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Their sale should be prohibited in hisec, but obviously flying them would need to be OK, its not as though teh ship maketh the man.. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Private Pineapple
Rifterlings Ushra'Khan
226
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:Concord lets - 5s fly around (those who actually break the laws). I doubt they would care about people in "pirate" ships who are upstanding pilots.
I'm pretty sure you get shot at by CONCORD if you fly around with a low enough security status in a high enough security status system. I am the Kingpin of the Crime and Punishment forum.
I am the rightful heir to the CSM 8 throne.
|

Private Pineapple
Rifterlings Ushra'Khan
226
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Their sale should be prohibited in hisec, but obviously flying them would need to be OK, its not as though teh ship maketh the man..
Yes this is one of the things I wanted to clarify in the OP, but apparently forgot to do so. I am the Kingpin of the Crime and Punishment forum.
I am the rightful heir to the CSM 8 throne.
|

Lilliana Stelles
Mindstar Technology Executive Outcomes
96
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
Honestly, only Sansha and some Blood Raider ships are piratey. The rest are just paint job variants. Even angels are based off of Jovian hulls, supposedly. |

Alara IonStorm
2582
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 20:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
Private Pineapple wrote: Secret star gates or not, I'm talking about capsuleers flying pirate ships, not the actual pirates themselves.
Don't tell me what you are or are not talking about...
Private Pineapple wrote:- According to the pirate rat floating around in highsec space thing, they do not appear at gates. So maybe they jump through into some highsec system and evades CONCORD. CONCORD probably suck at probing anyway so the rats are free forever in their complexes and asteroid belts. This is also supported by the fact that pirates rats do appear at gates in lowsec and nullsec (but not highsec - so the difference means something).
When you are talking about them getting into High Security right here. If you don't want to talk about it then don't talk about it.
Private Pineapple wrote: Does that mean capsuleers are vigilantes? I realize CONCORD is not *exactly* space police so maybe we are the police itself? If so, then I guess we can use anything we want as long as we get the job done.
More like bounty hunters and paid mercenaries. Concord works directly for the Empires and the budget to pay bounties comes from what they are aloud to tax / fine and what ISK they receive. The Empires obviously want Capsuleers preforming these tasks since they set up agent networks and everything. |

Private Pineapple
Rifterlings Ushra'Khan
226
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Private Pineapple wrote: Secret star gates or not, I'm talking about capsuleers flying pirate ships, not the actual pirates themselves.
Don't tell me what you are or are not talking about... Private Pineapple wrote:- According to the pirate rat floating around in highsec space thing, they do not appear at gates. So maybe they jump through into some highsec system and evades CONCORD. CONCORD probably suck at probing anyway so the rats are free forever in their complexes and asteroid belts. This is also supported by the fact that pirates rats do appear at gates in lowsec and nullsec (but not highsec - so the difference means something).
When you are talking about them getting into High Security right here. If you don't want to talk about it then don't talk about it.
I think you misunderstood what I meant. This is partly my fault as well for not clarifying it well enough. I meant pirates would jump in through a normal jumpgate (the ones we all use) but CONCORD would not act quick enough to kill them at the jumpgate. Thus, they warp off and evade CONCORD instead of using a secret jump bridge or star gate as you mentioned (though this is plausible...). If they hanged out at gates they would be popped by CONCORD (supposedly). That's what I meant.
I am the Kingpin of the Crime and Punishment forum.
I am the rightful heir to the CSM 8 throne.
|

Kix7
Suicide Lemmings
2
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
perhaps you could look at it this way: If eve was real, each capsuleer's ship would probibly look unique anyway, as we all have different opinions on what set up is better. Some may modify where the turrets sit, some may have a different thruster configuration, some may choose to get rid of the silly flyscreen wings on their ship *cough minmatar cough*
Oh and the paint jobs. I reckon you would allmost never see the same ship twice just based on colour. Mmm acid induced rainbow-geddon
I guess unless you're flying in anything but a sansha ship, you could use this reasoning. I think if you are flying in a one of sansha's though, you should be fined for excessive use of space spikes |

Kuehnelt
Devoid Privateering
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:31:00 -
[15] - Quote
Lilliana Stelles wrote:Honestly, only Sansha and some Blood Raider ships are piratey. The rest are just paint job variants.
Guristas and non-frigate Serpentis hulls are just paint job varients. Angel Cartel ships have their own hulls; the Daredevil (Serpentis frigate) has its own hull. |

Kuehnelt
Devoid Privateering
124
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Private Pineapple wrote:Corina Jarr wrote:Concord lets - 5s fly around (those who actually break the laws). I doubt they would care about people in "pirate" ships who are upstanding pilots. I'm pretty sure you get shot at by CONCORD if you fly around with a low enough security status in a high enough security status system.
You get shot at by faction police, not CONCORD, unless you're in a CONCORD sov system. |

Boober Fraggle
3
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
Its the sec status that makes no sense, not the ship.
I live in a city with lots of locks. They don't let pirate ships in the locks. It makes no sense for concord to allow pirates to use jumpgates.
And wow, would w-space and wormholes be FUN if they fixed that. |

Lilliana Stelles
Mindstar Technology Executive Outcomes
96
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:36:00 -
[18] - Quote
Another way to look at it: Not all of the rats are "pirates". The ones you see in the belt are hostile to you, sure, but not every single member of their society wants to kill you; you can run missions for them after all. There's a reason you don't see their officers spawning in highsec; those characters obviously have a far too low security status. But that doesn't mean that every single Syndicate or Serpentis member is at -5.0 and unable to enter highsec.
On that note, the pirates are really just corporations that don't quite agree with the empires' moralities, but their relationships aren't entirely hostile. Serpentis, Angels, and Syndicate get along fairly well with the Caldari and Amarr, for example, and are known to do some business with them. It wouldn't make sense for their ships to get killed in Empire space. |

lanyaie
430
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 21:37:00 -
[19] - Quote
. I dont post often, but when I do i'm probably trolling you Currently offering 100% legit hulkageddon security sponsored by the mittani, send 50m to me and 50m to him |

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1011
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 22:21:00 -
[20] - Quote
Kuehnelt wrote:Private Pineapple wrote:Corina Jarr wrote:Concord lets - 5s fly around (those who actually break the laws). I doubt they would care about people in "pirate" ships who are upstanding pilots. I'm pretty sure you get shot at by CONCORD if you fly around with a low enough security status in a high enough security status system. You get shot at by faction police, not CONCORD, unless you're in a CONCORD sov system. Yep.
Concord only cares if you engage in illegal aggression, otherwise they don't give a... |

Russell Casey
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
170
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 22:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Absolutely. The term outlaw means "outside the law" not "enemy of the state". To clarify, being an outlaw means someone could shoot you in front of the cops and they wouldn't say boo. Getting locked out of highsec has long been a deterrent to pvping in lowsec and has driven more aspiring pvpers into the abomination that is FW than should be allowed. Shooting outlaws should be the job of the players, not the faction navies acting as watered down CONCORD.
Thanks to alts and neutral friends, the -10 security rating is pretty much as broken as the bounty system atm. And who knows, MAYBE seeing -10s zooming around highsec besides the occasional fast frig/pod would actually curb the rampant Carebearitis infecting highsec atm. |

Alara IonStorm
2582
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 23:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
Russell Casey wrote:Absolutely. The term outlaw means "outside the law" not "enemy of the state". To clarify, being an outlaw means someone could shoot you in front of the cops and they wouldn't say boo. Getting locked out of highsec has long been a deterrent to pvping in lowsec and has driven more aspiring pvpers into the abomination that is FW than should be allowed. Shooting outlaws should be the job of the players, not the faction navies acting as watered down CONCORD.
Thanks to alts and neutral friends, the -10 security rating is pretty much as broken as the bounty system atm. And who knows, MAYBE seeing -10s zooming around highsec besides the occasional fast frig/pod would actually curb the rampant Carebearitis infecting highsec atm. I would enjoy it if Pirate Fleets could enter Hi Sec unmolested by NPC's. Freely attackable by any player and able to respond to attacks but not attack ships themselves without drawing police.
Lets Hi-Sec Players form up a fleet to engage them with the risk of being overpowered themselves by the Pirates. All the gankers can already move around Hi-Sec like nothing in there gankmobiles, this just encourages them to bring real, well fit bigger ships and risk a slug out while providing PvP to anyone who engages them.
|

MotherMoon
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
957
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 23:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
Tippia wrote:They're owned by (reasonably) upstanding citizens and they're doing CONCORD's workGǪ so of course they should be.
I think he means, why are NPC pirates allowed in highsec... he... kinda has a point O.o
mind blown
still not supporting it or clicking like, but still Why dust 514 is on Console and not PCBattle field 3 sales Xbox 360: 2.2 million PlayStation 3: 1.5 million PC: 500,000http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg |

Gil Roland
Roma Aeterna
8
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 23:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
Private Pineapple wrote:
In this way, why are pirate ships allowed in high security space!? Wouldn't a CONCORD pilot's blood pressure increase as he sees that a pirate ship uncloaked next to a high security jumpgate (or is it warpgate...)?
Wormholes.
|

Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
412
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 23:23:00 -
[25] - Quote
Private Pineapple wrote:I realized that CONCORD probably doesn't like rats, right? And all of those "rats" are pirates. In pirate ships.
In this way, why are pirate ships allowed in high security space!? Wouldn't a CONCORD pilot's blood pressure increase as he sees that a pirate ship uncloaked next to a high security jumpgate (or is it warpgate...)? I would think so. Allow me to clarify: I am addressing CAPSULEER USAGE of PIRATE STUFF including SHIPS, MODULES, and AMMO.
Not only should Pirate Faction Ships not be able to be flown in space patrolled by CONCORD, there shouldn't be any Pirate RATs in belts, missions, or exploration sites either.
Non newbie PvE should be completely outside of space patrolled by unbeatable CONCORD.
Pirate Ships should as you suggest be considered illegal contraband in that same space where CONCORD has a presence.
|

Alara IonStorm
2582
|
Posted - 2012.07.11 23:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
Xorv wrote: Non newbie PvE should be completely outside of space patrolled by unbeatable CONCORD.
They should also scale down the universe to 1/8 the size and layoff 75% of the Dev team to support EVE's new player base. |

Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
412
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:13:00 -
[27] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Xorv wrote: Non newbie PvE should be completely outside of space patrolled by unbeatable CONCORD.
They should also scale down the universe to 1/8 the size and layoff 75% of the Dev team to support EVE's new player base.
A prediction you cannot prove. I would argue that an increasingly stagnant EVE that doesn't fully embrace it's claims to being a Sandbox MMO built around player conflict is slowly killing EVE off regardless.
The more CCP creates safe zones, opt outs, insulation from other players, and themepark type gameplay, the less anything that happens in EVE really matters. If players have no real stakes or investment in what happens in EVE around them, they will eventually lose interest. There's no long term future for this game as some sort of Space WoW.
|

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
1617
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
CONCORD doesn't give a rats ass about security status ...
/thread. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Alara IonStorm
2582
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:20:00 -
[29] - Quote
Xorv wrote: A prediction you cannot prove. I would argue that an increasingly stagnant EVE that doesn't fully embrace it's claims to being a Sandbox MMO built around player conflict is slowly killing EVE off regardless.
The further increasing playerbase.
Xorv wrote: The more CCP creates safe zones, opt outs, insulation from other players, and themepark type gameplay, the less anything that happens in EVE really matters. If players have no real stakes or investment in what happens in EVE around them, they will eventually lose interest. There's no long term future for this game as some sort of Space WoW.
Now that is something you can not prove.
What you can prove is everytime you move something to low or null people do not go.
Most people who play this game move to Nullsec, W-space and Low and many of them move back. I tried Null Sec, I am going to try it again in the future but I like living in Highsec's casual atmosphere right now and so do many others. They PvE and PvP there, have alts there and maintain trade hubs.
There is not some massive group of the playerbase unwilling to try lower sec spaces and need a little push, that is a fantasy. Most players who start this game and are not alts will find themselves there and many will move back.
|

Cloned S0ul
Blood Fanatics
165
|
Posted - 2012.07.12 00:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
High sec need pirates and pirates ships because without them empire become bored space and pirates become total bored form eve, low sec are low populated, meny pirates are mad because lack of targets so they punish poor industrals pilots etc, somtime they fight with agresive enemys etc, but in fact low sec is place where people are bored and whine because lack of transit. Empire is a heaven for griefers, kamikaze etc, in most cases empire offers more fun than low sec space. Teemo for president. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |