| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CmdoColin
   |
Posted - 2004.12.16 02:10:00 -
[1]
Spot on video - made me laugh something rotten.
I'm an ebil CA simple fighter, so have no interest in what happens in empire. If you guys want consentual PvP - why shouldn't you have it - and hopefully not soonÖ, but soon. Concord is surely only there to protect those who don't want to fight. Odd to see some hardcore PvP'er who talk about the good ol' days before concord - seemly saying it should be forced down peoples necks. I really can't can't understand the flames here for what to me is a valid request.
I don't think you can call that whining in any shape or form - that video has far too much style. Absolutely brilliant. Hell, I reach into my pocket and send you guys some isk (I'm skint so won't be much) - who does it go to?
As an aside... I think it could be seriously interesting to have this feature for all alliances. Would certainly give bragging rights.
If one allaince declares war, and the other alliance accepts the challange - then no-one pays. If one side doesn't accept - then the agressor has to pay. Be extremely interesting to see what happens out in 0.0 if they implemented that...
Good luck to PIE and the Minmatar lot who's alliance I can't spell. 
Audita et altera pars |
CmdoColin
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 02:10:00 -
[2]
Spot on video - made me laugh something rotten.
I'm an ebil CA simple fighter, so have no interest in what happens in empire. If you guys want consentual PvP - why shouldn't you have it - and hopefully not soonÖ, but soon. Concord is surely only there to protect those who don't want to fight. Odd to see some hardcore PvP'er who talk about the good ol' days before concord - seemly saying it should be forced down peoples necks. I really can't can't understand the flames here for what to me is a valid request.
I don't think you can call that whining in any shape or form - that video has far too much style. Absolutely brilliant. Hell, I reach into my pocket and send you guys some isk (I'm skint so won't be much) - who does it go to?
As an aside... I think it could be seriously interesting to have this feature for all alliances. Would certainly give bragging rights.
If one allaince declares war, and the other alliance accepts the challange - then no-one pays. If one side doesn't accept - then the agressor has to pay. Be extremely interesting to see what happens out in 0.0 if they implemented that...
Good luck to PIE and the Minmatar lot who's alliance I can't spell.
Audita et altera pars |
CmdoColin
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 11:01:00 -
[3]
Interesting to see that all of those with the alliance tags here are posting saying, yes this is a good thing.
Again out of interest; Evolution isn't in a formal post exodus alliance is it? As such why should they care what formal post exodus alliances are doing?
Maybe I'm just being awkward, but as I said eariler:
/signed
Audita et altera pars |
CmdoColin
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 11:01:00 -
[4]
Interesting to see that all of those with the alliance tags here are posting saying, yes this is a good thing.
Again out of interest; Evolution isn't in a formal post exodus alliance is it? As such why should they care what formal post exodus alliances are doing?
Maybe I'm just being awkward, but as I said eariler:
/signed
Audita et altera pars |
CmdoColin
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 17:51:00 -
[5]
So you're a merc corp...
Mercenaries fight for money... So someone hires you to gank an alliances soft industrial underbelly without exposing there own, or to tie up the enemies combat forces elsewhere.
You as a merc corp should be getting paid to do this if you are any good. That charge should also cover the war costs.
War cost stop random one man alt corps being easily viable for someone just to get random kicks from - and not to have to live with the consequences.
Consensual War - is when two entities are agreeing to hammer each other full on, and are both extremely happy to do so.
Non-consensual war, is when an alliance doesn't want its soft industrial underbelly getting creamed by a harden sololy PvP corp.
Now does that explain the differences?
Note that this massive charge is only directed towards corps declaring on alliances, and alliances declaring on each other. Alliances are supposed to be nation states, and as such its like walmart declaring war on france.
Audita et altera pars |
CmdoColin
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 17:51:00 -
[6]
So you're a merc corp...
Mercenaries fight for money... So someone hires you to gank an alliances soft industrial underbelly without exposing there own, or to tie up the enemies combat forces elsewhere.
You as a merc corp should be getting paid to do this if you are any good. That charge should also cover the war costs.
War cost stop random one man alt corps being easily viable for someone just to get random kicks from - and not to have to live with the consequences.
Consensual War - is when two entities are agreeing to hammer each other full on, and are both extremely happy to do so.
Non-consensual war, is when an alliance doesn't want its soft industrial underbelly getting creamed by a harden sololy PvP corp.
Now does that explain the differences?
Note that this massive charge is only directed towards corps declaring on alliances, and alliances declaring on each other. Alliances are supposed to be nation states, and as such its like walmart declaring war on france.
Audita et altera pars |
| |
|