| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 02:31:00 -
[1]
Originally by: 1Ekrid1 okay let me put it this way. a T3 cruiser taking out a T1 cruiser like its 5 concord ships taking out someone who went GCC is not tactical. its not anythi gn other than "hurr durr I use bil isk and press button = I win".
One blackbird plus one t1 damage cruiser vs one t3 equals one dead t3. Seems pretty balanced to me.
Originally by: 1Ekrid1
Originally by: Daemonio Who would win in a fight, a modern jet fighter, or a WWI prop plane?
grossly ******ed fail quote you picked up from other braindead types who regurgitate that in response to any balancing thread.
you might say its more like an F15 vs an F22. That should be the diffence, but you are correct, they ahve made it the difference of a wright brothers plane to a F-22.
3 seconds and dead is not balance, no matter how you cut it.
An f22 would win every time vs an f15 so it might as well be a bi-plane.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 02:42:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Pr1ncess Alia
Originally by: Zeba An f22 would win every time vs an f15 so it might as well be a bi-plane.
not to tangent too much off the topic but... that would be a very conditional statement. from both a situational and environmental standpoint
Of course it is. Just like his horrible argument about the 'imbalance' between t3 and t1. Generate the correct conditions and even an aging late 1960's design dogfighter can beat a modern 21st century stealth fighter provided the f15 has the latest upgrades to its radar and firecontrol. But generally speaking in a normal 1 vs 1 the f15 and t1 cruiser are going to get creamed by the vastly advanced models.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 02:50:00 -
[3]
Originally by: 1Ekrid1 Pirate - "Lowsec is dead no newbie wants to come here" Pirate2 - Ahahah Im soo badass my proteous can vaporize a cruiser in 3 seconds" Pirate - "But there still is almost noone in lowsec all those nasty carebears are staying in highsec, if they just fit their T1 ships better they would stand a chance but they're just scared" Pirate2 - "ahahaha diee stupid newbie" *1 volleys some newbies tanked cruiser* "oh what were you saying just now pirate1?" FW Gang - "Nice T3 mate. I think we'll blow it up."
this game is made of fail since CCP let me poast again.
Fixed.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 03:06:00 -
[4]
Originally by: 1Ekrid1 I was trying to get away. his MWD got him to me from 30km to 5000m within 5 seconds, his guns killed in 3 seconds. yeah, thats not reatrded at all.
Could you show us the fit you used on your cruiser? It might help us to understand your plight.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 03:20:00 -
[5]
Originally by: 1Ekrid1
Originally by: Zeba
Originally by: 1Ekrid1 I was trying to get away. his MWD got him to me from 30km to 5000m within 5 seconds, his guns killed in 3 seconds. yeah, thats not reatrded at all.
Could you show us the fit you used on your cruiser? It might help us to understand your plight.
my EANM fit has nothing to do with the fact he covered 25km in 5 seconds for 5,000 km/s, or that he killed in three seconds, taking out one defensve layer per volley, meaning he must do 1400 damage a volley, while firing a volley every second.
Oh, I get it know. This is all a fantasy because those numbers just don't add up. You should immediately ask for this thread to be locked and start a proper tinfoil thread about someone using hax on his t3 to get it to perform outside of its ability.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 22:39:00 -
[6]
Originally by: 1Ekrid1 Edited by: 1Ekrid1 on 29/06/2010 22:34:24 so what you guys are saying, is that the cost justifies its power, yet its so easy to kill that 100m can kill 600m, and its not really that much more powreful. so how come you guys arent complaining that its too expensive and the SP loss also makes it so little worth it? Obviously it must have the power to stand behind its 600 mil pricetag and its SP loss cost, then obviosuly its far above and beyond the balance of cruiser sized hulls.
lte me make it clear. I have a 6 second alignment time, I warped in at 30km off the asteroid belt, he was 32km away, I saw him and by the time I aligned to warp off to another place, which was immediately after I saw him there, he was 8000m away and killed my shield and ate 10% of armor in one volley, then got through almost all armor in the next, then killed armor and hull in the third volley. and I was using resists. so please, lets not be ******s here.
Sounds like hax to me. Petition your loss under game mechanic exploitation.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|

Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 23:35:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk Op is a noob.
Here is my counter to tech 3.
Curse + Falcon.
It's even simpler and cheaper than that both in isk and sp needed.
Celestis + Blackbird.
Originally by: Balsak Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|
| |
|