| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
50
   |
Posted - 2012.07.28 20:50:00 -
[61] - Quote
Marcus Gord wrote:The Mach has been huge for how long now? Only now it's a problem and it needs to be downsized? Come on.
If they're going to do this to the Mach, are they going to make the other half of the Aeon too? Perhaps make the Wyvern fly forwards? (You know it looks like it flies backwards!)
People have already talked about Carriers/Supercarriers and their sizes too.
At least be consistent.
Crybabies. Macherial got resized because the skin for V3 which involves opening it up in a 3d editor anyway to apply the textures.
Capitals haven't been V3ed yet. |
Tallian Saotome
Casa Del Wombat
839
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 07:58:00 -
[62] - Quote
I've been listening to people complain about the mach being oversized for years. Bout time it gets resized, tired of it dwarfing my thanny.
Perhaps the best overall solution to all these complaints is to establish a size range for each class, and resize all ships in that class to conform(with machs and hypes being at the large end of battleship, for instance, and all capships getting sized up. Has anyone noticed the huge variety in size for titans?)
Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
114
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 12:32:00 -
[63] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Perhaps the best overall solution to all these complaints is to establish a size range for each class, and resize all ships in that class to conform(with machs and hypes being at the large end of battleship, for instance, and all capships getting sized up. Has anyone noticed the huge variety in size for titans?)
This is the only acceptable outcome. Lets hope we get a good rescaling of ships, stations, and celestials in the near future.
|
Austneal
Four Pillar Production
Dragehund
34
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:15:00 -
[64] - Quote
So they've nerfed the Dramiel into uselessness, dwarfed the Machariel, and made the Cynabal look like Rudolph the red nosed reindeer.... anyone want to buy a set of angel ships? |
Jerick Ludhowe
Toxic Waste Industries
115
|
Posted - 2012.07.29 15:32:00 -
[65] - Quote
Austneal wrote:So they've nerfed the Dramiel into uselessness, dwarfed the Machariel, and made the Cynabal look like Rudolph the red nosed reindeer.... anyone want to buy a set of angel ships?
Dram is not useless.... It's just no longer the best at everything frig it once was... Now the slower frigs are actually better at brawling  Changes to the dram were a HUGE step forward...
Mach getting reduced in size a reason to not buy it? Really? REALLY?!! It's arguably the best sub cap in the game and it being smaller is not going to have ANY effect on this WHATSOEVER. All that's happening is the foolishly sized ship is being reduced to reasonable levels. Honestly I'd rather the mach go to like 1000m instead of 1400m it still feels far to big for it's speed, agility and sig. Smaller more "tech advanced" BS pwning the larger lower "tech" ships is way more bad ass anyway... |
Durzel
The Xenodus Initiative.
26
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 08:25:00 -
[66] - Quote
Instead of redoing the textures and making the capitals much bigger (as they should be imo) CCP took the path of least resistance and are making BS smaller instead. Less work, same net result. |
to0onsi
AtlantiA French Corp
Yulai Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 01:53:00 -
[67] - Quote
Can someone tell me if they have changed the unpackage size too ? |
TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc
Elysian Empire
175
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 10:53:00 -
[68] - Quote
Ogogov wrote:-1
Shrink all the battleships or properly scale carriers so that they can fit the volume of assembled ships that they are supposed to.
I simply cannot see how a carrier is supposed to be able to fit two assembled BS in the SMA as it stands. It is utterly ridiculous.
SMAs, cargo containers, etc are stolen gallifreyan technology |
Yelena Fedorova
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2012.08.02 16:01:00 -
[69] - Quote
to0onsi wrote:Can someone tell me if they have changed the unpackage size too ?
Probably not |
2manno Asp
The Imperial Fedaykin
15
|
Posted - 2012.08.08 22:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
why is my Cynabal suddenly hilariously large? |
|
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
471
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 02:29:00 -
[71] - Quote
They just made the Mach smaller so you cannot see the duct taped parts that hold it together.
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Mike Whiite
Keystone Industrial
65
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 10:24:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Mach getting reduced in size a reason to not buy it? Really? REALLY?!! It's arguably the best sub cap in the game and it being smaller is not going to have ANY effect on this WHATSOEVER. All that's happening is the foolishly sized ship is being reduced to reasonable levels. Honestly I'd rather the mach go to like 1000m instead of 1400m it still feels far to big for it's speed, agility and sig. Smaller more "tech advanced" BS pwning the larger lower "tech" ships is way more bad ass anyway...
If only that where true, Caldari have the smallest hightec ships, with the sig's of giants and less agillity and speed than their Minmatar counter parts.
High tech advanced -> Sig > |
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
830
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 14:08:00 -
[73] - Quote
still to big, texture is not sharp enough. Make it as big as a rifter.
a eve-style bounty system https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=359105
You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |
Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy
Tactical Narcotics Team
175
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 09:31:00 -
[74] - Quote
I am happy to see the size of Machariels being reduced...
The tier 3 caldari battleship "ROKH" looked like a frigate compared to the Machariel and so did almost any other ship in the game.
Pinky |
Donedy
Snuff Box
34
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 12:07:00 -
[75] - Quote
Yeah, it should have been changed before.
Finally it has a BS size. |
Spc One
The Chodak
Void Alliance
69
|
Posted - 2012.08.11 07:33:00 -
[76] - Quote
We still didn't get official dev response.
So we don't know exact reason why to downsize it.
Since machariel was 1936m from it's intrudction it should stay this way..
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Machariel
New machariel looks very good, but it would be awesome if it could stay at 1936m. |
Aglais
Liberation Army
BricK sQuAD.
82
|
Posted - 2012.08.13 01:44:00 -
[77] - Quote
Your thread argues nothing that could benefit the game in any way, and it makes you look like an idiot who can't accept change.
If nothing else the Machariel being smaller will make the textures on it look sharper I guess? I dunno. Besides, it's more believable for being actually fast and agile now. |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
24
|
Posted - 2012.08.13 09:28:00 -
[78] - Quote
Precisely. The Mach is a speed ship, deal with it.
The bigger, the slower. CCP only respected that point.
Death to trees !!!
*Axe*
*Chop, chop, chop...*
You may understand what I'm talking about ;) |
Ogogov
Ars ex Discordia
Test Alliance Please Ignore
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.13 13:53:00 -
[79] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Ogogov wrote:-1
Shrink all the battleships or properly scale carriers so that they can fit the volume of assembled ships that they are supposed to.
I simply cannot see how a carrier is supposed to be able to fit two assembled BS in the SMA as it stands. It is utterly ridiculous. SMAs, cargo containers, etc are stolen gallifreyan technology
That would explain the Dalek infestation in my cargo hold. I tried everything but Windex seems to work best. |
2manno Asp
The Imperial Fedaykin
15
|
Posted - 2012.08.13 16:12:00 -
[80] - Quote
Altrue wrote:Precisely. The Mach is a speed ship, deal with it.
The bigger, the slower. CCP only respected that point.
of course, but then why make the cynabal bigger?
contradiction and ensuing frustration continues... |
|
|
Janet Patton
Brony Express
44
|
Posted - 2012.08.13 20:57:00 -
[81] - Quote
When I first saw this ship I thought it looked ridiculous for how fast it can move for it's size. It really throws off your perception.
It's a nice looking ship. I think it will now look more realistic this way.
Why do I have this sig? I don't smoke. |
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
4075
|
Posted - 2012.08.14 03:45:00 -
[82] - Quote
I remember the chimera being smaller than ANY battleship.
|
|
CCP Konflikt
CCP Engineering Corp
CCP Engineering Alliance
170
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 11:21:00 -
[83] - Quote
Team Trilambda's V3'ing project give's us an opportunity to revisit more than just updating the textures of a model to work with newer trinity technologies and as part of this we've been rescaling ships so that they are all more relative to their counterparts from other races.
In the case of the Machariel it was obviously much larger than other battleships. It is now similar in size to a Hyperion and ships from other races of the same class and tier.
CCP Konflikt
Technical QA Tester
Team Trilambda |
|
Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
246
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 13:02:00 -
[84] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Team Trilambda's V3'ing project give's us an opportunity to revisit more than just updating the textures of a model to work with newer trinity technologies and as part of this we've been rescaling ships so that they are all more relative to their counterparts from other races.
In the case of the Machariel it was obviously much larger than other battleships. It is now similar in size to a Hyperion and ships from other races of the same class and tier.
I'm going to quote this later. |
Isbariya
The Dancer.
A Point In Space
8
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 16:05:00 -
[85] - Quote
how about upscaling carriers and supers in time ? Besides any update on when we might expect a V3 version of capitals ? |
Nagarythe Tinurandir
Catholic School for Boys
A Point In Space
42
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 16:12:00 -
[86] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Team Trilambda's V3'ing project give's us an opportunity to revisit more than just updating the textures of a model to work with newer trinity technologies and as part of this we've been rescaling ships so that they are all more relative to their counterparts from other races.
In the case of the Machariel it was obviously much larger than other battleships. It is now similar in size to a Hyperion and ships from other races of the same class and tier.
hm. so your saying that the reason for the rifter to be twice as big as a punisher after v3'ing?
or the reaper 1/3 bigger than the impairor? |
Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
803
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 17:56:00 -
[87] - Quote
Carola Kessler wrote:The Machariel has been downsized to 1400 meters somewhat, smaller then Hyperion and Apocalypse, making it a joke against her reputation beeing the biggest BS within the BS sized ship class in Eve.... Dear CCP devs i beg you to take this back and give the Machariel its former size 1920 Meters, let her be still the biggest BS in Eve with his reputation beeing feared by most of the Eve pilots. Current size doesn't fits to it really, all which think the Same way like me, please raise your hands and vote for giving the MAch back her old size!! http://game-craft.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/EVE-ships-subcap-Tyrannis.jpgPLEASE PLEASE take this Change back!!! sincerly Carola Kessler 
Whatever. It was as big as my Nidhoggur, which is the smallest carrier. That's ridiculous.
It's the size it should have been.
Mimidae Risk Solutions Recruiting |
Pink Marshmellow
Caucasian Culture Club
Transmission Lost
41
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 18:23:00 -
[88] - Quote
CCP Konflikt wrote:Team Trilambda's V3'ing project give's us an opportunity to revisit more than just updating the textures of a model to work with newer trinity technologies and as part of this we've been rescaling ships so that they are all more relative to their counterparts from other races.
In the case of the Machariel it was obviously much larger than other battleships. It is now similar in size to a Hyperion and ships from other races of the same class and tier.
The machariel is bigger than other ships by volume as well. 595k vs >500k for other battleships, you can only fit one in a carrier while you can fit 2 battleships in a carrier.
You should reduced the unpackaged volume as well to reflect this.
|
Razgriz Shaishi
Helix Pulse
Rolling Thunder.
12
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 04:14:00 -
[89] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:Has anyone noticed the huge variety in size for titans?
Yes, I love how the Leviathon and the Ragnarok, the 2 weaker titans, are about 17 kilometers, while the Avatar and the Erebus, the 2 stronger titans, are significantly shorter at 13 kilometers
|
Waylon Sens
Sense of Serendipity
Echoes of Nowhere
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 18:33:00 -
[90] - Quote
You can't be Caldari and have qualities |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |