| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

Rivver
Legions Ltd
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:OTEC in roo-ins.
Decent first step, more interested in the long term plans to change the way moon mining / resource gathering in general is fixed... because it needs fixing.
This really changes nothing. It simply introduces a price cap. You won't see much of a difference.
How many people do you know actually do Alchemy? |

Rivver
Legions Ltd
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 15:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fiberton wrote:Wait so head of CSM would not give his Alliance an edge by accepting certain persons who use to work for said maker of game into into his alliance for full future intels ? Of course he would not he is TOP legit guy.
What is this CSM that you speak of? There's a CSM this year? Is that what you call them? |

Rivver
Legions Ltd
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 16:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote:Rivver wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:OTEC in roo-ins.
Decent first step, more interested in the long term plans to change the way moon mining / resource gathering in general is fixed... because it needs fixing.
This really changes nothing. It simply introduces a price cap. You won't see much of a difference. And those pricecaps are awesome, because they put certain restraints on the economy, very similar to scrapmetal reprocessing, wich guarantees that no larger number of items will be sold below their raw mineral value for an extended time. It's regulations like those that keep the player generated markets in eve online working- something that our RL governments fail continuously... 
And you realize that the cap is higher than the current price of Tech? |

Rivver
Legions Ltd
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:also i think the en guarde dude, due to being extremely bad at eve, isn't factoring in insurance when we lose scads of drakes its not a very big loss you know you guys were to be cool like china in the simpsons... you guys even decalred how terribad you all were... now look at you... all leet and sstuff... the stench of bob is eminating from your collective crotches!
What does this have to do with CCP fixing Tech?
|

Rivver
Legions Ltd
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
MeBiatch wrote:Rivver wrote:MeBiatch wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:also i think the en guarde dude, due to being extremely bad at eve, isn't factoring in insurance when we lose scads of drakes its not a very big loss you know you guys were to be cool like china in the simpsons... you guys even decalred how terribad you all were... now look at you... all leet and sstuff... the stench of bob is eminating from your collective crotches! What does this have to do with CCP fixing Tech? nothing tbh its just that cfc peeps are harrassing soco peeps due to collective butt smelling... so i atempted to put things in perspective...
I'm not sure how you intend to convince anyone of your perspective when your writing is so horrible. At any rate, this has nothing to do with the changes described in the Devblog.
I'm now of the belief that these changes will change nothing.
|

Rivver
Legions Ltd
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Two step wrote:Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:Maximus Stuu wrote:/me puts on tinfoil hat
How suprising that the market was brought out of Cobalt 2 months ago....probably the only way this new Dev was allowed to start playing with Tech, giving Goons the heads up before.... Funny how the CSM had their Newcastle, UK reach-around with CCP Unifex and friends ~2 months ago... call it a conspiracy or the delusions of the paranoid, but the CSM and Devs are only human. One thing leads to another, a hand-job is given and sekret game design information is the reward... Huh? The CSM summit was in Reykjavik, there was a player meet (open to the public) in Newcastle, UK a month or so ago. The CSM hasn't even known about this change for longer than a month, and only got the specific changes in the last few weeks, so perhaps your tinfoil hats need adjusting? Also, I would also like to point out that just like CCP devs, the CSM is monitored by CCP's Internal Affairs department. I know for a fact that some CSM members had piles of tech that they were unable to sell before this blog went public because of this policy. If you have a specific complaint, by all means post it here or send it to [email protected]. For what its worth, as stated we really just got the details recently. I can tell you I've been waiting for it to go public as at the start of the goon wars against us they called in a favor and super-capped our towers to oblivion. I was in the process of sorting out where we should put replacements and have deliberately stopped thinking about it until this was public so I wouldn't gain advantage. Funny thing is even before this was the case I was thinking about a cobalt moon because it is a big part of Gallente T2. Last time I looked though we found a lot of unoccupied cobalt moons but cadmium was elusive. I guess we can expect another rush to ignored moons now! So anyways, I didn't see any signs of insider information advantage from this and lets face it, having a tech moon is still better than alchemy. Until we get ring mining I think we still have a moon mining problem. Issler
And what have you really done for us?
|

Rivver
Legions Ltd
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:Well you can't keep playing and winning EVE for years and not become l33t in the process can you? If Goons kept saying they are terribad I'd call them liars.
The large alliances need to have taken a large portion of their income away, imho. Not because I hate them but for the good of the game and their own good. When an alliance suffers a string of major defeats in battle, they should be in dire fiscal straits. If a major bloc sits on trillions on cash then what does it really mean to lose a war? If you lose half your territory your alliance should be beggared and ruined, like a country would be after it is invaded.
So you want people to take your stuff? Is that what you are saying? |
| |
|