| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Balgore
|
Posted - 2004.12.20 21:36:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Balgore on 20/12/2004 21:36:49
Originally by: MOOstradamus Edited by: MOOstradamus on 20/12/2004 21:33:20
How about ...
- Each ship is given a SINGLE additional 'special' space to fit a 'super boost armour/shield' module
- The 'super boost' modules could come in various racial flavours and configurations ie:
- Amarr 150% Armour & 50% Shield
- Caldari 50% Armour & 150% Shield
- Minmatar100% Armour & 100% Shield
- The 'super boost' modules have no racial PRE-REQs and are just named in such a way to promote the history and roleplay element of EVE
This way instead of much heartache and troublesome balancing - all CCP have to do is code a few new modules (possibly with different Tech levels in mind for the future ...)
Also each individual ship pilot gets to choose and therefore slightly customise his ship's setup & perfomance.
Not a bad suggestion Make them real cheap and sold on npc market and used soley on battleships. Or give minmatar 120% shield and 60% armor 
|

Balgore
|
Posted - 2004.12.20 21:36:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Balgore on 20/12/2004 21:36:49
Originally by: MOOstradamus Edited by: MOOstradamus on 20/12/2004 21:33:20
How about ...
- Each ship is given a SINGLE additional 'special' space to fit a 'super boost armour/shield' module
- The 'super boost' modules could come in various racial flavours and configurations ie:
- Amarr 150% Armour & 50% Shield
- Caldari 50% Armour & 150% Shield
- Minmatar100% Armour & 100% Shield
- The 'super boost' modules have no racial PRE-REQs and are just named in such a way to promote the history and roleplay element of EVE
This way instead of much heartache and troublesome balancing - all CCP have to do is code a few new modules (possibly with different Tech levels in mind for the future ...)
Also each individual ship pilot gets to choose and therefore slightly customise his ship's setup & perfomance.
Not a bad suggestion Make them real cheap and sold on npc market and used soley on battleships. Or give minmatar 120% shield and 60% armor 
|

Balgore
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 17:26:00 -
[3]
Minmatar ships do shield tank, and that's what they were meant to do. They only armor tank because armor tanking is better at the moment and they have pretty much even mid/low slots to do either one. You can't possibly be saying that any ship with less than 6 mid slots cannot shield tank well...
|

Balgore
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 17:26:00 -
[4]
Minmatar ships do shield tank, and that's what they were meant to do. They only armor tank because armor tanking is better at the moment and they have pretty much even mid/low slots to do either one. You can't possibly be saying that any ship with less than 6 mid slots cannot shield tank well...
|

Balgore
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 21:05:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Balgore Minmatar ships do shield tank, and that's what they were meant to do. They only armor tank because armor tanking is better at the moment and they have pretty much even mid/low slots to do either one. You can't possibly be saying that any ship with less than 6 mid slots cannot shield tank well...
ohh please tell me your typhoon shield tank 
and now, you cant shield tank anything with less then 6 slots for tanking 
Typhoon: no. Tempest: yes.
Please tell me how you can armor tank when you use 1400 howitzers and need to use at least 2 lows for reactor controls.
|

Balgore
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 21:05:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Nafri
Originally by: Balgore Minmatar ships do shield tank, and that's what they were meant to do. They only armor tank because armor tanking is better at the moment and they have pretty much even mid/low slots to do either one. You can't possibly be saying that any ship with less than 6 mid slots cannot shield tank well...
ohh please tell me your typhoon shield tank 
and now, you cant shield tank anything with less then 6 slots for tanking 
Typhoon: no. Tempest: yes.
Please tell me how you can armor tank when you use 1400 howitzers and need to use at least 2 lows for reactor controls.
|

Balgore
|
Posted - 2005.01.26 19:17:00 -
[7]
Even if 30% people are against it that's enough of a reason not to implement it. There are bigger problems with eve and we definetely don't need another.
|
| |
|