|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
581
   |
Posted - 2012.07.23 19:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Feedback: i think all barges could use a PG boost.
Why? Fiddling with what this enables now (rigs used for tank instead of expanders) and I can get about 16k out of a hulk now, that'll go to 30k or so post-patch. Ganking that will require three tornados. Is that not good enough for you?
. |
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
582
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 01:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Denidil wrote:whiny max-yielders will keep the suiciders happy
Quote:
[Hulk, Tanked Max Yield]
Ice Harvester Upgrade II
Ice Harvester Upgrade II
EM Ward Amplifier II
Thermic Dissipation Amplifier II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Processor Overclocking Unit II
This fit has 16,893 EHP right now and of course maximizes your yield. With the changes to its base HP, it will have 26,727 EHP, while still achieving max yield.
It's a bit silly, really - miners get to have their cake and eat it. I think a better solution would have been to model the mining barges after all the other ORE ships - heavily biased towards structure, maybe heavily constrain their CPU as well, so that you can either pick a large buffer with a Damage Control and Reinforced Bulkhead, OR you can maximize your yield with mining laser upgrades, but not both.
. |
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
585
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 00:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
The QQ over mining crystals in this thread is hysterical. "WE DONT WANT TO DO POINTLESS LOGISTICS." Ya'll really aren't satisfied unless you're in a perfect mining environment that is as conducive to not having to think at all as possible.
. |
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
589
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 21:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Has it occurred to anyone whining that they can't hold more than three sets of crystals that maybe its intended that way? Perhaps CCP thought "Lets do it this way and if they want the convenience of more crystals, they can compromise their tank by rigging for cargo, or compromise their yield by using lows for cargo expanders."
. |
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
589
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 22:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Droxlyn wrote:corestwo wrote:Has it occurred to anyone whining that they can't hold more than three sets of crystals that maybe its intended that way? Perhaps CCP thought "Lets do it this way and if they want the convenience of more crystals, they can compromise their tank by rigging for cargo, or compromise their yield by using lows for cargo expanders." Or simply downgrade to T1 strips that don't use crystals? (No MLUs T2s: 4626.07, 2MLUs T1s: 4678.94) I just hate the masochistic tendencies of CCP of throwing in something annoying just to have something annoying. At least the other changes show a great deal of love. I just wish they would find a little more love. Drox
Well, I'm sure that they hate the tendency for players (and honestly this goes for players of all types, not just miners) to have everything exactly the way they want it. 
. |
|
|
| |
|